Jump to content

Thailand to Require Medical Certificates for Cannabis Use Within 40 Days


Recommended Posts

Posted

The draft, recently publicised under " Shinawatra's " administration,

the new bill spearheaded by Pheu Thai aims to regulate

 

Ready .....   Fire  ...   Aim

https://dl-staging-website.ghost.io/content/images/2022/07/Screen-Shot-2021-09-01-at-1.08.19-PM-copy.png

Posted
2 hours ago, Mickeem said:

This is all about a Mr T who missed the bus whilst exiled in his Dubai penthouse suite  ..

 

 

Absolutely spot on. Has his grubby little fingers all over this.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Good quality Thai weed is two dollars a gram In Cambodia without the need for a certificate. There aren't any dispensaries though.

Posted

Seeing some details on this proposal which mention a patient can get up to 30 grams in any 30 day period.

 

 

Obviously, "cannabis pharmacists/doctors" will have to be trained.

 

Controls/processes need to be drafted.

 

Eligible diagnoses/conditions will have to be published.

 

Very few conditions here - ~ four - are currently treatable with 'medical' cannabis.

 

Some U.S. states have quite strict medical conditions for which cannabis can be prescribed.

 

example: Florida

 

Qualifying Conditions (as of May 23, 2025):
Cancer:
Epilepsy:
Glaucoma:
HIV/AIDS:
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD):
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS):
Crohn's Disease:
Parkinson's Disease:
Multiple Sclerosis (MS):
Terminal illness (diagnosed by a physician):
Chronic nonmalignant pain:

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 hours ago, StandardIssue said:

I'm not into drugs or even getting drunk.

My personal choice. 

I don't need alcohol or drugs to feel OK.

Yes, give up the enjoyable stuff and go full MAGA. You're just changing crutches. Better high than MAGA.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

The work around will be   "health clinics" who offer  authorization certificates. It just won't result in the desired  effect.

It would  be much easier to enforce no smoking  regulations that already exist. Let the potheads smoke their dope in their own private space. No smoking in public places.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

The work around will be   "health clinics" who offer  authorization certificates. It just won't result in the desired  effect.

It would  be much easier to enforce no smoking  regulations that already exist. Let the potheads smoke their dope in their own private space. No smoking in public places.

Waiting for a app, you just sign in and apply with a tracking mode 🤓

 

Seriously, this wouldn’t had happen if public smoking was not an issue, which it is

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
On 5/22/2025 at 7:31 AM, PJ71 said:

You're obviously one of these people that has no idea about cannabis use.

 

Oh well...

 

Should we ban alcohol too?

Oh well, seems you're one of those that believes there are no problems with cannabis use... Or overuse 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 hours ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

YAWN!

 

But they did.

Actually, it was only legalised for medicinal purposes.... So this proposal is simply trying to bring it under control 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

Actually, it was only legalised for medicinal purposes

 

No. That's a common misconception.

 

There were no restrictions, other than age, pregnancy, no vending machines, no public use where it impacts others, etc., regarding medical only.

 

It's been legal for three years, no one has ODed, and there are very few negative impacts on society. The smuggling out of Thailand is an issue that could be easily resolved.

  • Agree 1
Posted
18 hours ago, StandardIssue said:

 

I smoked it for about 8 years and toward the end I developed a very adverse side effect when "high" ...total paranoia. The sticky bud that I was smoking was one or two hit bud. I didn't get a euphoria. It was straight up paranoia and evil hallucination.

 

 

 

 

 

I would be very careful about discussing this on a public forum, which is most likely being monitored.

They're probably on their way to your location right now.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Knock, knock Neo!!!

 

 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, gargamon said:

Yes, give up the enjoyable stuff and go full MAGA. You're just changing crutches. Better high than MAGA.

What makes you think I'm a MAGA-nut? LOL🤣

Posted
13 hours ago, sambum said:

 

One of those Immigration requirements that changes from Office to Office I guess! Our Office (as from a couple of years ago) also require a photo of you outside your house showing the house number!

For Retirement Extension?  Marriage needs photo.

