webfact Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 RED LEADER Criminal Court rejects Arisman's second request for bail The Nation The Criminal Court Monday rejected the second request of red-shirt leader Arisman Pongruangrong for his release on bail on the grounds that he could flee again. The court reasoned that there was no guarantee that Arisman wouldn't jump bail. Arisman turned himself in to face terrorism charges. He is also charged with defaming former prime minister Abhisit Vejjajiva and a senior police officer. Arisman has been held in remand since December 7 pending trial on charges related to terrorism in connection with the last year's political disturbances. He fled to Cambodia following the May 19, 2010 ending of the red shirt rallies at Ratchaprasong Intersection. His escape and the serious nature of the charges were two critical factors for the previous rejection of his bail. In the second request, Arisman testified to the court that he had to flee abroad and waited until early this month before surrendering because he was warned that he could be assassinated. Arisman also promised the court that he would not flee again and would not lead red-shirt rallies again. But the court ruled on Monday that with only Arisman and his wife, Rapipan Ruangrong, testifying that Arisman would not jump bail, the court was not convinced by the promise. -- The Nation 2011-12-19
whybother Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 Good decision. He hasn't shown any good reason why he should be given bail.
lannarebirth Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 That remark he made about burning down a specific hospital was never going to get him bail. He's such an unstable figure I imagine the other side will try to flip him for information. That's why I think someone kills him in prison.
givenall Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 Couldn't happen to a nicer guy I am very sorry for all the bad things I did, I promise I will not do it again,NOT
RogueExpat Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 Glad to see the courts are not falling for his BS. Thought his red pals would protect him. Som num na. Mr. "I don't understand what I done wrong!"
siampolee Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 (edited) His arrogance at the previous hearing was indeed amazing, possibly that may have gone against him as did the fact and I would say it was the the major fact that only his wife testified to his honesty in not jumping bail. Indeed the courts made a wise decision. Says a lot as to the attitude of the puppet government we have now who are dumping the gullible fools who supported them in the past. Certainly seems as it the Red Shirt movement has passed its sell by, or rather its buy by ( no pun intended ) date. as far as this government and its sponsor is concerned. Edited December 19, 2011 by siampolee
phiphidon Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 So can we now accept that Thaksin/Yingluck/PTP/Red Shirts et al do not have the courts in their pocket? Probably not..................................
whybother Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 So can we now accept that Thaksin/Yingluck/PTP/Red Shirts et al do not have the courts in their pocket? Probably not.................................. That depends on whether he's being sidelined or not ...
lannarebirth Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 So can we now accept that Thaksin/Yingluck/PTP/Red Shirts et al do not have the courts in their pocket? Probably not.................................. Apparently you missed the news of Potjaman's "appeal" and subsequent refusal of the Attorney General to follow up. Black Letter law conviction overturned.
phiphidon Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 So can we now accept that Thaksin/Yingluck/PTP/Red Shirts et al do not have the courts in their pocket? Probably not.................................. That depends on whether he's being sidelined or not ... Ah the old double standards again, being cast aside by Thaksin. Do you think that is because of Buchholz posting that compromising picture of him and Yingluck (That's Arisman, not Buchholz) some time ago, before the election, you know, when all the dirt was being dished. This post actually, Compromising photo . It's quite a funny thread when you read it again especially as he (that's Buchholz) even posts a gushing gossip rag story about Thaksin's supposed mistress.
lannarebirth Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 So can we now accept that Thaksin/Yingluck/PTP/Red Shirts et al do not have the courts in their pocket? Probably not.................................. That depends on whether he's being sidelined or not ... Ah the old double standards again, being cast aside by Thaksin. Do you think that is because of Buchholz posting that compromising picture of him and Yingluck (That's Arisman, not Buchholz) some time ago, before the election, you know, when all the dirt was being dished. This post actually, Compromising photo . It's quite a funny thread when you read it again especially as he (that's Buchholz) even posts a gushing gossip rag story about Thaksin's supposed mistress. Looks like he slipped her a roofie, eh? As if arsonist , insurrectionist wasn't bad enough.
