4 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

I had to look it up.  She's of Lebanese decent.

 

 

Does that count?

I thought it had to be lgb or a tranny, black with diabilities (for added bonus)

17 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

That's why the shallow thinking bedwetters on the left don't like her 

 

 

 

 

So, are you trying to say that lefties stand positive to sex offenders, child predators and other forms of abuse? Be careful, we are in Thailand. Such kind of talk falls under Thailands strict defamation laws. So does calling a group of people bedwetters. If you don´t have proof of both, that will say. Please, show you proof.

The only people required to judge her qualifications are the Senate Judiciary Committee and the full Senate.

 

If you think she's qualified, then nominate her, advance her nomination, hold hearings, and vote up or down.

 

But she has NOT been nominated - rather she has been appointed to a temporary four-month "term" - which tells everyone that she could not be confirmed and therefore is not qualified.

 

Women are often referred to here as "DEI" hires, at least when people wish to marginalize and denigrate their positions.

 

6 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

So, are you trying to say that lefties stand positive to sex offenders, child predators and other forms of abuse? Be careful, we are in Thailand. Such kind of talk falls under Thailands strict defamation laws. So does calling a group of people bedwetters. If you don´t have proof of both, that will say. Please, show you proof.

I'd like to see how far someone would get with a defamation case as a foreigner, based off a forums where members are using anonymous profiles.

You have to defame someone personally, using the term bed wetter and lefites will not get far. someone try please.

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us how Judge DiPirro is not qualified to be a prosecutor?

Tell me how Kamala Harris was unqualified to be a DA and the AG for California…..not to mention a senator and Vice President……Jennie is a harridan spouting lies and nonsense on fake news fox when she isent in her cups.but hey she’d fit rite in with the clown cabinet……I don’t think she stands a chance anyway just to toxic and a drunk.

2 minutes ago, Tug said:

Jennie is a harridan spouting lies and nonsense on fake news fox

What lies and nonsense did she spout on the highest rated program?

 

Harridan? Typical misogyny of the left.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

What lies and nonsense did she spout on the highest rated program?

 

Harridan? Typical misogyny of the left.

I’ve never watch fake Fox News I do remember her calling democrats demonrats lol sounds just the kind of person ya want sitting on the bench ehh??rember yagoda justice is supposed to be blind…..and she’s a drunk

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Huh? You have little understanding of how the adversary justice system works.

 

Would you rather the Judge skew everything for the Gov?

 

 

I have a very clear understanding of how the adversarial justice system works. In my understanding, which forms the basis of my post, the Judge is supposed to administer the process fairly, according to the law, and give no licence to either side, nor conduct a trial with the prepared intention of "slapping on" the maximum sentence. 

 

Somewhat different to the process you describe and enthuse over.

14 minutes ago, Tug said:

I’ve never watch fake Fox News I do remember her calling democrats demonrats lol sounds just the kind of person ya want sitting on the bench ehh??rember yagoda justice is supposed to be blind…..and she’s a drunk

If you never watch fake Fox news, the highest rated network, how do you know about "demonrats"?

33 minutes ago, JAG said:

I have a very clear understanding of how the adversarial justice system works. In my understanding, which forms the basis of my post, the Judge is supposed to administer the process fairly, according to the law, and give no licence to either side, nor conduct a trial with the prepared intention of "slapping on" the maximum sentence. 

 

Somewhat different to the process you describe and enthuse over.

You have never done it, and know not of what you speak. Especially when it comes to rules of evidence, leeway in cross examination, statues of limitations, jury charges, prosecutorial overreach, etc

 

Sort of like how that Judge in NYC skewed the case against Trump.

 

But folks are innocent till proven guilty and thus a judge that favours the defense in rulings is not prejudicing the government, he is protecting the innocent.

 

The Judge knows all the evidence, the only person that does. He knows about the 10 other killings done almost the same way, now he needs to decide whether the trier of fact will know too.

 

Enthuse over? The criminal defense lawyer is liberty's last champion. Thank god for Judges that will let them defend their clients.

 

PS. You know why Kash is going to make a great FBI director? Because he was a Federal Public Defender and he knows how the FBI and govt roll.

19 hours ago, Yagoda said:

She was very tough on sex offenders, domestic abusers and child predators.

 

Yet another sycophant with very little recent experience for the appointment. She contributed to Fox being fined $787.50 million for defamation against Dominion Voting Systems - I suppose an excellent reference for Trump appointing her - lol It would be interesting to know how many hours a day on average Trump watches Fox.

32 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

PS. You know why Kash is going to make a great FBI director? Because he was a Federal Public Defender and he knows how the FBI and govt roll.

 

"great"? Sure.

 

Kash Patel's new way of leading the FBI: Fewer morning intel briefings, more pro sports events

 

At the same time, Patel has drawn attention for regularly appearing with celebrities at professional sporting events around the country, according to flight logs and social media posts.

 

Since taking office on Feb. 20, Patel appears to have made three flights on FBI planes to Nashville, Tennessee, where his girlfriend, a country singer, lives; two flights to Las Vegas, where he has a home; and one flight to New York, where he attended a professional hockey game. FBI policy in recent years has mandated that directors fly on government aircraft for security reasons.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/kash-patels-new-way-leading-fbi-fewer-morning-intel-briefings-sports-e-rcna202865

 

 

 

 

2 hours ago, frank83628 said:

I'd like to see how far someone would get with a defamation case as a foreigner, based off a forums where members are using anonymous profiles.

You have to defame someone personally, using the term bed wetter and lefites will not get far. someone try please.

