34 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Britain has fallen stay in Thailand. Incidentally my British born white neighbour had a brain problem in his early 50s and is now bed bound carers need to come every day to bed bath and clean him and they have a key box at the front door so they can get in. They are invariably African and given the way they speak I guess new entrants. Probably the Boris wave which you flag wavers voted in to power to Get Brexit Done and then most of the security guards at he festivals I attend are now Indian students. They always used to be eastern European ones and the birds were fit to boot if a little moody. Instead of majoring on rape and boats a little humility would be in order at what your stupidity unleashed. I will accept apologies. Queue here please.

Didn’t come to Thailand to get away from immigrants.I came to get away from pricks like you.

10 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

You could verify him yourself he is in every town and village in our once pleasant land

Or just pass it off as fake AI and try to discredit what's in front of your face to fit a narrow narrative🤔

Apart from rampant rule breaking - though that’s not my call - I could show a video of a boozed up obese tatted Brit in Pattaya having a fight but it would prove nothing except that incident even if it was real.I don't think you people realise what your mate Brexit Boris did in terms of immigration and how that fundamentally changed the narrative.The boats are an issue for sure but not the issue you think they are what is the issue is like the MAGA idiots in the US how thick and stupid are a goodly proportion of the electorate and the fact they can vote. Hopefully if they get ugly I can call on my neighbour Muhammed to help me out.

1 minute ago, Keeenok Powell said:

Didn’t come to Thailand to get away from immigrants.I came to get away from pricks like you.

My flights booked for November 27th for our 3 month stay in Jomtien can you pick us up from the airport for 2k - we have 4 large bags (EVA) and 2 carry ons ?

2 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

My flights booked for November 27th for our 3 month stay in Jomtien can you pick us up from the airport for 2k - we have 4 large bags (EVA) and 2 carry ons ?

Hahahaha,see, some of your lot have a sense of humour.

Have a good hol.

4 minutes ago, Keeenok Powell said:

Hahahaha,see, some of your lot have a sense of humour.

Have a good hol.

Mai bpen rai Bolt it is then or take our chances at 2.5k with the taxi mafia. You'll be pleased to know that your gracious host deals with the Muslim Rohingya refugees (brought to Burma by the British no less but let's park that) by sinking their boats or kidnapping and selling them as slaves. That’s a solution for sure but if you go down that route you won't be getting a real vote or living in retirement in foreign climes, no siree.

Just now, beautifulthailand99 said:

Mai bpen rai Bolt it is then or take our chances at 2.5k with the taxi mafia. You'll be pleased to know that your gracious host deals with the Muslim Rohingya refugees (brought to Burma by the British no less but let's park that) by sinking their boats or kidnapping and selling them as slaves. That’s a solution for sure but if you go down that route you won't be getting a real vote or living in retirement in foreign climes, no siree.

I checked myself for clarity ;

“Thailand pushed Rohingya boats back to sea” — true.
“Thailand sank their boats” — misleading/exaggerated.
“Rohingya were kidnapped/enslaved through Thailand” — substantially true, especially through trafficking networks with corrupt official involvement.
“The British brought the Rohingya to Burma” — contains an important historical element but is much too categorical.

The final joke about “you won't be getting a real vote” is actually the strongest bit rhetorically: Thailand's ability historically to do things that would cause an enormous political/legal explosion in Britain has indeed existed partly in a very different democratic, judicial and military-political environment. But I'd avoid implying that contemporary Thailand officially operates a “sink the boats and sell the survivors” policy.

9 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Need to replace these two who were jailed today

Asylum seeker jailed after posing as teenage boy to groom and rape 13-year-old girl

Khan will be automatically deported to Afghanistan after serving two-thirds of his sentence.

https://news.sky.com/story/asylum-seeker-jailed-after-posing-as-teenage-boy-to-groom-and-rape-13-year-old-girl-13571676

Refugee jailed for sex attacks on two women in Falkirk

Muhammad Sheikhi, 23, targeted his victims in Falkirk during the early hours of 30 November 2025.

https://news.sky.com/story/refugee-sentenced-for-sex-attacks-on-two-women-in-falkirk-13558763

It's a pity they can't deport the white blokes that make up 77% - 86% of England's home grown groomers and rapists.

1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

It's a pity they can't deport the white blokes that make up 77% - 86% of England's home grown groomers and rapists.

We can encourage them to become sex tourists and go to Pattaya though - though like Frizl it seems to be a magnet for the world's depraved already.

