55 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

$24 billion? More like $240 Billion. In fact, they need large cargo ships to handle all the cash he'll give Iran.

Total and utter humiliation.

I see reports where a $24 Billion is from UAE. I heard already sent. All though denied.

https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/middle-east/the-gulf/artc-report-uae-agrees-to-release-billions-of-dollars-to-iran-in-bid-to-halt-attacks

No Tommy, they won't, because you can't be a MAGA fanboy without being a total hypocrite. It's just not possible.

Is 40th the charm? Will it finally happen? Has trump bent over far enough and spread his cheeks wide enough for all the mullahs to have a proper go?

Time will tell.

Well, even though this will become the greatest humiliation in US history at least Trump is setting records.

Every cloud has a silver lining.

4 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

...yes the world is going to hell cuz bonespurs

You finally get it. Amazing.

5 hours ago, stevenl said:

5 hours ago, potless said:

I think it will be an ongoing issue for as long as a repressive religion based regime is in power in Iran. Would anyone trust what they say?

It looks like the US is tearing up or simply ignoring agreements. What makes you think iran can not be trusted, implying the US sticks to its word?

I am not implying that the US sticks to its word. Are you implying that Iran can be trusted to stick to its word? Of the two, I trust Iran less. Its a mess.

4 minutes ago, potless said:

I am not implying that the US sticks to its word. Are you implying that Iran can be trusted to stick to its word? Of the two, I trust Iran less. Its a mess.

Before Trump I would have agreed. But now the US is less trustworthy than Iran, and it's not even close. Here is a small sample of why that is.

Edited June 13Jun 13 by BLMFem

5 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Before Trump I would have agreed. But now the US is less trustworthy than Iran, and it's not even close. Here is a small sample of why that is.

Yes, I am aware of these constant dubious announcements and contradictions. For the most part, I take no notice. Heard it all before. I blame the democrats. If they had voted to elect Trump instead of Biden, Trump would be gone by now.🙂

Here is clear proof that Iran is now more trustworthy than the US. The US president, probably realizing that his constant TACOs have made people ignore his claims, is reposting messages from the Iranian FM to make himself more believable.🤣

Remember trump and MAGA wailing and weeping because President Obama was negotiating and lifting some sanctions on Iran?

The cult of hypocrisy.

https://archive.ph/GXpzK

This makes perfect sense, and I think all governments around the world that have to deal with trump are secretly doing the same.

Macron, Starmer, Merz, Zelenskyy, Putin, they're all doing it. 100%.

3 hours ago, potless said:

I am not implying that the US sticks to its word. Are you implying that Iran can be trusted to stick to its word? Of the two, I trust Iran less. Its a mess.

Complaining about Iran being untrustworthy in a deal with the US, implies that the US is more trustworthy. Recent history shows otherwise, ignoring that doesn't make it less of a fact.

On 6/12/2026 at 8:49 PM, BLMFem said:

Have a lie-down, Sunny. You're not making any sense at all, bud.

Seriously.

Pot calling 5555555

11 hours ago, potless said:

As best as I can tell, the main flaw with the much mentioned Obama deal was 15 years of limited enrichment. After that, then what? I would not trust Iran to comply with anything unless it really suited them.

It's best just to let Iran have some nukes just like Israel, and it will act as a deterrent for Israeli and American aggression.

I've always been one to question the narrative and in this particular case I don't think it was about nuclear enrichment at all. I think it was about world banking and the fact that Iran completely refused to play the game, supported BRICS, and supplied most of China's oil. That is a far more likely narrative if one is actually seeking the truth.

12 hours ago, worgeordie said:

Trump 🤡 is the loser , he will agree to anything to get him out of this illegal war,

give them some money too ,although he criticized Obama for doing that. if he

does not change his mind , it will leave him free to start another war with Cuba.

regards Worgeordie

you will be proven wrong, again

12 hours ago, BLMFem said:

I, and basically the entire rest of the world, trusted the control mechanisms set in place to make sure Iran stuck to the deal they made with President Obama, and we were never proven wrong.

Then, of course, a thin skinned man-child moron comes along and rips it all up because his pathetic ego couldn't take it.

Got it?

got it. you trust the mullahs more than you own country, which you hate.

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

got it. you trust the mullahs more than you own country, which you hate.

You’re mistaking Trump for America.

Full blown cult stuff.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You’re mistaking Trump for America.

