-
Recently Browsing 1 member
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
-
-
Latest posts...
-
1
The Illusion of Liberty: How the Anti-Woke Right Betrayed Its Own Principles
Anti-woke are Trump's blackshirts -
1
Transgender Inmate Sues Trump, Claims His Rhetoric Incited Prison Rapes
he's been impeached? let's not get judgmental about tattoos! -
4
Trump says he’s negotiated 200 trade deals — but won’t say with whom
It’s just the usual nonsense for his rubes (base) create a problem then pretend to fix it.will they ever realize it and get tired of being gas lit? -
1
The Illusion of Liberty: How the Anti-Woke Right Betrayed Its Own Principles
The Illusion of Liberty: How the Anti-Woke Right Betrayed Its Own Principles Once heralded as champions of free speech and defenders of constitutional liberty, the anti-woke right has morphed into a movement defined not by the ideals it once claimed to uphold, but by its thirst for power and its relentless crusade against the political left. This coalition of influencers, podcasters, and tech elites rose to prominence by voicing concerns many Americans shared — about cancel culture, censorship, and the overreach of public institutions. But their evolution has revealed a troubling truth: their fight was never about liberty, but about control. Fuelled by public frustration following the racial reckoning after George Floyd's murder and the divisive impact of COVID-19 lockdowns and mandates, the anti-woke right gained momentum. They spoke in plain terms that resonated with many: "Let us have a say," "We don’t mindlessly obey," and "The elite doesn’t have a monopoly on truth." In the face of overzealous pandemic policies and double standards — such as the case of Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, which was denied permission for outdoor, masked worship even while protests and restaurant dining were permitted — their criticisms struck a chord. This moment could have sparked a constitutional revival, a chance to reaffirm the Bill of Rights and uphold freedom of expression amid societal upheaval. Instead, the movement turned inward and grew hostile. As Khawaja Asif said in a different but thematically resonant context, “We will not have any option, have absolutely no option.” The anti-woke right seemed to believe it had no choice but to mirror the tactics it once denounced. Their betrayal of free speech was not subtle. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis led the charge with laws banning the teaching of critical race theory and limiting discussions of gender and sexuality in schools. He attacked the autonomy of universities and punished Disney for opposing his policies. DeSantis proudly claimed Florida as the place “where woke goes to die,” but the real casualty was open discourse. In Donald Trump’s second term, the tactics of DeSantis have only been amplified. Trump has taken aim at law firms, private universities, and even individuals on the basis of their political beliefs or speech. Immigrants have been targeted simply for what they say. And through it all, few from the anti-woke right have voiced objections. Their movement now resembles a distorted reflection of the far left they once critiqued. Activist Chris Rufo, one of the anti-woke right’s most prominent figures, has openly embraced the Marxist theories of Antonio Gramsci, advocating for cultural dominance by seizing control of institutions and media. “The right needs a Gramsci,” Rufo argues — an astonishing admission from a movement supposedly built on opposing such ideological strategies. What we’re witnessing is not a defense of liberty but a consolidation of power. The anti-woke right has become a mirror image of Herbert Marcuse’s “repressive tolerance” — except in reverse. Where Marcuse advocated for silencing the right in favor of the marginalized, today’s right silences the left under the guise of protecting traditional values. As the Rev. Walter Fauntroy once said, “The First Amendment gave us the ability to speak,” and “Almighty God softened men’s hearts.” But the anti-woke right has discarded that legacy in favor of political advantage. The core of liberty lies in protecting individuals from power, not in wielding power to silence dissent. The anti-woke right cloaked itself in the language of liberty when it felt threatened, but now that it commands influence, its true aim is clear. This was never a movement for freedom. It was always a movement for dominance. Adpated by ASEAN Now from New York Times 2025-04-26 -
1
Transgender Inmate Sues Trump, Claims His Rhetoric Incited Prison Rapes
Transgender Inmate Sues Trump, Claims His Rhetoric Incited Prison Assaults A transgender inmate in Indiana has filed a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump, alleging that his rhetoric incited a wave of sexual violence against her while incarcerated. Autumn Cordellionè, who was born Jonathan C. Richardson and is serving a 55-year sentence for the 2001 killing of her 11-month-old stepdaughter, claims that Trump's "transphobic and extremist" statements have emboldened other prisoners and staff to target her. In a handwritten legal complaint, Cordellionè alleged that she was raped and assaulted multiple times at the Westville Correctional Facility (WCA), an all-male prison where she was transferred after initially being held in protective custody at New Castle Correctional Facility. According to her account, the abuse began after she began transitioning in 2020 by taking hormones and testosterone blockers following a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Cordellionè stated that she was subjected to brutal treatment both by fellow inmates and prison staff. In one particularly harrowing claim, she recounted an inmate telling her, “Trump’s president now, and we won’t even get in trouble for f****** you trannies up. We’re patriots and even if you tell on us, Trump will pardon us and probably give us a medal.” She also alleges that two other attackers made similar remarks during assaults. Her lawsuit seeks $3.5 million in damages from Trump personally. Cordellionè claims that when she attempted to report the abuse, she was met with hostility from prison officials. One staff member allegedly told her, “I’ve seen