15 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Keep him. 

 

 

We don't want him ,we got enough foreign provocateurs that are a National Security risks.

 

I couldn't find a news source  that didn't say he was "abducted" instead of "Detained" by ICE Enforcement until I came across the TimesofIndia.

 

Why was Hamdi Detained:

"According to RAIR Foundation USA,Hamdi has repeatedly praised attacks  carried out by Hamas,including the Oct. 7th massacre that killed 1200 civilians. He described the hostage taking  as "victorious and merciful" and publicly glorified the operation.

DHS officials said that such actions qualify as espousing terrorist activity and demonstrated a clear alignment with a US foreign terrorist organization".
 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/who-is-sami-hamdi-muslim-journalist-detained-by-ice-at-san-francisco-airport/articleshow/124834793.cms

 

4 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

“Propaganda”? No — that’s documented Nazi history. The SA beat Jews, ran Dachau, torched synagogues, and burned 25,000 books (USHMM, Yad Vashem, Nuremberg). ICE seized 27,000 lbs of fentanyl, rescued 1,100 trafficking victims, and arrested 1,800 cartel members (DHS, ICE 2025). Equating border cops with death-camp architects isn’t “criticism” — it’s Holocaust trivialization. You don’t get to invoke Auschwitz, then cry “propaganda” when the facts hit back. Stop dishonoring the dead. Start facing the truth.

Prove me wrong!!

Brilliantly transcribed, thank you. 

Some people are so blinded by hate that they refuse to open their eyes.

19 hours ago, Slowhand225 said:

I approve of this.

Free speech doesn't mean free of consequences.
He's not a native American so both his citizenship and place in America are in jeopardy, as it should be

 

 

Why should his British citizenship be in jeopardy? America has no power over taking away his British citizenship.

 

So I suspect you are in full approval of certain American commentators being banned from setting foot in the UK, people like Stephen Black, Erich Gliebe, the late Fred Phelps, Michael Savage, Mark Weber, Jerry Vlasak, Edward Snowden, Richard Spencer. So in general, you would disagree with the views of your Vice President, and think its right for the UK to repress free speech.

4 hours ago, riclag said:

Brilliantly transcribed, thank you. 

Some people are so blinded by hate that they refuse to open their eyes.

 

Please change your avatar. You are not an Englishman. You continually express values contrary to those of the Englishman. You are insulting a whole nation. Why are you not proud of your own flag?

 

If you refuse, I would assume you are a forum troll.

15 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

Can you give me one example of the  ‘terrorist supporting garbage’ that he spouted? 

 

A trivial search turns up numerous examples. Here are a couple.

 

“We are pitying a people who brought a huge victory since 1948. Don’t pity them, they don’t want your pity. Celebrate the victory."

“How many of you felt it in your hearts when you got the news that it happened? How many of you felt the euphoria? Allahu Akbari!”

 

https://nypost.com/2025/10/27/us-news/us-detains-british-commentator-sam-hamdi-who-celebrated-hamas-oct-7-attack-on-israel/

https://rairfoundation.substack.com/p/national-security-threat-dhs-must

12 hours ago, Peter Crow said:

Well, easy since you don't know what you are talking about. First I referred to SA with a good reason. While they were involved in the harassement of jews and opponents, they were exterminated by the SS during the Night of the Long Knives (June 30 to July 2, 1934. It was the SS, under Reinhard Heydrich who run the extermination camps. So your stupid hyperbole isn't even historically founded. As a Jew I know that part of the history quite well and I am fascinated by the similarities of events of 90 years ago. It is all so eerily reminiscent, and the mercenaries hastily recruited by ICE amongst a population full of hatred have exactly the profile of Röhm's Brown Shirts.

 

And by the way, there were probably a few criminals amongst the Jews beaten by the SA just as there were a few Narcos amongst the tens of thousands of innocent immigrants whose lives have been destroyed by ICE.

 

 

 

Your “Night of the Long Knives” excuse is Holocaust revisionism dressed as history.