Doesn't this imply that Sir Keir Starmer was more successful than anyone wants to credit?

Naturally, he was PM when the numbers went down so no one wants to admit it.

Just now, Purdey said:

Doesn't this imply that Sir Keir Starmer was more successful than anyone wants to credit?

Naturally, he was PM when the numbers went down so no one wants to admit it.

History will look kindly at Sir Keir. He may even make a comeback in a newly elected Burnham government. He'd make a great Foreign Secretary.

9 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

It's a pity they can't deport the white blokes that make up 77% - 86% of England's home grown groomers and rapists.

Who mentioned anything bout deporting anyone ? Just pointing out that on the day that a new big boat arrived , two of the previous arrivals got jailed for sexual offences . Wonder how many of the new arrivals will end up in jail for rape ?

1 minute ago, Purdey said:

Doesn't this imply that Sir Keir Starmer was more successful than anyone wants to credit?

Naturally, he was PM when the numbers went down so no one wants to admit it.

Starmer was trying to fix real deep problems that he had inherited from Brexit/Covid/Cost of Living Crisis - the fact that he came over as a sort of know it all bore was his ubndoing. Britain is fast becoming ungovernable - if you are hugely indebted and in probably terminal decline as a prosperous nation then all you can try and do is manage that rather than arrest it. Whilst the entitled populace gets increasingly angry at seeing their and their children's futures go down the swanee. It's as much a crisis of democracy as an economic one but then they are intertwined. Farage and his ilk have no solutions bu their own snake oil sold whilst their billionaire backers behind try and game the system for their own benefit.

STOP THE BOATS

Look at it this way the numbers that came via the giant rubber tyre ring Yesterday was the Equivalent size to a full Boe I see the usual gang of 4 dismiss ing 737 or a Airbus A320. I see the gang of 4 dismiss these claims of either fake news or Ai , throw in Reform or Farage for good measure. Im surprised GB News wasn't mentioned. Where do you think the nearly 1,300 illegals since Friday, once proceseed and given a new clean set of clothing went to ?

1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

Look at it this way the numbers that came via the giant rubber tyre ring Yesterday was the Equivalent size to a full Boe I see the usual gang of 4 dismiss ing 737 or a Airbus A320. I see the gang of 4 dismiss these claims of either fake news or Ai , throw in Reform or Farage for good measure. Im surprised GB News wasn't mentioned. Where do you think the nearly 1,300 illegals since Friday, once proceseed and given a new clean set of clothing went to ?

You are a bad faith actor arguing from a point of ignorance if you want to point the finger at the billionaire globalist class that have robbed western economies of huge amounts of wealth over the last few decades and enriched themselves like never before in history then we have mutual cause. If instead you want to nickel and dime complaints about the least well off and start a fight in a soup kitchen then I won't play.

16 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

History will look kindly at Sir Keir. He may even make a comeback in a newly elected Burnham government. He'd make a great Foreign Secretary.

Maybe even as good as Lammy?

3 minutes ago, Keeenok Powell said:

Maybe even as good as Lammy?

"You lot" got rid of Sir Keir with all your wnker nonsense and now Burnham who is arguably shallower than him has eaten into Reform's lunch with good old Rupert (keep it up sir!) Lowe eating away on the right and Farage's own inherent corruption eating away from within. Britain unlike the US has a way of self-correcting away from extremism long may it prosper.

10 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Ok let's start with your first point free iPhone - evidence or the REST of your post is BS. I’ll wait.

From @SunnyinBangrak never did get an answer can I STOP THE VOTES !

4 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

I'll have to expand this table but I'm not sure "country of origin" is germane. Are they talking about this generation or ethnicity, for instance? Denmark doesn't allow immigration, so where are these people coming from?

Furthermore, violent crimes are not delineated by type or number. Therefore, two carjackings, one home invasion and a rape could put Kuwaitis the highest category.

MENAPT is an acronym standing for Middle East, North Africa, Pakistan, and Turkey (Türkiye). It is primarily used as a statistical and political demographic category—notably pioneered in Denmark—to track and analyze immigration, employment, and integration trends originating from predominantly Muslim countries.

And is widely considered to be racist.

