Jump to content

New Evidence About The Killing Of Red-Shirt 'Seh Daeng'


webfact

Recommended Posts

Reasons

It's a wonder no-one has thought of buying the sniper a ticket to Dubai? Just a thought! giggle.gif
because the sniper works for mr T
Highly doubtful as the red shirts take orders from, and obey Mr T.

Reasons..

  1. One possibility is that 'Seh Daeng was covertly helping the government.
  2. A coup rumor in connection with the grenade attack on army chief General Anupong Paojinda’s office at army headquarters:
  3. hardcore elements of the red shirts wanted to strike down Khattiya so that the ensuing upheaval would go out of control

  4. Some speculate Maj. Gen. Khattiya is using the Reds so a cabal of rightwing military officers and retirees can seize power.
  5. He was becoming more popular than Thaskin.
  6. After redshirt leaders accepted the prime minister's offer of early elections, 'Seh Daeng' refuses to comply, saying that a group of 400 to 500 protesters would hold out in what he described as a fortified area under the his command.

  7. 'Seh Daeng' proclaimed himself leader of the Red Shirts and was declaring war on the Thai military. Based on that it simply says he was taking the Red Shirts from Thaksin so he could use them to deal with his own personal war
  8. Dismissed army general General Kattiya Sawasdipol now claims that Thaksin Shinawatra has appointed three new red shirt leaders. He is also caliming that the will not be dispersing anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Off topic posts have been removed. Misspellings and grammatical errors can make posts difficult to understand. However be aware that not every member is a native English speaker and excessive posts regarding others spelling and grammar not only hijacks the topic but is poor netiquette.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a wonder no-one has thought of buying the sniper a ticket to Dubai? Just a thought!
because the sniper works for mr T
Highly doubtful as the red shirts take orders from, and obey Mr T.

But Seh Daeng was going 'off-message' at the time, and possibly embarassing Thaksin, who was by-then trying to appear not to be the obvious guiding-hand or 'big boss' behind the protests, when they had been turning increasingly violent.

So IMO it is entirely credible to think, as many here seem to, that Seh Daeng may have been a case of 'friendly fire'.

If "the red shirts take orders from, and obey Mr T", then what would happen when one red shirt leader gets carried-away, and starts to say things which his boss doesn't want spelled-out ? It's not like he was a Cabinet-minister, who might simply be replaced, at the next reshuffle. cool.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If some one is shot while carrying on a terrorist act, and by a policeman

May be he should be awarded a medal for dong his duty

And was it not the same man setting off those grenades, he had the pulled pins around his hat..! And was it not those same vigilantes (men in Black) who murdered the young Army Captain.. It was a great shot that took that madman out... well done whoever it was , police, army or just a concerned citizen..! Was he not just a plain old aerobics teacher anyhow..? And if it were not for his death, his daughter would still be selling Som-tam in the backstreets...!

I must say she is looking better and whiter everyday. Maybe one day she would become Thailand's 2nd lady PM.

Dear needs a new daddy, any volunteers?

This is a daughter fighting for the truth about who murdered her father, a brave man fighting for the democratic rights of the majority of thais, assassinated by a sniper. Your responses are quite perverse. If this happened in most other counrtries in the world, people would support her. How about JFK, MLK, etc. Did you get callous, racist or perverse comments about their family? But here on Thai Visa, as I can see, anything goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question in Seh Daeng's killing is "Cui bono?" Who benefited?

The Red Shirts were trying their damnedest to provoke the Army and Police in order to get a bloody shirt to wave. That's why they were firing off those wicked little M-80's with a ball bearing taped to it. But during the time of the protest I think the number of deaths in Bangkok actually lessened.

But supposedly the government had a sniper shoot Seh Daeng because...why exactly? In order to give the Red Shirts the martyr they wanted?

I thought the government leaders were supposed to be sophisticated villians, able to manage 37 layers of conspiracy without leaving any evidence?

It looks to me like the Red Shirts are still looking for a bloody shirt to wave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a daughter fighting for the truth about who murdered her father, a brave man fighting for the democratic rights of the majority of thais, assassinated by a sniper. Your responses are quite perverse. If this happened in most other counrtries in the world, people would support her. How about JFK, MLK, etc. Did you get callous, racist or perverse comments about their family? But here on Thai Visa, as I can see, anything goes.