your case on the news, and I personally don’t think us tax payers should have to pay for your surgery. God doesn’t approve of transgenders and gays, so what do you expect to happen when you dress like a woman and have t*** in a male facility.” The prison official was reportedly referencing a previous legal case Cordellionè filed to challenge a state law prohibiting taxpayer-funded gender-affirming surgery for inmates. As part of that case, she argued that the denial of surgery worsened her gender dysphoria and mental health, including self-harm and suicide attempts. A federal court ultimately ordered the Indiana Department of Corrections to provide sex reassignment surgery for her “at the earliest opportunity.” Cordellionè’s criminal past continues to weigh heavily on the public perception of her legal battles. In September 2001, she was convicted of murdering her infant stepdaughter while the child’s mother was away. Initially, she claimed to have discovered the baby with vomit in her mouth, but later admitted she had tried to calm the child and ultimately strangled her. At one point, Cordellionè allegedly told a corrections officer, “Well all I know is I killed the little f**king b*tch.” She was sentenced to 55 years in prison in 2002. Her latest lawsuit also references other alleged incidents of discrimination. She previously filed a complaint against the prison chaplain, claiming she was not allowed to wear a hijab despite identifying as a Muslim woman. Responding to the recent claims, a White House spokesperson commented, “President Trump has vowed to defend biological women from gender ideology extremism and restore biological truth to the Federal government.” Cordellionè’s case is likely to reignite debates around transgender rights in prison systems, particularly in relation to housing assignments, medical care, and the influence of political discourse on institutional treatment. Whether her claims will gain traction in court remains to be seen, but the legal action adds another layer to the ongoing and controversial discussion surrounding gender identity, incarceration, and justice in America. Adpated by ASEAN Now from Daily Mail 2025-04-26 -
0
Kyiv Mayor Klitschko Hints at Possible Land Concessions for Peace
Klitschko Hints at Possible Land Concessions for Peace, Stirs Debate in Ukraine Kyiv’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko, has ignited a wave of controversy after suggesting Ukraine may have to consider territorial concessions to Russia as part of a future peace settlement. In a candid interview with the BBC, the former heavyweight boxing champion acknowledged that giving up land—even temporarily—might be one of the potential paths toward ending the war, though he emphasized that such a scenario would be painful and far from ideal. "One of the scenarios is… to give up territory. It's not fair. But for the peace, temporary peace, maybe it can be a solution, temporary," Klitschko said. However, he was quick to underline the steadfastness of the Ukrainian people, declaring, “the Ukrainian people would never accept occupation” by Russia. Klitschko’s remarks came in the wake of one of the deadliest Russian attacks on the Ukrainian capital in recent months. A coordinated missile-and-drone strike killed 12 people and injured more than 80, underscoring the devastating human cost of the conflict and the urgency felt by some to seek an end to the war. Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and currently occupies around 20% of Ukrainian territory. Klitschko’s statement marks one of the most high-profile acknowledgments by a Ukrainian official that territorial concessions might need to be considered, even if only as a temporary measure. Still, his suggestion is bound to prove divisive, especially given the strong national resolve against yielding any ground to Moscow. Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme from his office in central Kyiv, Klitschko described the capital as “the heart” of the country and reaffirmed his role as its steward during wartime. Despite the gravity of the situation, he noted that he has not been consulted by President Volodymyr Zelensky on any potential peace settlement. “President Zelensky does [it] himself. It's not my function,” he said. Klitschko and Zelensky have had a tense political relationship, with the mayor previously accusing the president and his team of undermining his authority. While discussing the strained dynamics between leaders, Klitschko alluded to a highly publicized confrontation between Zelensky and former U.S. President Donald Trump earlier this year. “Key issues between top politicians would be better discussed without video cameras,” Klitschko said, suggesting a more discreet approach to diplomacy. Tensions between Ukraine and Trump have resurfaced as the former U.S. president pushes for Ukraine to accept territorial losses, including the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014. Trump recently criticized Zelensky for refusing to entertain any negotiations that would concede Crimea to Russia, arguing that the territory “was lost years ago” and is “not even a point of discussion.” Zelensky, however, has stood firm, pointing to a 2018 “Crimea declaration” made by Trump’s then-Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, in which the United States explicitly rejected Russia’s attempted annexation. The Ukrainian president’s stance reflects the broader sentiment within Ukraine and among its European allies, many of whom have expressed growing concern over what they perceive as Trump’s increasingly conciliatory posture toward Russian President Vladimir Putin. As the war drags on and geopolitical tensions mount, Klitschko’s comments may reflect a pragmatic, albeit controversial, recognition that hard choices could lie ahead. Whether Ukraine's leadership and people will ultimately entertain the idea of territorial compromise remains to be seen, but for now, the suggestion alone is likely to spark intense debate both within Ukraine and beyond. Related Topic: Why Zelensky Won’t Bargain Away Crimea — No Matter the Pressure Adpated by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-04-26
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now