Pm Abhisit Concludes His Weekly Tv Program With Full Participation By Guest Mcs

[Lite Beer]

PM Abhisit concludes his weekly TV program with full participation by guest MCs

By Amporn Samosorn.

BANGKOK, 1 May 2011 (NNT) - Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva this morning concludes his weekly television program “Confidence in Thailand with PM Abhisit” by talking straight from his heart in the first part and with full participation by guest MCs in the past 117 episodes in the remaining time of the program

In his report to the Thai people, the Prime Minister touched on the Thai-Cambodian border clashes which were still ongoing, saying that there would be no void in national administration after the House dissolution, and that the military had its firm stance of defending national sovereignty and eliminating aggression of all sorts. The Government, although an interim one after the House dissolution, would be able to perform its full duty in this regard, including the defending of the country’s stance in international arena, as well as the International Court of Justice.

Asked by an MC why he did not put off relinquishing his power in the face of serious threat to the country’s territorial integrity, the Prime Minister restated that it was his stance from the beginning not to serve the full term, partly because of certain elements that used the existence of his administration as the pretext for violent protests. He would rather turn back the power to the people to decide whether to continue with the administration or to seek changes. He reaffirmed that the issue of national sovereignty would never be compromised.

-- NNT 2011-05-01

[maewrocks]

This man is an embarrassment. He was never elected, but shamelessly accepted power, because of his links with the army & yellows. He has ruled ineffectively for 2 1/2 years and now he is going to be voted out. Thankfully!

[rubl]

This man is an embarrassment. He was never elected, but shamelessly accepted power, because of his links with the army & yellows. He has ruled ineffectively for 2 1/2 years and now he is going to be voted out. Thankfully!

There we go again

K. Abhisit is an elected MP who was elected by other MP's to be the PM. Just like the late k. Samak and k. Somchai before him. As PM he had to lead this country through the global economical crisis and the red-shirt protests.

He may not return but not because people vote him out, it would be 'not voted in'

Wait and see, two months at the most

[animatic]

This man is an embarrassment. He was never elected, but shamelessly accepted power, because of his links with the army & yellows. He has ruled ineffectively for 2 1/2 years and now he is going to be voted out. Thankfully!

There we go again

K. Abhisit is an elected MP who was elected by other MP's to be the PM. Just like the late k. Samak and k. Somchai before him. As PM he had to lead this country through the global economical crisis and the red-shirt protests.

He may not return but not because people vote him out, it would be 'not voted in'

Wait and see, two months at the most

Agreed.

maewrocks argument is as spurious as the Birthers on Obama.

Abhisit became PM in classic Thai political horse trading of MP's. A coalition was a greed to, same as ALL PMs before him. All legal as far as laws are concerned.

There has NEVER, ever been a coalition government where

pressure was not applied from BOTH SIDES, to try and win the most MP votes. Never happened, no matter what argument you may try and make.

Considering the impediments of violent dissent, an opposition in legislature that did nothing for the populace, but ONLY tried to take back power via censure debates, and considering the horrendous world economic collapse Abhisit has contended with, he has done a surprisingly GOOD job in 2.5 years.

And the PTP opposition has showed itself as serial incompetents, and the sock-puppets for Thaksin.

Edited May 1, 2011 by animatic

[maewrocks]

No you are both wrong. In the 2007 election PPP won 233 seats & the Dems 166. Rightfully so, after that PPP formed a coaltion government. That's a functioning democracy. After that convincing victory (even though the military were instructed to vote Dem) the powers to be; removed 2 PM's, dissolved the ruling party, politically persecuted and prosecuted the previously elected PM and in a deal done in the barracks forced all minor parties to team with Mark & the Dems. Anyone who claims that to be democratic is far more biased & brainwashed than any red shirt (who by the way didn't even exist before all this happened).

[rubl]

No you are both wrong.

...

Well, thank you for pointing this out to me. I promise to better my life, starting with ignoring agitators, ignorami, and other fools

[473geo]

No you are both wrong.

