WikiLeaks website again offline after company cuts DNS service

[LaoPo]

However, they knew that they were stolen and they flooded the Internet with them.

Som non na America

And they were stolen by an American, repeat American NOT an Australian performing a public service right to know.

Exactly.......................long live wikileaks!!!!!

KhunAussie52, is there a reason why your PM system doesn't work?

LaoPo

[animatic]

Conspiracy To Commit Espionage is a crime in most countries.

And covered by extradition treaties.

If Assange accepted stolen documents and then distributed them,

he is guilty of that conspiracy whether in or out of the country.

If he is arrested on an international arrest warrant outside of his own country,

as he is presently, and a treaty of extradition is in affect, and the crime is

essentially the same under both countries laws, then he can be extradited

to the prosecuting country for trial, regardless of his nation of origin...

And regardless of his nation of origin's objections.

If an Australian national or military personnel

gave or sold me classified national security information or documents,

and I then put them on the web, I have no doubts the Australian government

would fist charge their own national for treason, and charge all his partners

including myself, or those who assisted after the fact, with international espionage.

You couldn't get me to take a Wikileaks insurance file

on my computer for any amount of cash.

Files are leaked to the media all around the world and Australian Politicians including the foriegn minister have stated that he has committed NO OFFENCE....... What the Americans are accussing him of is not an offence in Australia as politicians say he not committed an offence. The Americans have turned him into a national hero. I would not give an American citizen the time of day now after what they are doing to great Aussie. No that is not American bashing but just my personal stance. It has turned into America against the Aussies tho.

You think so eh.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Australia. The Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act 2002 The Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act 2002 enhances Australia's national security legislative framework by strengthening Australia's espionage laws. The maximum penalty for a person convicted of espionage is now 25 years imprisonment. In addition to strengthening the offence provisions, the Act supports the process of bringing cases of espionage to trial.

First Post; Espionage

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forget what one or more politicians say and your personal prejudices,

and think in a legal framework.

Lets try this one.

Just because she couldn't name the law, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

------------------------------------------------------

Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (ESPIONAGE AND RELATED OFFENCES) BILL 2002

THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (ESPIONAGE AND RELATED OFFENCES) BILL 2002

http://www.austlii.e...2426/memo2.html

The new espionage offences are intended to strengthen Australia’s espionage laws by:

• referring to conduct that may prejudice Australia’s security and defence, rather than safety and defence;

• expanding the range of activity that may constitute espionage to capture situations where a person communicated or made available information concerning the Commonwealth's security or defence with the intention of prejudicing the Commonwealth’s security or defence or to advantage the security or defence of another country;

• affording the same protection to foreign sourced information belonging to Australia as Australian-generated information; and

• increasing the maximum penalty for a person convicted of espionage from seven years imprisonment to 25 years imprisonment

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another point missed by some is

AUSTRALIAN LAW MEANS SQUAT to Assange right now.

He is not IN Australia.

Edited December 11, 2010 by animatic

[moetownblues]

I would not give an American citizen the time of day now after what they are doing to great Aussie. No that is not American bashing but just my personal stance. It has turned into America against the Aussies tho.

Nonsense. I have many Aussie friends and none of them care what happens to Assange or Wikileaks. This problem isn't even a blip on their radar.

I can get the time of day from them so you don't have to stand by for my call.

The only reason I care is because I am retired and sometimes bored so it gives me something to occupy my time. There is also the fact that Assange is such a morally bankrupt creature.

Well,if you have so many Aussie friends.May i suggest they let us know there thoughts on the subject.Show you some support.Some how i doubt it!!!!

The only place that is morally bankrupt is America.

Assange is a hero!!!!!!!!!

I agree also Assange is a HERO. A fighter for democracy and free speach. The man is a true legend.

[moetownblues]

Conspiracy To Commit Espionage is a crime in most countries.

And covered by extradition treaties.

If Assange accepted stolen documents and then distributed them,

he is guilty of that conspiracy whether in or out of the country.

If he is arrested on an international arrest warrant outside of his own country,

as he is presently, and a treaty of extradition is in affect, and the crime is

essentially the same under both countries laws, then he can be extradited

to the prosecuting country for trial, regardless of his nation of origin...

And regardless of his nation of origin's objections.

If an Australian national or military personnel

gave or sold me classified national security information or documents,

and I then put them on the web, I have no doubts the Australian government

would fist charge their own national for treason, and charge all his partners

including myself, or those who assisted after the fact, with international espionage.

