Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Threatens Tariffs on Nations Rejecting Greenland Takeover

Featured Replies

42 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

Didn't trump reach an trade agreement with the EU back in August 2025?

Joint Statement on a United States-European Union Framework on an Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/08/joint-statement-on-a-united-states-european-union-framework-on-an-agreement-on-reciprocal-fair-and-balanced-trade/

Fact Sheet: The United States and European Union Reach Massive Trade Deal

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/07/fact-sheet-the-united-states-and-european-union-reach-massive-trade-deal/

So that lasted what, six-ish months?

Not even. The EU meeting on this trade deal was supposed to happen this week.

  • Replies 202
  • Views 7.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    What’s not to hate?

  • ronnie50
    ronnie50

    How is this any different from local mafia/thugs demanding 'protection money' from the local baker or bar owner, with threats against his business if he doesn't comply? It's not different of course. I

  • JBChiangRai
    JBChiangRai

    The world has mishandled Trump's Tariffs. There is only one way to deal with a bully.

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

The US has tried to acquire Greenland for strategic reasons numerous times over the last 100-150 years, but all the sudden it is somehow ridiculous.

  • Popular Post
12 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The US has tried to acquire Greenland for strategic reasons numerous times over the last 100-150 years, but all the sudden it is somehow ridiculous.

Is this meant to be some sort of justification for Trump's actions?

On each previous occasion the US's approaches have been rebuffed. Each of these previous administrations may well have been mightily cheesed off with the outcome but, to the best of my knowledge, none of them stated that they would apply tariffs to all those who supported the decision or threaten an invasion of Greenland as a result of the refusal: There's the difference.

7 minutes ago, RayC said:

Is this meant to be some sort of justification for Trump's actions?

On each previous occasion the US's approaches have been rebuffed. Each of these previous administrations may well have been mightily cheesed off with the outcome but, to the best of my knowledge, none of them stated that they would apply tariffs to all those who supported the decision or threaten an invasion of Greenland as a result of the refusal: There's the difference.

To the best of your knowledge. Your honesty is refreshing here,

  • Popular Post
15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

To the best of your knowledge. Your honesty is refreshing here,

Congratulations. One of the most outstanding examples of evasion I have seen in this forum.

So can you point to any previous US administrations threatening tariffs or force against Greenland, Denmark or their supporters as a result of a US approach to buy Greenland being rejected?

1 hour ago, bamnutsak said:

Didn't trump reach an trade agreement with the EU back in August 2025?

No, in fact I don't believe trump has closed any trade deals.

All he has is announcements of pending somethings, or a signed "framework" agreement agreeing to agree to agree on further negotiations to agree on another potential agreement.

"The United States and the European Union are pleased to announce that they have agreed on a Framework on an Agreement..."

  • Popular Post
On 1/16/2026 at 10:27 PM, dinsdale said:

I wonder how this thread will go? "I may do that" and no actual nations mentioned. This is simply Trump doing what Trump does. Threatening a possibility. Fairly sure this won't stop the tirade of Trump hate that will fill the comments on this thread.

So this comment has aged well (given that Trump has already announced the tariffs, and when they will be implemented).

  • Popular Post
27 minutes ago, RayC said:

Congratulations. One of the most outstanding examples of evasion I have seen in this forum.

So can you point to any previous US administrations threatening tariffs or force against Greenland, Denmark or their supporters as a result of a US approach to buy Greenland being rejected?

No, but I, like you, don't know that they haven't.

It seems a lot of people seem to believe that the US wanting to acquire Greenland is just some ridiculous Trump idea, when in fact, the US has tried to acquire Greenland for strategic reasons numerous times over the last 100-150 years.

13 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

When it comes to intelligence, and just being a decent human being, both Harris and AOC run rings around you. That’s why sad and petty little men like you hate them so much, because you just can’t stand it that there are strong women who are superior to you in every possible way.

do you feel better after your little rant snowflake ? talk about triggered lol..

8 hours ago, John Drake said:

Frankly, if Harris were in office, right now those of us in Thailand would be getting 35 or 36 or maybe even 37 baht to the dollar. She would have made my life tangibly better.

Well i reckon anybody with such excellent financial forecasting powers, would be rolling in money anyway, or at least be able to mitigate fluctuations in the exchange rate , What went wrong for you

8 hours ago, John Drake said:

Yes, AOC is an opportunistic narcissist as well. But put her up against Trump and she looks like Thomas Jefferson. I supported DeSantis and later came to endorse first Biden and then Harris, because I think Trump is corrupt and incompetent. Frankly, if Harris were in office, right now those of us in Thailand would be getting 35 or 36 or maybe even 37 baht to the dollar. She would have made my life tangibly better.