Soylent Green (1973)

In an overpopulated futuristic Earth, a New York police detective finds himself marked for murder by government agents when he gets too close to a bizarre state secret involving the origins of a revolutionary and needed new foodstuff.

In 2022, Earth is overpopulated and totally polluted; the natural resources have been exhausted and the nourishment of the population is provided by Soylent Industries, a food made by plankton from the oceans. In New York, when Soylent's member of the board William R. Simonson is murdered apparently by a burglar at the Chelsea Towers West where he lives, efficient Detective Thorn is assigned to investigate the case with his partner Solomon "Sol" Roth. Thorn comes to the fancy apartment and meets Simonson's bodyguard Tab Fielding and the "furniture" (woman that is rented together with the flat) Shirl and the detective concludes that the executive was not victim of burglary but executed. Further, he finds that the Governor Santini and other powerful men want to disrupt and end his investigation. But Thorn continues his work and discovers that the oceans have exhausted and the bizarre and disturbing secret of the ingredient used to manufacture Soylent Green.

Edited by wxyz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a daughter fighting for the truth about who murdered her father, a brave man fighting for the democratic rights of the majority of thais, assassinated by a sniper. Your responses are quite perverse. If this happened in most other counrtries in the world, people would support her. How about JFK, MLK, etc. Did you get callous, racist or perverse comments about their family? But here on Thai Visa, as I can see, anything goes.

she needs to look no further than mr T and his band of merry thugs

[[[Absent Khattiya's leadership, discipline inside the red fortress was on the decline. Alcohol flowed freely, fueling tempers and fist-fights. Earlier in the day a Ronin fighter fired an Israeli-made TAR-21 assault rifle, seized from the army in April, at an army helicopter overhead.

Competing personalities vied for dominance among the disordered Ronin, but the bearded man who spoke little was calling the shots for now. "Do you know who is in charge here?" he said. "It's me."

At least until another unnamed commandant he described as second to Khattiya arrived to assume command and investigate why journalists were with the gunmen. ]]]

http://www.atimes.co...a/LE29Ae02.html

Edited by wxyz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a wonder no-one has thought of buying the sniper a ticket to Dubai? Just a thought! giggle.gif

because the sniper works for mr T

He works for whoever pays the most as time passes. But why waste money on an air fare when you can wait until the Messiah returns and then take him out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as you may not like a person for personal or political reasons, some of you seem to forget, that a person killed is always someones son or daughter, someones father or mother, someones sister or brother or "only" someones friend.

Some of your comments are plain disgusting.

Indeed, I wonder if Kattiya had the same consideration for the men that were given the business end of the grenade pins he wore on his hat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm. OK here's maybe something I picked up from watching too much NCIS and CSI cheesy.gif .

How can they prove the direction of the shot, it's been over a year!

Won't you need the weapon that fired the fatal shot to convict anyone of the 'crime'.

Some poor sod is just going to get rail roaded for this, unfortunately.

Can someone remind me if there is any actual footage of him being shot? Such as from the CCTV that the BMA put on the streetsclap2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a daughter fighting for the truth about who murdered her father, a brave man fighting for the democratic rights of the majority of thais, assassinated by a sniper. Your responses are quite perverse. If this happened in most other counrtries in the world, people would support her. How about JFK, MLK, etc. Did you get callous, racist or perverse comments about their family? But here on Thai Visa, as I can see, anything goes.

Murdered? He was a feral leading Thaksin's "Black Scum" in a terrorist attack on the Thai Army and Thailand. Your camparison to a Kennedy or a King is an absolute joke and shows how far removed from reality some are.

And as for why he was taken out. Simple tactics. If an opposition commander is parading around like a right dork then rules of combat are to remove the piece of garbage and weaken the terrorists leadership. Said it at the time that he should be dealt to by the Army as he was their 'feral" and their problem. That he was removed was a job well done. Little Dear should get on with her life and accept that her father was a lost cause when he when feral in terrorist action against Thailand.

The heading is correct with "killing" of.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was by 'the police' then this is about they only action they took that actually came off during the whole protests period. Other than this it would be a grand total of 0% done or done properly...

which is why the army came in.

Easy enough to hide the truth of inly 2-3 people know who did it and who ordered it.