You couldn't get me to take a Wikileaks insurance file

on my computer for any amount of cash.

Files are leaked to the media all around the world and Australian Politicians including the foriegn minister have stated that he has committed NO OFFENCE....... What the Americans are accussing him of is not an offence in Australia as politicians say he not committed an offence. The Americans have turned him into a national hero. I would not give an American citizen the time of day now after what they are doing to great Aussie. No that is not American bashing but just my personal stance. It has turned into America against the Aussies tho.

You think so eh.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Australia. The Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act 2002 The Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act 2002 enhances Australia's national security legislative framework by strengthening Australia's espionage laws. The maximum penalty for a person convicted of espionage is now 25 years imprisonment. In addition to strengthening the offence provisions, the Act supports the process of bringing cases of espionage to trial.

First Post; Espionage

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forget what one or more politicians say and your personal prejudices,

and think in a legal framework.

Lets try this one.

Just because she couldn't name the law, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

------------------------------------------------------

Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (ESPIONAGE AND RELATED OFFENCES) BILL 2002

THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (ESPIONAGE AND RELATED OFFENCES) BILL 2002

http://www.austlii.e...2426/memo2.html

The new espionage offences are intended to strengthen Australia’s espionage laws by:

• referring to conduct that may prejudice Australia’s security and defence, rather than safety and defence;

• expanding the range of activity that may constitute espionage to capture situations where a person communicated or made available information concerning the Commonwealth's security or defence with the intention of prejudicing the Commonwealth’s security or defence or to advantage the security or defence of another country;

• affording the same protection to foreign sourced information belonging to Australia as Australian-generated information; and

• increasing the maximum penalty for a person convicted of espionage from seven years imprisonment to 25 years imprisonment

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another point missed by some is

AUSTRALIAN LAW MEANS SQUAT to Assange right now.

He is not IN Australia.

He hasn't broken any laws this is a witch hunt for a truely great geniune guy.

[KhunAussie52]

Conspiracy To Commit Espionage is a crime in most countries.

And covered by extradition treaties.

If Assange accepted stolen documents and then distributed them,

he is guilty of that conspiracy whether in or out of the country.

If he is arrested on an international arrest warrant outside of his own country,

as he is presently, and a treaty of extradition is in affect, and the crime is

essentially the same under both countries laws, then he can be extradited

to the prosecuting country for trial, regardless of his nation of origin...

And regardless of his nation of origin's objections.

If an Australian national or military personnel

gave or sold me classified national security information or documents,

and I then put them on the web, I have no doubts the Australian government

would fist charge their own national for treason, and charge all his partners

including myself, or those who assisted after the fact, with international espionage.

You couldn't get me to take a Wikileaks insurance file

on my computer for any amount of cash.

Files are leaked to the media all around the world and Australian Politicians including the foriegn minister have stated that he has committed NO OFFENCE....... What the Americans are accussing him of is not an offence in Australia as politicians say he not committed an offence. The Americans have turned him into a national hero. I would not give an American citizen the time of day now after what they are doing to great Aussie. No that is not American bashing but just my personal stance. It has turned into America against the Aussies tho.

You think so eh.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Australia. The Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act 2002 The Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Matters) Act 2002 enhances Australia's national security legislative framework by strengthening Australia's espionage laws. The maximum penalty for a person convicted of espionage is now 25 years imprisonment. In addition to strengthening the offence provisions, the Act supports the process of bringing cases of espionage to trial.

First Post; Espionage

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forget what one or more politicians say and your personal prejudices,

and think in a legal framework.

Lets try this one.

Just because she couldn't name the law, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

------------------------------------------------------

Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (ESPIONAGE AND RELATED OFFENCES) BILL 2002

THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (ESPIONAGE AND RELATED OFFENCES) BILL 2002

http://www.austlii.e...2426/memo2.html

The new espionage offences are intended to strengthen Australia’s espionage laws by:

• referring to conduct that may prejudice Australia’s security and defence, rather than safety and defence;

• expanding the range of activity that may constitute espionage to capture situations where a person communicated or made available information concerning the Commonwealth's security or defence with the intention of prejudicing the Commonwealth’s security or defence or to advantage the security or defence of another country;

• affording the same protection to foreign sourced information belonging to Australia as Australian-generated information; and

• increasing the maximum penalty for a person convicted of espionage from seven years imprisonment to 25 years imprisonment

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another point missed by some is

AUSTRALIAN LAW MEANS SQUAT to Assange right now.

