2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You are not educated enough to understand the laws of thermodynamics, which drive both climate change (first law0 and global warming ( second law).

 

I am nobody's pet scientist.

So what will the average temperature be next year?

19 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

What's your degree?

I've got science and education!

IMO it did not take very well, when you are expressing the views that you do.

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You are not educated enough to understand

Seeing as you are "educated enough" perhaps you can explain how the climate during the age of dinosaurs was much warmer and had much more C02 in the atmosphere ?  

7 minutes ago, johng said:

Seeing as you are "educated enough" perhaps you can explain how the climate during the age of dinosaurs was much warmer and had much more C02 in the atmosphere ?  

The climate has been fluctuating for eons, in ways that humans have yet to completely understand and measure, so instead of using real world observations these pseudo agenda based “scientists” that are sell-outs resort to computer models that are commonly manipulated that incite hysterics.

Nobody has explained the 1998 to 2016 pause in warming. 

7 minutes ago, johng said:

Seeing as you are "educated enough" perhaps you can explain how the climate during the age of dinosaurs was much warmer and had much more C02 in the atmosphere ?  

Just ask the question of an AI vehicle:

 

"By what mechanism does CO2 contribute to global warming?"

 

In parliaments, your question would be dubbed a Dorothy Dixer.

2 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Nobody has explained the 1998 to 2016 pause in warming. 

You don't know ice cools its surroundings as it melts?

 

Check out what has happened to the Greenland ice cap and Larsen ice shelf in the time frame you posted.

35 minutes ago, impulse said:

Not since WaPo screwed up and published this:

 

 

Here's my favorite part:

 

 

As if they had V8 Chevies 250 million years ago...

 

It is not contradictory of course to say climate has varied widely due to a range of factors over time and that man made climate change is a key factor affecting us now.

It is also not correct to say if it was much hotter before that returning to that level of heat in a totally different world should be no issue. 

So not sure what is your point. 

12 minutes ago, novacova said:

The climate has been fluctuating for eons, in ways that humans have yet to completely understand and measure, so instead of using real world observations these pseudo agenda based “scientists” that are sell-outs resort to computer models that are commonly manipulated that incite hysterics.

The increase in CO2 levels from 280 ppm for about 10,000 years, to 425 ppm in just 300 years of human activity, is not a model. It's a fact.

 

CO2 absorbs solar radiation, and re-radiates it in the infra-red spectrum as heat. Another fact.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

What's your degree?

I've got science and education!

What sort of degree? Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.), Master of Science (M.Sc.), Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), ........ 

26 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

The increase in CO2 levels from 280 ppm for about 10,000 years, to 425 ppm in just 300 years of human activity, is not a model. It's a fact.

 

CO2 absorbs solar radiation, and re-radiates it in the infra-red spectrum as heat. Another fact.

Yet the weather is good not bad

 

47 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

The increase in CO2 levels from 280 ppm for about 10,000 years, to 425 ppm in just 300 years of human activity, is not a model. It's a fact.

 

CO2 absorbs solar radiation, and re-radiates it in the infra-red spectrum as heat. Another fact.

Yeah so what, have anything new? Climate is not a linear or static phenomena. It’s a system of non-static nonlinear complexities. Non-linearity is an inherent phenomenon of the complexities of climate. Pseudo climate science attempts to explain climate in a linear manner in order to force their research to a result that correlates humans being solely responsible for climate doomsday scenarios. Yet these pseudo quack scientists have not in any way shape or form PROVEN that humans are responsible for the climate phenomena that is happening which isn’t anything new on the grand scale of history, just a correlation to get folks like you all riled up.  

2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Does anyone still believe these lefty new world order predictions of doom?

Regularly spewed out by their pet scientists?

Yeah, because nothing says 'lefty conspiracy' like a peer-reviewed study in Nature linking ExxonMobil's emissions to making 213 real heat waves—like the ones killing thousands in India and Europe—up to 200x more likely. Top 14 polluters alone drove half the extra scorch. Not predictions; math from climate models that even oil companies' own scientists nailed decades ago.

Yours is classic dismissal: it waves away evidence as partisan conspiracy while ignoring the data.

2 hours ago, JayClay said:

 

Yes. Those of us who will be alive long enough to have to deal with the consequences are extremely concerned.

You’re so doomed you might as well give up. 

Scientist told us that we would reach peak oil in the year 2000.  

 

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618303207

1 hour ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

It is not contradictory of course to say climate has varied widely due to a range of factors over time and that man made climate change is a key factor affecting us now.

It is also not correct to say if it was much hotter before that returning to that level of heat in a totally different world should be no issue. 

So not sure what is your point. 

 

My point is that the climate has been changing for billions of years.  Long before industry.  It will continue changing, and the best thing we can do is be ready with strong economies, plenty of energy, and plants and critters that are bred to survive and feed us.

 

17 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Yeah, because nothing says 'lefty conspiracy' like a peer-reviewed study in Nature linking ExxonMobil's emissions to making 213 real heat waves—like the ones killing thousands in India and Europe—up to 200x more likely. Top 14 polluters alone drove half the extra scorch. Not predictions; math from climate models that even oil companies' own scientists nailed decades ago.

Yours is classic dismissal: it waves away evidence as partisan conspiracy while ignoring the data.

Stop using electronics then.

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

Just ask the question of an AI vehicle:

Perhaps I already did  but it didn't answer my question  and I have no idea what a Dorothy Dixer is...  is it another AI construct /hallucination ?

2 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

So what will the average temperature be next year?

In Thailand it will be hot, then hot and wet.

11 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

In Thailand it will be hot, then hot and wet.

They say Thailand has three seasons  so you "forgot" the 

bloody hot and sweaty season 😋

3 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

These guys lie all the time.

Just like you on AN!