I think you misunderstood. When did I post that calling somebody lefties was a problem?

On 5/9/2025 at 9:42 AM, bubblegum said:

Trump on Truth social appoints, wait for it, Judge Jeanine from Fox as interim State Attorney for the district of Columbia.

Another one with booze problems.

Does he know anybody outside of the Fox circle?

Booze problems? What do you mean by that? Also: What do you mean by "wait for it"? You seem a bit obsessed and mislead.  The election is over. Trump won. And is now doing those things he said he'd do. Is that why you're so upset?

58 minutes ago, simple1 said:

with very little recent experience for the appointment.

Do realize what an US Atty does?

3 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I had to look it up.  She's of Lebanese decent.

 

 

Ha I thought she was Italian. Not much difference though.

3 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

Be careful, we are in Thailand. Such kind of talk falls under Thailands strict defamation laws. So does calling a group of people bedwetters.

 

Hey Gottfrid, do you have a rubberised incontinence mattress cover on your bed. If not, you don’t need to be offended; unless of course, you are another leftie that is part of the newly formed offence industry, and wake up every morning wondering what to be offended about that day, usually on behalf of someone else that probably doesn’t give a monkey’s anyway. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

 

 

 

50 minutes ago, Magictoad said:

Booze problems? What do you mean by that? Also: What do you mean by "wait for it"? You seem a bit obsessed and mislead.  The election is over. Trump won. And is now doing those things he said he'd do. Is that why you're so upset?

Booze problems means she is an alcoholic just like Pete. I'm fine if you as an American (?) like to have your country by incompetent drunks.

5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Common. At least she hasnt spent her career being a suckhole, like most who seek Justice Department/Judge positions.

Really? So ceaslessly defending and showering Trump with praise for years doesn't count as being a suckhole?

Interesting.

3 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Does that count?

I thought it had to be lgb or a tranny, black with diabilities (for added bonus)

Do you even know what it is you're writing about? I though you had sent all those to the gulags years ago, Dima. Was I wrong?

20 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

doesn’t give a monkey’s anyway

Something you should learn and adhere to.

19 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Really? So ceaslessly defending and showering Trump with praise for years doesn't count as being a suckhole?

Interesting.

Depends whos getting sucked and the method used. You dont know much about USA local politics.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Depends whos getting sucked and the method used. You dont know much about USA local politics.

I know you're deflecting, and quite lamely to be honest.

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

What lies and nonsense did she spout on the highest rated program?

 

Harridan? Typical misogyny of the left.

The Big Lie. 🤣

You know, the case Fox News settled by paying $787.5 million and by acknowledging that the broadcast statements were false.

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

You have never done it, and know not of what you speak. Especially when it comes to rules of evidence, leeway in cross examination, statues of limitations, jury charges, prosecutorial overreach, etc

 

Sort of like how that Judge in NYC skewed the case against Trump.

 

But folks are innocent till proven guilty and thus a judge that favours the defense in rulings is not prejudicing the government, he is protecting the innocent.

 

The Judge knows all the evidence, the only person that does. He knows about the 10 other killings done almost the same way, now he needs to decide whether the trier of fact will know too.

 

Enthuse over? The criminal defense lawyer is liberty's last champion. Thank god for Judges that will let them defend their clients.

 

PS. You know why Kash is going to make a great FBI director? Because he was a Federal Public Defender and he knows how the FBI and govt roll.

Your words and I quote "she was one of the types who would let defense attorneys get away with anything at trial. That way, if the jury convicted, reversible errors were minimized and she could slap the s**t out of the Defendant with a max indeterminate."

 

And as I said "the Judge is supposed to administer the process fairly, according to the law, and give no licence to either side, nor conduct a trial with the prepared intention of "slapping on" the maximum sentence. "

 

It really is quite straightforward.

 

By the way, whilst I have never appeared in court as an advocate for either prosecution or defence, I have, on several occasions, been called as a witness for the prosecution in a couple of cases, involving serious charges, which carried heavy sentences. Both cases were "Diplock trials", heard by a judge without a jury, due to extensive and on occasion lethal intimidation by terrorists. I think I have a very clear idea of how a judge should properly conduct a case.

 

 

I note he's getting his excuses in early.

 

 

 

Quote

I don't know her

 

 

 

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Do realize what an US Atty does?

 

Yes.  Most definitely not a role for a sycophant.

3 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Do you even know what it is you're writing about? I though you had sent all those to the gulags years ago, Dima. Was I wrong?

You always are wrong

15 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

Yes.  Most definitely not a role for a sycophant.

Translation: I have no idea how a US Attys office is run.

19 hours ago, JAG said:

Your words and I quote "she was one of the types who would let defense attorneys get away with anything at trial. That way, if the jury convicted, reversible errors were minimized and she could slap the s**t out of the Defendant with a max indeterminate."

 

And as I said "the Judge is supposed to administer the process fairly, according to the law, and give no licence to either side, nor conduct a trial with the prepared intention of "slapping on" the maximum sentence. "

 

It really is quite straightforward.

 

By the way, whilst I have never appeared in court as an advocate for either prosecution or defence, I have, on several occasions, been called as a witness for the prosecution in a couple of cases, involving serious charges, which carried heavy sentences. Both cases were "Diplock trials", heard by a judge without a jury, due to extensive and on occasion lethal intimidation by terrorists. I think I have a very clear idea of how a judge should properly conduct a case.

 

 

Got it. A witness in a trial in Northern Ireland morphs into an expert on the US Justice system. Only in the Trump deranged world....