...

Well, thank you for pointing this out to me. I promise to better my life, starting with ignoring agitators, ignorami, and other fools

Better put that mirror down you once suggested you were using Rubl........

[scorecard]

No you are both wrong.

...

Well, thank you for pointing this out to me. I promise to better my life, starting with ignoring agitators, ignorami, and other fools

Don't worry Rubi, if he refuses to accept the well established and easy to understand laws and regulations involved, the facts of the situation, and the previous precedents, they why bother.

[scorecard]

This man is an embarrassment. He was never elected, but shamelessly accepted power, because of his links with the army & yellows. He has ruled ineffectively for 2 1/2 years and now he is going to be voted out. Thankfully!

There we go again

K. Abhisit is an elected MP who was elected by other MP's to be the PM. Just like the late k. Samak and k. Somchai before him. As PM he had to lead this country through the global economical crisis and the red-shirt protests.

He may not return but not because people vote him out, it would be 'not voted in'

Wait and see, two months at the most

Agreed.

maewrocks argument is as spurious as the Birthers on Obama.

Abhisit became PM in classic Thai political horse trading of MP's. A coalition was a greed to, same as ALL PMs before him. All legal as far as laws are concerned.

There has NEVER, ever been a coalition government where

pressure was not applied from BOTH SIDES, to try and win the most MP votes. Never happened, no matter what argument you may try and make.

Considering the impediments of violent dissent, an opposition in legislature that did nothing for the populace, but ONLY tried to take back power via censure debates, and considering the horrendous world economic collapse Abhisit has contended with, he has done a surprisingly GOOD job in 2.5 years.

And the PTP opposition has showed itself as serial incompetents, and the sock-puppets for Thaksin.

Well said!

[animatic]

No you are both wrong. In the 2007 election PPP won 233 seats & the Dems 166. Rightfully so, after that PPP formed a coaltion government. That's a functioning democracy. After that convincing victory (even though the military were instructed to vote Dem) the powers to be; removed 2 PM's, dissolved the ruling party, politically persecuted and prosecuted the previously elected PM and in a deal done in the barracks forced all minor parties to team with Mark & the Dems. Anyone who claims that to be democratic is far more biased & brainwashed than any red shirt (who by the way didn't even exist before all this happened).

It's the legend the red side wants to be believed.

But it is naught but a tissue of lies attached to half truths.

No point in refuting fact for fact here, after the first sentence,

there are too many total fallacies to bother with here.

[maewrocks]

Don't worry Rubi, if he refuses to accept the well established and easy to understand laws and regulations involved, the facts of the situation, and the previous precedents, they why bother.

Right, next time I'll just give a response that discredits & disregards any previous points, while being devoid of any reason or argument. Smart.

[animatic]

Don't worry Rubi, if he refuses to accept the well established and easy to understand laws and regulations involved, the facts of the situation, and the previous precedents, they why bother.

Right, next time I'll just give a response that discredits & disregards any previous points, while being devoid of any reason or argument. Smart.

I will grant you the 1st three sentences.

After the semi-colon it is just points that have been successfully refuted dozens of times here.

It just becomes redundant to repeat them every time they get reposted.

The laws are quite clear and easy to understand.

The legend building propaganda for Team Thaksin and the PPP mis-history lessons much less so....

[animatic]

Don't worry Rubi, if he refuses to accept the well established and easy to understand laws and regulations involved, the facts of the situation, and the previous precedents, they why bother.

Right, next time I'll just give a response that discredits & disregards any previous points, while being devoid of any reason or argument. Smart.

I will grant you the 1st three sentences.

After the semi-colon it is just points that have been successfully refuted dozens of times here. It just becomes redundant to repeat them every time they get reposted.

The laws are quite clear and easy to understand.

The legend building propaganda for Team Thaksin and the PPP mis-history lessons much less so....

Edited May 1, 2011 by animatic