And people in the US would be paying $6 a gallon for gasoline, there'd be another two million illegal aliens in the country, taxes would be up, there'd be men in girls showers, trans in the military and another 10% increase in the number of government employees.

Personally, what I will save in taxes, and how the market has grown outweighs what I might lose on the rate in the event I need to transfer more money to Thailand.

As it stands, the 8% currency change has been a net benefit for me,

  • Popular Post

Man alive, this is delicious. The bootlickers have been stomped on by the boot. And they revolt. Mightily. France is sending 15 soldiers to defend Greenland, UK one, Germany 7, ... You can't make this up.

Here's a suggestion, Europe. The Warsaw Pact is defunct but not dead. Relevant docs will be in file cabinets in Moscow and Berlin. Dust them out, sign and ask to join. Now that the Ukraine war's winding down Putin's got more than enough weaponry to help defend Europe.

Russian nuclear subs off the coast of Greenland will keep the US navy away. And ringing the island with S-500 batteries will scare off B-52s. Think about it.

  • Popular Post

Greenland issue resolved.

image.png

  • Popular Post
32 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Greenland issue resolved.

image.png

Wouldn't that be a relief.. The white polar bears helping saving our world 🤣

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

No, but I, like you, don't know that they haven't.

The burden of proof is on you to prove a premise not me to disprove it.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

It seems a lot of people seem to believe that the US wanting to acquire Greenland is just some ridiculous Trump idea, when in fact, the US has tried to acquire Greenland for strategic reasons numerous times over the last 100-150 years.

Whether Trump is the first US President or not to have desires on Greenland is irrelevant. He is to repeat - to the best of both our collective knowledge - the only President to threaten financial sanctions against Greenland, Denmark and their supporters and the prospect of the use of force to obtain Greenland.

Many have condemned this behaviour. You appear unable and/or unwilling to do the same.

34 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Greenland issue resolved.

image.png

Tastes like chicken!

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

And people in the US would be paying $6 a gallon for gasoline, there'd be another two million illegal aliens in the country, taxes would be up, there'd be men in girls showers, trans in the military and another 10% increase in the number of government employees.

Personally, what I will save in taxes, and how the market has grown outweighs what I might lose on the rate in the event I need to transfer more money to Thailand.

As it stands, the 8% currency change has been a net benefit for me,

Another Yank who has no idea that he is being conned by trump who is paying for trumps tarriffs the yanks are !!!

Tarriffs are taxes Tariffs are 'excise taxes' a tax imposed on a particular type of good. Tariffs are taxes on consumers in very like the same way that a tax on cars are a tax on consumers. Yes, the car dealership might be the entity required to remit the tax to the government, but the result of the tax is that car prices are higher. So consumers will end up 'paying' some of the tax. Car prices generally won't go up by the full amount of a car tax, but they will go up by some amount. The amount that prices go up by, as a percentage of the tax, is the 'tax burden' on the consumer.

you will not be saving Taxes you will pay more

12 hours ago, RayC said:

What should Europe do in response to this latest threat?

An economic response will be needed but, perhaps the most telling action would be a co-ordinated boycott of the forthcoming World Cup. 16 of the 48 sides will be European (most of whom are members of either the EU, EEA or NATO). From a sporting perspective, the tournament would lose all credibility. Although I doubt that will bother Trump (or many Americans?), the cancellations and negative effect on the local US economies might.

It's unfortunate that the other hosts Canada and Mexico will also suffer from a boycott, but if they plus the likes of Australia and NZ could be persuaded to withdraw even better. Argentina will take part come what may but, again, if Brazil - a very big fish in footballing terms - and other central/ South American sides withdrew, then it is difficult to see how even a truncated tournament could be held. This would obviously be a complete embarrassment and loss of face for Trump, something that he would hate.

Unfortunately, getting nations to agree to a mass boycott, especially given the relatively short timescale, won't be easy. In addition, even if the governments agree to such a boycott, there is no guarantee that some of the individual national football associations will not send a team.

However despite these obstacles, I'd still give a try.

The biggest sporting event, by far, in the world. You're having a laff..

2 hours ago, RayC said:

The burden of proof is on you to prove a premise not me to disprove it.