Posted
1 minute ago, StandardIssue said:

What makes you think I'm a MAGA-nut? LOL🤣

Your post history makes it clear.

 

It reminds me of a line from Cheech and Chong. “i used to be all messed up on drugs, now I'm all messed up on the lord.“ In your case, it's “all messed up on MAGA “

  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Your post history makes it clear.

 

It reminds me of a line from Cheech and Chong. “i used to be all messed up on drugs, now I'm all messed up on the lord.“ In your case, it's “all messed up on MAGA “

 

Haha, I am the guy who started this thread. You are WAY off dude! LOL 🤣🤣

 

You do realize that people can be liberal and progressive in their politics and still be against drug use .. yea?

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

Actually, it was only legalised for medicinal purposes.... So this proposal is simply trying to bring it under control 

Can't reason with people who doesn't understand themselves are their own biggest enemy to keep it as it was. Instead many of them are flying high and not thinking of the consequences. Suppliers, shops and users burning the bridges. 

 

Flame away, this is just a sober analysis 

Posted
1 hour ago, bamnutsak said:

 

No. That's a common misconception.

 

There were no restrictions, other than age, pregnancy, no vending machines, no public use where it impacts others, etc., regarding medical only.

 

It's been legal for three years, no one has ODed, and there are very few negative impacts on society. The smuggling out of Thailand is an issue that could be easily resolved.

You are the one who is wrong, I clearly remember when it was legalised, specifically medicinal purposes.

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

"If the duration of use exceeds one month, that will not be considered for medical purposes and there will be prosecution"

 

How can I treat my chronic insomnia for 30 days only?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

"If the duration of use exceeds one month, that will not be considered for medical purposes and there will be prosecution"

 

How can I treat my chronic insomnia for 30 days only?

Posted
On 5/22/2025 at 3:48 AM, webfact said:

Dr Somlerk Jeungsmarn, Director-General of the Department of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine, echoed the sentiment, suggesting potential dosage limits and penalties for non-medical use, including possible imprisonment.

 

somewhat above his pay scale in my not so humble opinion, since when has crime and punishment been anything to do with "directors of traditional medicine" (other wise commonly known as quacks)

Posted
1 hour ago, Krabi King said:

"If the duration of use exceeds one month, that will not be considered for medical purposes and there will be prosecution"

 

How can I treat my chronic insomnia for 30 days only?

where did you find that snippet of information? It certainly isn't in the OP

Posted
47 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

where did you find that snippet of information? It certainly isn't in the OP

 

It's in the original article from the Bangkok Post

Posted
3 hours ago, Aussie999 said:

You are the one who is wrong, I clearly remember when it was legalised, specifically medicinal purposes.

It was legalised for recreational use on Thailand on June 9, 2022

Posted
6 hours ago, Aussie999 said:

Actually, it was only legalised for medicinal purposes.... So this proposal is simply trying to bring it under control 

No you've got that wrong...that was the first move, later it was legalised for recreational Thailand on June 9, 2022

Posted
51 minutes ago, kwilco said:

No you've got that wrong...that was the first move, later it was legalised for recreational Thailand on June 9, 2022

Show me the legislation 

This from June 9, 2022

"Thailand's government has said it is promoting cannabis for medical use only, warning those eager to light up for fun that smoking in public could still considered to be a nuisance, subject to a potential 3-month sentence and 25,000 Thai baht ($780) fine."

Posted

Cannabis flower was removed from the Narcotics list ~ Feb. 9, 2022 (date gazetted, effective date +3 months at May 9, 2022), essentially decriminalizing production, distribution, and personal use.

 

Cannabis extracts remain on the Narcotics list.

 

Some 4,000 prisoners serving sentences for cannabis possession/distribution et al, were released from jail.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Phuket Restaurant Owner Urges More Public Bathrooms After Incidents

    2. 44

      The Thai Baht Paradox: Currency Climbs as Economy Falters

    3. 0

      Trump’s Trumpcoin Gala: A Right Crypto Clown Feast

    4. 5

      Swiss National 'David' Jailed for Assaulting Thai Doctor in Phuket

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...