37 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

How about a seat for Kar-Mar-La-La ...

I'm certain she'll be there because, unlike the current president-elect, she respects the will of the voters, even when she loses.

Seeing Joe and Dr Jill near trump and Melania  is like normal vs the monsters.  

Hilarious seeing the "literally Hitler" narrative crumble like a sand castle. Have the left no shame? Did I miss apologies for the years long fake narrative that got low info and iq voters so hot under the collar?

2 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Hilarious seeing the "literally Hitler" narrative crumble like a sand castle. Have the left no shame? Did I miss apologies for the years long fake narrative that got low info and iq voters so hot under the collar?

 

Can anyone translate this into a meaningful sentence?

9 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

Can anyone translate this into a meaningful sentence?

For years Biden claimed Trump was worse than Hitler and electing him would end democracy. Now he is honoring Trump by being in his presence. Which means Joe was lying all along about Trump. I will only charge you $20 for your first translation.

On 12/23/2024 at 8:17 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

No plans to incite an attack on the Capitol in an attempt to overthrow the election then.

 

No need to protest as there wanst any cheating this time 

22 hours ago, novacova said:

Why would Biden attend the inauguration of a fascist MAGA threat to democracy hitler dictator that will destroy America? Seems contradictory in a convoluted way to everything that the left has been yelling and screaming about for the last few years.

 They're all in panic mode knowing he has the power to go after all them, and rightly so

3 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

For years Biden claimed Trump was worse than Hitler and electing him would end democracy. Now he is honoring Trump by being in his presence. Which means Joe was lying all along about Trump. I will only charge you $20 for your first translation.

 

Cheque's in the post.

20 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

President Biden is being Presidential. This is how Obama behaved after Trump won his election.  It is not how Trump behaved after he lost his election. It is an exercise in showing  someone how to do the right thing.

Was he presidential when referring to TrUMP as illegitimate, along with Clinton and all the others 

On 12/23/2024 at 8:23 AM, kingstonkid said:

Don't worry, MOMY JILL will hold his hand.  What will be interesting is if he thinks it is his inauguration

 

Don't expect Kamala she is too busy teaching public speaking LOL.

 

 

Maybe they’ll  let Joe speak!

He’s good for a laugh.

“4 more years pause”

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Was he presidential when referring to TrUMP as illegitimate, along with Clinton and all the others 

And was Trump  appropriate when he tried to bully Senator Clinton with his chants of lock her up? He is the coinvicted felon and failed insurrectionist who should be locked up.

2 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Was he presidential when referring to TrUMP as illegitimate, along with Clinton and all the others 

When did Biden claim that the 2016 elections have been rigged and refuse to admit that Trump won? 

18 minutes ago, candide said:

When did Biden claim that the 2016 elections have been rigged and refuse to admit that Trump won? 

I was referring to obama

35 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

And was Trump  appropriate when he tried to bully Senator Clinton with his chants of lock her up? He is the coinvicted felon and failed insurrectionist who should be locked up.

In case you missed it, he is just about to be President 

6 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

For years Biden claimed Trump was worse than Hitler and electing him would end democracy. Now he is honoring Trump by being in his presence. Which means Joe was lying all along about Trump. I will only charge you $20 for your first translation.

You are mistaken Biden is being the adult in the room no more no less

8 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

I was referring to obama

So when did Ovama claim that the 2016 elections have been rigged and refuse to admit that Trump won?

5 minutes ago, Tug said:

You are mistaken Biden is being the adult in the room no more no less

 

Biden does what his carer wife tells him to do

2 minutes ago, candide said:

So when did Ovama claim that the 2016 elections have been rigged and refuse to admit that Trump won?

Everytime Russain collusion was mentioned

49 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Everytime Russain collusion was mentioned

So you have nothing. That's what I thought.

19 minutes ago, candide said:

So you have nothing. That's what I thought.

Wjya is that nothing? You all stupidly believed Putin got Trump elected, that is basicaly saying the election result was not genuine Obama said it, and denying the result. Clinton said it, they all did.

On 12/25/2024 at 1:05 PM, Emdog said:

Trump has been adjudicated by Colorado supreme court for  being an insurrectionist and this was not negated when SCOTUS review a case on this subject. He should not be sworn in.

14th amendment, section 3 verbatim. Highlights mine.

"Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

Congress has not removed such disability

As Biden is still President, he could deny inauguration of Trump per Constitution as part of his official duties which SCOTUS said would make him immune from any charges....

The colorado supreme court is a state court and is unable to even make such a determination. Its ruling was close to be void ab initio.

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

The colorado supreme court is a state court and is unable to even make such a determination. Its ruling was close to be void ab initio.

 

The Colorado Supreme Court does have the authority to interpret and apply both state and federal constitutional provisions within its jurisdiction. 

 

However, in this case, the heavily loaded SCOTUS reversed the courts decision.   

29 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

The Colorado Supreme Court does have the authority to interpret and apply both state and federal constitutional provisions within its jurisdiction. 

 

However, in this case, the heavily loaded SCOTUS reversed the courts decision.   

Caught in an ignorant lie again are you? Did not the Supreme Court hold that Congress enforces the provision not the Courts? Do you know and understand the text of the specific clause? By the way, didnt the DEI lefty judges concur in the judgement?

 

Heavily loaded. Lie. Jurisdiction in state court. Lie. 

 

Check your sources

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Caught in an ignorant lie again are you? Did not the Supreme Court hold that Congress enforces the provision not the Courts? Do you know and understand the text of the specific clause? By the way, didnt the DEI lefty judges concur in the judgement?

 

Heavily loaded. Lie. Jurisdiction in state court. Lie. 

 

Check your sources

 

What was the lie?