The United States government will begin revoking passports from Americans who owe significant amounts of unpaid child support, the US State Department has announced, as authorities seek to strengthen enforcement of existing federal laws.

Get today's headlines by email

Officials said parents with more than $2,500 (€1,844) in outstanding child support obligations could face the loss of their passports, though the policy will primarily target individuals with what the department described as “significant outstanding” debt.

The move expands the use of powers granted under a federal law passed in 1996, which allows the government to deny or revoke passports for individuals who fail to meet their child support responsibilities.

Stronger enforcement of existing law

In a statement, the State Department said the measure is intended to reinforce both the legal and moral responsibility of parents to support their children.

The department said it is deploying “commonsense tools to support American families and strengthen compliance” with US laws governing child support payments.

“This action supports the welfare of American children by exacting real consequences for child support delinquency under existing federal law,” the statement added.

Under the policy, individuals whose passports are revoked will no longer be able to use them for international travel. They will also be ineligible to receive a new passport until their outstanding child support debt has been fully settled.

Authorities urged parents who owe money to arrange payment with the relevant state child support agencies to avoid losing their travel documents.

Change from previous practice

The authority to restrict passports over unpaid child support has existed since the mid-1990s but has rarely been enforced through direct revocation.

Until now, the rule was typically applied when individuals attempted to renew their passports. In such cases, those with qualifying debt could be denied renewal until their payments were brought up to date.

Under the new approach, the State Department will proactively identify individuals who owe substantial amounts and move to revoke their passports even if they are still valid.

Officials said the department will work alongside the US Department of Health and Human Services to locate people with unpaid obligations and enforce the policy.

Impact on travellers abroad

The department did not specify exactly when enforcement would begin. However, the Associated Press reported the new policy could take effect as early as Friday.

Those whose passports are revoked while they are outside the United States may face additional complications. According to the report, affected travellers would need to contact a US embassy or consulate to obtain an emergency travel document that would allow them to return to the country.

Such documents would permit entry back into the US but would not restore full passport privileges until the outstanding debt is cleared.

Officials said the aim of the policy is to ensure stronger compliance with child support obligations and to reinforce existing laws designed to protect the financial wellbeing of children.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 9 May 2026

View full article

This represents yet another instance of fascism from Trump.

I'm all for enforcement of child support obligations, but going after passports is clearly a slippery slope. First they came for the deadbeat Dads ... who's next?

Good idea. Pay for play. Especially, for the kids left behind.

I wonder how many of those people that owe child support

need a passport and go abroad.

A way to remove voter IDs. The states are responsible for enforcing child support, not the feds.

4 hours ago, nick supreme said:

This represents yet another instance of fascism from Trump.

The law was passed in 1996 under Clinton. It was used to deny renewals. As a guy who always paid child support on time it’s about time somebody clamps down on those deadbeats who don’t pay.

8 hours ago, nick supreme said:

This represents yet another instance of fascism from Trump.

"Under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996, the government can deny or revoke passports for parents owing more than $2,500 in child support."

Sorry, an instance of the radical left?

Now make it like Canada where they enforce overseas child support for the deadbeats who abandon their foreign children...

I wonder how this will impact certain communities like "X in Thailand"... 🤣

Seriously though- the ability to travel is a human right and a constitutional right which the government has no authority to revoke based on anything but immediate national security concerns IMO. Child support as it is implemented in the west is a form of slavery - you are obligated to pay thousands of dollars a month or go to jail. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for supporting your children - but the system as it is enacted now basically gives women womb-power to shackle men for 18 years for every baby she pops out, and it doesn't matter if the man actually wanted to be a father or not.

If eligibility for child support was conditional on the father agreeing to have the baby ahead of time, single motherhood rates in the west would drop miraculously...

1 minute ago, PingRoundTheWorld said:

I wonder how this will impact certain communities like "X in Thailand"... 🤣

Seriously though- the ability to travel is a human right and a constitutional right which the government has no authority to revoke based on anything but immediate national security concerns IMO. Child support as it is implemented in the west is a form of slavery - you are obligated to pay thousands of dollars a month or go to jail. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for supporting your children - but the system as it is enacted now basically gives women womb-power to shackle men for 18 years for every baby she pops out, and it doesn't matter if the man actually wanted to be a father or not.

If eligibility for child support was conditional on the father agreeing to have the baby ahead of time, single motherhood rates in the west would drop miraculously...

The right to travel within the country exists but there are limits on crossing borders. The responsibility for supervising child support still lies with the states and any restrictions should be started there.

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I'm all for enforcement of child support obligations, but going after passports is clearly a slippery slope. First they came for the deadbeat Dads ... who's next?

Tax evaders would be my first choice.

1 hour ago, PingRoundTheWorld said:

I wonder how this will impact certain communities like "X in Thailand"... 🤣

Seriously though- the ability to travel is a human right and a constitutional right which the government has no authority to revoke based on anything but immediate national security concerns IMO. Child support as it is implemented in the west is a form of slavery - you are obligated to pay thousands of dollars a month or go to jail. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for supporting your children - but the system as it is enacted now basically gives women womb-power to shackle men for 18 years for every baby she pops out, and it doesn't matter if the man actually wanted to be a father or not.

If eligibility for child support was conditional on the father agreeing to have the baby ahead of time, single motherhood rates in the west would drop miraculously...

Canada cancels passports of persons (fathers) who fail to pay child support. This is done by the revenue depts of the provinces administering the support payments to the passport office in Ottawa.

I think this is a despicable practice. The alleged motive may be to prevent deadbeats fleeing abroad but the effect is to make a person stateless and unable to fulfill immigration requirements in their country of residence.

In too many cases, she got the goldmine and he got the shaft.

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Canada cancels passports of persons (fathers) who fail to pay child support. This is done by the revenue depts of the provinces administering the support payments to the passport office in Ottawa.

I think this is a despicable practice. The alleged motive may be to prevent deadbeats fleeing abroad but the effect is to make a person stateless and unable to fulfill immigration requirements in their country of residence.

In too many cases, she got the goldmine and he got the shaft.

Cancelling a passport doesn’t make the holder stateless.

Edited May 9May 9 by Chomper Higgot

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

I think this is a despicable practice. The alleged motive may be to prevent deadbeats fleeing abroad but the effect is to make a person stateless and unable to fulfill immigration requirements in their country of residence.

Isn't it important for someone to support their child?

I am all for equality

so when will it stop that a man has to pay long life for an ex partner or children

if the other partner also works and in many cases, denies access to those children and brain rot them against the other partner ?

time to invest in some scam to buy another passport from another country then

if they would revoke the passport, I would also revoke from paying taxes