3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Who controls the files?

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted files for four years, yes?

3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Who keeps pushing distractions?

Yes, speculation.

But sometimes 2 + 2 becomes 4.

And Donald has a long history around Epstein, and with young women making complaints and filing charges.

10 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Got it. Because Biden and Obama didn't release anything about Trump, that means there's stuff in there about him

That's how you read it?

1 minute ago, Hummin said:

That's how you read it?

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted files for four years, yes?

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted files for four years, yes?

Biden did not promise something he knew he probably could not legally do. Those files involve investigations, victims, minors, witnesses, privacy, and legal limits.

Trump, on the other hand, throws promises east and west, same as saying he can stop a war with one phone call.

Sounds good on stage. Reality is different.

2 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Biden did not promise something he knew he probably could not legally do. Those files involve investigations, victims, minors, witnesses, privacy, and legal limits.

Trump, on the other hand, throws promises east and west, same as saying he can stop a war with one phone call.

Sounds good on stage. Reality is different.

The Biden DOJ had the files for four years and did not even find anything on Trump they could leak.

6 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Reality is different

Clearly not a place you are in with your Epstein nonsense

14 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

So the real question is will Don or his acolytes say or do anything to try to convince his followers that he's a decent man, that he cares about them, and that he is on the right track?

This statement by Bessent is certainly a major bald-faced lie.

“So, you’re calling President Trump a statesman? You’re saying that he is taking a statesmanlike position, that he has a core belief, and he believes that the most important thing is for Iran never to have a nuclear weapon,” Bessent said at a White House press briefing.

He added: “I believe both things can be true, that we can do well in the midterms and that we, you know, perhaps have the makings of a deal here.”

Trump made the remark at a Cabinet meeting Wednesday, saying about Iran: “They thought they were going to outwait me, you know? We’ll outwait him, he’s got the midterms. I don’t care about the midterms.”

Bessent also acknowledged that the economy “is challenging now.” He said that despite economic headwinds the “unemployment is still low, tax refunds were still high and consumer spending is still quite high.”

“And I’m in constant contact with the banks and every income quintile is still doing well,” Bessent said.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/28/world/live-news/iran-war-us-news

So gang, who do you beleive, a respected businessman like Bessant or an anti Trump america hating personal grudge troll who spends his entire life in a insane bubble of Trump hate?

15 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Clearly not a place you are in with your Epstein nonsense

The irony every time you defend your president amuses me!

18 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The Biden DOJ had the files for four years and did not even find anything on Trump they could leak.

Obviously, they did not "find" this one as they did not leak it! 😂

"Among the newly released materials is an FBI case file (EFTA00020518) dated October 2020 that contains an allegation of rape involving Trump. The document does not identify the source of the allegation, as names and other identifying details have been redacted."

https://time.com/7342332/trump-epstein-files-release-latest-maxwell/

14 minutes ago, Hummin said:

The irony every time you defend your president amuses me!

Why? Simple reality. If you think there is a credible report about Trump and Epstein illegal actions anywhere, then you should probably get some reality tests under the DSM, along with all the beleivers in flat earth, Lizard people, Umbrella ladies, the elders of zion and Green Cheesers, as clearly, the Tristero effect is strong in you, and others.

Trump is your muted horn symbol LOL.

Edited May 29May 29 by Yagoda

28 minutes ago, candide said:

Obviously, they did not "find" this one as they did not leak it! 😂

"Among the newly released materials is an FBI case file (EFTA00020518) dated October 2020 that contains an allegation of rape involving Trump. The document does not identify the source of the allegation, as names and other identifying details have been redacted."

https://time.com/7342332/trump-epstein-files-release-latest-maxwell/

Oh no, some one claimed Trump raped them, and the Biden DOJ ignored it.

Nothing was redacted when the Biden DOJ had the files for four years,

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh no, some one claimed Trump raped them, and the Biden DOJ ignored it.