AI: The vast majority of violent crimes in Denmark in absolute numbers are committed by ethnic Danes due to their majority demographic status. However, relative per capita conviction rates and index adjustments show higher statistical representation among certain non-Western immigrant groups and descendants of immigrants. Official data is published via Statistics Denmark. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Statistically show higher relative crime and conviction index scores per capita compared to persons of Danish origin, though overall crime rates across all groups have seen downward trajectories over multi-decade tracking

Denmark has recently tightened up but has previously allowed higher amounts of immigration. Pakistan and Turkey are listed individually, as those two nationalities have sent the highest numbers of immigrants from outside Europe, into Denmark in recent history. I was hoping that your bold and underlined Statstics Denmark inclusion might be a link to some meaningful data but, no - just another waste of your ink and my time.

The concern from the Danes is valid. The crime rate of non-Western male migrants was about three times that of the Western male population in Denmark.

5 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

I'll have to expand this table but I'm not sure "country of origin" is germane. Are they talking about this generation or ethnicity, for instance? Denmark doesn't allow immigration, so where are these people coming from?

Furthermore, violent crimes are not delineated by type or number. Therefore, two carjackings, one home invasion and a rape could put Kuwaitis the highest category.

MENAPT is an acronym standing for Middle East, North Africa, Pakistan, and Turkey (Türkiye). It is primarily used as a statistical and political demographic category—notably pioneered in Denmark—to track and analyze immigration, employment, and integration trends originating from predominantly Muslim countries.

And is widely considered to be racist.

AI: The vast majority of violent crimes in Denmark in absolute numbers are committed by ethnic Danes due to their majority demographic status. However, relative per capita conviction rates and index adjustments show higher statistical representation among certain non-Western immigrant groups and descendants of immigrants. Official data is published via Statistics Denmark. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Statistically show higher relative crime and conviction index scores per capita compared to persons of Danish origin, though overall crime rates across all groups have seen downward trajectories over multi-decade tracking

Using the Zionist origin arguments my ancestors may have come from Denmark raping and pillaging a thousand years ago - I think I should be given a right of return - ditto Italy. I will look for a house occupied by a Dane kick them out and if they fight back shoot them. I shall expect the western government to back me in my righteous return as well and give me the gun. And if anyone should have the temerity to complain about me I will scream RACIST and play the victim.

Edited August 11Aug 11 by beautifulthailand99

5 hours ago, JonnyF said:

There's some truth to this.

The boats are definitely getting bigger.

Pretty soon, there will be a Guiness Book of World records category for "Most engineers and doctors in one inflatable".

And they'll be cruising the 19 miles to Gibraltar.

Edited August 11Aug 11 by impulse

1 minute ago, impulse said:

Pretty soon, there will be a Guiness Book of World records category for "Most engineers and doctors" in one inflatable.

And they'll be cruising the 19 miles to Gibraltar.

4 minutes ago, impulse said:

Pretty soon, there will be a Guiness Book of World records category for "Most engineers and doctors in one inflatable".

And they'll be cruising the 19 miles to Gibraltar.

I don't think so.

If you are wondering why boats specifically do not land directly in Gibraltar (the British Overseas Territory), it is due to an airtight security environment:

• Geography: The Strait of Gibraltar is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world and is under constant radar, satellite, and naval tracking by British, Spanish, and Moroccan authorities.

• No Legal Path: The British Home Office has explicitly stated there is no mechanism to claim asylum in the UK via Gibraltar. Combined with Gibraltar's tiny, highly policed coastline, smuggling syndicates avoid it because interception is virtually guaranteed.

7 hours ago, impulse said:

Racist? They're kidding right? (Probably, they're just suicidally empathetic idiots.) How is that racist?

MENAPT is all Muslim countries, i.e., a racist designation.

8 minutes ago, bannork said:

I don't think so.

If you are wondering why boats specifically do not land directly in Gibraltar (the British Overseas Territory), it is due to an airtight security environment:

• Geography: The Strait of Gibraltar is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world and is under constant radar, satellite, and naval tracking by British, Spanish, and Moroccan authorities.

• No Legal Path: The British Home Office has explicitly stated there is no mechanism to claim asylum in the UK via Gibraltar. Combined with Gibraltar's tiny, highly policed coastline, smuggling syndicates avoid it because interception is virtually guaranteed.

Ceutas was just a test run.

2 hours ago, nauseus said:

Denmark has recently tightened up but has previously allowed higher amounts of immigration. Pakistan and Turkey are listed individually, as those two nationalities have sent the highest numbers of immigrants from outside Europe, into Denmark in recent history. I was hoping that your bold and underlined Statstics Denmark inclusion might be a link to some meaningful data but, no - just another waste of your ink and my time.

