.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
25
Nigel Farage: A Prime Minister in the Making? The Reform UK Leader’s Ascent
Another Putin puppet, just closer to home this time. -
4
Consequences of Backing Out of a Signed One-Year School Contract?
Contract signed. No nonsense. You clearly don't know the "Thai Way". -
31
Foreigner Assaults Thai Man in Road Rage Incident in Pattaya
Oh dear. I am not fitting in? Ah yes, the Thai deserved it. They all do. Terrible people who should be deported. And leave the country to the lovely Swiss, who kicked Thais in the street, who kick them on the beaches, who bash them in the supermarket and sic their dogs on the Thais on the beaches. Gawd. -
35
Help needed with buying an annuity with my personal pension funds
Bear in mind that Pension Wise doesn't recommend specific products or providers, nor does it provide investment advice, which seems to be what your original OP was requesting. -
8
Scientists Say NIH Officials Told Them To Scrub mRNA References on Grants
Every single one of those parameters could be explained with variables other than vaccination status. It could be overall health. It could be overall access to health care. It could be reluctance to see a physician and actually afford it. Show me that study that followed the vaccinated and the unvaccinated through the entire cycle, including long term. Adjust for variables like pre-existing conditions, age, etc. You can't do it, because it hasn't been long term yet. But the studies I have seen don't look too good for the vaccinated in terms of all cause mortality.- 1
-
-
0
Fact-Check: No Planned Supreme Court En Banc Session on March 17
File photo for reference only The Philippine Supreme Court has firmly dismissed social media claims suggesting a court session to deliberate on a supposed petition on March 17. Posts from Facebook accounts "Choose Libungan" and "Bernard Flores Maicon" falsely alleged that a document dated March 16 indicated a full court session convened by SC Spokesperson Camille Sue Mae L. Ting. In an official statement, Ting categorically denied the legitimacy of these claims, affirming that no such session nor statement exists. She clarified that the Supreme Court has neither received such a petition nor scheduled an En Banc meeting for the mentioned date. The Court further highlighted the persistent issue of disinformation, recalling a prior false report claiming a temporary restraining order issued on March 11, 2025. Ting assured that these instances of misinformation would be subject to investigation, with aims to hold responsible parties accountable. Ting urged the public to rely solely on verified communication from official Supreme Court channels—namely their website and authenticated social media accounts. She also encouraged people to meticulously verify any information before sharing it to curtail the spread of falsehoods, reported The Manila Bulletin. -- 2025-03-17
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now