If you are referring to my earlier post I want to point out that this was only hearsay and not a report. Nevertheless, you are confusing a few things: Sexual asphyxiation, or "breath play," is the intentional restriction of oxygen to the brain to enhance sexual arousal. Upon release, a rush of blood and oxygen triggers a release of endorphins, dopamine, and serotonin, producing an intense, euphoric head rush. Practiced alone it is very dangerous, you might want to ask the guy who got the part in Kung Fu which was written for Bruce Lee but you can't because he died of it inside the closet of his room at the former Swissôtel in Bangkok 17 years ago and even in partnered scenarios there is no guaranteed safe way as it carries severe risks of brain damage, cardiac arrest, and accidental death. My point is sexual arousal happens to the person who is experiencing asphyxiation and I strongly doubt that the guy was trying to enhance her sexual arousal — he was probably just trying to enhance his own. This is a completely different situation because it involves sadistic sexual arousal by dominance, wherein the perpetrator derives pleasure from inflicting pain and putting the victim in a painful—and possibly fatal—situation while the she is fully aware of the danger. In my opinion at least from a legal point of view it doesn't matter if his sexual satisfaction had to include the victim’s death or not. He put her in that situation and I think it's safe to say without her consent and she died. But all of this is just speculation. Nevertheless, any discussion about her parents being pimps or alcoholics deliberately sending their daughter to sell her body is just pathetic guilt shifting.
