1 minute ago, riclag said:

I'm reading that the GJ will be impaneled in FLorida.

If true ,its huge!

 

 

Since this is a federal investigation, it’s likely to be convened in Washington, D.C., or another federal district with jurisdiction over national security and intelligence matters.

 

Who Decides the Grand Jury Location?

 

•  Federal prosecutors choose the venue based on:

 

  ⁠◦  Where the alleged crime occurred

  ⁠◦  Where key witnesses or evidence are located

  ⁠◦  Jurisdictional relevance (e.g., national security cases often go through Washington, D.C.)

•  The DOJ’s Criminal Division may also weigh in for high-profile or politically sensitive cases.

 

If it does switch to Florida it stinks of the politicalisation of the DOJ even more than anything that has gone before......oh! apart from ....whoops......there are no Epstein files. 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If it ever convenes.

 

Correct again. And it may look at the evidence and bust out laughing. 

 

I've said I don't expect any big names to be jailed. I don't really think the GJ is aimed at jailing people - I think it's aimed at "rogue" elements of the Intelligence communities. 

 

And I don't expect any of them to be jailed either. I think it's a shot across the bow of the Intelligence services saying "you are not beyond reach." 

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Since this is a federal investigation, it’s likely to be convened in Washington, D.C., or another federal district with jurisdiction over national security and intelligence matters.

 

Who Decides the Grand Jury Location?

 

•  Federal prosecutors choose the venue based on:

 

  ⁠◦  Where the alleged crime occurred

  ⁠◦  Where key witnesses or evidence are located

  ⁠◦  Jurisdictional relevance (e.g., national security cases often go through Washington, D.C.)

•  The DOJ’s Criminal Division may also weigh in for high-profile or politically sensitive cases.

 

If it does switch to Florida it stinks of the politicalisation of the DOJ even more than anything that has gone before......oh! apart from ....whoops......there are no Epstein files. 

They just got Pirro in DC, she can handle it personally, when she sobers up.

1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

They just got Pirro in DC, she can handle it personally, when she sobers up.

 

If she lives long enough...what is she? 100 plus?

Just now, Will B Good said:

 

If she lives long enough...what is she? 100 plus?

74, she only has to outlive Trump and that will not be hard. Everyone send Burger King coupons to the White House.

12 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Since this is a federal investigation, it’s likely to be convened in Washington, D.C., or another federal district with jurisdiction over national security and intelligence matters.

 

Who Decides the Grand Jury Location?

 

•  Federal prosecutors choose the venue based on:

 

  ⁠◦  Where the alleged crime occurred

  ⁠◦  Where key witnesses or evidence are located

  ⁠◦  Jurisdictional relevance (e.g., national security cases often go through Washington, D.C.)

•  The DOJ’s Criminal Division may also weigh in for high-profile or politically sensitive cases.

 

If it does switch to Florida it stinks of the politicalisation of the DOJ even more than anything that has gone before......oh! apart from ....whoops......there are no Epstein files. 

 

 

 

Please stop panicking and these desperate distractions. Everyone is equal under the law. Let justice take its course. Nothing to hide nothing to fear arf arf

8 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

They just got Pirro in DC, she can handle it personally, when she sobers up.

If she is so brahms & liszt she starts painting eyebrows halfway up her forehead like the inebriated vineyard owner much loved by team woke, wake us up pls.

11 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Please stop panicking and these desperate distractions. Everyone is equal under the law. Let justice take its course. Nothing to hide nothing to fear arf arf

 

Like Patel, Bongino and Bondi.....no panic there over the Epstein files...555

9 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

If she is so brahms & liszt she starts painting eyebrows halfway up her forehead like the inebriated vineyard owner much loved by team woke, wake us up pls.

That  might be more effective in English.

6 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Well, trump certainly seems to be partially above the law as he's not been tried and convicted for treason yet.

Guess because he never committed treason. Like he was a Russian asset

6 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

74, she only has to outlive Trump and that will not be hard. Everyone send Burger King coupons to the White House.

Sounds like a threat. How typical.

 

Hey, Trump haters: No one is above the law hahaqhahahahahahahahahahahahaah

8 hours ago, theblether said:

Statute of limitations applies to the last criminal act in ongoing offense acts so the fact the conspiracy began in 2016 is irrelevant for those who continued to participate, testify to Congress, be interviewed by Special Prosecutors etc 

 

I'm reading from retired Federal Prosecutors the primary interest of the DoJ are the law firms and companies known to be involved in this imbroglio. 

 

I still don't expect anyone senior to get jailed - the job just now is to scare whistleblowers into compliance. One pulled thread could unravel this entire fiasco. 

You could make a RICO case out of the public information. Watch the rats start squealing

Well, Michelle is definitely gonna leave Obama now. Last thing she wants is to be married to a jailbird.

