Jump to content

Trump's crackdown on LA protests is pure hypocrisy


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Yes. Trump is 100 times more corrupt than Biden was in his wildest dreams. If you can't see that there's nothing that I can say to you to establish real and actual facts. 


Can you prove Trump is 60 times more corrupt out of the 100 you claim?


In your wildest dreams.  You certainly are a dreamer.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JAG said:

Returning, no doubt briefly, to the original "premise" of deploying troops (both Californian National Guard and USMC) into Los Angeles, has Mr Trump invoked, and announced publicly that he has invoked any of the Laws and Acts which may authorise him to do so?

 

If he hasn't, then what is their and his, lawful position?

 

He does not have to announce anything publicly. 

 

Nothing new about presidents assuming command of the National Guard against the wishes of a governor.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, jvs said:

That raises more questions. If the government attacks "we the people" isn't that where the

2nd amendment is for?

That is part of what the Second Amendment is for, were that to happen. People rioting in the streets are not being attacked, they are attacking. 

 

You are not from the US are you? 

 

"Its first three words – “We The People” – affirm that the government of the United States exists to serve its citizens." 

 

https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

He does not have to announce anything publicly. 

 

Nothing new about presidents assuming command of the National Guard against the wishes of a governor.  

I understand it has happened once, 60 years ago, during the 1965 desegregation marches from Selma to Montgomery in Alabama. President Johnson deployed them to prevent the police and vigilantes from attacking the marchers.

 

Given that it has happened once, in 60 years, in very different circumstances, perhaps it is rather new?

 

Oh, and Johnson was very open about what he planned to do, and doing it. Unlike Trump, where the troops were deployed with no warning or announcement.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, JAG said:

I understand it has happened once, 60 years ago, during the 1965 desegregation marches from Selma to Montgomery in Alabama. President Johnson deployed them to prevent the police and vigilantes from attacking the marchers.

 

Given that it has happened once, in 60 years, in very different circumstances, perhaps it is rather new?

 

It happened several other times as well. 

 

In any event it's not unprecedented, regardless of what the lying leftist media are claiming. 

 

How is it different?

 

You are not from the US are you? 

 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Yellowtail said:

 

It happened several other times as well. 

 

In any event it's not unprecedented, regardless of what the lying leftist media are claiming. 

 

How is it different?

 

You are not from the US are you? 

 

No I am not from the US.

Now how about referencing these precedents you claim?

Posted
Just now, JAG said:

No I am not from the US.

I thought not. Where are you from? 

Just now, JAG said:

Now how about referencing these precedents you claim?

To what end?

 

And perhaps after you explain how it is different. 

Posted
9 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Good. Much like Trump, she was poorly qualified for that office. I hope the Dems never consider her and I hope they're wise enough to go with younger more Centrist people in the future, who appeal to the masses. Harris was a disaster on every level, l I never liked her even as a Centrist Dem. 

 

It would sure be nice if more Republicans were speaking about out about some of their terrible candidates, congress and senate members, and their horrific president. 

 

 

coward-manga-image-troubled-person-260nw-1391771078.jpg


You appear constipated in this photo.

Posted
8 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Anyone who asks someone to prove that Trump is more corrupt than virtually anyone else in America, has either not done their research, lives in a state of total denial or is just simply defending him for the sake of defending him. Period. End of story. Biden was a saint worthy of canonization, relative to Trump. 

 

Mike,  I've agreed with you on allot of your posts and think / thought you had a clear viewpoint, but I'm sorry I must say I do believe you now have <removed>.  This post reflects it.

 

You cant come to terms that Trump is doing anything good. If anyone supports Trump or his agendas you are against them just because they support Trump or one of his ideas.  

 

I'm not blinding following Trump and I dont agree with everything he's doing.  However, the immigration issue I definitely agree with.

My question to you is why do you think illegal immigrants in the USA shouldn't be deported. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

CNN, their muppet commie regime activist reporter standing in the restricted area took a rubber bullet, next one should be a live round, it's called FAFO, Trump style. But, CNN, daft and feckless like all things liberal. They need tp GTFO of the way. Maybe get that masturbating jeffrey Toobin MOFO out there too....make it interesting, give him some raz-a-ma-taz....Bring it on.....say hello to the active duty deployed marines from 29 Palms, illegals all gonna get their teeth bashed in .....how ya doin....Trumps in charge....REMEMBER THAT!

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, illisdean said:

CNN, their muppet commie regime activist reporter standing in the restricted area took a rubber bullet, next one should be a live round, it's called FAFO, Trump style. But, CNN, daft and feckless like all things liberal. They need tp GTFO of the way. Maybe get that masturbating jeffrey Toobin MOFO out there too....make it interesting, give him some raz-a-ma-taz....Bring it on.....say hello to the active duty deployed marines from 29 Palms, illegals all gonna get their teeth bashed in .....how ya doin....Trumps in charge....REMEMBER THAT!

 

 

And not one the morons on CNN know that illegal entry is a felony, not a misdemeanor. Either that, or they know, but they are pretending they don't know, because it does not fit the leftist narrative. 