phiphidon Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 So can we now accept that Thaksin/Yingluck/PTP/Red Shirts et al do not have the courts in their pocket? Probably not.................................. That depends on whether he's being sidelined or not ... Ah the old double standards again, being cast aside by Thaksin. Do you think that is because of Buchholz posting that compromising picture of him and Yingluck (That's Arisman, not Buchholz) some time ago, before the election, you know, when all the dirt was being dished. This post actually, Compromising photo . It's quite a funny thread when you read it again especially as he (that's Buchholz) even posts a gushing gossip rag story about Thaksin's supposed mistress. Looks like he slipped her a roofie, eh? As if arsonist , insurrectionist wasn't bad enough. Best you get Zimbio.com on your favourites list. I understand that Hello is an english equivalent,or The Sun.
phiphidon Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 So can we now accept that Thaksin/Yingluck/PTP/Red Shirts et al do not have the courts in their pocket? Probably not.................................. Apparently you missed the news of Potjaman's "appeal" and subsequent refusal of the Attorney General to follow up. Black Letter law conviction overturned. As I said....................................probably not .
hellodolly Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 "In the second request, Arisman testified to the court that he had to flee abroad and waited until early this month before surrendering because he was warned that he could be assassinated." Wonder who he figured would assassinate him? Could it be some of the red shirt followers who were promised money and never got it.
lannarebirth Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 "In the second request, Arisman testified to the court that he had to flee abroad and waited until early this month before surrendering because he was warned that he could be assassinated." Wonder who he figured would assassinate him? Could it be some of the red shirt followers who were promised money and never got it. I think it is the Thaksinistas that are embarrased by him. He's disposable and he knows it better than anyone.
hellodolly Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 "In the second request, Arisman testified to the court that he had to flee abroad and waited until early this month before surrendering because he was warned that he could be assassinated." Wonder who he figured would assassinate him? Could it be some of the red shirt followers who were promised money and never got it. I think it is the Thaksinistas that are embarrased by him. He's disposable and he knows it better than anyone. Good point.
OzMick Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 Assassinated? Arisman? Only in his own mind would his death be rated such. I think the word he was looking for was executed, though exterminated would be appropriate enough. Having your wife as a reference with her position as MP fails when it is realised that the only reason that she is an MP is because of payback for his criminal actions. Jatuporn, Weng, et al, will be paying close attention to his trial. Could set a precedent. If he wins the top prize, PTP may have quite a few party list candidates watching the next election results from Cambodia.
Siam Simon Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 Assassinated? Arisman? Only in his own mind would his death be rated such. I think the word he was looking for was executed, though exterminated would be appropriate enough. Having your wife as a reference with her position as MP fails when it is realised that the only reason that she is an MP is because of payback for his criminal actions. Jatuporn, Weng, et al, will be paying close attention to his trial. Could set a precedent. If he wins the top prize, PTP may have quite a few party list candidates watching the next election results from Cambodia. don't get yourself too excited, Mick. Nobody will lose much face aver this.
bkkjames Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 Political liability-no longer needed, it appears.
