A challenge brought to the High Court against plans for a large Chinese embassy in London has been dismissed, with judges upholding planning permission for the project at a former Royal Mint site near the Tower of London.

The ruling ends a legal effort by campaigners from the Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association (RMCRA), which represents families and businesses in about 100 properties in the area.

Planning Permission Upheld

The court decision confirmed that permission granted for the embassy’s construction should stand. The RMCRA said it was concerned the development could pose an espionage risk and could be used to help enforce what it described as “draconian” Chinese laws in the UK, as well as to target dissidents.

In defending the application, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and the London Borough of Tower Hamlets said they had “conscientiously and carefully had regard” to the residents’ concerns during the planning process.

Fire Risk And Diplomatic Immunity Concerns

The residents’ association also argued that the Chinese government could create a fire safety risk by failing to meet obligations, and said those requirements would not be enforceable due to diplomatic immunity.

A representative for the Chinese embassy welcomed the judgement, telling the BBC that supporting and facilitating the construction of diplomatic premises is an international obligation of the host country.

The embassy spokesperson also said the proposed premises were “high-quality”, and that the planning and design process followed international practices and complied with local regulations and procedures.

No Unfairness Over Blast Assessment

The High Court hearing took place earlier this month. Two judges have now dismissed the RMCRA’s challenge: Mrs Justice Lieven, sitting with Lord Justice Dingemans.

The judge said there was “no doubt” that the government had taken into account that the Chinese government was the applicant for planning permission.

Mrs Justice Lieven also addressed a complaint that the residents were not provided with a copy of a “blast assessment” at the time the decision was made. The assessment sets out the potential impact of a possible terrorist explosion.

The judge said: “There was no unfairness to the claimant by reason of these documents not having been disclosed.”

Appeal Planned After High Court Ruling

Outside Parliament, Luke de Pulford of the Interparliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), who has supported the RMCRA, said solicitors had been instructed to appeal. He said the appeal would be funded by donations from the public.

RMCRA spokesman Mark Nygate said residents viewed the High Court outcome as the start of a longer campaign. He said they intended to pursue the case “as far as the Supreme Court”.

A further speaker, Chloe Cheung, told the BBC she is a Hongkonger and described herself as a democracy campaigner. She said she had received information about a “bounty of $HK1 million” from the Chinese Communist Party for help leading to her capture abroad. The 21-year-old said she fled Hong Kong for the UK in 2021 after being accused of breaching a national security law introduced by Beijing following the 2019 pro-democracy protests in the former British colony.

Conservative MP Iain Duncan Smith, also an IPAC member and described as sanctioned by the Chinese government, said the Chinese government posed a “major threat” to the UK. Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged Prime Minister Andy Burnham to deny permission for the embassy, arguing that the decision could compromise national security.

Join the discussion?

1 August 2026

View full article

UK High Court Refuses Bid To Block Chinese Mega Embassy....

Just how woke can the UK get?

13 minutes ago, wombat said:

UK High Court Refuses Bid To Block Chinese Mega Embassy....

Just how woke can the UK get?

The mere fact that it was agreed in the first place shows a distinct lack of joined up thinking and co-operation between different local and govt. departments.

Personally I think it should have been stopped from the get go.......

Obviously UK is not what it used to be. No wonder US not relying on any EU countries anymore.

Big mistake. China does not need a mega complex in the heart of London.

Big mistake. would the wiley Chinese allow a figeign country planning permission for a hugh spy structure in the centre of Biegin. I think not

11 minutes ago, jippytum said:

Big mistake. would the wiley Chinese allow a figeign country planning permission for a hugh spy structure in the centre of Biegin. I think not

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer?

8 hours ago, webfact said:

site near the Tower of London.

Any hanky panky from the Chinese staff, just lock them up next door and öff with their heads"!!

Looks like Whitehall has managed to turn a straightforward security call into a drawn‑out legal circus.

By letting it drift toward the Supreme Court, the government has guaranteed that whichever way the ruling goes, one side will feel betrayed and the other emboldened.

A bit of clear leadership early on could have avoided this mess.

Canberra showed how it’s done in 2023 when it simply blocked Russia’s new embassy project without drama.

