On 6/30/2026 at 11:44 AM, worgeordie said:

Well Trump has 2 kinds of supporters ,the poorer ,uneducated folks ,who

don't know any better ,and might only have 6 teeth due to Meth use, then

there are the Billionaires with 6 yachts' 6 homes ,that's where his support is

I think that's what the poster is referring too ,

regards Worgeordie

Let's be more accurate.

Dumb, fat and butt ugly types constitute those who actually still like him. (Anyone who wonders if they are truly MAGA cultists need only scan their empty resume, plus stand in front of the bathroom mirror au natural.)

"Weathervane" Centabillionaires are his other "supporters", but they will switch allegiances with the wind. They know Trump is a self-serving, incompetent moron, but they can manipulate Trump by pretending they like him and feeding Trump's woeful insecurity with fake and unctuous praise.

True MAGAs are so ignorant.

How ignorant are they?

They're so ignorant they actually think some "lefty" took a box cutter and walked 2000 feet along the Reflecting Pool slashing the bottom material, and that somewhere, somehow, lefties developed a product called "Miracle Algae Grow".

They're so ignorant they think attendees to Trump's Great American Fair-lure have disguised themselves as blades of grass, masking the true "massive attendance".

They're so ignorant they think Trump actually ended the Rwandan Genocide in 1994, all while filing Chapter 11 bankruptcy for his failed casinos.

They're so ignorant they think Trump is actually 6'3" and 225 lbs.

They're so ignorant they think Trump achieved all of his stated goals re the Iran War.

They're so ignorant they think Trump is BOTH a Bronze Age physician AND White Jeebus 1.0 (as the original Jesus was a dark-skinned Middle Easterner), as well as Atlas 2.0, holding the entire world on his flabby, rounded shoulders.

They're so ignorant they think Trump is also a actually stand up comedian who deserves the Mark Twain Award, since even MAGAs see the world's leaders laughing at Trump, and assume it's because of Trump pone-liners.

Sane and rational people can take some solace is seeing that even the insanity of cults has a limit, as many previously afflicted with misplaced hero worship are finally waking up to the fact Trump is a self-serving, corrupt moron who couldn't care less about his supporters once he got their vote.

Edited July 2Jul 2 by Wingate

12 hours ago, Yagoda said:

oh isnt that cute. demonstrating your toddler level again lol

Toddler level is embodied in every Trump social media post.

For example, what would happen on a decent online Forum, if I continually misspelled the 44th President's name?

Edited July 2Jul 2 by Wingate

4 minutes ago, Wingate said:

For example, what would happen on a decent online Forum, if I continually misspelled the 44th President's name

if it was 45 your sycophants would give you a thumbs up

5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

if it was 45 your sycophants would give you a thumbs up

So behaving like a toddler is okay if your Donald Trump?

Got it. I didn't know the rules of this game.

So, it turns out that the guy who lied to us about bone spurs and hush money, and his Ukraine phone call and a hurricane and covid and the election, and his height and his weight, and his golf scores and his magically regenerated ear, also lied to us about preserving the East Wing.

I’m shocked, I tell you. how did we not see this coming?

Recently some reporter had the temerity to ask, ‘dude, what the crap?’ — and God’s Own Avatar On Earth was not pleased.

reporter: “I just want a quick follow-up to that question. your response to people who say you haven’t been transparent enough about this—”

Donny: “I haven’t been transparent enough? really? I’ve shown this to everybody that would listen. third-rate reporters didn’t see it because they didn’t look. you’re a third-rate reporter. always have been.”

What a whiny crybaby. ‘everyone has to love my vulgar dance hall, and you’re a third-rate poopyhead if you don’t.’ Oh, boo hoo.

Here’s what Donny calls ‘being transparent’: he held up a held up a drawing of some gaudy gold monstrosity — and then raged because every reporter didn’t immediately burst into tears and go ‘sir! thank you for your transparency. how do you do it? how do you hold up a drawing like no one thought possible? sir! sir!’

