Actor Arrested Over Up-skirt Photos In Mall

[george]

Actor arrested over up-skirt photos in mall

BANGKOK: -- Atthakorn Suwannarat, a 27-year-old actor, was arrested on Friday on suspicion of snapping sneak shots with his mobile-phone camera of a sales assistant’s panties in a Bangkok shopping mall.

Atthakorn reportedly confessed to police that he had taken an up-skirt photo of a saleswoman at The Mall Ngamwongwan.

After she and her co-worker discovered what Atthakorn was up to, they alerted security guards, who seized the actor’s phone as evidence and called police. Atthakorn’s camera contained an up-skirt photo of the saleswoman as well as one of another unidentified woman.

The saleswoman explained that she and her friend had turn-ed round and seen the actor standing beneath them on an escalator, taking the picture.

Later yesterday, however, in addressing the media, Atthakorn denied the allegations. “It was a total misunderstanding,” he said. “Why would I risk my reputation for something like this?”

He conceded that his digital camera did contain up-skirt photos of women’s panties, but claimed that he had no idea how it had turned itself on.

He said his earlier confession to the police had been done in haste only so as to avoid further embarrassment.

According to the 388 Criminal Act, Atthakorn will if found guil-ty be fined Bt500 and required to delete the photos from his camera.

The plaintiff, however, called for Bt30,000 in compensation, and even while he continued to deny culpability, the actor made attempts to renegotiate the sum.

--The Nation 2005-01-23

[dr_Pat_Pong]

Actor arrested over up-skirt photos in mall

BANGKOK: -- Atthakorn Suwannarat, a 27-year-old actor, was arrested on Friday on suspicion of snapping sneak shots with his mobile-phone camera of a sales assistant’s panties in a Bangkok shopping mall.

Atthakorn reportedly confessed to police that he had taken an up-skirt photo of a saleswoman at The Mall Ngamwongwan.

After she and her co-worker discovered what Atthakorn was up to, they alerted security guards, who seized the actor’s phone as evidence and called police. Atthakorn’s camera contained an up-skirt photo of the saleswoman as well as one of another unidentified woman.

The saleswoman explained that she and her friend had turn-ed round and seen the actor standing beneath them on an escalator, taking the picture.

Later yesterday, however, in addressing the media, Atthakorn denied the allegations. “It was a total misunderstanding,” he said. “Why would I risk my reputation for something like this?”

He conceded that his digital camera did contain up-skirt photos of women’s panties, but claimed that he had no idea how it had turned itself on.

He said his earlier confession to the police had been done in haste only so as to avoid further embarrassment.

According to the 388 Criminal Act, Atthakorn will if found guil-ty be fined Bt500 and required to delete the photos from his camera.

The plaintiff, however, called for Bt30,000 in compensation, and even while he continued to deny culpability, the actor made attempts to renegotiate the sum.

--The Nation 2005-01-23

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

He could see a lot more than knickers in the streets of nocturnal delights. He might even cop a feel as well.

[sriracha john]

BANGKOK: -- Atthakorn Suwannarat, a 27-year-old actor, was arrested on Friday on suspicion of snapping sneak shots with his mobile-phone camera of a sales assistant’s panties in a Bangkok shopping mall.

the actor with no career?.... google/yahoo search for him turn up NOTHING

Later yesterday, however, in addressing the media, Atthakorn denied the allegations. “It was a total misunderstanding,” he said. “Why would I risk my reputation for something like this?”

Because you're an idiot?

He conceded that his digital camera did contain up-skirt photos of women’s panties, but claimed that he had no idea how it had turned itself on.

hahahaha...you'll have to come up with something better than that.

He said his earlier confession to the police had been done in haste only so as to avoid further embarrassment.

yeah.... riiiiiiiiiiiight.

According to the 388 Criminal Act, Atthakorn will, if found guilty, be fined Bt500 and required to delete the photos from his camera.

sheesh.... such a small fine, he's probably more upset about having to delete the photos.

The plaintiff, however, called for Bt30,000 in compensation, and even while he continued to deny culpability, the actor made attempts to renegotiate the sum.

doesn't follow he would do that if he's innocent??

Edited January 23, 2005 by RDN

[dr_Pat_Pong]

BANGKOK: -- Atthakorn Suwannarat, a 27-year-old actor, was arrested on Friday on suspicion of snapping sneak shots with his mobile-phone camera of a sales assistant’s panties in a Bangkok shopping mall.

the actor with no career?.... google/yahoo search for him turn up NOTHING

Later yesterday, however, in addressing the media, Atthakorn denied the allegations. “It was a total misunderstanding,” he said. “Why would I risk my reputation for something like this?”

Because you're an idiot?

