Thats all he does Dan O he never puts anything into a thread exept call you a loser a leftie or a liar if you critisize Trump he iMPUTS nothing into the forum.

As usual Don negotiated a very subpar agreement and one that puts America in a much weaker position than prior to the start of this absolutely ridiculous and poorly thought out war of choice.

Between Don and Pete we had two very dumb men executing a truly silly war, without any real tangible objectives achieved, and having set back American prestige by decades in the process. The lowest quality street junk SEC DEF was so grossly unqualified for this task it truly boggles the mind that he could have gotten in this position to begin with.

15 hours ago, Yagoda said:

so has anybody read the agreement? you know it sure sounds like nobody has when you have the local ensatzgruppen here hysterically quoting loony jews

".....loony jews"

While we're on the subject of pots....🤣

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

Nonsense. He's complaining about Netanyahu.

Try reading it again. Slowly this time.

Are you serious???🤣

Since it seems you're having a hard time grasping anything but stuff being spelled out for you, I'll help out.

You're welcome.

12 hours ago, still kicking said:

Iran claims Strait of Hormuz still closed

https://resources.news.com.au/author-profiles/6c974d94-3e08-4a58-ad79-5a0a0ac6768f.png

Benedict Brook

Iran has claimed the Strait of Hormuz is closed and there has been “zero passage” through it.

The statement on Monday, local time, appears to be in direct contradiction to information that suggested ssveerasl ships has indeed sailed through the Strait on Monday.

Iran state media said the Strait will be “closed until further notice”.

To be fair, the deal reached between the US and Iran is not due to be signed until Friday. So Iran may well want to say it is close until then.

US politics, Iran war live updates: Peace deal announcement hits the Strait of Hormuz | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site for latest headlines

All quiet on the SOH front.

https://hormuzstraitmonitor.com

On 6/12/2026 at 8:50 PM, MikeandDow said:

Iran laughing all the way to the bank !! with Yank Tax dollars

How much is Israel's share again???

So President Obama unfroze $1.7 Billion, and trump is in the process of giving them $300 Billion. Art of the deal, I guess.

The baton has been passed. Who are the surrender monkeys now, eh?

*

*This is an AI produced image made to illustrate a point.

Edited June 16Jun 16 by BLMFem

On 6/14/2026 at 8:32 AM, potless said:

Maybe that would act as a deterrent. However, looking ahead 10 ,20 or 30 years, if Iran had nukes, you may have a religious based regime that is far more extreme than the current one. There is no way to know whose finger may be on the trigger in future. Imagine an ISIS or Al Qaeda type regime. I dont believe it would be worth the risk.

If there is a case for Iran to have nukes, then there would be a case for every country on the planet to have nukes.

Iran seems to have reasonable relations with Russia and China but I doubt that either of those two would be keen on Iran having nukes. Otherwise, they could have supplied Iran with nukes years ago.

I don't think we can predict the future. Countries that have nukes don't want to share. I don't think Iran, or even ISIS/al-Qaeda, is more likely to use the bomb than Israel or the US. It's the threat of MAD that keeps fingers off the buttons.

What all these paranoid states don't have the courage to do is dismantle their nukes. That along would make this a safer world.

On 6/14/2026 at 9:43 AM, Hanaguma said:

So.. to the baying mobs and their various "theories" about what is happing, I have a simple question;

What do YOU think is an acceptable deal to end the conflict?

Try to remove yourself from your circle of hate, give thinking dispassionately a try, and come up with your best solution.

Frankly, I think it's pretty good as it stands, though I'd be having Israel paying three-quarters of the reparations.

An unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation, well, how is that different from Pearl Harbor?

We may think Iran is a murderous regime as proven by the recent demonstrations. But who instigated those demonstrations? Israel and the US both promised "we are with you" but didn't show up for the slaughter.

Bibi or Trump could have kidnapped the Ayatollah just like Venezuela.

Maybe something good can come out of this s**t show. If Netanyahu and his fellow war criminals get kicked out and replaced by cooler heads, and trump neutered by global humiliation and the midterms, the world will be a better and safer place.

On 6/14/2026 at 8:53 PM, ericthai said:

do you read or you just post? "Interim US-Iran agreement appears to take shape"

let me explain so you understand. This means negotiations are progressing.

It does not mean a final agreement has been signed and it certainly doesn't tell us the final terms.