Here’s a free clue for the fluorescent tangerine. Flashing a rendering of some vulgar billionaire playground isn’t being ‘transparent.’

Transparency means answering questions. and oh boy, do we have questions. Wjat about the billions in ill gotten gains? What about the unprecedented corruption? Why don't your devotees care?

Let’s talk about the timing, because that’s pretty suspicious. Two days after eight million Americans told Donny to go fu** himself, demolition crews show up unannounced and start tearing the East Wing — before any plans or permits are submitted, and before any prep work is done at the site.

So, is this some kind of revenge thing? Did Donny work himself up in a Big Rage, and grab the phone and bark GET THIS THING DONE NOW into it? Sounds totally plausible, doesn’t it? because you know that Donny is an impulsive rage-baby who acts first and thinks never.

Which leads us to the next question: in the big rush to knock everything down, did anyone preserve any of that? All the furnishings, all the portraits. all the historical artifacts. where are they now? Did anyone even bother to catalog any of it? Is there a list? Can we see it?

Did everything get bulldozed under, or thrown into the dumpster behind the White House? And if that dumpster is now full, where is Steve Bannon going to sleep tonight?

Here’s my biggest question: is Donny getting off on this? He absolutely is, isn’t he? He’s loving this, all our outrage and anguish.

Donny is a sadist and a bully. Tell me he isn’t enjoying all this destruction — and also our pained reaction to it. the demon-spawn child who used to bully his siblings is all grown up, and now he has an entire country to torment, and he is having the time of his life. Cruelty, as always, is the point.

By the way, is there a single elected Republican outraged by what’s going on? I haven’t heard of one. This is your House too. Right?

37 minutes ago, Wingate said:

So behaving like a toddler is okay if your Donald Trump?

Got it. I didn't know the rules of this game.

Saint Donald. Total revisionist history, a complete reformation of his entire career, and a total erasure of his past crimes, moral terpitude, and a total and complete willingness to overlook a lifetime of moral bankruptcy.

With many people, once they got attached to a theory, it was hard to get them detached. They’d screen out unhelpful facts, invent favorable ones, and ignore contradictions in their own claims. Look at those Sandy Hook, multiple fraud convictions, and Jan. 6th truthers, babbling about false flags and crisis actors and all the rest. When people were motivated enough to believe something, they were going to believe it no matter what. There was no such thing as a bridge too far.

52 minutes ago, Effective altruism said:

You're giving that poster too much credit; it's not very intelligent.

I feel a sense of superiority because you lack basic skills, such as changing a timing chain. I apologize for your lack of these abilities.

Have you Brits truly reflected on the impact of colonialism and the oppression it caused in many regions around the world?

"Truly reflected"? Gibberish. I think you started a sentence, but joined it with another resulting in messed up phrasing. A foil to that is have we falsely reflected.. Yeah, we just pretend to think about the past.

Not sure why you are apologising for thinking I have never changed a timing chain and pump, nor lapped valves. At least I spell proper, like.

As per the forum rules, you should address the British without reverting to slang slurs. For instance, it is forbidden to refer to Americans as "Septics", "Seppos", "Yankees" etc.

I presume you identify as a non-"liberal" white American, judging from your recent posts looking down on Africans and other non-white peoples.

The irony is you are the product of such colonialism. Something you attack is responsible for your very existence. Every single white American is the result of someone colonising a far away land at the expense of others. If not for colonialism, your line would be no more, likely dying of starvation while trying to dig for spuds that weren't there. So you should be grateful for colonialism for giving you the ability in 2026, to attack it.