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

It happened several other times as well. 

 

In any event it's not unprecedented, regardless of what the lying leftist media are claiming. 

 

How is it different?

 

You are not from the US are you? 

 

 
No reply to citizenship means not a USC.

 

I figured that out some time ago.

 

For some strange reason, non USC ‘s on the forum are afraid or embarrassed to cite their citizenship when asked.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

And not one the morons on CNN know that illegal entry is a felony, not a misdemeanor. Either that, or they know, but they are pretending they don't know, because it does not fit the leftist narrative. 

LOL....a gerbil has more functioning grey matter than this are$hole democrat imbecile.

 

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

A hot MILF with a hot weapon. What more could a guy ask for?

Take off everything but the bullet-proof vest?  Keep the boots on too!  :licklips:

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

 

2028 Dem Platform

 

We support child sniffing 👍👍

 

Save water. Shower with daughters. 👍👍

 

th-3640615922.jpg

th-2153993212.jpg

th-395123832.jpg

The guy is a sexual predator.  Like his dementia that the Left couldn't see, how long will it take before they admit that he predated on women and children and worst - those around him allow it. Why?  Maybe if you allow Joe to fondle your child you could get a career boost. Those parents are just as sick.

 

I wouldn't have let him get anywhere near my child - boy or girl.  He is no one sick, pervert. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, connda said:

The guy is a sexual predator.  Like his dementia that the Left couldn't see, how long will it take before they admit that he predated on women and children and worst - those around him allow it. Why?  Maybe if you allow Joe to fondle your child you could get a career boost. Those parents are just as sick.

 

I wouldn't have let him get anywhere near my child - boy or girl.  He is no one sick, pervert. 

Remember the MeToo movement? Women had to be believed....right up until Tara Reade...

Posted
2 minutes ago, connda said:

The guy is a sexual predator.  Like his dementia that the Left couldn't see, how long will it take before they admit that he predated on women and children and worst - those around him allow it. Why?  Maybe if you allow Joe to fondle your child you could get a career boost. Those parents are just as sick.

 

I wouldn't have let him get anywhere near my child - boy or girl.  He is no one sick, pervert. 


Disturbing .

 

@spidermike007 thinks he should be canonized a Saint. 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

 

He does not have to announce anything publicly. 

 

Nothing new about presidents assuming command of the National Guard against the wishes of a governor.  

Trumpspeacefulmarines.jpg.05a5094d7c7f9d6b6f2c9bf495279f30.jpg

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I thought not. Where are you from? 

To what end?

 

And perhaps after you explain how it is different. 

I have never made any secret of where I am from, I am from the United Kingdom. England (the South West - Somerset to be precise). 

 

Now back to my question, when since Alabama in 1965 (60 years ago) has a President deployed a State National Guard in opposition to that States Governors wishes?

 

We will perhaps leave out any further questions about calling for or threatening the arrest of that Governor!

Posted
13 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Not to mention, ICE wasn't just cruising the streets of LA looking for brown people to harass. They were executing criminal warrants on specific individuals. People charged with crimes from rape to murder to child abuse.  So if THESE are the types of "migrants" that California's left wants to keep in the country, they are welcome to them.

Not to mention the worst of the worst, the absolute scoundrels looking for jobs (jobs that no-one else would do) in "Home Depot"!

 

Such hardened scoundrels were these job seakers that it was necessary for the ICE to be heavily armed, mounted in armoured vehicles and clad in military fatigues, to raid the car park of "Home Depot"!

 

It is pretty clear that ICE were exactly  " just cruising the streets of LA looking for brown people to harass."

 

Why? Because the Trump administration was looking to pick a fight! An excuse to put troops on the streets. The volatile and immigrant (Latino) rich community of Los Angeles being the most fertile ground for that fight.

 

Accumulating and moving those numbers of ICE personnel and that equipment to Los Angeles must have been a significant logistical operation, long in the planning and would have taken some time. I somehow doubt that those personnel and that equipment are "barracked" in the City!

 

This was, is, a planned campaign. And it worked, Trump has got his riots, his excuse to deploy troops, he has evaded, ignored, any legal constraints. Most eyes are off the economic clusterf#@* he has created over the last months with his wild unpredictable swings on tarrifs, little notice has been taken that his budgetry bill has been kicked out by the Senate. He has moved it on! Where next is the question? He has put troops, including the regular armed forces into a State which is politically diametrically opposed to him politically, and which voted against him at his election. He will be loath to withdraw them.

 

Interesting that we now hear talk of arresting Governor Newsom

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JAG said:

Now back to my question, when since Alabama in 1965 (60 years ago) has a President deployed a State National Guard in opposition to that States Governors wishes?

When since 1965 has a Governor failed in his duties to his state and the constitution necessitating this completely legal deployment.

 

Notice how you arent seeing videos of terrorists and rioters attacking Federal facilities protected by the Guard and Marine. The rioters and their command and control folks arent stupid, they attack the weak points, they know the LAPD is going to be restrained, poor guys. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...