.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
64
Thai PM Considers Easing Alcohol Sales Rules to Boost Tourism
I agree. The main problem is at restaurants -
55
Why Isn’t the World Angrier About the Creation of the Wuhan Flu?
Of course it came from China. DUH! -
4
Any Windows search gurus here?
Everything 1.5a can index metadata and specific metadata. https://www.voidtools.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=9788#index -
40
Citibank ATMs in Bangkok?
I send USD via SWIFT wire transfer method directly from my US Chase Bank checking or savings accts to my Bangkok Bank (USD) acct. Chase Bank does not charge me an outgoing wire fee due to my Private Client level. Bangkok Bank does charge an incoming wire fee. It's .25% with a min. 200B and max 500B. I can hold the USD in my USD acct or convert it to my THB acct online during work hours at the going TT rates. If I send to my SCB USD acct, I have to go into the bank to convert to THB, so it's not convenient. If I need money quickly, I just use my Chase Bank debit card at an ATM. The conversion rates seem to be pretty good. -
196
Road Safety in Thailand – a summary of Perceptions and Reality
Ps how do you feel about 181 kph in a 50 kph zone or an average of 145kph in 110 zone? -
196
Road Safety in Thailand – a summary of Perceptions and Reality
Ah yes, the brilliant scientific method of ‘I saw it, so it must be true.’ Who needs controlled studies, statistical analysis, or decades of research when we have your eyeballs collecting ‘data’ with all the accuracy of a drunk fortune teller? By your logic, if someone ‘sees’ five bad drivers in a day, that’s enough to declare an entire population reckless. If ten people ‘see’ the same thing, we should just throw out every road safety study ever conducted. Hell, why even have researchers when we can just rely on random guys like you on the internet who ‘see things’ and mistake anecdotal bias for fact? Remember the plural of anecdote isn’t data! What you re repeatedly doing is the intellectual equivalent of saying, ‘I saw a guy smoking and he lived to 90, so smoking isn’t bad for you.’ It’s not data. It’s blinkered, small-minded reasoning that collapses the second you apply even a shred of critical thinking. But you don’t know what that is either If you want to be taken seriously, try understanding the difference between scientific evidence and whatever nonsense your gut tells you. (and your gut is so full of it, it really deserves an enema). Until then, leave the actual analysis to people who know what they’re talking about.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now