Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Chinas-Playbook-Aug-1525-feat-1140x570.jpg.32abfcbc78ef7dcf0ddaa10d700ae409.jpg

 

 

China’s growing role as a mediator in Myanmar is less about reconciliation and more about securing its strategic and economic interests. As conflict intensifies along the China–Myanmar border, Beijing’s interventions have shifted from passive diplomacy to active management—aimed at stabilising the China–Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC), a vital artery of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

 

The CMEC links China’s Yunnan Province to the Indian Ocean via Myanmar’s Rakhine coast, bypassing the vulnerable Strait of Malacca. It includes the Kyaukphyu Deep Sea Port, oil and gas pipelines, and a planned railway connecting Muse to Mandalay. These projects are not merely commercial—they are geopolitical lifelines. Yet, escalating violence involving ethnic armed groups such as the Kachin Independence Army and the Three Brotherhood Alliance has disrupted key towns and trade routes, threatening China’s infrastructure ambitions.

 

In response, Beijing has stepped up its mediation efforts. Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s visits to Naypyidaw, and Chinese envoy Deng Xijun’s attendance at junta-hosted peace forums, signal a shift from non-interference to strategic engagement. China has pressured ethnic factions to negotiate ceasefires and return seized territory, notably influencing the MNDAA’s withdrawal from Lashio.

 

These moves are not driven by humanitarian concern. They are calculated efforts to protect Chinese investments and ensure uninterrupted progress on BRI projects. The junta’s weakening control has forced Beijing to balance support for the regime with pragmatic outreach to its opponents. Mediation, in this context, is a tool for entrenching influence—not resolving conflict.

 

China’s push for stability in Myanmar reveals a broader pattern: peace is instrumentalised. Dialogue becomes a means to secure infrastructure, extract resources, and project power. The rhetoric of harmony masks a transactional reality—where mediation serves Beijing’s long-term strategic calculus.

 

For Myanmar, the implications are stark. Accepting Chinese mediation without scrutiny risks deepening dependency and eroding sovereignty. Peace, repurposed as a corridor for pipelines and railways, may offer calm—but not justice.

 

 

logo.jpg.f4401beb8e46ea06b85c12f0d10d7f9a.jpg

-2025-08-22

ThaiVisa, c'est aussi en français

ThaiVisa, it's also in French

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...