As for those Britons who didn't colonise, and now reflect on the impacts of that Imperial run. It was great. Colonialism built London. It built Liverpool, Glasgow, Belfast, it lives on in the London Stock Exchange, the Baltic Exchange and others. It built magnificent buildings, funded the motorway network. The legacy is seen in the National Gallery, the British Museum and others, stacked full of treasure. A The impact of Empire on Britain looks pretty sweet to me. My ancestors didn't colonise, but we benefited. That accumulated wealth still reflects in the UK's economy ranking. We are still punching above our weight, largely because of colonialism.

As for impacts on others; its a matter of perspective, isn't it? Being American is a pretty good thing for Americans, not so maybe for others on the sharp end of a GBU or Tomahawk.

You can probably drum up some positives, you can also think of quite a few negatives, if you were at all honest about things. But you maybe describe yourself as a Patriot, but others will likely identify you as a Nationalist, judging from your posts on this forum. The Nationalist will like Decatur's toast "My Country, right or wrong". True Patriots would prefer Senator Carl Schurz's refrain "Our country, right or wrong; when right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right".

I could do the same with the legacy of the British Empire; a fair few negatives, a fair few positives. Which means the Commonwealth of Nations has more member countries than colonies in the Imperial British Empire (the Imperial Era starting after 1776). The includes 6 countries with no previous links to Britain, but liked us so much, they joined. So we can't be that bad, even though there is some self-loathing on the other side of the Atlantic.

With the United States, it was a bit touch and for a while in the 1860s, when 11 states decided they didn't want to be American any more.

At the height of the British Empire, the standing army was 270,000 men, operating over 25% of the land mass, with 1 in 4 people of the Big Blue Marble under the rule of London. The British troops were ably supported by local voluntary levees in maintaining order. So effective, we had the luxury of spare ships to suppress the slave trade, once we grew a conscience, an exercise of no real direct economic benefit to the United Kingdom, but it made some of the God Botherers feel better.

Colonialism allowed your ancestors to leave whatever hovel they found themselves in, take a boat far across the sea, effectively steal land from a people they never met, getting something for nothing, presumably prosper because they were said colonists in a colony, likely oppressing whatever natives were left to be oppressed. If your first instinct is to associate colonialism, the very reason you are alive today, with oppression, what does it say about your people.

I saw on another thread that the Spanish threw out the Moors after 700 years. I'm not sure it was exactly like that (how many modern Spanish are descendants of those Moors), but I wonder if one day all those colonial descendants one day decided to return to their countries of origin. Those without the messed up cultural backgrounds that is.

Edited July 2Jul 2 by Roadsternut

4 hours ago, Wingate said:

Got it. I didn't know the rules of this game

your motto is ignorance is bliss

3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Saint Donald. Total revisionist history, a complete reformation of his entire career, and a total erasure of his past crimes, moral terpitude, and a total and complete willingness to overlook a lifetime of moral bankruptcy.

With many people, once they got attached to a theory, it was hard to get them detached. They’d screen out unhelpful facts, invent favorable ones, and ignore contradictions in their own claims. Look at those Sandy Hook, multiple fraud convictions, and Jan. 6th truthers, babbling about false flags and crisis actors and all the rest. When people were motivated enough to believe something, they were going to believe it no matter what. There was no such thing as a bridge too far.

spoken like the biggest loser here: every one of your doom and glooms havent come to pass. yet here you are still screeching over the beating trump gave you 50 years ago.

i doubt you have one,but if you did, your 401k would love trump lol.

moral bankruptcy is not a term an obsessed hater should use

It is tiresome hearing “the left” accusation whenever someone criticises the Cult leader Trump. I personally have never voted “left”, so it’s a tired old trope rolled out by MAGA loons who seem to think any criticism of Trump is a) solely political and b) therefore untrue. History won’t be kind to you as eventually Trump’s full activities will be revealed. He deserves to be in jail but I suspect death will take him before that. But it will be fun to watch his enablers face the music. They’ll take the “following orders” defence I guess?

