Jump to content

The Neo-Imperialist was Serious About Stealing Greenland


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

There is an alternative narrative.

Im sure one could make up a lot of alternatives, have your anti American politics and obsessive Trump hating influenced yours?

 

10 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Their medical and social programmes are handed to the less than tender care of the American insurance companies, (effectively ended).

Like in Alaska? Are you aware of the Indian Health Service? The ANMHC? Free btw,

 

12 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

The big mining corporations move in to exploit the islands resources (the real reason for Trumps demands). The indigenous people, who are largely Inuit, will be ignored, the Danes amongst the population will be expelled. We all know what happened to the Indigenous peoples within the mainland US when any resource wanted by big businesses was found on their lands!

Like in Alaska, right? The dividend for ASRC members last year was $6,000. Average wages up there are  about $70,000.

 

the Natives own the mineral rights.

18 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Within 10 years Greenland will be like Puerto Rico with a much higher chill factor, the native people rotting in reservations, and the landscape scarred by mining.

Why Puerto Rico? Compare it to the place where the Greenland-US relationship comparable. Alaska. 

 

PS show me a landscape scarred by mining in PR? Show me the Native Reservation there too.

20 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Incidentally "The Greenlanders, who are not native to the island have been exploited by the Danes for years." The Greenlanders, Danish or Inuit, have been living on the island for longer than the USA has existed - arguably in fact for longer than White people have been settled in North America!

Greenlanders arrived in the 1300s, they are Inuit like many Alaska natives. Are you denying that they have been exploited by the Danes?

  • Haha 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

There is an alternative narrative. The US takes Greenland. Their medical and social programmes are handed to the less than tender care of the American insurance companies, (effectively ended). The big mining corporations move in to exploit the islands resources (the real reason for Trumps demands). The indigenous people, who are largely Inuit, will be ignored, the Danes amongst the population will be expelled. We all know what happened to the Indigenous peoples within the mainland US when any resource wanted by big businesses was found on their lands!

 

Within 10 years Greenland will be like Puerto Rico with a much higher chill factor, the native people rotting in reservations, and the landscape scarred by mining.

 

Incidentally "The Greenlanders, who are not native to the island have been exploited by the Danes for years." The Greenlanders, Danish or Inuit, have been living on the island for longer than the USA has existed - arguably in fact for longer than White people have been settled in North America!

Impressive, this sudden care for natives, where you guys plow untouched nature in your own backyard, and make oil pipelines through their land, polluting their nature surroundings and water. 

 

The very same things will happen in Greenland, where greedy capitalists will get their hands on their resources. 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Impressive, this sudden care for natives, where you guys plow untouched nature in your own backyard, and make oil pipelines through their land, polluting their nature surroundings and water. 

 

The very same things will happen in Greenland, where greedy capitalists will get their hands on their resources. 

Greedy capitalists make your life possible. Dont you feel a bit hypocritical whinging about oil  yet sucking the $$ out of the shivering  Euro masses to fill your coffers?

Posted
23 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Im sure one could make up a lot of alternatives, have your anti American politics and obsessive Trump hating influenced yours?

 

Like in Alaska? Are you aware of the Indian Health Service? The ANMHC? Free btw,

 

Like in Alaska, right? The dividend for ASRC members last year was $6,000. Average wages up there are  about $70,000.

 

the Natives own the mineral rights.

Why Puerto Rico? Compare it to the place where the Greenland-US relationship comparable. Alaska. 

 

PS show me a landscape scarred by mining in PR? Show me the Native Reservation there too.

Greenlanders arrived in the 1300s, they are Inuit like many Alaska natives. Are you denying that they have been exploited by the Danes?

1) I am not particularly anti - American, although I admittedly dislike Trump and his regime ( rather like a lot of Americans). That dislike has been reinforced by his demands for other countries to allow themselves to be subsumed into the US.

 

I very much doubt that any regime put in place in Greenland would be remotely as benign as the one you describe applies to Alaska!