The boss, the go between, and the shooter. A pro-shooter from outside, with a silenced sniper rifle sitting quietly in the hotel for several days waiting for the right shot, and then walking out just as quietly wouldn't be noticed, since the Red Rally was a total box of annoying noise anyway. Shooter likely left the country and is clipping coupons somewhere.

This is naught but a blame laying game, 'truth' has squat to do with it,

and manipulating the pretty, sad, young lady to do it.

Edited by animatic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a wonder no-one has thought of buying the sniper a ticket to Dubai? Just a thought! giggle.gif
because the sniper works for mr T
Highly doubtful as the red shirts take orders from, and obey Mr T.

I believe the point about this theory is that;

The general knew too much, was unstable and was talking too much,

safer and more useful at that point as a martyr than as a loose cannon general.

And he was at odds about strategy and how to use their forces onsite with the red protest leadership in particular Jatuporn, but also Vera, and that was part of why trust had evaporated between Sae Daeng and 'management'. S.D was much more hardcore and gungho than they seemed to have the stomach for.

Edited by animatic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reporting to the police that she suspects a policeman killed, her when in fact the police were on the Red side, and it wasn't an army person afterall, it's getting pretty murky. If you father leads an armed vigilante force defending terrorist type actions you should expect him to get shot, <snip>

If you live by the sword...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question in Seh Daeng's killing is "Cui bono?" Who benefited?

The Red Shirts were trying their damnedest to provoke the Army and Police in order to get a bloody shirt to wave. That's why they were firing off those wicked little M-80's with a ball bearing taped to it. But during the time of the protest I think the number of deaths in Bangkok actually lessened.

But supposedly the government had a sniper shoot Seh Daeng because...why exactly? In order to give the Red Shirts the martyr they wanted?

I thought the government leaders were supposed to be sophisticated villians, able to manage 37 layers of conspiracy without leaving any evidence?

It looks to me like the Red Shirts are still looking for a bloody shirt to wave.

You might want to check your timelines - By the time Sae Daeng was shot the Red Shirts already had far too many "bloody shirts to wave" as you so nicely refer to the dead red shirt supporters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a daughter fighting for the truth about who murdered her father, a brave man fighting for the democratic rights of the majority of thais, assassinated by a sniper. Your responses are quite perverse. If this happened in most other counrtries in the world, people would support her. How about JFK, MLK, etc. Did you get callous, racist or perverse comments about their family? But here on Thai Visa, as I can see, anything goes.

Sa Daeng was a rogue, insane wild dog that needed to be taken out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a daughter fighting for the truth about who murdered her father, a brave man fighting for the democratic rights of the majority of thais, assassinated by a sniper. Your responses are quite perverse. If this happened in most other counrtries in the world, people would support her. How about JFK, MLK, etc. Did you get callous, racist or perverse comments about their family? But here on Thai Visa, as I can see, anything goes.

Sa Daeng was a rogue, insane wild dog that needed to be taken out.

You are starting to sound like a North Korean Party Spokesman now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a daughter fighting for the truth about who murdered her father, a brave man fighting for the democratic rights of the majority of thais, assassinated by a sniper. Your responses are quite perverse. If this happened in most other counrtries in the world, people would support her. How about JFK, MLK, etc. Did you get callous, racist or perverse comments about their family? But here on Thai Visa, as I can see, anything goes.

Murdered? He was a feral leading Thaksin's "Black Scum" in a terrorist attack on the Thai Army and Thailand. Your camparison to a Kennedy or a King is an absolute joke and shows how far removed from reality some are.

And as for why he was taken out. Simple tactics. If an opposition commander is parading around like a right dork then rules of combat are to remove the piece of garbage and weaken the terrorists leadership. Said it at the time that he should be dealt to by the Army as he was their 'feral" and their problem. That he was removed was a job well done. Little Dear should get on with her life and accept that her father was a lost cause when he when feral in terrorist action against Thailand.

The heading is correct with "killing" of.

Your psychopathic comments reveal how far you are removed from reality.

If you took the time to read my post you would see that the compasrison was made in terms of grieving families and racist, sexist comments, not in terms of their popularity or platforms.

Seh Daeng represented and fought for the Red shirt movement who won the elections, thus for the majority of Thais, not the bunch of crooked bloodsucking leeches you seem to support.

It's obvious you have been reading too many Andy McNab comics when you start spouting terms like "taken out", "remove the piece of garbage", "removed".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your psychopathic comments reveal how far you are removed from reality.