webfact Posted December 19, 2011 Author Posted December 19, 2011 Criminal Court rejects Arisman's second request for bail THE NATION The Criminal Court yesterday rejected red-shirt leader Arisman Pongruangrong's second request for bail on grounds that he might flee again. Arisman, who turned himself in to face terrorism charges, also faces charges of defaming former PM Abhisit Vejjajiva and a senior police officer. The red-shirt leader has been held in remand since December 7 pending trial on charges related to terrorism in connection with last year's political turmoil. He fled to Cambodia once the red-shirt rally at Ratchaprasong intersection was brought to an end on May 19 last year. His escape and the serious nature of the charges were two critical factors behind the rejection of his first request for bail, the court said. In his second plea for bail, Arisman told the court that he had to flee abroad and wait until this month to surrender because people had warned him of attempts on his life. Arisman vowed in court that he would not attempt to escape or lead any rallies again. However, the court ruled yesterday that just Arisman and his wife, Rapipan Ruangrong, promising that he would not jump bail was not enough. In a separate ruling, the Criminal Court said yesterday that Arisman and Pheu Thai party-list MP Jatuporn Promphan had not defamed former deputy premier Suthep Thaugsuban in comments made to the press in 2009. Suthep had alleged that Jatuporn had defamed him at a press conference on December 4, 2009, by saying that the then-deputy PM was planning to bring in some 5,000 immigrants from neighbouring countries to pass off as red-shirt protesters. Jatuporn said Suthep was planning to have the foreigners destroy His Majesty's images on Rajdamnoen Road to prompt public anger against the red shirts. The court ruled that Jatuporn had justifiable grounds to express that fear. In the verdict, it said that Jatuporn and Suthep were political opponents and a senior city police officer had indeed testified that there were some foreigners among the demonstrators and that they might have been behind certain situations during the protest. Hence, the court said, Jatuporn was correct in expressing concerns to protect his side. -- The Nation 2011-12-20
OzMick Posted December 19, 2011 Posted December 19, 2011 (edited) Assassinated? Arisman? Only in his own mind would his death be rated such. I think the word he was looking for was executed, though exterminated would be appropriate enough. Having your wife as a reference with her position as MP fails when it is realised that the only reason that she is an MP is because of payback for his criminal actions. Jatuporn, Weng, et al, will be paying close attention to his trial. Could set a precedent. If he wins the top prize, PTP may have quite a few party list candidates watching the next election results from Cambodia. don't get yourself too excited, Mick. Nobody will lose much face aver this. Oh really! If he is found guilty of terrorism, and one video should be enough to satisfy a court, there will be no embarrassment that there are several more on the government benches waiting trial? Of course not, they will just claim court prejudice, double standards, politically motivated charges and all the rest of their standard mindless crap. Edited December 20, 2011 by OzMick
Siam Simon Posted December 20, 2011 Posted December 20, 2011 Assassinated? Arisman? Only in his own mind would his death be rated such. I think the word he was looking for was executed, though exterminated would be appropriate enough. Having your wife as a reference with her position as MP fails when it is realised that the only reason that she is an MP is because of payback for his criminal actions. Jatuporn, Weng, et al, will be paying close attention to his trial. Could set a precedent. If he wins the top prize, PTP may have quite a few party list candidates watching the next election results from Cambodia. don't get yourself too excited, Mick. Nobody will lose much face aver this. Oh really! If he is found guilty of terrorism, and one video should be enough to satisfy a court, there will be no embarrassment that there are several more on the government benches waiting trial? Of course not, they will just claim court prejudice, double standards, politically motivated charges and all the rest of their standard mindless crap. Like I said, calm down. Nothing much will come of this.
OzMick Posted December 20, 2011 Posted December 20, 2011 Assassinated? Arisman? Only in his own mind would his death be rated such. I think the word he was looking for was executed, though exterminated would be appropriate enough. Having your wife as a reference with her position as MP fails when it is realised that the only reason that she is an MP is because of payback for his criminal actions. Jatuporn, Weng, et al, will be paying close attention to his trial. Could set a precedent. If he wins the top prize, PTP may have quite a few party list candidates watching the next election results from Cambodia. don't get yourself too excited, Mick. Nobody will lose much face aver this. Oh really! If he is found guilty of terrorism, and one video should be enough to satisfy a court, there will be no embarrassment that there are several more on the government benches waiting trial? Of course not, they will just claim court prejudice, double standards, politically motivated charges and all the rest of their standard mindless crap. Like I said, calm down. Nothing much will come of this. Are you suggesting/expecting political interference with the courts? Bribing of judges?
Siam Simon Posted December 20, 2011 Posted December 20, 2011 Are you suggesting/expecting political interference with the courts? Bribing of judges? Mick, you might be a bit of a ranter with a vivid imagination, but you're not stupid. If you know anything about Thailand, you know that everything (repeat: everything) is always up for negotiation.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now