There was no red "Satire" big or small when it was originally posted. I do suppose it could have been written in black but the original post was difficult to read with a continuous string of <BR> etc trash mixed in.

However, I'm in full agreement of your last sentence, and no excuses after the first person or two!

There was when I posted the third reply, so I might forgive the first response.

I don't even think that not having the word "satire" there is an excuse.

The title of the article alone should be enough to spell it out.

I wonder if TH's 100 or so friends of similar economic standing on 'packages' subscribe to TV or just get their nannies, maids and drivers reply on their behalf-in between tea at the oriental and polo?

Perhaps the article struck a nerve-subconcious or not-however not that relevant is it when you can afford to ignore the insecurity.

I wonder if TH's 100 or so friends of similar economic standing on 'packages' subscribe to TV or just get their nannies, maids and drivers reply on their behalf-in between tea at the oriental and polo?

Perhaps the article struck a nerve-subconcious or not-however not that relevant is it when you can afford to ignore the insecurity.

My boss says 'That's outrageous, I would never do such a thing!'