Whether Trump is the first US President or not to have desires on Greenland is irrelevant. He is to repeat - to the best of both our collective knowledge - the only President to threaten financial sanctions against Greenland, Denmark and their supporters and the prospect of the use of force to obtain Greenland.

Many have condemned this behaviour. You appear unable and/or unwilling to do the same.

Not nearly as bad as Bush, starting fake wars in Iraq.

Or Nixon, or Obama for that matter, and definitely Biden and Clinton.

56 minutes ago, JimCM said:

The biggest sporting event, by far, in the world. You're having a laff..

Whats to laugh at ?

  • Popular Post
10 hours ago, jimmybcool said:

Problem with that is if the US economy crashes (which it might if the bonds don't sell) the rest of the world follows suit.

No, the rest of the world keep trading with each other, your country isn't that important anymore.

  • Popular Post
10 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

do you feel better after your little rant snowflake ? talk about triggered lol..

If you want to talk about rants and being triggered, let me remind you of your original post:

"Alexandria Ocasio Cortez ... Some gobby leftist democrat bint who is even more stupid and annoying than cackling Kamala Highly unlikely she would ever be a presidential candidate unless the democrats want to lose again"

11 hours ago, BerndD said:

Wrong; that's currently this week and gold-blond Donnie will not like it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–Mercosur_Association_Agreement

My post was correct. The meeting was supposed to happen this week. Your correction and link are not related to my post.

10 hours ago, RayC said:

The burden of proof is on you to prove a premise not me to disprove it.

Whether Trump is the first US President or not to have desires on Greenland is irrelevant. He is to repeat - to the best of both our collective knowledge - the only President to threaten financial sanctions against Greenland, Denmark and their supporters and the prospect of the use of force to obtain Greenland.

Many have condemned this behaviour. You appear unable and/or unwilling to do the same.

You've made that claim twice without supporting it.

Cleary previous administrations have tried to acquired Greenland, the only difference may be the tactics.

10 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

Another Yank who has no idea that he is being conned by trump who is paying for trumps tarriffs the yanks are !!!

Tarriffs are taxes Tariffs are 'excise taxes' a tax imposed on a particular type of good. Tariffs are taxes on consumers in very like the same way that a tax on cars are a tax on consumers. Yes, the car dealership might be the entity required to remit the tax to the government, but the result of the tax is that car prices are higher. So consumers will end up 'paying' some of the tax. Car prices generally won't go up by the full amount of a car tax, but they will go up by some amount. The amount that prices go up by, as a percentage of the tax, is the 'tax burden' on the consumer.

you will not be saving Taxes you will pay more

Tariffs are taxes on consumers the same way that corporate income taxes are taxes on consumers. The difference is that tariffs favor domestic companies and residents, while corporate income taxes favor foreign companies and residents. That's likely why the left hates tariffs but loves corporate income taxes.

Tariffs are not excise taxes.

19 hours ago, John Drake said:

Think there is enough room in the new ballroom for all of them?

 

If not, the ballroom can also be enlarged...

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Tariffs are taxes on consumers the same way that corporate income taxes are taxes on consumers. The difference is that tariffs favor domestic companies and residents, while corporate income taxes favor foreign companies and residents. That's likely why the left hates tariffs but loves corporate income taxes.

Tariffs are not excise taxes.

WRONG!

Tariffs favour domestic manufacturers NOT residents AND NOT domestic importers.

Corporate Income taxes favour foreign manufacturers AND residents AND domestic importers.

Residents pay more with Tariff's and have less choice with slower innovation and often poorer products.

2 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

WRONG!

Tariffs favour domestic manufacturers NOT residents AND NOT domestic importers.

Corporate Income taxes favour foreign manufacturers AND residents AND domestic importers.

Residents pay more with Tariff's and have less choice with slower innovation and often poorer products.

First, there are a lot of companies that benefit and or are punished aside from manufactures.

How does favoring domestic companies not favor residents with more jobs and a bigger tax base.

I am not concerned with domestic importers, as they are just a tax as well.

To be clear, I am generally against both tariffs and corporate income taxes, but I think corporate income taxes are worse. I also think good arguments can be made for both, but to be for one and against the other I think makes one a hypocrite.

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

My post was correct. The meeting was supposed to happen this week. Your correction and link are not related to my post.

Sorry, you're right. Your post referred to the "Turnberry deal" that was supposed to be signed these days, but has now been stopped by the EU because of Donnie's new tariff announcements.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.