Firefan Posted November 15, 2007 Share Posted November 15, 2007 I might not have understood this correctly but does BUPA (and others?) have some kind of exclusion of cover of certain backterial infections? Sounds bizar to me, but I have heard it from a couple of different sources. Does Thaihealth(via Thaivisa) have a similar exclusion? Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canopus1969 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Maybe you should be more specific as to what infections you are talking about and when did BUPA say they were not covered ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firefan Posted November 16, 2007 Author Share Posted November 16, 2007 Friend got a rare flesh eating backterial infection (can infect through open cut/wounds) and after doing research to obtain health insurance after that experience was told from BUPA that they would not have covered even if he had had the insurance..... (he was self insured and it become rather expensive). Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qualtrough Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Friend got a rare flesh eating backterial infection (can infect through open cut/wounds) and after doing research to obtain health insurance after that experience was told from BUPA that they would not have covered even if he had had the insurance..... (he was self insured and it become rather expensive). Cheers! Perhaps he was denied coverage for that on the basis that it was a pre-existing illness. Many insurance companies will not provide health cover for any condition or illness that you have already had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firefan Posted November 16, 2007 Author Share Posted November 16, 2007 Was not pre-existing. It is a standard exclusion with BUPA I was told. Mybe the health insurance expert here can answer? Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywais Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 I have Bupa and it does say specifically in the documentation coverage of bacterial infections are excluded. Have no idea as to why and to what extent this means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firefan Posted November 16, 2007 Author Share Posted November 16, 2007 Ah, but browsing through pages and pages at bupa.co.th it seems that it is only under "personal accident" meaning compensation for disability and death that there is no cover. I.e. the actual hospital stay/treatment for backterial infection would be covered even under BUPA. CHeers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywais Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 Ah, but browsing through pages and pages at bupa.co.th it seems that it is only under "personal accident" meaning compensation for disability and death that there is no cover. I.e. the actual hospital stay/treatment for backterial infection would be covered even under BUPA. CHeers! Thanks for that update. Sometimes reading insurance documents is like reading a legal paper, have to keep reading it to get any clarity out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaivisaInsurance Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 Firefan now seems to have answered his initial question and the Thai Visa plans ( along with BUPA etc. ) would cover this unfortunate event but not if pre-existing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firefan Posted November 17, 2007 Author Share Posted November 17, 2007 (edited) Again; it was NOT pre-existing. But there would be no Personal Accident compensation if it leads to disability or death. Cheers! Edited November 17, 2007 by Firefan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonydabbs Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 As has already been pointed out, Personal Accident (PA) coverage found in health insurance plans has nothing to do with treatment. It is an add-on coverage that more appropriately should be named Accidental Death, Dismemberment and Diisability coverage. Having PA coverage in a health insurance policy confuses a lot of people; they quickly zero in on the PA exclusions and associate them with the treatment exclsions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LivinLOS Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 Hold on.. Are most infections not bacterial in nature ?? I had MRSA 10 years ago.. Was a bugger to get rid of.. Would that make me uninsurable for MRSA ever again ?? Would that be MRSA at the same wound site ?? Or MRSA anywhere in the body ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakhar Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 TB is also bacterial, and when and if that stuff gets out of hand, it gets costly. Here is a funny thought. Essentially there is no treatment for a viral infection.... (essentially) But in many cases there is a treatment for a Bacterial infection.... but no coverage? Sounds to me, Bubal is just another location to throw your money away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LivinLOS Posted March 11, 2008 Share Posted March 11, 2008 Exactly.. Theres very little viral treatment (cures, they treat symptoms).. So only treatable stuff is bacterial.. And Bacterial not covered if pre existing.. So what I get a staph infection once as a kid and I am not covered for staph bacterial ?? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now