The SA didn’t vanish in 1934 — the purge killed 85–200 leaders (mostly Röhm’s inner circle) as a calculated power grab to appease the German Army. The SA continued (3 million members demoted, not dissolved) and kept terrorizing Jews, socialists, and gays until 1945.

Pre-purge SA crimes:

1933: Ran Dachau (first concentration camp), boycotted Jewish shops, beat civilians in the streets.

1938: Orchestrated Kristallnacht — 91 Jews murdered, 30,000 arrested, 267 synagogues burned.

Your deflection (“SS took over”) doesn’t erase SA’s role — it enabled the Final Solution.

2. ICE ≠ “Röhm’s Brown Shirts” — that’s a vile, fact-free smear.

ICE agents: Sworn federal officers, background-checked, trained at FLETC, rescue victims (1,100+ trafficking survivors in 2025, including 27 victims — 10 children — from a Nebraska ring in August).

SA profile: Unemployed thugs, street fighters, recruited for violence — no training, no oversight, no mission to save lives.

“Mercenaries full of hatred”? False. ICE’s 2025 stats: 60% of detainees have criminal records; 27,000 lbs fentanyl seized; 1,800 cartel arrests in Operation Plaza Spike.

3. “A few criminals among Jews” = victim-blaming the Shoah.

SA didn’t target “criminals” — they targeted doctors, teachers, shopkeepers for being Jewish. 400+ suicides by 1935 from despair.

ICE targets lawbreakers — due process, hearings, appeals — not ethnic cleansing.

Equating narcos with Holocaust victims? That’s moral rot.

**4. As a Jew “fascinated” by “eerie similarities”? That’s dangerous trivialization.

Holocaust scholars (ADL, Yad Vashem) warn: Nazi analogies desensitize — make real fascism harder to spot.

Your rhetoric cheapens the 6 million for a political jab at border security.

Honor the dead: Stop weaponizing their suffering.
ICE saves lives. SA took them. 

1 hour ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Your “Night of the Long Knives” excuse is Holocaust revisionism dressed as history.

The SA didn’t vanish in 1934 — the purge killed 85–200 leaders (mostly Röhm’s inner circle) as a calculated power grab to appease the German Army. The SA continued (3 million members demoted, not dissolved) and kept terrorizing Jews, socialists, and gays until 1945.

Pre-purge SA crimes:

1933: Ran Dachau (first concentration camp), boycotted Jewish shops, beat civilians in the streets.

1938: Orchestrated Kristallnacht — 91 Jews murdered, 30,000 arrested, 267 synagogues burned.

Your deflection (“SS took over”) doesn’t erase SA’s role — it enabled the Final Solution.

2. ICE ≠ “Röhm’s Brown Shirts” — that’s a vile, fact-free smear.

ICE agents: Sworn federal officers, background-checked, trained at FLETC, rescue victims (1,100+ trafficking survivors in 2025, including 27 victims — 10 children — from a Nebraska ring in August).

SA profile: Unemployed thugs, street fighters, recruited for violence — no training, no oversight, no mission to save lives.

“Mercenaries full of hatred”? False. ICE’s 2025 stats: 60% of detainees have criminal records; 27,000 lbs fentanyl seized; 1,800 cartel arrests in Operation Plaza Spike.

3. “A few criminals among Jews” = victim-blaming the Shoah.

SA didn’t target “criminals” — they targeted doctors, teachers, shopkeepers for being Jewish. 400+ suicides by 1935 from despair.

ICE targets lawbreakers — due process, hearings, appeals — not ethnic cleansing.

Equating narcos with Holocaust victims? That’s moral rot.

**4. As a Jew “fascinated” by “eerie similarities”? That’s dangerus trivialization.

Holocaust scholars (ADL, Yad Vashem) warn: Nazi analogies desensitize — make real fascism harder to spot.

Your rhetoric cheapens the 6 million for a political jab at border security.