He is not IN Australia.

Quote!!!!

Despite WikiLeaks being based in Europe, Attorney-General Robert McClelland has set up a whole-of-government task force, which includes members of the Federal Police force, to determine whether Assange can be charged with any offences.

At a doorstop interview at Parliament House on Monday, McClelland said that the publication of documents by the WikiLeaks website "could be damaging to the national security interests of the United States and its allies, including Australia."

"So obviously Australia will support any law enforcement action that might be taken," McClelland said. "The United States government will be the lead government in that respect, but certainly Australian agencies will assist and look at - of course, I'd ask the Australian Federal Police to look at the issue as to whether any Australian laws have been breached as a specific issue as well."

Greg Barns, a barrister and director of the Australian Lawyers Alliance, poured scorn on the idea that Assange could be charged as a result of investigations from the taskforce. He told Lawyers Weekly that the Australian government is motivated by politics and that to charge Assange would represent a danger to the ideas of democracy and freedom of expression and freedom of the press.

"This is a compete waste of the AFP's time," Barns said. "All McClelland is doing is barking to the tune of his American counterpart, and seeking to cuddle up to Australia's closest ally."

Barns said that it would "be a stretch" to charge Assange for alleged breaches in terms of possible charges under anti-terrorism laws and the National Security Information Act.

"The fact that any government would be embarrassed by the publication of information doesn't make it an offence to publish it," he said. "The only information released regarding Australia thus far has been in relation to its relatively modest role in the world, it certainly hasn't compromised or involved important national security issues."

Professor George Williams, an anti-terrorism expert from the University of New South Wales, agrees with Barns that there are few avenues the Australian government could take to charge Assange.

"I don't know what they could charge him with," he said. "If they are looking to charge him under anti-terrorism laws, it would be hard to do, as he has not committed any terrorist act."

Barns and Williams conceded that the Attorney-General and the government had more discretion when it comes to revoking his Australian passport, but that there would need to be a sound legal basis for doing so.

"There are no reasonable grounds to cancel Assange's passport on the basis that he runs a website that is a repository for leaking sensitive information," Barns said. "Politicians, their staffers and journalists all leak sensitive information from time to time to discredit opponents or for other reasons.

"Will McClelland take their passports as well?"

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/332-wikileaks/australia-charges-assange-74109/

[KhunAussie52]

However, they knew that they were stolen and they flooded the Internet with them.

Som non na America

And they were stolen by an American, repeat American NOT an Australian performing a public service right to know.

Exactly.......................long live wikileaks!!!!!

KhunAussie52, is there a reason why your PM system doesn't work?

LaoPo

Hello LaoPo.............I do not know.sorry!!!

[animatic]

Again, that is only valid if AUSTRAILIA wants to prosecute him

or IF he were IN Australia when a extradition request comes in.

He is in England and subject, for the moment to UK laws.

If he first is extradited to Sweden for what ever reason,

then at that moment he is subject to Sweden USA extradition laws.

So if the crime is the same in Sweden essentially, then extradition can go through.

Unless he is actually in Austrailia this is a moot point.

But the basic point is;

Yes, Austrailia DOES have laws on classified documents, their theft and dissemination.

This is not a discussion of cultures or nationalist agenda's but of legality of actions.

And no I do not think his actions are grandly heroic.

I think the repercussions of his actions will cause great heartache for millions

long after the neo-socialist joy has worn off the WikiRose bloom.

[KhunAussie52]

Again, that is only valid if AUSTRAILIA wants to prosecute him

or IF he were IN Australia when a extradition request comes in.

He is in England and subject, for the moment to UK laws.

If he first is extradited to Sweden for what ever reason,

then at that moment he is subject to Sweden USA extradition laws.

So if the crime is the same in Sweden essentially, then extradition can go through.

Unless he is actually in Austrailia this is a moot point.

But the basic point is;

Yes, Austrailia DOES have laws on classified documents, their theft and dissemination.

This is not a discussion of cultures or nationalist agenda's but of legality of actions.

And no I do not think his actions are grandly heroic.

I think the repercussions of his actions will cause great heartache for millions

long after the neo-socialist joy has worn off the WikiRose bloom.

No case to answer in Australia.read my last post re prosecution

[Ulysses G.]

He hasn't broken any laws this is a witch hunt for a truely great geniune guy.

Who is under arrest for sex crimes and being investigated for espionage.

