Jump to content

US - The 1st peer-reviewed nationwide study of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed long-term health outcomes


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

You have just summarised the Big Pharma business model. A business needs long-term clients. Healthy people, from a strict balance sheet perspective, are the last thing a pharmaceutical company wants.

Yup…exactly.

 

I always used to talk about how “big food” and “big pharma” were working in concert.  One to make people sick and one to treat their subsequent chronic illnesses.

 

I believe someone linked to a video (podcast) recently where this was discussed.  
 

It was an interesting discussion but in some ways it seemed like a sort of “good cop, bad cop” scenario (for lack of a better description) where it feels (as you mentioned in another thread) that the information will be slowly released to the lumpenproletariat.  

 

Dr Bowden seemed to be there only as a bystander with Kruse essentially running the show.  Something about him seems a bit off although I can’t put my finger on it.  Kind of like he’s playing a role in some sort of kabuki theater.

 

I’m also a bit curious of who this Danny Jones guy is.

 

  

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Quote

The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research is an anti-vaccine journal. It is known for promoting misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines.

.

The editor-in-chief is John Oller, a former linguistics professor at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette who published a book falsely linking vaccines to autism in 2009. Its senior editor, Christopher Shaw, is a professor at the University of British Columbia's Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences department who has promoted scare stories about vaccines. Its associate editors are Russell Blaylock, a former neurosurgeon who has baselessly claimed that wearing face masks helps SARS-CoV-2 enter the brain, and anti-vaccine activists Stephanie Seneff and Brian Hooker. Hooker and associate editor Mary Holland are also members of the anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense.

 

Matti Sällström (Karolinska Institute) said of the journal: "The editorial board is a joke. None of the editors or associate editors are scientists of a good reputation. Some even are not in the scope of the title of the journal."

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Journal_of_Vaccine_Theory,_Practice,_and_Research

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

The author of this study has one publication- this one.  The journal itself has an impressive name, that's all.

 

Peer review by a panel of anti-vaxxers from varying backgrounds which have nothing to do with vaccines is not a peer review, it's bullsh!t.

 

When this paper is published by The Lancet or Nature, I'll sit up and take notice.

 

10 minutes of my time wasted reading this tripe.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...