Mutilation of US Children to End

[KhaoHom]

47 minutes ago, Magictoad said:

There is no evidence that circumcision cuts down on infections. If that were REALLY TRUE then adults could choose to have the operation as Adults! Not as new born babies. The infection myth is an American myth designed to promote and propagate male genital mutilation AKA Male circumcision. No country in the civilised world imposes this barbarism on babies. None! The sooner America joins the fold the better. There is no reason to think that circumcision leads to less infections; it's a medical myth promoted by the American Doctors and Surgeons to make money.

I.suggest we leave the operation until boys are 18 years old. Then let them decide.

 

My bil recently was circumcised at 44. He was having problems with infection.

 

You raise an interesting point, but it's not the same.

 

Removing a bit of skin is not the same as removing the entire penis. It certainly has no correlation/ relation to a young girl receiving a double mastectomy!

 

The idiom cutting off your nose to spite your face comes quickly to mind - but that is not entirely apt

 

Removing a bit of skin in order to prevent recurring infection is a corrective measure with proven outcome. I realize you dispute this (to cause problems). The question is whether it really helps - what it does not do is cause greater possiblity of infection.

 

Yet, all this misses the point entirely.

 

The purpose of removing the penis is so the boy effectively becomes a woman. The boy will NEVER be a woman. He will grow up and grow old as a man -without a penis. Therefore, the outcome cannot reach the stated objective.

 

Moreover, it is beyond argument that minors are treated differently than adults because they in fact are not fully intellectually developed. In Thailand adulthood begins at the age not of 18 but a full 20 years old for context.

 

Minors are not capable of making such serious and weighty decisions such as should I cut off my penis or not ffs. Moreover, the decision itself could be clouded by a whole host of hormonal and psychoactive drugs and underlying psychological issues. These drugs pushed by big pharma and extremely unethical medical industry is ghastly, but unsurprising in this day and age - especially when government is forced to pick up the tab 💰💰💰

 

How cynical 😳

 

When the individual is an adult and wish to cut off their dick or add goat horns to their head it's entirely up to them.

 

I'm very pleased I was circumcised at birth. I've suffered no infection and I have a dick that doesn't look like it belongs on a dog.

 

Finally, to go back to the first portion of your post:

 

There is no evidence that circumcision cuts down on infections. If that were REALLY TRUE then adults could choose to have the operation as Adults! Not as new born babies.

 

HU?!? The above makes zero sense. If it were true as it is then we would want the procedure done asap.

 

==

 

Read the SCOTUS opinions before replying

[NanLaew]

11 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

 

No there are not. They become these reclusive types. Little to no makeup, dresses, no tits... basically effeminate men. Never seen one in a dress I can recall. Try to reduce the snickering and eye rolls I'm guessing

 

Central Bangkok 15 years.

Ah yes, central Bangkok.

 

Carry on.

[cjinchiangrai]

On 6/19/2025 at 9:02 PM, KhaoHom said:

The insanity is now officially over. Removing children's genitals for fun and profit now illegal.

 

https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2025/0618/supreme-court-transgender-treatment-skrmetti-tennessee

It was never legal, the MAGA morons just made it up. If you want to protect kids, keep them away from ministers.

[StandardIssue]

11 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Well, I guess the gay and the greedy medical industry pushed too hard and you got handed your shi+ on a plate.

 

For myself, it's just another nail in the coffin of wokism, gay activist agenda, tranny activism, pronoun rubbish.

 

Medical establishment won't want any part of these surgeries now as it's just adults and they must pay out of pocket. Before when government was paying for tranny's in military and child genital mutilation it was all good 🏳️‍🌈😘

What's it like to live in your scary conspiracy theory mind? Tough neighborhood I reckon.

The MAGA propaganda power players have you just where they want you. Scared and believing the "dems" and the "radical left" are messing with your life.

[Patong2021]

12 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Yeah? Talk to Vanderbilt University about that.  They were performing "gender affirming" surgeries on kids under 18 until 2022.  

 

How many people?

Did you review the medical files and know the reason for the procedures?

What are your medical qualifications to  perform treatment assessment review?

[Patong2021]

12 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Chopping off a kids genitals, giving them hormones is hardly nothing.

 

I believe 19 States on board. It's a SCOTUS decision..no penises will be chopped off any longer in the aid of homosexual fetishism. No hormones provided to aid this tragic confusion.

 

It's hilariously tragic how you defend it and stand in defiance.

 

Certifiably mental

 

Your gender dysphoria bs is DONE. Bye bye ...

 

What are you on about? Seriously. The judgement has nothing to do with what you are claiming. Have you read the court's opinion? Please take the time to do so, because you are attaching your own opinion to the court's. This was a case in respect to  the existing Constitutional provision that relates to Equal Protection Guarantees. The court was not ruling on the validity of gender dysphoria. The court opinion is very clear; The Court’s role is not “to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic” of SB1,  but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees. It does not.

 

The  court opinion Held that Tennessee’s law prohibiting certain medical treatments for transgender minors is not subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and satisfies rational basis review. The TN law  incorporates two classifications: one based on age (allowing certain medical treatments for adults but not minors) and another based on medical use (permitting puberty blockers and hormones for minors to treat certain conditions but not to treat gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder, or gender incongruence). Classifications based on age or medical use are subject to only rational basis review. This is a court opinion that gives authority to a state to determine how medical care will be administered. In effect, it allows the state of TN to determine which medical conditions can or cannot be treated. 

 

If the health provider choose to classify the  gender dysphoria as something else or offer an additional unspecified condition, treatment can still be obtained. Nor is the  restriction national. It is specific to one set of circumstances and to one specific state. As I previously stated, a person from TN can obtain the treatments in another state that does not have the restriction.

 

This is not the big deal you make it out to be, and as for the  transgender lobby, they too are excited over an issue that will impact only a small number of poor people. As is the norm in the USA, the poor will be denied access to the  procedure, while those with money will be able to access it. To put it cruelly and crudely, in the end we will see nicely dressed transgenders, rather than Walmart fashion transgenders.

 

[StandardIssue]

15 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

How many people?

Did you review the medical files and know the reason for the procedures?

What are your medical qualifications to  perform treatment assessment review?

Good questions, a quick bit of research on a couple of AI engines shows that the majority of procedures that even roughly fit what the OP claims were breast reduction procedures performed on boys with hormone problems which caused breasts to grow. Nothing to do with removal of genitals as the conspiracy theory claims. 

[Yagoda]

Transgenderism is a mental illness that should be nipped in the bud with children via counseling.

 

The LBTQ etc movement, (which is a movement to "normalize" deviant behavior and essentially groom children} of course opposes efforts to protect children. If they cant groom, who will be left to march in the streets?