[KhunAussie52]

Again, that is only valid if AUSTRAILIA wants to prosecute him

or IF he were IN Australia when a extradition request comes in.

He is in England and subject, for the moment to UK laws.

If he first is extradited to Sweden for what ever reason,

then at that moment he is subject to Sweden USA extradition laws.

So if the crime is the same in Sweden essentially, then extradition can go through.

Unless he is actually in Austrailia this is a moot point.

But the basic point is;

Yes, Austrailia DOES have laws on classified documents, their theft and dissemination.

This is not a discussion of cultures or nationalist agenda's but of legality of actions.

And no I do not think his actions are grandly heroic.

I think the repercussions of his actions will cause great heartache for millions

long after the neo-socialist joy has worn off the WikiRose bloom.

No case to answer in Australia.read my last post re prosecution

Heartache for the US administration for there deceit and lies.

[animatic]

Again, that is only valid if AUSTRAILIA wants to prosecute him

or IF he were IN Australia when a extradition request comes in.

He is in England and subject, for the moment to UK laws.

If he first is extradited to Sweden for what ever reason,

then at that moment he is subject to Sweden USA extradition laws.

So if the crime is the same in Sweden essentially, then extradition can go through.

Unless he is actually in Austrailia this is a moot point.

But the basic point is;

Yes, Austrailia DOES have laws on classified documents, their theft and dissemination.

This is not a discussion of cultures or nationalist agenda's but of legality of actions.

And no I do not think his actions are grandly heroic.

I think the repercussions of his actions will cause great heartache for millions

long after the neo-socialist joy has worn off the WikiRose bloom.

No case to answer in Australia.read my last post re prosecution

Heartache for the US administration for there deceit and lies.

I did read it.

Again the point is missed.

For Extradition from Australia.

If he had broken Australian espionage laws

for steeling or accepting stolen clasified data from Austrailia,

would he be prosecuted?

What i posted seems to say yes.

So if that legal fact matches close enough to America's similar law,

then his EXTRADITION, would have to go through,

not a prosecution in Australia for an Australian crime.

Simply complying with extradition for a similar crime.

That of encouraging, and accepting classified stolen documents.

And before this even applies, he must extricate himself from UK,

and likely Sweden before he can even consider Australian law.

So does the American law parallel the Swedish law?

If it does and the paper work is done fast enough,

Convicted or not in Sweden, once there he can then come under a

extradition request from USA. I imaging right now, several dozen lawyers

are examining those laws to find the best combination to prevent his exit from Sweden.

-----------------------

Genuine guy?

How is some one not genuine, there are no fake humans... yet.

Edited December 11, 2010 by animatic

[philw]

He hasn't broken any laws this is a witch hunt for a truely great geniune guy.

Who is under arrest for sex crimes and being investigated for espionage.

Totally wrong, he is being detained pending an extradition request that may or may not granted.

Your assertion that he is under arrest for sex crimes is wrong, libellous and inflamatory.

I guess you do it deliberately...

The USA authorities might be investigating the chance of trying to make a charge under American espionage laws but again, that is far different from your statement.

I wonder if you are man enough apologise to Julian Assange for your incorrect and libellous remarks on a public board?

[elcent]

There's a global outcry over the framing of Julian Assange. Over 535 000 petition signatures within two days and still growing.

It's not the documents that are revealing but the reactions to it.

I think we need to look at facts rather than fiction.

There are real conspiracies behind, but they're not from the messenger.

Hacker issues

It also turned out that geographically most attacks are from the US of A and that this so called LOIC (Low Orbit Ion Cannon) - software is mostly downloaded in the US of A.

[luckizuchinni]

Personally, and I have never met the guy, I think he is an attention-grabber more interested in his self-aggrandizing than any freedom of speech issues. If the US gets a hold of him, though, they very well may charge him with crimes against the US, and there is plenty of precedence for that, for trying non-US citizens for crimes committed outside the US. ALthough, you could argue very easily that when those documents were made available in the US, he then committed the crime.

However, I also personally don't think the case is that strong. The person who stole the data is certainly culpable, but I think an argument can be made that Assange is not. However, if is is a sex criminal, if he has ever fudged on his taxes, if he has jaywalked, he is going to get nabbed. he made his bed, now he has to sleep in it, and I don't blame any nation for following the rule of the law with regards to him, even if that might seem excessive.

Assange is not a hero. He just wants the limelight, in my humble opinion. And I base that opinion on what others in his organization have reported, not based on what has been reported by people on the "other side."

