whybother Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 There was no red "Satire" big or small when it was originally posted. I do suppose it could have been written in black but the original post was difficult to read with a continuous string of <BR> etc trash mixed in. However, I'm in full agreement of your last sentence, and no excuses after the first person or two! There was when I posted the third reply, so I might forgive the first response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonrakers Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 I don't even think that not having the word "satire" there is an excuse. The title of the article alone should be enough to spell it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 I wonder if TH's 100 or so friends of similar economic standing on 'packages' subscribe to TV or just get their nannies, maids and drivers reply on their behalf-in between tea at the oriental and polo? Perhaps the article struck a nerve-subconcious or not-however not that relevant is it when you can afford to ignore the insecurity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remiss Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 I wonder if TH's 100 or so friends of similar economic standing on 'packages' subscribe to TV or just get their nannies, maids and drivers reply on their behalf-in between tea at the oriental and polo? Perhaps the article struck a nerve-subconcious or not-however not that relevant is it when you can afford to ignore the insecurity. My boss says 'That's outrageous, I would never do such a thing!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now