Three Myanmar migrant workers were shot dead and another man was seriously injured following a confrontation with a village security volunteer in Chachoengsao province late on 27 June. Police said the shooting happened at around 11.30pm in Ban Nong Nam Dam, Koh Khanun subdistrict, Phanom Sarakham district.

Get today's headlines by email

Officers who responded to the scene found the bodies of three Myanmar nationals, each with multiple gunshot wounds. Their identities had not yet been confirmed. A Thai man, identified as Pichai Daphantha, suffered serious stab wounds to his left side and was taken to Phanom Sarakham Hospital before police arrived.

Investigators recovered more than 16 spent shell casings, along with a handgun and a knife believed to have been used during the confrontation. Police forensic officers examined the scene while collecting evidence as part of the ongoing investigation.

The shooter, 24-year-old village security volunteer Theerapat Nopthao, told police that he and a friend had gone to warn several groups of migrant workers who were drinking alcohol and playing loud music near a residential area. He claimed an argument followed, during which his friend was struck with a bottle before falling to the ground and being stabbed.

According to Theerapat, around 10 men armed with knives then ran towards him. He said he opened fire in self-defence. Police have not independently confirmed his account, and investigators continue to examine the circumstances surrounding the shooting.

Authorities have not yet announced whether any charges will be filed. Police said forensic evidence and witness statements would form part of the investigation as they work to establish the sequence of events and determine whether the use of force was legally justified.

Khaosod reported that the case has drawn attention because it involves multiple fatalities and competing accounts of what happened before the shooting. The identities of the three deceased Myanmar nationals remain unconfirmed as police continue their inquiries.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now Khaosod 29 June 2026

View full article

You really have to wonder why a 24-year-old village volunteer was walking around heavily armed and ready to use that kind of lethal force over a noise complaint.

More than 16 shots fired isn’t a measured response to noisy drinkers, and it must certainly stretch the definition of legal self-defence to its absolute breaking point!

You really have to wonder why a 24-year-old village volunteer was walking around heavily armed and ready to use that kind of lethal force over a noise complaint.

More than 16 shots fired isn’t a measured response to noisy drinkers, and it must certainly stretch the definition of legal self-defence to its absolute breaking point!

I wonder why anyone would hit someone over the head with a bottle, stab him, and then attack his friend for asking them to quiet down.

16 shots is a mag dump. Seems appropriate if 10 guys were trying to stab him. If he hadn't been armed, we'd probably be reading about 2 Thai guys stabbed to death by unknown assailants.

Outdoor-use loud audio speakers are very dangerous and should be banned in Thailand.

Audio speakers must be sold with a prominent warning: These Audio Speakers May Cause Death and Destruction

I wish I had a directed beam EMP weapon I could use to fry the circuitry of all audio equipment I hear blasting in the distance.

And, YES,

This shooting was justified if the culprits were blasting music.

Completely Justified....!!!!

We need more standup volunteers, in fact.

28 minutes ago, impulse said:

I wonder why anyone would hit someone over the head with a bottle, stab him, and then attack his friend for asking them to quiet down.

The shots are confirmed, his account, and thereby your statement, not.

The shots are confirmed, his account, and thereby your statement, not.

Neither is Waldron's diatribe. Which is what I responded to.

He was armed because that's what village security volunteers do.

2 hours ago, impulse said:

Neither is Waldron's diatribe. Which is what I responded to.

He was armed because that's what village security volunteers do.

They should not be armed. They serve as a warning system for real police. Young guys, of any nationality, are hotheads. Foreign workers are looked down upon in almost every country.

Nah, the Burmese guys dug their own grave, they were certainly looking for trouble, and they paid with their life. just how it is.

6 hours ago, Jim Waldron said:

You really have to wonder why a 24-year-old village volunteer was walking around heavily armed and ready to use that kind of lethal force over a noise complaint

You really would have to wonder why anyone would read the report in that way when it's actually reported that he used lethal force only when he was confronted with 10 men with knives approaching aggressively, not because of a noise complaint.

They should not be armed. They serve as a warning system for real police. Young guys, of any nationality, are hotheads. Foreign workers are looked down upon in almost every country.

That's one opinion. Apparently not shared by the Thai people.

On 6/29/2026 at 10:07 AM, impulse said:

Neither is Waldron's diatribe. Which is what I responded to.

He was armed because that's what village security volunteers do.

He states confirmed facts, leading to his voiced opinion. Your post is unconfirmed.

18 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

when it's actually reported that he used lethal force only when he was confronted with 10 men with knives approaching aggressively, not because of a noise complaint.

You're confusing his excuse with independent reporting.

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

20 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

and you're confusing the other reporting with accuracywhen it's actually reported that he used lethal force only when he was confronted with 10 men with knives approaching aggressively, not because of a noise complaint.

You're confusing his excuse with independent reporting

...and you're confusing the other reporting that you've seen with accuracy. Why is the reporting that you're claiming to have seen, but haven't provided link to, correct and the reporting that I'm reading here incorrect?