The concern from the Danes is valid. The crime rate of non-Western male migrants was about three times that of the Western male population in Denmark.

Not according to the stats. More Danes than any other--there are, after all, more of them!

17 minutes ago, impulse said:

Ceutas was just a test run.

Should I be scared - after all Halloween is coming ?

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Not according to the stats. More Danes than any other--there are, after all, more of them!

Rate!

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

MENAPT is all Muslim countries, i.e., a racist designation.

Muslims include all races, silly.

The Reality of Calais Uncovered. Lee Anderson discovers the SHOCKING truth about the migrant camps in Calais.

Straight from horses mouth. Listen to this exchange between Angela Rayner and Nick Robinson on illegal migration. It’s very revealing.

Under Andy Burnham’s new government, Angela Rayner just showed Labour still doesn’t get it on the boats. A record 230 people on one mega-dinghy crossed the Channel yesterday. Nick Robinson asks Housing Secretary Angela Rayner how she feels as a politician seeing it. She replies that she feels “absolutely appalled” these criminal gangs will load a boat up to dangerous levels and put the “innocent lives of desperate people at risk”. That’s why they must crack down on the criminal gangs.
Robinson then puts to her that people feel “rage” watching these huge boats coming over, saying “it’s no longer a taxi service, it’s a bus service!” And they don’t go back to France. Rayner’s response: “Well these are desperate, vulnerable people getting into these vessels that are dangerous and we’ve got to stop that.”

That exchange shows they just don’t get it. These people are choosing to make the crossing. They’re not desperate families. It’s overwhelmingly young men, economic migrants coming for a handout from the British taxpayer, making the trip voluntarily. They’re not being forced onto the boats. Rayner has no problem with the migrants coming over. No problem with the huge numbers. No problem with who they might be or what they might do. No problem with the huge costs involved. The only problem, in her view, is their choice of travel to this country.

Now you understand why Mahmood and Burnham keep banging on about more safe and legal routes. They don’t want to stop the immigrants. They just want a safer entry.

36 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

Straight from horses mouth. Listen to this exchange between Angela Rayner and Nick Robinson on illegal migration. It’s very revealing.

Under Andy Burnham’s new government, Angela Rayner just showed Labour still doesn’t get it on the boats. A record 230 people on one mega-dinghy crossed the Channel yesterday. Nick Robinson asks Housing Secretary Angela Rayner how she feels as a politician seeing it. She replies that she feels “absolutely appalled” these criminal gangs will load a boat up to dangerous levels and put the “innocent lives of desperate people at risk”. That’s why they must crack down on the criminal gangs.
Robinson then puts to her that people feel “rage” watching these huge boats coming over, saying “it’s no longer a taxi service, it’s a bus service!” And they don’t go back to France. Rayner’s response: “Well these are desperate, vulnerable people getting into these vessels that are dangerous and we’ve got to stop that.”

That exchange shows they just don’t get it. These people are choosing to make the crossing. They’re not desperate families. It’s overwhelmingly young men, economic migrants coming for a handout from the British taxpayer, making the trip voluntarily. They’re not being forced onto the boats. Rayner has no problem with the migrants coming over. No problem with the huge numbers. No problem with who they might be or what they might do. No problem with the huge costs involved. The only problem, in her view, is their choice of travel to this country.

Now you understand why Mahmood and Burnham keep banging on about more safe and legal routes. They don’t want to stop the immigrants. They just want a safer entry.

Rayner and Mahmood exist on different wings of the Labour Party. And because she is the daughter of immigrants herself, Mahmood can talk tough about migration without being accused of 'racism'.

What Mahmood Has Done

• Ended Permanent Refugee Status: Under her generation-defining asylum shake-up, refugees are no longer granted permanent settlement. Instead, status is strictly temporary and reviewed every 30 months, forcing individuals to return home if their country of origin is deemed safe.

• Discretionary Housing and Allowances: She removed the legal guarantee of housing and financial allowances for asylum seekers. Support is withdrawn if migrants work illegally, break the law, or are found to have the financial means to support themselves.

• International Visa Sanctions: To force cooperation on removals, she began leveraging UK visa access. The Home Office actively reduces or halts visas to countries (such as Angola, Namibia, and the DRC) if their governments refuse to take back deported citizens.

What has Mahmood British Home Secretary done and said about stopping migrant boats? - Google Search