Posted
Just now, Yagoda said:

Greedy capitalists make your life possible. Dont you feel a bit hypocritical whinging about oil  yet sucking the $$ out of the shivering  Euro masses to fill your coffers?

We saving Europe from an even bigger crisis, and talking about hypocritical coming from an greedy capitalists country who makes their tax payers believe they hand outs free aid, when they grabb with their both hands and let their companies exploit the countries with greedy contracts.

 

Just to give you one name Halliburton 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Hummin said:

We saving Europe from an even bigger crisis, and talking about hypocritical coming from an greedy capitalists country who makes their tax payers believe they hand outs free aid, when they grabb with their both hands and let their companies exploit the countries with greedy contracts.

 

Just to give you one name Halliburton 

Translation: Im an exploiter but its someone elses fault.

Posted
3 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

1) I am not particularly anti - American, although I admittedly dislike Trump and his regime ( rather like a lot of Americans). That dislike has been reinforced by his demands for other countries to allow themselves to be subsumed into the US.

 

I very much doubt that any regime put in place in Greenland would be remotely as benign as the one you describe applies to Alaska!

Why not? It works, its been in place for years and the folks involved are RELATIVES of each other.

 

So what do you base your doubts on? Clearly not knowledge or experience.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Translation: Im an exploiter but its someone elses fault.

Twisted truths is what you got, and that's all you got.

 

You are an easy target for propaganda and love it to be true. 

 

I do not know your background, but my best guess, you wouldn't live in Cambodia, if you had other choices. 

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Twisted truths is what you got, and that's all you got.

 

You are an easy target for propaganda and love it to be true. 

 

I do not know your background, but my best guess, you wouldn't live in Cambodia, if you had other choices. 

Whats wrong with Cambodia as part of your rotation? Siem Reap is a fabulous place.

Posted
On 1/26/2025 at 2:52 PM, Cameroni said:

 

He does not. The US do not need to pay Denmark a penny. The US can simply take Greenland by military force. Nothing could stop the US from doing so, certainly not a non-country like Denmark, a German province at best.

 

Why anyone should pander to the sensibilities of Danes is anyone's guess. Trump is being far too soft, he should just annex Greenland by military force. Why squander money on Denmark?

You must be one of those Internet Tough Guys.

 

Signing up for the invasion are you? Put your body where your mouth is? Or maybe you're an old, obese coward like your messiah? Yes, that's it.

 

It's vile people who think killing innocent people, as a military action would, is okay just because a bloated crybaby convicted felon wants more land.  I do hope if 47 pulls that crap, decent NATO nations fire a couple of Cruise missiles into the White House and Mar-a-Lago. Or maybe seize the clown and do a old style Viking Blood Eagle on the South Lawn. They would be fully justified.

 

Check you calendar, MAGAs. It's 2025, not 1750. Imperialism is dead.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

You must be one of those Internet Tough Guys.

 

Signing up for the invasion are you? Put your body where your mouth is? Or maybe you're an old, obese coward like your messiah? Yes, that's it.

 

It's vile people who think killing innocent people, as a military action would, is okay just because a bloated crybaby convicted felon wants more land.  I do hope if 47 pulls that crap, decent NATO nations fire a couple of Cruise missiles into the White House and Mar-a-Lago. Or maybe seize the clown and do a old style Viking Blood Eagle on the South Lawn. They would be fully justified.

 

Check you calendar, MAGAs. It's 2025, not 1750. Imperialism is dead.

Wow!  You sound just like the kind of guy I WOULDN'T want as a neighbor.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Walker88 said:

You must be one of those Internet Tough Guys.

 

Signing up for the invasion are you? Put your body where your mouth is? Or maybe you're an old, obese coward like your messiah? Yes, that's it.

 

It's vile people who think killing innocent people, as a military action would, is okay just because a bloated crybaby convicted felon wants more land.  I do hope if 47 pulls that crap, decent NATO nations fire a couple of Cruise missiles into the White House and Mar-a-Lago. Or maybe seize the clown and do a old style Viking Blood Eagle on the South Lawn. They would be fully justified.