If you took the time to read my post you would see that the compasrison was made in terms of grieving families and racist, sexist comments, not in terms of their popularity or platforms.

Seh Daeng represented and fought for the Red shirt movement who won the elections, thus for the majority of Thais, not the bunch of crooked bloodsucking leeches you seem to support.

It's obvious you have been reading too many Andy McNab comics when you start spouting terms like "taken out", "remove the piece of garbage", "removed".

Many, many Thais did note vote in the last election. The current government did not get over 50% of that vote. The party that won was PTP that is not composed completely of red shirts. Many of the red shirts would not have known that a disaffected general in the pay of a deposed corrupt ex-PM would be leading the military wing of the movement - or even that such a wing existed.

Many red shirts may have mistakenly thought that they were attending a peaceful protest against the coup (albeit 2+ years and 4 PMs too late) and considered that their leaders hate-filled speeches were merely rhetoric, How many actually brought bottles?

To ignore those realities and leap to the conclusion that Seh Daeng represented the "majority of Thais" goes past a flight of fancy well into lunacy, and would be considered an insult by the majority of Thais that I know, and many of those are red shirt supporters.

Edited by OzMick
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your psychopathic comments reveal how far you are removed from reality.

If you took the time to read my post you would see that the compasrison was made in terms of grieving families and racist, sexist comments, not in terms of their popularity or platforms.

Seh Daeng represented and fought for the Red shirt movement who won the elections, thus for the majority of Thais, not the bunch of crooked bloodsucking leeches you seem to support.

It's obvious you have been reading too many Andy McNab comics when you start spouting terms like "taken out", "remove the piece of garbage", "removed".

Many, many Thais did note vote in the last election. The current government did not get over 50% of that vote. The party that won was PTP that is not composed completely of red shirts. Many of the red shirts would not have known that a disaffected general in the pay of a deposed corrupt ex-PM would be leading the military wing of the movement - or even that such a wing existed.

Many red shirts may have mistakenly thought that they were attending a peaceful protest against the coup (albeit 2+ years and 4 PMs too late) and considered that their leaders hate-filled speeches were merely rhetoric, How many actually brought bottles?

To ignore those realities and leap to the conclusion that Seh Daeng represented the "majority of Thais" goes past a flight of fancy well into lunacy, and would be considered an insult by the majority of Thais that I know, and many of those are red shirt supporters.

Nit picking as usual, I see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your psychopathic comments reveal how far you are removed from reality.

If you took the time to read my post you would see that the compasrison was made in terms of grieving families and racist, sexist comments, not in terms of their popularity or platforms.

Seh Daeng represented and fought for the Red shirt movement who won the elections, thus for the majority of Thais, not the bunch of crooked bloodsucking leeches you seem to support.

It's obvious you have been reading too many Andy McNab comics when you start spouting terms like "taken out", "remove the piece of garbage", "removed".

Many, many Thais did note vote in the last election. The current government did not get over 50% of that vote. The party that won was PTP that is not composed completely of red shirts. Many of the red shirts would not have known that a disaffected general in the pay of a deposed corrupt ex-PM would be leading the military wing of the movement - or even that such a wing existed.

Many red shirts may have mistakenly thought that they were attending a peaceful protest against the coup (albeit 2+ years and 4 PMs too late) and considered that their leaders hate-filled speeches were merely rhetoric, How many actually brought bottles?

To ignore those realities and leap to the conclusion that Seh Daeng represented the "majority of Thais" goes past a flight of fancy well into lunacy, and would be considered an insult by the majority of Thais that I know, and many of those are red shirt supporters.

Nit picking as usual, I see.

The easiest way to stop others pointing out your idiotic statements is to not post them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your psychopathic comments reveal how far you are removed from reality.

If you took the time to read my post you would see that the compasrison was made in terms of grieving families and racist, sexist comments, not in terms of their popularity or platforms.

Seh Daeng represented and fought for the Red shirt movement who won the elections, thus for the majority of Thais, not the bunch of crooked bloodsucking leeches you seem to support.

It's obvious you have been reading too many Andy McNab comics when you start spouting terms like "taken out", "remove the piece of garbage", "removed".