Honor the dead: Stop weaponizing their suffering.
ICE saves lives. SA took them. 

Propaganda nonsense.

7 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

 

 

Why should his British citizenship be in jeopardy? America has no power over taking away his British citizenship.

 

So I suspect you are in full approval of certain American commentators being banned from setting foot in the UK, people like Stephen Black, Erich Gliebe, the late Fred Phelps, Michael Savage, Mark Weber, Jerry Vlasak, Edward Snowden, Richard Spencer. So in general, you would disagree with the views of your Vice President, and think its right for the UK to repress free speech.

When this story broke, he wasn't British and they said he was a naturalized American, so my comment about his citizenship.

I'd never heard of him before so he couldn't be too important and it turns out, he isn't.

Now they are telling you he's british. BFD, I don't care where he's from. We revoked his visa and he's gone. Thats all I care about.

I think you can refuse entry to anyone you want, again, I don't care. 

22 hours ago, Peter Crow said:

You can shove those up somewhere of your choice, I am a free man and will never set foot in the US again. 

 

ICE ≡ SA

 

SA?

1 hour ago, philipsharpe said:

SA?

Sturm Abteilung 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

 

Combo of ICE and the January 6 creeps, who had their sentences quashed by Taco. I all likelihood some of them "work" with ICE now.

 

4 hours ago, Peter Crow said:

Propaganda nonsense.

“Propaganda nonsense”? No — that’s your lazy dismissal of undeniable history and current facts. You’re not debating; you’re deflecting with a buzzword.

18 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

“Propaganda nonsense”? No — that’s your lazy dismissal of undeniable history and current facts. You’re not debating; you’re deflecting with a buzzword.

Well, I mentioned  the eery resemblance of the currents events and actors with those or the early Third Reich and you come up with ridiculous accusations of negationism; if that isn't a grotesque deflection...

5 hours ago, Peter Crow said:

Well, I mentioned  the eery resemblance of the currents events and actors with those or the early Third Reich and you come up with ridiculous accusations of negationism; if that isn't a grotesque deflection...

“Eerie resemblance”? No — that’s Holocaust inversion, not history. Calling ICE “early Third Reich” isn’t “resemblance” — it’s dangerous distortion that erases the actual genocide. Your “negationism” dodge? Grotesque deflection from your own trivialization.

23 hours ago, Peter Crow said:

Sturm Abteilung 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

 

Combo of ICE and the January 6 creeps, who had their sentences quashed by Taco. I all likelihood some of them "work" with ICE now.

 

Aaaaaaah,so it's part of the rhetoric denoting Nazism to anything/anyone that has differing beliefs and thinking....very edifying,much obliged.

29 minutes ago, philipsharpe said:

Aaaaaaah,so it's part of the rhetoric denoting Nazism to anything/anyone that has differing beliefs and thinking....very edifying,much obliged.

Naahh, only awareness of totalitarianism on the move..

 

Bye.

On 10/27/2025 at 6:29 PM, koolkarl said:

Another kind, honest looking face.  He is part of the propaganda arm of muslims to brainwash weak minds who still believe

the moon is made of cheese.  

 

Similar to those lodge men that meet every year in a cave in Jerusalem and are planning to rebuild the Third Temple ,and are behind the "pandemic" that destroyed the world economy causing so much suffering and misery everywhere. All based in a lie of  a novel virus that was supposedly killing thousands of people even purple frogs and yellow flying pigs. 

On 10/28/2025 at 9:17 PM, Roadsternut said:

 

Please change your avatar. You are not an Englishman. You continually express values contrary to those of the Englishman. You are insulting a whole nation. Why are you not proud of your own flag?

 

If you refuse, I would assume you are a forum troll.

@riclag Don't dear Riclag - you have been here as long as I have and whilst I might disagree with much that you post I would never deign to stymie your freedom to use any avatar of your choosing unlike impertinent arrivistes with an agenda. That's what being English is really about and I welcome you to the club.