Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

MAGA rules, and you are an esteemed low level member promoting the lost cause Biden era losers who got destruction-ized by MAGA, a much superior entity then anything on the DEI woke obsessed liberal card and who now resort to displaying and confirming their genre with their constant imbecile actions since they are far too stupid to see the next day on their losing calendar. Trump beat your useless democrats without breaking a sweat as he did with Hillary. You are on the losing side for thick and dense bone heads. u r in a mess!

Could you please post the above in structured English!

I lost the will trying to read it!

Posted
21 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

I totally agree regarding any president/premier/ruler of any country  wanting to reduce waste!

The only problem is the underhand obfuscating way in which Trump claims to be attempting to do it!

So you do not think he is trying to reduce corruption and waste?

Posted
20 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Could you please post the above in structured English!

I lost the will trying to read it!

You are the same, on the losing side of EVERYTHING. You lose and make idiots of yourselves and the people on the winning side laugh at you and your ridiculously moronic actions. when will you ever learn?

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

MAGA rules, and you are an esteemed low level member promoting the lost cause Biden era losers who got destruction-ized by MAGA, a much superior entity then anything on the DEI woke obsessed liberal card and who now resort to displaying and confirming their genre with their constant imbecile actions since they are far too stupid to see the next day on their losing calendar. Trump beat your useless democrats without breaking a sweat as he did with Hillary. You are on the losing side for thick and dense bone heads. u r in a mess!

Any chance of rewriting in English with sentences?

It is just a jumble of words at present!

  • Sad 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, mogandave said:

So you do not think he is trying to reduce corruption and waste?

Read my post again!

The answer to your question is in the first line!

God help the USA when people are so blinkered by their MAGAlomania that they cannot read the first line of a post and have to question it!

  • Sad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Read my post again!

The answer to your question is in the first line!

God help the USA when people are so blinkered by their MAGAlomania that they cannot read the first line of a post and have to question it!

I read it again ant it is not clear to me. I think you should re-read the question.

 

It is amusing that you accuse others of being blinkered. 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, mogandave said:

I read it again ant it is not clear to me. I think you should re-read the question.

 

It is amusing that you accuse others of being blinkered. 

I am confused now!

Do you want me to re-read my own question, which since I wrote it I don't think re-reading it will do any good to either of us or do you mean you want me to re write it?

If you want the  simple question of "read my post again" re-written or rephrased please point out what ambiguity is confusing you!

Posted
1 hour ago, mogandave said:

Yes, it is in the article you linked to. You have to add two numbers together, but it’s there.

 

IMG_2755.jpeg.f83a922506f82f53b0f7d0ccb6c0b054.jpeg

This not from the article I cited....

  • Confused 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

I am confused now!

Do you want me to re-read my own question, which since I wrote it I don't think re-reading it will do any good to either of us or do you mean you want me to re write it?

If you want the  simple question of "read my post again" re-written or rephrased please point out what ambiguity is confusing you!

I am not confused 

Posted
Just now, candide said:

Ah OK, I thought that was the one in the post to which Yellowtail replied.

So it is from the article you linked to, correct? 

 

You should read what you link to.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, darbie-foos said:

MAGA rules, and you are an esteemed low level member promoting the lost cause Biden era losers who got destruction-ized by MAGA, a much superior entity then anything on the DEI woke obsessed liberal card and who now resort to displaying and confirming their genre with their constant imbecile actions since they are far too stupid to see the next day on their losing calendar. Trump beat your useless democrats without breaking a sweat as he did with Hillary. You are on the losing side for thick and dense bone heads. u r in a mess!

Dully noted! 🙂

Posted
13 minutes ago, mogandave said:

So it is from the article you linked to, correct? 

 

You should read what you link to.

 

And they have done something.

Posted
11 minutes ago, candide said:

And they have done something.

Indeed. $1.6B out of $403B, and (apparently) no safeguards put in place. 

 

Do you think that’s enough, or do you think more should be done?

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Screaming said:

EPA administrator Zeldin demands return of $20B in taxpayer money wasted by Biden administration

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/epa-administrator-zeldin-demands-return-20b-taxpayer-money-wasted-biden-administration

 

"The days of irresponsibly shoveling boatloads of cash to far-left activist groups in the name of environmental justice and climate equity are over," Zeldin said. "The American public deserves a more transparent and accountable government than what transpired these past four years."

Shoveling boatloads of taxpayers money to support Marxist social justice 

warriors radical agenda!

 

Notice the name on the bottom?

 

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Indeed. $1.6B out of $403B, and (apparently) no safeguards put in place. 

 

Do you think that’s enough, or do you think more should be done?

The $1.4B is from mid-2023, I don't know the current count. It's certainly not enough but due to the large number of cases, it's not surprising that it may be slow.

 

The Dems proposed a fraud prevention and recovery act particularly aimed at Covid related fraud. Guess which party opposed it?

I would not be surprised if the GOP ends up voting a similar bill one day.

Posted
15 minutes ago, candide said:

The $1.4B is from mid-2023, I don't know the current count. It's certainly not enough but due to the large number of cases, it's not surprising that it may be slow.

 

The Dems proposed a fraud prevention and recovery act particularly aimed at Covid related fraud. Guess which party opposed it?

I would not be surprised if the GOP ends up voting a similar bill one day.

Burisma Biden "proposed a fraud prevention and recovery act" ? Did he now😉. The age of critical thinking appears to have been replaced by narratives.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...