Many, many Thais did note vote in the last election. The current government did not get over 50% of that vote. The party that won was PTP that is not composed completely of red shirts. Many of the red shirts would not have known that a disaffected general in the pay of a deposed corrupt ex-PM would be leading the military wing of the movement - or even that such a wing existed.

Many red shirts may have mistakenly thought that they were attending a peaceful protest against the coup (albeit 2+ years and 4 PMs too late) and considered that their leaders hate-filled speeches were merely rhetoric, How many actually brought bottles?

To ignore those realities and leap to the conclusion that Seh Daeng represented the "majority of Thais" goes past a flight of fancy well into lunacy, and would be considered an insult by the majority of Thais that I know, and many of those are red shirt supporters.

Blimey, Mick, what possesed you to show such a sudden burst of sanity and reason? I know from experience that it's beyond the bounds of reason to beseech you to keep it up..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your psychopathic comments reveal how far you are removed from reality.

If you took the time to read my post you would see that the compasrison was made in terms of grieving families and racist, sexist comments, not in terms of their popularity or platforms.

Seh Daeng represented and fought for the Red shirt movement who won the elections, thus for the majority of Thais, not the bunch of crooked bloodsucking leeches you seem to support.

It's obvious you have been reading too many Andy McNab comics when you start spouting terms like "taken out", "remove the piece of garbage", "removed".

Many, many Thais did note vote in the last election. The current government did not get over 50% of that vote. The party that won was PTP that is not composed completely of red shirts. Many of the red shirts would not have known that a disaffected general in the pay of a deposed corrupt ex-PM would be leading the military wing of the movement - or even that such a wing existed.

Many red shirts may have mistakenly thought that they were attending a peaceful protest against the coup (albeit 2+ years and 4 PMs too late) and considered that their leaders hate-filled speeches were merely rhetoric, How many actually brought bottles?

To ignore those realities and leap to the conclusion that Seh Daeng represented the "majority of Thais" goes past a flight of fancy well into lunacy, and would be considered an insult by the majority of Thais that I know, and many of those are red shirt supporters.

Nit picking as usual, I see.

The easiest way to stop others pointing out your idiotic statements is to not post them.

Look who's talking, , the conspiracy nut himself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

soylent green: how are the red shirt party not blood sucking leeches?! And their supporters only want handouts.Look no further than this current admin either.

C'mon they have done nothing, and before them was thaksin who did nothing honest, but manipulate people for his own gain and to make his arrogant family richer.

. You can't be that new to Thailand or are you?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

soylent green: how are the red shirt party not blood sucking leeches?! And their supporters only want handouts.Look no further than this current admin either.

C'mon they have done nothing, and before them was thaksin who did nothing honest, but manipulate people for his own gain and to make his arrogant family richer.

. You can't be that new to Thailand or are you?!

Sorry,you are right, I must have been brutally brainwashed by an Issan bar girl, I suppose.

I will try to reeducate myself as to who are the real blodsuckers in Thailand.

Before I wrongly believed that it was the Thai-Chinese elite in Bangkok,but now, after your generous and timely guidance, I realise that it must be the rice farmers in Issan who are the true enemies of Thailand..

Thank you so much.for your illumination.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that get me about this, is if it was some kind of conspiracy perpetrated by the Red Shirts in order to have a martyr, or as an excuse to armed combat, or as evidence after of the fact, or all of the above, then it could not have been done more incompetantly. If a cop wants to fit you up, he puts drugs in your draw and finds them during a search, he doesn't leave them under a tree outside and suggest that they must be yours because you had something to gain from them. What I mean is, why was it not made obvious it was a soldier that did it - a video of a guy in fatigues or a group of soldiers on a roof top witha sniper rifle, or whatever - not exactly hard to make a low quality phone movie showing just that (videod at any time and with sympathisers dressed up) - then it would lend itself nicely and make world news - as it stands it is a rumour no more than the same rumours as to JFK's assassination etc (even more vague as at least then they had a shooter even if some believe it was not him).

So, what does this leave? It really was the Army or PAD as rumoured? It was just someone living nearby that had had enough? That it was just an unlucky random shot that looks like an assissination given the context and apparant expert aim? If they arrested any of the above tomorrow, would you believe it was a good arrest or just a fit up? File it under "no one knows or no one's telling" and move on - I can, of course, understand why his daughter will not - and I wish her luck (which is probably to wish her no success as that may well be ill-luck!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...