Right now we're getting conflicting claims from Washington and Tehran. Some reports say a memorandum may be signed soon, while Iranian officials continue to say important issues remain unresolved. We don't even have a final public text to analyze yet.

So how can anyone honestly conclude that it is "vastly more beneficial to Iran" than the Obama deal when we don't know the final terms?

Also, I'm skeptical of treating statements coming from Tehran as established fact. The Iranian regime has a long history of concealing nuclear activities, violating commitments, and presenting different stories to different audiences. If there are conflicting claims between U.S. negotiators and Iranian officials, I'm not automatically assuming Iran's version is the accurate one.

When the final agreement is public, let's compare the actual provisions—uranium enrichment, inspections, sanctions relief, verification, enforcement, and asset releases. Until then, declaring it a total U.S. defeat is speculation, not analysis.

No matter how it goes down from here on in, the US lost. Perhaps they'll wait for the next President to sign.

On 6/14/2026 at 8:58 PM, ericthai said:

If Obama's deal "made sure" Iran's nuclear program was no longer a threat, then why are we still talking about Iran's nuclear program?

The JCPOA didn't eliminate Iran's nuclear capability. It imposed limits, monitoring and timelines while allowing Iran to keep significant nuclear infrastructure. That's not the same thing as dismantling the program.

What I find amusing is that you're treating statements from the Iranian regime as if they're gospel truth. Iran has spent decades concealing nuclear activities, funding proxies and telling different stories to different audiences. Forgive me if I don't consider Tehran the gold standard for credibility.

You can dislike Trump all you want. But rewriting the actual terms and results of the Obama deal doesn't make your argument stronger.

June 25 2025: “completely and fully obliterated” (NBC)

July 2025 Pentagon assessment found that Iran's nuclear program was likely set back around 2 years (Dept of War)

Feb 2026: "remarkable military actions, including destroying Iran's nuclear weapons capability" twice within a single week (USA Today) Trump contradicted his prior claims that the Iranian nuclear program had been "obliterated" by again claiming that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program. Iran war with the Iranian nuclear program as a justification. (USA Today)

Mar 2026: Iran will never be permitted to obtain a nuclear weapon, 74 times. (White House)

Four years after the U.S. and other Western nations helped engineer the 1953 Iranian coup d'état against Iranian prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlaviand the Eisenhower administration agreed to help develop the Iranian nuclear program, part of the U.S. effort to promote the peaceful pursuit of nuclear science through the "Atoms for Peace" program.

In 1968, Iran signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). With profits made from the 1973 oil crisis, Pahlavi decided to increase Iran's civil nuclear program and dispatched Iranian students to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to learn nuclear engineering.With U.S. endorsement, Pahlavi began a plan to build 23 nuclear power plants, which would enable Iran to supply electricity to neighboring countries, become a leader in the region, and become a modern state.

When then-secretary of state Henry Kissinger attempted to limit Iran's ability to weaponize the nuclear reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel into fissile material through safeguards, Pahlavi handed nuclear-construction contracts to Germany and France. (Wikipedia)

IOW the US gave nukes to Iran.

On 6/14/2026 at 10:55 PM, spidermike007 said:

Ending up in a worse position than we were before the war started is certainly not a good place to end up at the end of all this. Yet with Trump in charge that is bound to happen as the man is an utter failure and nearly everything he does, except when it comes to swindling money out of Hlhapless investors and small contractors.

I certainly hope a researcher figures out how much the Trump Mafia family grifted off the Presidency. Probably make our eyes water. Most corrupt President in US history.

On 6/15/2026 at 9:49 AM, howlee101 said:

Your typical "I hate Trump" mantra. You are also the mirror image of the looney left politicians and biased MSM with your Iran apologist propaganda.

Nobody's apologising. Just the facts, ma'am.

4 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

As usual Don negotiated a very subpar agreement and one that puts America in a much weaker position than prior to the start of this absolutely ridiculous and poorly thought out war of choice.

Between Don and Pete we had two very dumb men executing a truly silly war, without any real tangible objectives achieved, and having set back American prestige by decades in the process. The lowest quality street junk SEC DEF was so grossly unqualified for this task it truly boggles the mind that he could have gotten in this position to begin with.

CORRECTION: SEC WAR.

Frankly, I don't check on anybody's reactions, to mine or others' posts. However, I do notice that I'm the only one in this thread to be using the broken-heart emoji. Nobody else is distressed that all this is senseless violence?

5 hours ago, nauseus said:

Nonsense. He's complaining about Netanyahu.