On 6/30/2026 at 1:56 PM, spidermike007 said:

the signing ceremony

Trump canceled a planned signing ceremony for the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (bipartisan legislation to boost housing supply via faster permitting, prefab homes, grants, and limits on certain investor purchases). He conditioned signing on Congress passing the SAVE America Act first (proof of citizenship/ID for federal voting, restrictions on mail-in ballots, etc.). He later called the housing bill "so unimportant" and "a yawn" compared to SAVE.

This was leverage, not "sabotage" or refusal to help non-rich people. The housing bill had veto-proof majorities (e.g., Senate 85-5, House 358-32). It would likely become law anyway if Trump took no action (10-day window). Speaker Mike Johnson planned to send it forward.

President Trump has long pushed housing supply reforms and criticized restrictive zoning/regulations as drivers of high costs. His first term and 2024 campaign emphasized building more homes. The bill aligns with that.

Prioritizing election integrity (SAVE Act) is consistent with his view that secure elections are foundational. Polls often show strong public support for voter ID/proof of citizenship. He framed SAVE as a "National Emergency."

https://abcnews.com/Politics/yawn-trump-downplays-bipartisan-landmark-housing-bill/story?id=134323115

https://www.whitehouse.gov/saveamerica/

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-06-24/trump-refuses-to-sign-landmark-housing-bill-demanding-congress-pass-voter-id-law

Your post is typical partisan hyperbole. Trump's style is abrasive and self-sabotaging at times (the "yawn" comment hurt optics ahead of midterms). Using the housing bill for leverage was risky politics. But it doesn't demonstrate "no care one iota" for non-rich Americans. It shows prioritization of election security and a willingness to play hardball—consistent with his brand. Housing costs are driven more by local regulations, migration, and supply shortages than presidential whims. If the bill becomes law (likely), the "sabotage" claim falls apart. Voters will judge by outcomes, not soundbites.

Edited July 2Jul 2 by team adanac

On 7/1/2026 at 9:14 PM, Roadsternut said:

"Truly reflected"? Gibberish. I think you started a sentence, but joined it with another resulting in messed up phrasing. A foil to that is have we falsely reflected.. Yeah, we just pretend to think about the past.

Not sure why you are apologising for thinking I have never changed a timing chain and pump, nor lapped valves. At least I spell proper, like.

As per the forum rules, you should address the British without reverting to slang slurs. For instance, it is forbidden to refer to Americans as "Septics", "Seppos", "Yankees" etc.

I presume you identify as a non-"liberal" white American, judging from your recent posts looking down on Africans and other non-white peoples.

The irony is you are the product of such colonialism. Something you attack is responsible for your very existence. Every single white American is the result of someone colonising a far away land at the expense of others. If not for colonialism, your line would be no more, likely dying of starvation while trying to dig for spuds that weren't there. So you should be grateful for colonialism for giving you the ability in 2026, to attack it.

As for those Britons who didn't colonise, and now reflect on the impacts of that Imperial run. It was great. Colonialism built London. It built Liverpool, Glasgow, Belfast, it lives on in the London Stock Exchange, the Baltic Exchange and others. It built magnificent buildings, funded the motorway network. The legacy is seen in the National Gallery, the British Museum and others, stacked full of treasure. A The impact of Empire on Britain looks pretty sweet to me. My ancestors didn't colonise, but we benefited. That accumulated wealth still reflects in the UK's economy ranking. We are still punching above our weight, largely because of colonialism.

As for impacts on others; its a matter of perspective, isn't it? Being American is a pretty good thing for Americans, not so maybe for others on the sharp end of a GBU or Tomahawk.

You can probably drum up some positives, you can also think of quite a few negatives, if you were at all honest about things. But you maybe describe yourself as a Patriot, but others will likely identify you as a Nationalist, judging from your posts on this forum. The Nationalist will like Decatur's toast "My Country, right or wrong". True Patriots would prefer Senator Carl Schurz's refrain "Our country, right or wrong; when right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right".