A post with nothing other than a trolling meme and a reply has been removed.

A post using a derogatory nickname to belittle or mock individuals with differing political views has been removed.

10 hours ago, Will B Good said:

And Trump in particular! 

17 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

From the linked foxnews report  above:

 

It is unclear whom the grand jury is expected to target and what charges could be in play given the statutes of limitations for much of the activity from nearly a decade ago have lapsed.

No, the statute of limitations have not expired since it is an ongoing conspiracy. and statute dates are refreshed with any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. The first one that comes to mind is the FBI raid at MAL and being in Florida, Pam Bondi's recently convened grand jury is rumored to be taking place in the state of Florida bypassing the democrat infused and anti-Trump biased jury pool in DC. This will be a big win for the prosecution.

 

 

4 minutes ago, illisdean said:

No, the statute of limitations have not expired since it is an ongoing conspiracy. and statute dates are refreshed with any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. The first one that comes to mind is the FBI raid at MAL and being in Florida, Pam Bondi's recently convened grand jury is rumored to be taking place in the state of Florida bypassing the democrat infused and anti-Trump biased jury pool in DC. This will be a big win for the prosecution.

 

 

Let's guess... Judge Cannon? 

1 hour ago, candide said:

Let's guess... Judge Cannon? 

Well if she is randomly chosen. Are you alleging that Judges arent?

 

How is her appellate record, btw, do you know? Naw, you dont.

10 hours ago, illisdean said:

No, the statute of limitations have not expired since it is an ongoing conspiracy. and statute dates are refreshed with any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. The first one that comes to mind is the FBI raid at MAL and being in Florida, Pam Bondi's recently convened grand jury is rumored to be taking place in the state of Florida bypassing the democrat infused and anti-Trump biased jury pool in DC. This will be a big win for the prosecution.

 

 

If true, pop the Champagne bottles on Florida & the conspiracy continuing  to be charged despite statue's of limitations controversy by the left. 

The party of 20 somethin % will be fuming  hate even more.

8 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Well if she is randomly chosen. Are you alleging that Judges arent?

 

How is her appellate record, btw, do you know? Naw, you dont.

The left will melt even further if the destroyer/exposers of Jack Smith was in charge of anything related to Obamagate/Russiagate. 

 

The conspirators will get a fair trial in Florida.

 

21 hours ago, theblether said:

 

Correct. 

 

And that's why a Grand Jury will decide whether or not to indict. 

 

That's how it works..

Rather as happened with various Grand Juries which led to various inditements against Mr Trump then?

 

Didn't he end up with a variety of convictions as a result?

10 hours ago, illisdean said:

No, the statute of limitations have not expired since it is an ongoing conspiracy. and statute dates are refreshed with any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. The first one that comes to mind is the FBI raid at MAL and being in Florida, Pam Bondi's recently convened grand jury is rumored to be taking place in the state of Florida bypassing the democrat infused and anti-Trump biased jury pool in DC. This will be a big win for the prosecution.

 

 

 "The same Two dozen people  & Media operatives"!

Are media operatives immune from prosecution  involving Conspiracy ?

No

On 8/5/2025 at 8:56 AM, riclag said:

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election

 

trump won the 2016 Presidential election, right?

 

Who cares about "reviews" of that election?

 

 

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/2020/08/18/publications-report-select-committee-intelligence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures/

 

https://www.congress.gov/committee-report/116th-congress/senate-report/290/1

 

 

 

14 hours ago, Yagoda said:

You could make a RICO case out of the public information. Watch the rats start squealing

More Truth bombs ! They/them was so obsessed with derangement ,

The party that was once the party of JFK, crossed the Rubicon 

 

22 hours ago, riclag said:

And look at the Smug Vance! Like Turley said in my previous post, Bondi got evidence.

 

Yes, What the majority of Americans are asking right now is: Where is the accountability? And they deserve answers.

 

The question however is more probably, was the President "a player" in Epstein's teenage girls sex fest, and if so where is the accountability?

 

The probable answers, yes and no.

11 hours ago, candide said:

Let's guess... Judge Cannon? 

Well that would result in considerable financial savings - she would be able to combine the roles of judge, prosecutor and jury!

22 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

•  Federal prosecutors choose the venue based on:

 

  ⁠◦  Where the alleged crime occurred

Yes -- and just remember: You rip what you sew.

8 hours ago, JAG said:

Didn't he end up with a variety of convictions as a result?

Do you think rRumps criminal conviction will survive appeal.?

7 hours ago, JAG said:

The question however is more probably, was the President "a player" in Epstein's teenage girls sex fest, and if so where is the accountability?

Are you alleging that Trump exploited underage girls? If so, why didnt the Dems release it?

 

7 hours ago, JAG said:

Well that would result in considerable financial savings - she would be able to combine the roles of judge, prosecutor and jury!

Do you have examples of her doing that?