 

Check you calendar, MAGAs. It's 2025, not 1750. Imperialism is dead.

 

There would not be any fighting to speak of. Like in WWII Denmark would roll over with minimal resist ance, they surrendered in less than 6 hours then to the Germans. Against the US military the Danes would most likely not even put up any fight.

 

The US already has a military base in Greenland, it just needs to enlarge its presence. There is nothing anyone could do to stop it.

 

You seriously believing that Britain or France would fire missiles into the White House and thereby risk the total destruction of their countries to aid Denmark shows your brain is terminally divorced from reality. What did Britain and France do in the Ukraine war? Go in blazing on the Kremlin did they?  No, they understood, as indeed did the US, that it is prudent not to risk your own nuclear destruction.

 

As for your nonsense that imperialism is dead in 2025, maybe ask the people of the Donbass, Palestine, South Sudan or Muslim Mindanao what they think about that.

Posted
3 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

Wow!  You sound just like the kind of guy I WOULDN'T want as a neighbor.

You do know what "88" signifies dont you? Google it, then read his hate ridden, anti american, antisemitic posts.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

There would not be any fighting to speak of. Like in WWII Denmark would roll over with minimal resist ance, they surrendered in less than 6 hours then to the Germans. Against the US military the Danes would most likely not even put up any fight.

 

The US already has a military base in Greenland, it just needs to enlarge its presence. There is nothing anyone could do to stop it.

 

You seriously believing that Britain or France would fire missiles into the White House and thereby risk the total destruction of their countries to aid Denmark shows your brain is terminally divorced from reality. What did Britain and France do in the Ukraine war? Go in blazing on the Kremlin did they?  No, they understood, as indeed did the US, that it is prudent not to risk your own nuclear destruction.

 

As for your nonsense that imperialism is dead in 2025, maybe ask the people of the Donbass, Palestine, South Sudan or Muslim Mindanao what they think about that.

Bout time we have some benevolent imperialism. I bet if you surveyed Congolese, we could indenture the entire country in exchnage for Green cards.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Bout time we have some benevolent imperialism. I bet if you surveyed Congolese, we could indenture the entire country in exchnage for Green cards.

 

By all accounts many Greenlanders are welcoming their new American overlords already.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

By all accounts many Greenlanders are welcoming their new American overlords already.

Well think about it. They are seeing their cousins (actual and figurative) basicly owning a whole state:

 

Free Medical Care

A piece of all the resource money

Cash from a Sovereign fund

Free college education

Guaranteed jobs

A big city

Racism in their favour as to hunting, whaling, etc.

Political power

The ability to live their lives as THEY chose without state interference.

The ability to influence NATIONAL politics beyond their numbers.

 

What have the Danes done for Greenland? Start a Sovereign Wealth fund? Infrastructure? Resource development.? Do they even have an International Airport near a capital city with modern hospital? A deepwater port?

 

Greenland is what Alaska was in 1941. 

 

I bet the Greenlanders would overwhelmingly vote to be a US state.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Free Medical Care

They got that already, as do the rest of the Danes.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

A piece of all the resource money

They get them all at the moment.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Cash from a Sovereign fund

They get that already, the Danish Government sends a lot of money to Greenland.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Free college education

They got that already, as do the rest of the Danes. Did you ever wonder why the Danes always are at the top of lists of the most happy people?

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

A big city

Not sure they want anything bigger than what they got.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Racism in their favour as to hunting, whaling, etc.

Are you in favour of racism? Anyway, I believe they can hunt just fine at the moment.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Political power

It would be less than what they have now.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

The ability to live their lives as THEY chose without state interference.

It would be less that what they have now.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

I bet the Greenlanders would overwhelmingly vote to be a US state.

 

I bet your knowledge of Greenland (and Denmark) is somewhat lacking, as demonstrated above.