Nothing was redacted when the Biden DOJ had the files for four years,

Did Biden actually and physically hold the files ? Thats interesting. And the more interesting part the list? First there where a list, and then it was not a list, and then it was a democrat hoax. All confirmed by your president. Talking about Taco

Just now, Hummin said:

Did Biden actually and physically hold the files ? Thats interesting. And the more interesting part the list? First there where a list, and then it was not a list, and then it was a democrat hoax. All confirmed by your president. Talking about Taco

Do you not understand what Biden DOJ means? Hundreds of lawyers combing through the unredacted files for four years looking for dirt on Trump, and they came up with nothing,

You better get back to reading RawStory

17 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you not understand what Biden DOJ means? Hundreds of lawyers combing through the unredacted files for four years looking for dirt on Trump, and they came up with nothing,

You better get back to reading RawStory

How do you know they combed throught the files? You are making stuff up again! 😃

Edited May 29May 29 by candide

6 minutes ago, candide said:

How do you know they combed throught the files? You are making stuff up again! 😃

Yes, the Democrats are so altruistic that they would never consider using the files for political advantage.

1 hour ago, Effective altruism said:

Yes, the Democrats are so altruistic that they would never consider using the files for political advantage.

So you also have nothing.

15 hours ago, Hummin said:

Guess who is not in the files ? Obama and Biden ! Another reason to hate them even more

Larry Sinclair recently passed away.

Ashleys diary was confirmed genuine by the FBI

Im guessing censorship stopped you being adequately informed?

23 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Larry Sinclair recently passed away.

Ashleys diary was confirmed genuine by the FBI

Im guessing censorship stopped you being adequately informed?

You are jumping to another subject because Obama and Biden are not in the Epstein material the same way Trump keeps appearing around Epstein.

2 hours ago, Hummin said:

You are jumping to another subject because Obama and Biden are not in the Epstein material the same way Trump keeps appearing around Epstein.

There is nothing incriminating about Trump in the files. They hated each other to the extent democrats COLLUDED WITH A PEDO to try nailing Trump(Plaskett fiasco).

Epstein was buddies with globalists and the douche illuminati. 99.9% democrats and lefties.

Trump likes pornstars and slutty looking women with giant hooters(Amen sir!😅)

It feels like Im explaining where milk comes from to a toddler. But I suspect you know the files were a bust for Trump haters, just like every other narrative that they embraced which turned to brown stuff.

13 hours ago, candide said:

How do you know they combed throught the files? You are making stuff up again! 😃

The Biden DOJ had hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of investigative records. What would they be doing if not combing through the files?

Would that not have been their job?

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

The Biden DOJ had hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of investigative records. What would they be doing if not combing through the files?

Would that not have been their job?

What files did they comb? Do you have evidence they combed the Epstein files?! You have nothing! 😃

Edited May 30May 30 by candide

8 minutes ago, candide said:

What files did they comb? Do you have evidence they combed the Epstein files?! You have nothing! 😃

Is it your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records?

Or is it that they did not use a comb?

I am unclear if you are joking.

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Is it your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records?

Or is it that they did not use a comb?

I am unclear if you are joking.

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Is it your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records?

Or is it that they did not use a comb?

I am unclear if you are joking.

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Is it your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records?

Or is it that they did not use a comb?

I am unclear if you are joking.

Lol! You claiming that they did, without being able to show any evidence. You still have nothing! 😃

Edited May 30May 30 by candide

3 minutes ago, candide said:

Lol! You claiming that they did, without being able to show any evidence. 😃

Is it your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records?

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Is it your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records?

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Is it your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records?

My position is that you have no evidence that they did. You are making that up !

The only evidence we have is what they did not do: they did not leak juicy details such as the birthday postcard, the rape accusation, etc... They could have done a Giuliani and leak them shortly before the election to selected media.

Are you claiming that they combed the files, but did not leak anything detrimental to Trump. for ethical reasons? 😃

1 minute ago, candide said:

My position is that you have no evidence that they did. You are making that up !

The only evidence we have is what they did not do: they did not leak juicy details such as the birthday postcard, the rape accusation, etc... They could have done a Giuliani and leak them shortly before the election to selected media.

Are you claiming that they combed the files, but did not leak anything detrimental to Trump. for ethical reasons? 😃

So, it is your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records, correct?

They either did or did not. I say they did.

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, it is your position that the Biden DOJ did not have hundreds of lawyers and FBI analysts assigned to review and redact millions of pages of the Epstein investigative records, correct?

They either did or did not. I say they did.

You either have evidence to support your claim, or you don't. You don't! 😄

6 minutes ago, candide said:

You either have evidence to support your claim, or you don't. You don't! 😄

You are not able to answer a simple question.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You are not able to answer a simple question.

Why should I? You are just trying to distract attention from the fact that you have have nothing to support your claim!

Edited May 30May 30 by candide