[luckizuchinni]

There's a global outcry over the framing of Julian Assange. Over 535 000 petition signatures within two days and still growing.

It's not the documents that are revealing but the reactions to it.

I think we need to look at facts rather than fiction.

There are real conspiracies behind, but they're not from the messenger.

Hacker issues

It also turned out that geographically most attacks are from the US of A and that this so called LOIC (Low Orbit Ion Cannon) - software is mostly downloaded in the US of A.

And until all the facts are known, we don't know if this is a frame job or not. SO I am not sure how you can judge it so unless you are privy to knowledge that the rest of us are not.

Just because some governments may want these charges, that does not mean they are baseless. Doesn't mean they are valid, either. We need to wait for the Swedish authorities to complete their investigation.

[elcent]

interesting live discussion going on here http://personaldemocracy.com/pdfleaks

right now the co-founder from Huffington-post is talking

Edited December 11, 2010 by elcent

[philw]

interesting live discussion going on here http://personaldemocracy.com/pdfleaks

right now the co-founder from Huffington-post is talking

Thanks for that.

ph

[elcent]

discussion is over at personaldemocracy, just a little entertainment below - hilarious

[animatic]

He hasn't broken any laws this is a witch hunt for a truely great geniune guy.

Who is under arrest for sex crimes and being investigated for espionage.

Totally wrong, he is being detained pending an extradition request that may or may not granted.

Your assertion that he is under arrest for sex crimes is wrong, libellous and inflamatory.

I guess you do it deliberately...

The USA authorities might be investigating the chance of trying to make a charge under American espionage laws but again, that is far different from your statement.

I wonder if you are man enough apologise to Julian Assange for your incorrect and libellous remarks on a public board?

Then he is 'under arrest pending extradition for sex crimes in another country'.

Feel better now? Your semantic argument didn't further understanding the issue a bit.

Edited December 11, 2010 by animatic

[TAWP]

No, he is held during proceeding to extradite him on a request for an interview!

He could very well be set on free foot after a 2h interview about the allegations. Well, if this wasn't a high-profile case that is how it would go.

But due to the amount of publicity the new prosecutor might want to try to charge him, even at a lower suspicion-grade (in Sweden we can charge people on different levels of suspicions, that apart from preliminary evidence-requirement also outline the rules and framework of their bail, restrictions on visits, access to news etc), and try to proceed to trial quickly - or slowly if they for some magical reason are able to hold him in detention.

[elcent]

There's a global outcry over the framing of Julian Assange. Over 535 000 petition signatures within two days and still growing.

It's not the documents that are revealing but the reactions to it.

I think we need to look at facts rather than fiction.

There are real conspiracies behind, but they're not from the messenger.

Hacker issues

It also turned out that geographically most attacks are from the US of A and that this so called LOIC (Low Orbit Ion Cannon) - software is mostly downloaded in the US of A.

And until all the facts are known, we don't know if this is a frame job or not. SO I am not sure how you can judge it so unless you are privy to knowledge that the rest of us are not.

Just because some governments may want these charges, that does not mean they are baseless. Doesn't mean they are valid, either. We need to wait for the Swedish authorities to complete their investigation.

what facts are you talking about? The facts of truth or the facts of lies? As Huffington just said a couple of minutes ago, The government is lying to us. I agree fully with her.

Despite of that I do quite a bit of research on that.

[Wallaby]

I actually think he is an introvert and doesn't like the limelight, he very rarely gave interviews previously and I don't think he has given many at all. Some reporters here have called him a very private person.

I believe espionage in the US could carry the death penalty, correct me if I'm wrong.

If that is so then it is a worrying factor for the australian govt to be assisting the US. Australia doesn't support the death penalty and will not extradite a person from our shores unless the death penalty is off the table. Further, we recently had a case where our federal police assisted the indonesian authorities in a drug running case where the people charged received the death penalty. This caused a major outcry in this country and after much consideration the AFP were advised to re consider offering assistance to other countries where an australian citizen could face the death penalty.

Of course I may be getting way ahead of myself on this but I 'could' cause quite a bit of trouble for our government if things start to head that way.

[elcent]

As rumours have it, Lieutenant Colonel Mattias Ardin Deputy Head of Operations, Swedish Joint Forces Land Component Command in Afghanistan is cousin and very close friend to Anna Ardin, one of the woman that alleges Julian Assange of rape are possibly connected to CIA involvement.