He conceded that his digital camera did contain up-skirt photos of women’s panties, but claimed that he had no idea how it had turned itself on.

hahahaha...you'll have to come up with something better than that.

He said his earlier confession to the police had been done in haste only so as to avoid further embarrassment.

yeah.... riiiiiiiiiiiight.

According to the 388 Criminal Act, Atthakorn will, if found guilty, be fined Bt500 and required to delete the photos from his camera.

sheesh.... such a small fine, he's probably more upset about having to delete the photos.

The plaintiff, however, called for Bt30,000 in compensation, and even while he continued to deny culpability, the actor made attempts to renegotiate the sum.

doesn't follow he would do that if he's innocent??

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'd hate to be trying to defend the loser in a court.

[ovenman]

He conceded that his digital camera did contain up-skirt photos of women’s panties, but claimed that he had no idea how it had turned itself on.

That statement is priceless.

[Golf]

Classic!

[chingy_]

do we have a picture of this guy

[dr_Pat_Pong]

do we have a picture of this guy

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

only a couple of pic's of nickers

[tuky]

:blush:

nicking pics of knickers,

presumably for kicks,

sounds rather sick,

send him to nick,

and do it real quick

[dr_Pat_Pong]

:blush:

nicking pics of knickers,

presumably for kicks,

sounds rather sick,

send him to nick,

and do it real quick

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

And so you should be

[Pattaya_Fox]

Actor arrested over up-skirt photos in mall

BANGKOK: -- Atthakorn Suwannarat, a 27-year-old actor, was arrested on Friday on suspicion of snapping sneak shots with his mobile-phone camera of a sales assistant’s panties in a Bangkok shopping mall.

Atthakorn reportedly confessed to police that he had taken an up-skirt photo of a saleswoman at The Mall Ngamwongwan.

After she and her co-worker discovered what Atthakorn was up to, they alerted security guards, who seized the actor’s phone as evidence and called police. Atthakorn’s camera contained an up-skirt photo of the saleswoman as well as one of another unidentified woman.

The saleswoman explained that she and her friend had turn-ed round and seen the actor standing beneath them on an escalator, taking the picture.

Later yesterday, however, in addressing the media, Atthakorn denied the allegations. “It was a total misunderstanding,” he said. “Why would I risk my reputation for something like this?”

He conceded that his digital camera did contain up-skirt photos of women’s panties, but claimed that he had no idea how it had turned itself on.

He said his earlier confession to the police had been done in haste only so as to avoid further embarrassment.

According to the 388 Criminal Act, Atthakorn will if found guil-ty be fined Bt500 and required to delete the photos from his camera.

The plaintiff, however, called for Bt30,000 in compensation, and even while he continued to deny culpability, the actor made attempts to renegotiate the sum.

--The Nation 2005-01-23

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

He could see a lot more than knickers in the streets of nocturnal delights. He might even cop a feel as well.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This person has brought a whole new meaning to the word `Flasher`

I wonder if the plaintiff would get a better price then Bt 30,000 if she sold the pair of unmentionables to the press?. She could ofcourse donate the cash for the rehabilitation of sick photographers.

[Ijustwannateach]

And I thought only Japanese got up to things like this!

[ProfessorFart]

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm women's panties..............

[marquess]

Can we check out the evidence?

[ProfessorFart]

I just wonder how he managed to get away with even taking one?

Sounds like a breakdown to me!

[penzman]

The accused was spotted today on the "outskirts" of Bangkok.

[stumonster]

I think I found one of the photos online...

its a little bit grainy and small , but if you look closely

[Thetyim]

The Pattaya Police have got involved now and they have arrested the girl for indecent exposure.

[marquess]

So what's the big deal then! If the girl wanted to expose herself, surely that is down to her. Especially if no one complained at the time.

[dr_Pat_Pong]

The Pattaya Police have got involved now and they have arrested the girl for indecent exposure.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The poor girl. She'd had a hard day at the orifice.

[Thaddeus]

And I thought only Japanese got up to things like this!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It's far worse in some other countries........ South Africa

[kat]

I think I found one of the photos online...

its a little bit grainy and small , but if you look closely

  Actually, this scenario should figure into that chap's punishment.  That'll fix 'im.

     

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

[taxexile]

The accused was spotted today on the "outskirts" of Bangkok.

hiding behind a bush ??

[dr_Pat_Pong]

The accused was spotted today on the "outskirts" of Bangkok.

hiding behind a bush ??

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

He was trying to find one I thought

[tuky]

he had better pull his finger out as this kind of behaviour is way below the belt.

[dr_Pat_Pong]

he had better pull his finger out as this kind of behaviour is way below the belt.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Werll ... a little below the belt