President Trump ... accuses court system of blocking him from doing his job

[Dan O]

13 minutes ago, candide said:

As expected, MAGAs whining and blaming others. 🙂

True, You cant undermine a lacknor attack on democracy when you follow the law. Thats one of the cornerstones of democracy but trumoettes can deal with facts and truth. I find it hilarious when they claim judges are liberal or activist when they disagree with trump when some of them are trumps appointees. Hahahaha 

[Dan O]

3 hours ago, frank83628 said:

The clip is heavily edited, show the original. You're siding with illegal entry to a country.

Your siding with stupidity. Do some research 

[Felton Jarvis]

This is EXACTLY what I want to see. Nothing will bring Trump madness screeching to a halt faster than feuding with the court system. Trump has never understood the concept of checks and balances.

[Peabody]

5 hours ago, Dan O said:

You make bs claims and never provide proof just change the topic or play stupid when called out 

You think he is just playing?  🙂

[Dan O]

37 minutes ago, Peabody said:

You think he is just playing?  🙂

He always trolls with claims but never any proof when asked. Quick to claim your justva flamer or leftist when called out.  Just another lost soul that got tricked 

[MicroB]

Suspension of Habeas corpus on the cards.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/09/politics/miller-habeas-corpus-immigrant-judge

 

 

 

 

[jerrymahoney]

As in the OP:

Trump on Truth Social: Our Court System is not letting me do the job I was Elected to do.

Trump and Ms. Bondi have fired or caused career attorneys to quit so there are not enough lawyers to handle cases from the Executive orders Trump has enacted.

Washington Post headline MAY 4:

- Justice Department lawyers face skeptical judges upset by ‘shoddy work’
- As they defend against more than 200 lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump’s initiatives, some government lawyers are getting scolded from the bench.

And the article gives instances of 'shoddy work' in front of judges appointed by both Repub and Dem Presidents.

[frank83628]

2 hours ago, Dan O said:

Your siding with stupidity. Do some research 

Show the unedited clip....easy to prove

[SunnyinBangrak]

As usual he is 100% correct.

[candide]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Show the unedited clip....easy to prove

You claimed the clip has been edited. Why don't you show it to support your claim?

[frank83628]

13 minutes ago, candide said:

You claimed the clip has been edited. Why don't you show it to support your claim?

Why would i bother You would not watch If i did because you will never change your decrepit old brain. If I post the unedited version from fox, will you admit you are wrong to this whole forum?

[Rob Browder]

11 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

"Our Court System is not letting me do the job I was Elected to do.

This is all for show.  Why is that evident?

 

When did they stop him country-banning the Caravan Hordes in 2018?  The SCOTUS had just re-affirmed that law in 2017, but he refused to use it to stop them.  As a result, the flood was even worse than under Obama, up until he turned the WH over to Fauci for the "pandemic" (sic).

 

When did they stop him from enforcing the Felony prohibiting employing Illegal-Aliens?  They never did.  But he WANTS those ~50 Million keeping American wages in poverty, so he won't order it enforced. 

 

Instead, we get Obama's "Bad Hombres Out" policy, of which he said correctly in 2016, "If we only enforce the laws against crime, we have an Open Border to the Entire World."  Sadly, even lousy Obama and Biden deported more. 

 

Now, he says he wants to give the illegals a "stipend" to do a "touch home base and return" Amnesty, to make absolutely sure Americans can't have their stolen careers back - and our wages remain in the toilet.

[candide]

46 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Why would i bother You would not watch If i did because you will never change your decrepit old brain. If I post the unedited version from fox, will you admit you are wrong to this whole forum?

I'll help you. Here's the full transcript. What critical parts have been edited out and most of all how did it alter the meaning of what Trump said, according to you?

 

Of course, in the clip, they cannot keep the whole interview, so they have selected only a part of it. So what are the parts they left out to alter the meaning of what Trump said, and how editing them out may have altered the meaning of what Trump said about this particular issue?

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/read-full-transcript-president-donald-trump-interviewed-meet-press-mod-rcna203514

[frank83628]

Just now, candide said:

I'll help you. Here's the full transcript. What critical parts have been edited out and most of all how did it alter the meaning of what Trump said, according to you?

 

Of course, in the clip, they cannot keep the whole interview, so they have selected only a part of it. So what are the parts they left out to alter the meaning of what Trump said, and how editing them out may have altered the meaning of what Trump said about this particular issue?

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/read-full-transcript-president-donald-trump-interviewed-meet-press-mod-rcna203514

Yes, only selected parts, so an edited clip of the whole interview, that shows a certain msm narrative. At your age are you so brainwashed?

OK, so answer me this to save wasting anymore time... do you remember the Charlottesville video clip? Do you think Trump called the neo Nazis 'fine people' or do you know that clip was a selected = edited part of what was actually said?

[candide]

26 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Yes, only selected parts, so an edited clip of the whole interview, that shows a certain msm narrative. At your age are you so brainwashed?

OK, so answer me this to save wasting anymore time... do you remember the Charlottesville video clip? Do you think Trump called the neo Nazis 'fine people' or do you know that clip was a selected = edited part of what was actually said?

In brief, you have nothing to argue.

[frank83628]

58 minutes ago, candide said:

In brief, you have nothing to argue.

I cannot be arsed with arguing with an old man, twice my age. My laptop is not here so I am unable to do so, but please put me on ignore to avoid any further communication.

[hotandsticky]

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

I cannot be arsed with arguing with an old man, twice my age. My laptop is not here so I am unable to do so, but please put me on ignore to avoid any further communication.

 

 

S0,    you lose.

 

To an old man.

 

No shame in that.

 

Be wary of old men

[frank83628]

13 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

S0,    you lose.

 

To an old man.

 

No shame in that.

 

Be wary of old men

Loss of interest is not losing.

trying to translate Bidens recent mumblings on the view would be better use of my time.