20 hours ago, bannork said:

Deviation, John.

Yes the Muslim population is growing fast but they're still a minority by a long way.

Ai-

Following the July 2024 general election, there are a record 25 Muslim MPs in the UK Parliament. They constitute approximately 4% of the total 650 MPs in the House of Commons. 

The Muslim MPs represent different political affiliations: 

• 18 Labour Party MPs

• 4 Independent MPs (several of whom were elected on a pro-Palestinian stance)

• 2 Conservative Party MPs

• 1 Liberal Democrat MP 

Muslims make up about 6.5% of the UK population, meaning they are still underrepresented in Parliament relative to their demographic size.

6.5 percent is more than enough, because Islamists are willing to be violent and confrontational. UKers don't have a similar willingness to resist. Just negotiate the surrender before you're massacred.

Seems like a good time to boycott all USA produce.

2 hours ago, John Drake said:

6.5 percent is more than enough, because Islamists are willing to be violent and confrontational. UKers don't have a similar willingness to resist. Just negotiate the surrender before you're massacred.

Unlike the Irish were ?

Funny. Ana Paulina Luna, the proponent of this legislation, is a right wing republican from a state that has made it a priority to remove from schools any books that even mention the existence of gay people. But an internet venue that is being used to create pornographic images of real live children needs to be defended from being blocked even to the point of disrupting relations between 2 nations. Because gay people bad, child pornography good?

The Europen Union nations are drifting to leftist-woke, excessive feminism, anti-specism or pro-migrant patterns. Obviously the European Union central command, (or the UK in this case), wants to shut down anyplace that allows democratically expressed views that go against the EU's leftist dogma. No wonder people at one point get fed up and end up in voting for Trump or alikes.

26 minutes ago, SingAPorn said:

The Europen Union nations are drifting to leftist-woke, excessive feminism, anti-specism or pro-migrant patterns. Obviously the European Union central command, (or the UK in this case), wants to shut down anyplace that allows democratically expressed views that go against the EU's leftist dogma. No wonder people at one point get fed up and end up in voting for Trump or alikes.

Especially the child pornographers and their fans.

X has radicalised many vulnerable uneducated people. It's no different to terrorists doing it to vulnerable people.

It simply has to go.

I've seen so many racists (mainly Brits) who peddle so much false information, go down rabbit holes of racism that it is really alarming. Even if you point at stats, or show them evidence to the contrary they don't care, because Jerry on twitter said the opposite.

Throw them a ...buoy !

On 1/11/2026 at 1:21 PM, John Drake said:

Simply respond in kind. Recognize that all British internet, television, and news publications are foreign agents and shut them down while cancelling the work visas of all non-US citizens working for them on US territory. Otherwise, the UK should do what the UK wants to do. If it wants to block X or any other platform from operating inside its borders, go ahead and so so. Any attempt, however, to extend UK law into US territory should be met with additional financial and trade sanctions.

With the DOJ still sitting on the Epstein files, why is it unsurprising they too are turning a blind eye to the online sexualisation of women and children? These images are being created by sick people who have been encouraged by the world's richest man, through his stated wish for Grok users to create NSFW and 'unhinged' content. This is the same guy who has vowed to provide instantaneous internet to every corner of the world, while contributing $227 million to Trump's election campaign.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/09/grok-undressing-women-children-us-action

6 hours ago, NanLaew said:

...and convenience stores and Indian takeaways.

Who started this nonsense?

The guys screeching Allahu akhbar while strapping bombs on children?

Guys like Starmer rise to the pinnacle of public life and become a leader of a country - and then whine and cry because the peasants have the cheek to ridicule their all-powerful "leadership" with "mean-tweets." These people are clowns and jesters. They deserve the ridicule. If you can't stand the heat, then don't get near the fire. You people choose to be public figures so you can enjoy the "power" that comes with the life of a so-called "leader." Whining about "mean-tweets is simply pathetic.

Baiting post removed.

3 hours ago, connda said:

Guys like Starmer rise to the pinnacle of public life and become a leader of a country - and then whine and cry because the peasants have the cheek to ridicule their all-powerful "leadership" with "mean-tweets." These people are clowns and jesters. They deserve the ridicule. If you can't stand the heat, then don't get near the fire. You people choose to be public figures so you can enjoy the "power" that comes with the life of a so-called "leader." Whining about "mean-tweets is simply pathetic.

Starmer and the British government are protesting about the porn peddled by Musk on X.

5 hours ago, connda said:

Guys like Starmer rise to the pinnacle of public life and become a leader of a country - and then whine and cry because the peasants have the cheek to ridicule their all-powerful "leadership" with "mean-tweets." These people are clowns and jesters. They deserve the ridicule. If you can't stand the heat, then don't get near the fire. You people choose to be public figures so you can enjoy the "power" that comes with the life of a so-called "leader." Whining about "mean-tweets is simply pathetic.

Agree with you to some extent, but that's not related to the issue at hand.

10 hours ago, Yagoda said:

The guys screeching Allahu akhbar while strapping bombs on children?

When did this happen? Did Chris the bot from India tell you this?

8 hours ago, connda said:

Guys like Starmer rise to the pinnacle of public life and become a leader of a country - and then whine and cry because the peasants have the cheek to ridicule their all-powerful "leadership" with "mean-tweets." These people are clowns and jesters. They deserve the ridicule. If you can't stand the heat, then don't get near the fire. You people choose to be public figures so you can enjoy the "power" that comes with the life of a so-called "leader." Whining about "mean-tweets is simply pathetic.

No one has been locked up for mean tweets.

The lass that was locked up was locked up for inciting violence, including setting fire to a hotel that families in it. If she had written the same message in Thailand or America she would have got done too.

Secondly, Starmer didn't come from a privileged background. He rose up to become the top of his profession in the law field. Whilst, you can ackowledge he may not be doing the best job, you cannot dismantle his decency compared to the sheer corruption of the last lot (other than getting free specs and some football match tickets).

Thirdly, you do have a rite to free speech in the UK. I would say there is more free speech in the UK than America (where they ban you from entering the country if you write mean stuff about them on social media, or deporting people who have protested against Isreal on university grounds etc). There is definately more free speech in the UK than Thailand - and you know this, as you would dare not attack a Thai or other institutes in Thailand, because the consequences would be dire.

What you don't have is the rite to discriminate someone because of their colour of their skin, race, sex, or sexual orientation. I for one welcome a tolerent society that has those protections. Even in Thailand they have these protections.

Instead you are getting carried away by bots from India, some rancid politicians and career minded self serving right wing racists (sitting on a beach in the muslim country of Dubai) telling you there is no free speech in the UK and that the immigrants are out to get you. It's called radicalising thick vulnerable people.

18 minutes ago, DonniePeverley said:

When did this happen? Did Chris the bot from India tell you this?

I thought you were Chris the Bot.