Prof Ian Brightrope > mRNA vaccines hailed as the future!

[Stiddle Mump]

1 hour ago, save the frogs said:

Cancer is not a disease?

Actually, there might be an "emotional" component?

Maybe if a person is depressed for years and years, maybe it can contribute to cancer?

I don't think it's fully understood by the scientific community all the things that may cause cancer. 

 

Cancer is complex for sure. And you are right to say that the mind plays a big role. 'The way to the body, is through the mind.'

 

What  is cancer? For me; it's the serious disruption of the defence/maintenance system. If there are just too many toxins getting in, or/and over too long a period, the body as it stands. maybe cannot immediately rid itself of them. The toxins start damaging cells and the body acts appropriately. It does this by coating them, and tucking the undesirables away. Not out of harm's way, but where they can do least harm. This is the start of the dreaded tumor.

 

Before that though, and I make this point regularly, the body actually has to be equipped to handle the toxins.  It needs a robust defence system in place. Nutritious food, clean water and fresh air are the basics for the defence within.

 

Not saying it is simple. But to understand cancer, we should first start with looking at nature.

 

[Lacessit]

44 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

What evidence do you need Sir?

 

If you think AI is smart, then you are deluded. AI are programmes that access a huge data-base. The algorithms surt through it and turn it into a thing that we humans are more familiar with; rather than zeroes and ones. That's it. The contents for this particular subject have been put up, over the years by the very people The Don is trying to bring into line.

 

Is it no wonder that those with eyes to see, and a brain to think, reject Big Pharma and their pimp's musings. Whether it comes from the mouth of a compromised white-coat, or the new kid on the block; AI.

You are saying you are smarter than AI. Prove it.

[save the frogs]

46 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

If you think AI is smart, then you are deluded.

AI is probably not trained to regurgitate any non-mainstream views.

So it is not necessarily accurate about everything. 

But in the future, I wonder if you can have conversations with AI where it might be willing to whisper conspiracies in your ear. 

 

[scottiejohn]

49 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I'm quite able, and willing, to discuss anything you want Scottie; under the umbrella of Red's OP.

 

However, I don't see much content from yourself. Just silly one-liners and derogatory posts. So come on; let's debate.

 

What say you?

 

There is nothing to discuss!

Just that you should give up on a lost cause and ditch the tin foil hat!

[Stiddle Mump]

1 minute ago, scottiejohn said:

That you should give up on a lost cause!

What is there in my posts that you don't agree with Scottie?

[scottiejohn]

10 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

What is there in my posts that you don't agree with Scottie?

EVERYTHING!

[Stiddle Mump]

37 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You are saying you are smarter than AI. Prove it.

Well! I can work out the area of any circle just with a bag of Isaan rice. Ca AI do that? Of course not. Can it feed a cat its favourite food? Of course not.

 

Take away the internet, and AI is just a bit of zeroes and ones.

[scottiejohn]

38 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You are saying you are smarter than AI. Prove it.

He would probably use AI to try and prove it!

😆

[Stiddle Mump]

4 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

EVERYTHING!

So you don't agree with me that it's advisable to eat nutritious food?

 

Off to the joke section with you Sir.

[scottiejohn]

37 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

But in the future, I wonder if you can have conversations with AI where it might be willing to whisper conspiracies in your ear. 

Are you not wearing your latest AI proof Tin Foil Hat?

You can get them in all good Trump outlets!

[scottiejohn]

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

So you don't agree with me that it's advisable to eat nutritious food?

If you think I have wasted any time reading through all your B.S. deep enough to find any such reference then you have more than one screw loose!

[Lacessit]

8 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

So you don't agree with me that it's advisable to eat nutritious food?

 

Off to the joke section with you Sir.

It's one thing to say it's worth eating nutritious food. It's entirely another to say it prevents or cures cancer.

 

Off to the same section with you - the sick joke sub-section.

[Stiddle Mump]

19 hours ago, Lacessit said:

It's one thing to say it's worth eating nutritious food. It's entirely another to say it prevents or cures cancer.

 

Off to the same section with you - the sick joke sub-section.

You are part way there Sir.

 

As I have stated; nutritious food, clean water and fresh air are intertwined with a robust body defence/maintenance system.

 

The other aspect to my discussion - toxins - arrive in many ways, shapes and sizes. They are around us much of the time. They abound in over-processed food. Big Pharma medications; including vaxxes. Smoke,  bad air generally, unclean water.

 

A robust defence/maintenance system usually rids the body of toxins without too much trouble as they as come in. And is at work 24/7/365. However, this is the up side. The down side is when, for various reasons, the body can't eliminate them. Then globulins, and specific enzymes, get to work, isolating the toxin, and any cells they might have damaged, coating them with special proteins, then tucking them away where they will do least harm and where they can be accessed at a later time. This is often the first stage of what is known as cancer.

 

And no! I don't reckon cancer is hereditary, as I think you might do.