I could do the same with the legacy of the British Empire; a fair few negatives, a fair few positives. Which means the Commonwealth of Nations has more member countries than colonies in the Imperial British Empire (the Imperial Era starting after 1776). The includes 6 countries with no previous links to Britain, but liked us so much, they joined. So we can't be that bad, even though there is some self-loathing on the other side of the Atlantic.

With the United States, it was a bit touch and for a while in the 1860s, when 11 states decided they didn't want to be American any more.

At the height of the British Empire, the standing army was 270,000 men, operating over 25% of the land mass, with 1 in 4 people of the Big Blue Marble under the rule of London. The British troops were ably supported by local voluntary levees in maintaining order. So effective, we had the luxury of spare ships to suppress the slave trade, once we grew a conscience, an exercise of no real direct economic benefit to the United Kingdom, but it made some of the God Botherers feel better.

Colonialism allowed your ancestors to leave whatever hovel they found themselves in, take a boat far across the sea, effectively steal land from a people they never met, getting something for nothing, presumably prosper because they were said colonists in a colony, likely oppressing whatever natives were left to be oppressed. If your first instinct is to associate colonialism, the very reason you are alive today, with oppression, what does it say about your people.

I saw on another thread that the Spanish threw out the Moors after 700 years. I'm not sure it was exactly like that (how many modern Spanish are descendants of those Moors), but I wonder if one day all those colonial descendants one day decided to return to their countries of origin. Those without the messed up cultural backgrounds that is.

I see that Brits like you do not truly acknowledge the damage your country has done to the world. Your racism and white supremacy are on display in this forum. Be proud of your oppressive heritage.

If you ever find yourself in my area, I'd be happy to teach you some basic mechanical skills. We can start with checking tire pressure and fluid levels. After that, we can discuss your issues with white supremacy.

6 hours ago, Effective altruism said:

I see that Brits like you do not truly acknowledge the damage your country has done to the world. Your racism and white supremacy are on display in this forum. Be proud of your oppressive heritage.

If you ever find yourself in my area, I'd be happy to teach you some basic mechanical skills. We can start with checking tire pressure and fluid levels. After that, we can discuss your issues with white supremacy.

There is no doubt that Britain has a very sordid history when it comes to oppression, colonialism and the brutality of their colonial states. However that in no way excuses America's treatment of the Mexicans, the Native Americans and the black race, and it's long support of the slave trade. That brutality will forever be a pox on the face of America and is a very dark page in its history. America was founded upon brutality and it continues to adore violence to this day.

Deflection is simply not helpful within this dialogue.

On 6/30/2026 at 9:15 PM, Yagoda said:

hes aussie. aussies are lower forms.

Says the bigot who named himself for a Soviet director of security who executed hundreds of innocents. They later got rid of him the same way.

All nations have some low life forms, but to insult a whole nation is ignorant and pure bigotry.

On 7/2/2026 at 8:14 AM, spidermike007 said:

Saint Donald. Total revisionist history, a complete reformation of his entire career, and a total erasure of his past crimes, moral terpitude, and a total and complete willingness to overlook a lifetime of moral bankruptcy.

With many people, once they got attached to a theory, it was hard to get them detached. They’d screen out unhelpful facts, invent favorable ones, and ignore contradictions in their own claims. Look at those Sandy Hook, multiple fraud convictions, and Jan. 6th truthers, babbling about false flags and crisis actors and all the rest. When people were motivated enough to believe something, they were going to believe it no matter what. There was no such thing as a bridge too far.

It's all about critical thinking. If you lack that ability you are as described above.

6 hours ago, Old Croc said:

Says the bigot who named himself for a Soviet director of security who executed hundreds of innocents. They later got rid of him the same way.

All nations have some low life forms, but to insult a whole nation is ignorant and pure bigotry.

you must be an aussie. typical flames from the ignorant. its ok, we say jump, you say how hi