London instead has opted for muddle and delay, alienating both Beijing and domestic critics. The result is ill will all around, and a reminder that dithering is the worst of all options.

Jim Hacker would be impressed!

4 hours ago, wombat said:

UK High Court Refuses Bid To Block Chinese Mega Embassy....

Just how woke can the UK get?

What is "woke" about that?

Diplomatic relations are a thing you know. We're not all as paranoid and insular as the Americans. Best check there isn't a Commie under your bed.

Well the UK is a communist country under the rule of Backhander Burnham. So what do you expect

Backhander Burnham? That didn't take long.

5 hours ago, OneManShow said:

Obviously UK is not what it used to be. No wonder US not relying on any EU countries anymore.

UK by its own wish is no longer an EU member and the EU is glad to be rid of that ball and chain - leaders and citizens alike. We're getting on great without them. We're also glad to be disconnecting from what the US has become as well.

Edited August 1Aug 1 by BusyB
Clarifying ambiguity

I guess this must mean the High Court has been undermined by the commies eh? Can't see any other possible explanation for this treasonous verdict.

/s

12 minutes ago, lavender19 said:

Well the UK is a communist country under the rule of Backhander Burnham. So what do you expect

Pretty sure it hasn't become a communist country.

And what backhanders has Burnham taken? Are you sure you're not thinking of Farage?

Go on, do tell of these backhanders. I am surprised nothing has come to light - must be the pesky "MSM" covering it up. They are probably commies too.

16 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

Backhander Burnham? That didn't take long.

They're not constrained by any attachment to the truth. So they just constantly spout any old mental diarhhoea all over the place. It's an attempt to sow alarm and despondency and undermine people's faith in the countries they've lived in peacefully and prosperously all their lives, and see what sticks.

3 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

What is "woke" about that?

Diplomatic relations are a thing you know. We're not all as paranoid and insular as the Americans. Best check there isn't a Commie under your bed.

There's also that little insignificant question of the law as well. But that's never interested those sorts - they want to destroy it so they can rule and the law will be their iron fist. They'd like that. Really. It screams out of every sentence they manage to string together.

3 hours ago, Jim Waldron said:

Looks like Whitehall has managed to turn a straightforward security call into a drawn‑out legal circus.

By letting it drift toward the Supreme Court, the government has guaranteed that whichever way the ruling goes, one side will feel betrayed and the other emboldened.

A bit of clear leadership early on could have avoided this mess.

Canberra showed how it’s done in 2023 when it simply blocked Russia’s new embassy project without drama.

London instead has opted for muddle and delay, alienating both Beijing and domestic critics. The result is ill will all around, and a reminder that dithering is the worst of all options.

Jim Hacker would be impressed!

It's called English Management.

16 hours ago, BusyB said:

UK by its own wish is no longer an EU member and the EU is glad to be rid of that ball and chain - leaders and citizens alike. We're getting on great without them. We're also glad to be disconnecting from what the US has become as well.

When the UK left the EU they forgot to undo the ball and chain because it is fast sinking it into obscurity. A new commo Prime

minister won't help because it has a mountain of debt , people cant't afford to pay their electric due to green ideology , hundreds of illegal small boaters steaming in every day that will have to be put up in 4 star hotels. Now they can't even afford social care for the elderly and will have to put on a tax to pay for it. If that's going along fine then I would hate to see the UK when it is in trouble.

I find it quite incredible the Government is allowing this. Surely they remember in 2022 when a Hong Kong pro democracy protestor was dragged through the Manchester Chinese consulate grounds. It was only through good fortune police were in attendance and he was pulled back. Goodness knows what his fate my have been, had the police not been there.

It’s not hard to see this new Embassy being used as a major centre for espionage, cyber warfare and a disappearance or two. The case of the unfortunate Jamal Khashoggi in Turkey springs to mind.

Their ideology is so totally opposed to any functioning democracy, yet the court upheld the planning permission. I sincerely hope the Supreme Court has the common sense to refuse permission. If not, then the Government steps in.

Edited August 2Aug 2 by BexMan

On 8/1/2026 at 1:51 PM, josephbloggs said:

a Commie under your bed.

The last time that happened was when Robert Menzie's ex Australian PM told everybody there was a red under the bed.