Here a link http://www.rusi.org/events/past/ref:E46DFE0753B9E5

Remember, she was called in to the meeting in Sweden on a very short note.

so far a leaking condom(condom-leaks) didn't work at first. Now we're seeing five charges including alleged rape.

[elcent]

interesting live discussion going on here http://personaldemocracy.com/pdfleaks

right now the co-founder from Huffington-post is talking

Thanks for that.

ph

The discussion is recorded for reference at the same site as mentioned above. Quite a few great remarks to dig.

Just see it doesn't work yet. Guess it will be available soon or someone else will post it on youtube then.

Edited December 11, 2010 by elcent

[beechguy]

I actually think he is an introvert and doesn't like the limelight, he very rarely gave interviews previously and I don't think he has given many at all. Some reporters here have called him a very private person.

I believe espionage in the US could carry the death penalty, correct me if I'm wrong.

If that is so then it is a worrying factor for the australian govt to be assisting the US. Australia doesn't support the death penalty and will not extradite a person from our shores unless the death penalty is off the table. Further, we recently had a case where our federal police assisted the indonesian authorities in a drug running case where the people charged received the death penalty. This caused a major outcry in this country and after much consideration the AFP were advised to re consider offering assistance to other countries where an australian citizen could face the death penalty.

Of course I may be getting way ahead of myself on this but I 'could' cause quite a bit of trouble for our government if things start to head that way.

No one has gotten the death penalty in a long time, including people who have done worse. I think it's safe to take that out of consideration.

Edited December 11, 2010 by beechguy

[Ulysses G.]

He hasn't broken any laws this is a witch hunt for a truely great geniune guy.

Who is under arrest for sex crimes and being investigated for espionage.

Totally wrong, he is being detained pending an extradition request that may or may not granted.

Your assertion that he is under arrest for sex crimes is wrong, libellous and inflamatory.

I guess you do it deliberately...

The USA authorities might be investigating the chance of trying to make a charge under American espionage laws but again, that is far different from your statement.

I wonder if you are man enough apologise to Julian Assange for your incorrect and libellous remarks on a public board?

Then he is 'under arrest pending extradition for sex crimes in another country'.

Feel better now? Your semantic argument didn't further understanding the issue a bit.

Some of the "arguments" on here are silly beyond belief - talk about useless spin.

That Ignore Feature really comes in handy for consistently hopeless posters. Too bad it does not block everything.

Edited December 11, 2010 by Ulysses G.

[moetownblues]

Australian soldiers are dying in Afganistan for America, I think this is a good time to bring our people home.

[KhunAussie52]

Australian soldiers are dying in Afganistan for America, I think this is a good time to bring our people home.

Totally agree!!

[KhunAussie52]

Who is under arrest for sex crimes and being investigated for espionage.

Totally wrong, he is being detained pending an extradition request that may or may not granted.

Your assertion that he is under arrest for sex crimes is wrong, libellous and inflamatory.

I guess you do it deliberately...

The USA authorities might be investigating the chance of trying to make a charge under American espionage laws but again, that is far different from your statement.

I wonder if you are man enough apologise to Julian Assange for your incorrect and libellous remarks on a public board?

Then he is 'under arrest pending extradition for sex crimes in another country'.

Feel better now? Your semantic argument didn't further understanding the issue a bit.

Some of the "arguments" on here are silly beyond belief - talk about useless spin.

That Ignore Feature really comes in handy for consistently hopeless posters. Too bad it does not block everything.

Were you a comedian in a past life :whistling:

[KhunAussie52]

Who is under arrest for sex crimes and being investigated for espionage.

Totally wrong, he is being detained pending an extradition request that may or may not granted.

Your assertion that he is under arrest for sex crimes is wrong, libellous and inflamatory.

I guess you do it deliberately...

The USA authorities might be investigating the chance of trying to make a charge under American espionage laws but again, that is far different from your statement.

I wonder if you are man enough apologise to Julian Assange for your incorrect and libellous remarks on a public board?

Then he is 'under arrest pending extradition for sex crimes in another country'.

Feel better now? Your semantic argument didn't further understanding the issue a bit.

Some of the "arguments" on here are silly beyond belief - talk about useless spin.

That Ignore Feature really comes in handy for consistently hopeless posters. Too bad it does not block everything.

Were you a comedian in a past life :whistling:

Why hasn't Sara Palin been arrested? Is it an offense under American law to incite murder and civil unrest?

Very good question............care to comment?