Posted
20 minutes ago, farang51 said:
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

A piece of all the resource money

They get them all at the moment.

What development?

 

20 minutes ago, farang51 said:
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Cash from a Sovereign fund

They get that already, the Danish Government sends a lot of money to Greenland.

 

How much is the direct cash payment per year? Every Alaskan gets $1700

Posted

I hit the wrong button

21 minutes ago, farang51 said:
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

A big city

Not sure they want anything bigger than what they got.

You live there?

Posted
21 minutes ago, farang51 said:
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Political power

It would be less than what they have now.

 

So Greenlanders influence Danish policy? Tell me how.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

So Greenlanders influence Danish policy? Tell me how.

They are represented in the Danish parliament.

Posted
14 minutes ago, farang51 said:

No, do you?

Not now. But since your a Dane, let me make it clear to you. Your country is the size of NJ and you have 17 jets. You are a lovely albiet expensive tourist destination with nice people and great cheese but totally meaningless in terms of power. You dont have the capability to defend or develop Greenland and your lives in Denmark wont materially change when its gone. 

 

You can argue with me all you want, but if we want Greenland its ours and you cant do a thing about it. Its closer to us anyway, and planting a Viking flag 1000 years ago doesnt mean much anymore when the interests of US 330 million Americans are taken into account.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Yagoda said:
35 minutes ago, farang51 said:
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

A piece of all the resource money

They get them all at the moment.

What development?

Whatever the Greenlanders decide. Recently, they declined extraction of minerals for billions of dollars due to environment issues. I am not sure the Greenlanders would have that option under president Trump.

 

18 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

How much is the direct cash payment per year? Every Alaskan gets $1700

 

That is about a tenth of what the Danish government send to government in Greenland per inhabitant every year. Not directly to every inhabitant, some gets more than others, depending on needs.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You can argue with me all you want, but if we want Greenland its ours and you cant do a thing about it

That is correct - just as we couldn't do anything the last time a despot wanted to rule over our land. Hopefully, we have allies that will help prevent that.

Posted
8 minutes ago, farang51 said:

That is correct - just as we couldn't do anything the last time a despot wanted to rule over our land. Hopefully, we have allies that will help prevent that.

Dont hold your breathe. Consider it payback for our blood we used to rescue you from the Teutons.

 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, farang51 said:

Whatever the Greenlanders decide. Recently, they declined extraction of minerals for billions of dollars due to environment issues. I am not sure the Greenlanders would have that option under president Trump.

 

 

That is about a tenth of what the Danish government send to government in Greenland per inhabitant every year. Not directly to every inhabitant, some gets more than others, depending on needs.

If Greenland is a state it is governed by their own environmental laws, like Alaska, as well as US law. Trump has nothing to do with it.

 

Dude that $1700 is just interest on a bank account. Per person. Not infrastructure, welfare, hospitals, medical or amenities, thats government, this is just plain hard cash. There is no such thing in Greenland.

Posted
2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Dont hold your breathe. Consider it payback for our blood we used to rescue you from the Teutons.

 

 

I did not know that the USA existed in Roman times.  I think your history/geography timelines are just a little bit askew!

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

I did not know that the USA existed in Roman times.  I think your history/geography timelines are just a little bit askew!

Check your dictionary, Jock.

 

I didnt know your people were named after a pouch to hold ones dangling bits.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 124

      Teenage Brit Involved in Fatal Road Collision in Pattaya

    2. 3

      Thailand Live Thursday 30 January 2025

    3. 0

      Rubio Discusses Future of Gaza in Calls with Egyptian and Jordanian Leaders

    4. 0

      Mass Casuality Event Foiled as Sydney Caravan Bomb Plot Sparks Terror Investigation

    5. 0

      Tensions Rise as Marco Rubio Challenges David Lammy Over Chagos Islands Deal

    6. 0

      Misogyny and Online Extremism: Leaked UK Gov Report Warns of Emerging Threats

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...