Full blown cult stuff.

yes, you haters sure are.

america thinks that the blm org is a racist scam and fems have issues. you, having never even been to the usa wouldnt be able to judge regardless.

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

got it. you trust the mullahs more than you own country, which you hate.

Even though he thinks he is BLM, I don't think he is American

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings, or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

9 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

20 hours ago, potless said:

As best as I can tell, the main flaw with the much mentioned Obama deal was 15 years of limited enrichment. After that, then what? I would not trust Iran to comply with anything unless it really suited them.

It's best just to let Iran have some nukes just like Israel, and it will act as a deterrent for Israeli and American aggression.

Maybe that would act as a deterrent. However, looking ahead 10 ,20 or 30 years, if Iran had nukes, you may have a religious based regime that is far more extreme than the current one. There is no way to know whose finger may be on the trigger in future. Imagine an ISIS or Al Qaeda type regime. I dont believe it would be worth the risk.

If there is a case for Iran to have nukes, then there would be a case for every country on the planet to have nukes.

Iran seems to have reasonable relations with Russia and China but I doubt that either of those two would be keen on Iran having nukes. Otherwise, they could have supplied Iran with nukes years ago.

11 hours ago, stevenl said:

15 hours ago, potless said:

I am not implying that the US sticks to its word. Are you implying that Iran can be trusted to stick to its word? Of the two, I trust Iran less. Its a mess.

Complaining about Iran being untrustworthy in a deal with the US, implies that the US is more trustworthy. Recent history shows otherwise, ignoring that doesn't make it less of a fact.

For myself, its not about recent history. The current US administration will likely be gone in a few years. Its about looking forward 5, 10 or 20 years. Would you trust Iran to relinquish any plans to have nukes irrespective of any deal signed now? I dont. Its not a complaint. Its a point of view.

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

yes, you haters sure are.

america thinks that the blm org is a racist scam and fems have issues. you, having never even been to the usa wouldnt be able to judge regardless.

I see you’re letting your imagination run riot again.

‘Racist and Fems’ what triggered that I wonder?

35 minutes ago, potless said:

Maybe that would act as a deterrent. However, looking ahead 10 ,20 or 30 years, if Iran had nukes, you may have a religious based regime that is far more extreme than the current one. There is no way to know whose finger may be on the trigger in future. Imagine an ISIS or Al Qaeda type regime. I dont believe it would be worth the risk.

If there is a case for Iran to have nukes, then there would be a case for every country on the planet to have nukes.

Iran seems to have reasonable relations with Russia and China but I doubt that either of those two would be keen on Iran having nukes. Otherwise, they could have supplied Iran with nukes years ago.

I’m not a fan of looking 10, 20 or 39 years, six months ago there was free navigation through the straits of Hormuz.

There’s always some brain dead idiot willing to toss a spanner in the works.

33 minutes ago, potless said:

The current US administration will likely be gone in a few years.

Which is exactly the issue. That next administration can cancel agreements, as has been shown. Long term vision is lacking in the west, especially the US.

So.. to the baying mobs and their various "theories" about what is happing, I have a simple question;

What do YOU think is an acceptable deal to end the conflict?

Try to remove yourself from your circle of hate, give thinking dispassionately a try, and come up with your best solution.

10 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

So.. to the baying mobs and their various "theories" about what is happing, I have a simple question;

What do YOU think is an acceptable deal to end the conflict?

Try to remove yourself from your circle of hate, give thinking dispassionately a try, and come up with your best solution.

A sorry and we won't do it again. Together with helping to rebuild what they destroyed. Helping to make the lives of the Iranian people better than ever. Is that a circle of love?

17 minutes ago, stevenl said:

The current US administration will likely be gone in a few years.

Which is exactly the issue. That next administration can cancel agreements, as has been shown.

Yes, the next admin can cancel agreements as can Iran.

My question was would you trust Iran to relinquish any plans to have nukes irrespective of any deal signed now? No doubts at all?

1 hour ago, FigLeaf said:

A sorry and we won't do it again. Together with helping to rebuild what they destroyed. Helping to make the lives of the Iranian people better than ever. Is that a circle of love?

So, a return to status quo ante then.

The US can send some warplanes and ships to replace those destroyed, a few dozen ballistic missiles, that kind of thing?

As for helping the Iranian people.... how would that work?