Try reading it again. Slowly this time.

Err no Mark Levin was a regular visitor to Trump and the White House and one of his most fervent supporters - he is taking the pee out of Trump - it's you that needs to read it more carefully.

"Israel is carrying out actions that advance American security interests, so Americans should stop treating Netanyahu as a problem and start treating him as an ally worthy of support."

23 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Deb, I hate to break it to you, but that's EXACTLY what's gonna happen, you absolute muppet.

let's see she has to say now... before she said pallets, now with Trump it's full containers

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Nobody's apologising. Just the facts, ma'am.

The facts only exist in your head....and many others like you. You only wish for President Trump, and America, to fail and the success of the Iranian leadership (i.e. the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps).

And why are you assuming gender? I thought that was taboo with your political agenda 😉

SURRENDER!

CAPITULATION!

HUMILIATION!

IDIOCY!

The voice of a REAL conservative republican (as opposed to a maga fascist cult member):

Edited June 16Jun 16 by Jingthing

3 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Frankly, I think it's pretty good as it stands, though I'd be having Israel paying three-quarters of the reparations.

An unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation, well, how is that different from Pearl Harbor?

We may think Iran is a murderous regime as proven by the recent demonstrations. But who instigated those demonstrations? Israel and the US both promised "we are with you" but didn't show up for the slaughter.

Bibi or Trump could have kidnapped the Ayatollah just like Venezuela.

The Japanese attack on the USA was provoked by the USA embargoing oil supplies to Japan.

Japan sought to secure its oil supplies by starting and then finishing the war to its advantage.

The US provoked.......Japan started.

In todays world Iran provoked and the USA started.......the "provocation" being similar to that which resulted in the Peloponnesian War:

"The growth of the power of Athens, and the alarm which this inspired in Sparta, made war inevitable."

Thucydides

What there is now is a ceasefire, open Straits (notionally?) and an MOU to reach a deal.....an MOU that in itself will not be signed off until this coming Friday.

There is no longterm deal at the moment.

So the result being that right now the situation in the Gulf is exactly what it was when the war began......negotiations continuing with the Iranian regime (as they were when the the US started the war) the regime intact, armed, defiant and ready to fight if need be.

Iran in the same position as the UK after it won the Battle of Britain........mauled but not beaten.

Edited June 16Jun 16 by Enoon

Nah, I don't want the US to fail. Who else would buy China's useless crap?

Nor do I want Iran hegemony. Religion is a ruse.

How about nobody bashing anybody else. That's you, Bibi, Putin & Trump.

4 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Nah, I don't want the US to fail. Who else would buy China's useless crap?

Nor do I want Iran hegemony. Religion is a ruse.

How about nobody bashing anybody else. That's you, Bibi, Putin & Trump.

Let's all sing Kumbaya now!

6 hours ago, BLMFem said:

".....loony jews"

While we're on the subject of pots....🤣

who are you referring too, o troll proudly waving the fraud flag?

6 hours ago, BLMFem said:

So President Obama unfroze $1.7 Billion, and trump is in the process of giving them $300 Billion. Art of the deal, I guess.

and maga cheers....

2 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Err no Mark Levin was a regular visitor to Trump and the White House and one of his most fervent supporters - he is taking the pee out of Trump - it's you that needs to read it more carefully.

"Israel is carrying out actions that advance American security interests, so Americans should stop treating Netanyahu as a problem and start treating him as an ally worthy of support."

Trump to BIBI please stop sending planes or missiles into Lebanon BIBI's reply OK Mr President, BIBI to his top Dog in the field ok boys Suit up you know your targets.

7 hours ago, BLMFem said:

Are you serious???🤣

Since it seems you're having a hard time grasping anything but stuff being spelled out for you, I'll help out.

You're welcome.

That is not Levin's voice.

2 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Err no Mark Levin was a regular visitor to Trump and the White House and one of his most fervent supporters - he is taking the pee out of Trump - it's you that needs to read it more carefully.

"Israel is carrying out actions that advance American security interests, so Americans should stop treating Netanyahu as a problem and start treating him as an ally worthy of support."

This is the post insert that I saw where Levin says Netanyahu is being "difficult" now. That's it below.

4 hours ago, nauseus said:

This is the post insert that I saw where Levin says Netanyahu is being "difficult" now. That's it below.

You need to know who Mark Levin is his importance to Trump and the heavy irony he is applying here - I shall use AI to explain it.