Jump to content

Democratic lawmakers Calls Grow to Limit Trump's Unilateral Authority over Nuclear Weapons


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

President Joe Biden faces mounting pressure from Democratic lawmakers to curb the president's unilateral authority over nuclear weapons—a move spurred by concerns about Donald Trump potentially regaining the presidency. On Thursday, Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Representative Ted Lieu of California sent a letter urging Biden to overhaul the longstanding policy that grants the sitting president sole authority to authorize nuclear strikes.  

 

Currently, the U.S. policy, as outlined in a Congressional Research Service report from May, allows the president to independently order nuclear weapon use as part of their constitutional role as commander in chief. While the president may seek advice from military leaders, those leaders are obligated to carry out the orders once issued.  

 

In their letter, Markey and Lieu emphasized the urgency of revisiting this policy, calling it "dangerous." "As Donald Trump prepares to return to the Oval Office, it is more important than ever to take the power to start a nuclear war out of the hands of a single individual and ensure that Congress' constitutional role is respected and fulfilled," they wrote.  

 

The Democratic lawmakers proposed a significant shift: requiring congressional approval before a president can initiate a nuclear strike. They argued that such a change would serve as a critical safeguard against impulsive decisions, particularly in times of international tension. "We urge you to announce that henceforth it will be the policy of the United States that it will not initiate a nuclear first strike without express authorization from Congress," their letter stated. However, they acknowledged that in the event of a nuclear attack on the U.S., the president would retain the ability to respond unilaterally.

 

Markey and Lieu framed this policy revision as an opportunity for Biden to solidify his presidential legacy. "Such a move could become an important part of your legacy," they wrote, appealing to the president's authority to enact a defining change.  

 

Concerns about Trump’s stance on nuclear weapons have persisted among Democrats since his first term in office. Trump has been vocal about his readiness to employ nuclear power, often invoking provocative rhetoric. In January 2018, he responded to a statement by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un by tweeting, "North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the 'Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.' Will someone from his depleted and food-starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!"  

 

These concerns are not one-sided. Republicans and Trump himself have accused Biden and the Democrats of escalating nuclear tensions. During a campaign rally in Pennsylvania in September, Trump warned of imminent global conflict, stating, "We're heading into World War III territory, and because of the power of weapons, nuclear weapons in particular."  

 

As debate over nuclear authority intensifies, the stakes remain high. Neither the White House nor Trump’s team has yet commented on the Democratic lawmakers' proposals. However, as the U.S. approaches the 2024 presidential election, the issue is likely to remain a focal point in discussions about national security and executive power.  

 

Based on a report by Newsweek 2024-12-16

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Haha 2
Posted

They never went to Congress to ask permission for any of their forever wars. Now they want Congressional approval for the nuclear button to be pushed?

"What's that you say, the enemy has just launched a first strike? Err....hold on General, we need to wait for a Congressional caucus to gather".

  • Agree 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, biggles45 said:

So the Dems don't want Trump to have control but having a senile Biden, with dementia and who will just do what he is told, is fine!! 

 

I did hear, sometime last year.

The security at the white house had to wrestle the nuclear football off sleepy joe.

As he was found kicking it around the oval office, one afternoon.

Safety first sleepy joe.

 

 

Posted

Markey and Liu are notorious Leftist liars. The only ones who make a big deal of their deranged bs are their jackal like, lickspittle lackeys in the Democratic media

  • Agree 1
Posted

Once again the Dems show they have no idea about what to do in the country and simply act out on things to undermine Trumps abilities when he takes office. Personally, i think they are scared to death that Dems will not be able to get into the WH again for a long time. Biden has been pushing a WW3 agenda with Russia and Ukraine for a while now. Even increasing the threats that the Ukraine can use against Russia rather than increasing the defense of Ukraine. Now, as seen this week, Russia is retaliating against the weapons Biden has authorised by targeting the infrastructure of Ukraine. But even worse, Biden has already approved even more sophisticated weapons that can be launched against Russia.. So who is the threat? Biden or Trump. In my opinion Biden is making WW3 come about for Trump to find a way to manage it. And now it seems Biden is trying to take away any threats Trump can use to get negotiations to the table making his job a lot harder and less believable to any country. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, roquefort said:

They never went to Congress to ask permission for any of their forever wars. Now they want Congressional approval for the nuclear button to be pushed?

"What's that you say, the enemy has just launched a first strike? Err....hold on General, we need to wait for a Congressional caucus to gather".

As opposed to, let's finish the job and totally destroy the world.

Posted
On 12/16/2024 at 3:05 AM, Social Media said:

However, as the U.S. approaches the 2024 presidential election, the issue is likely to remain a focal point in discussions about national security and executive power.  

 

Based on a report by Newsweek 2024-12-16

Since they didn't know yesterday that the election was over i wonder how much else in this story is BS?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
13 hours ago, jchfriis said:

Since they didn't know yesterday that the election was over i wonder how much else in this story is BS?

Perhaps they can't think of anything more current to attack Trump over, so they just resurrected an old story and put a new date on it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      China’s Stealth Fighter: A Game-Changing Super Weapon in the Race for Air Supremacy

    2. 0

      Judge Rebukes Jay-Z's Legal Tactics in Child Rape Case, Grants Accuser Anonymity

    3. 0

      The Scientists and Spies Who Questioned Covid’s Origins

    4. 0

      Red Wall MPs Urge Starmer to Take Stronger Stance on Immigration to Secure Seats

    5. 0

      Putin Expresses Readiness for Talks with Trump to End Ukraine War

    6. 0

      Diplomatic Immunity Tested: Russian Diplomats in Buenos Aires Traffic Stop Controversy

    7. 0

      Looming Crisis: Private Schools Face Closures Amid VAT Hike

    8. 0

      A Cultural Battle Within MAGA: Musk and Ramaswamy Clash with Hard Right Over Immigration

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...