jbauer Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Leaving aside Muay Thai, how he came to have a damaged eye (erm... self-inflicted?), or insinuations about English teachers, may I make it clear that I have no special desire to defend the guy, other than the fact that WE DON'T HAVE ALL THE EVIDENCE YET and PEOPLE SEEM TO WANT TO FIND HIM GUILTY OF BEING A THUG BASED ON HIS REACTIONS IN A VIDEO TO APPARENTLY BEING HIT IN THE HEAD. Sorry for the caps, I know it's bad form, but is it possible to delay the lynching until there is an outcome, or more information? If he caused the whole thing and the guards acted reasonably, I will gladly be one of the lynching party! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbauer Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Why is his filing a complaint proof of anything in itself? Maybe, just maybe, he wanted to let it go or just forget about it, until he found BTS had filed. What would you have done (yeah yeah it would have never happened to you). If he was after money, wouldn't he have filed immediately? I don't know, but neither do you, so stop insinuating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
submaniac Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Sorry for the caps, I know it's bad form, but is it possible to delay the lynching until there is an outcome, or more information? If he caused the whole thing and the guards acted reasonably, I will gladly be one of the lynching party! Agreed. We do not have all the facts yet, but the things we know for certain are (1) He's an English teacher at a Thai school (2) he has a Thai wife and (3) he has a Thai/Falang daughter. Claiming that he was acting as a thug will have serious repurcussions on the man's job as a teacher, potentially his ability to remain in the country, and his ability to keep his family together. Let's not jump to conclusions without knowing a bit more of the facts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbauer Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Finally, when I said "would this even be reported if it were the case", the it would be his exoneration of any charges, or mitigation thereof. I have no doubt that many people would be interested in this case as it stands now (farang v thai! rules v breaking rules!); it is just that from previous form, follow up on many cases in the news is minimal or nothing (too many teen hiso incidents/minivan crashes to mention), and I doubt if the guy was found to be blameless it would be reported or anyone would care. Just thinking how this irreversible damage would impact his life in Thailand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Traveller Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 22 pages !!! What's the problem? This kind of thing happens everyday. A guy had a disagreement with a security guard that got physical, and...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurofiend Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 22 pages !!! What's the problem? This kind of thing happens everyday. A guy had a disagreement with a security guard that got physical, and...? and... a lot of people replied, others just looked and sighed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbauer Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 I only got into it because some jerks were defaming a man's character without knowing much about what happened or caring to get any solid information, and they seemed to be doing this for a variety of unpalatable reasons (general ignorance, nationalism of a type [no guesses as to which poster did a lot of that], reliance on insufficient evidence, insinuation, and some sort of desire to put themselves above someone else and sneer from on high, whether deserved or not). I don't think I have anything else to say, in the absence of solid info (I'm sure my intended silence pleases some); this puts me where many of the posters in this super-long thread were about 12 hours ago, but it didn't stop them from yammering on and spreading innuendo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurofiend Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 I only got into it because some jerks were defaming a man's character without knowing much about what happened or caring to get any solid information, and they seemed to be doing this for a variety of unpalatable reasons (general ignorance, nationalism of a type [no guesses as to which poster did a lot of that], reliance on insufficient evidence, insinuation, and some sort of desire to put themselves above someone else and sneer from on high, whether deserved or not). i completely agree with your sentiments sometimes it is better to just look and sigh, for your own sanity 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedOctober Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Funny how Thais are sticklers for the rules when a Farang is involved. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F4UCorsair Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 People seem to miss the point that this video is after the initial confrontation. Everyone is flushed with adrenaline. Many of us have only flexed our cyber muscles. But any of us who have been in such conflict can attest to an "altered" state of being. Man if you undergo an 'altered state of being' over something like this issue, you have serious problems in your life, and they can only become more serious if you don't alter your behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F4UCorsair Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Per the March 23, 2012 Nation News article: "If a balloon explodes in a train compartment, other passengers may think a bomb has gone off and panic. A stampede could follow, and many people can be injured in such scenario." I guess that would make sense why balloons are not allowed on BTS. You're onto it, a particularly good reason why they wouldn't be permitted. Many years ago, pre 9/11, when I flew aircraft for a living, the co-pilot brought three balloons on board, left overs from his birthday party in a layover port the previous evening. They were small/ish so had plenty of room to expand, and I never suspected for a moment that they could ever expand enough to burst, but climbing through 40,000 feet they went off in succession, and chaos reigned for quite a few seconds on the flight deck, both of us thinking that we'd had an on board bomb go off. That's a good enough reason. If it had been in the cabin, panic may well have occurred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webfact Posted March 22, 2012 Author Share Posted March 22, 2012 related: Bangkok BTS apologises for guard's clash with Irish passenger BANGKOK: -- Bangkok Mass Transit System (BTS), the operator of the Skytrain, yesterday apologised to a foreign passenger who claimed he was attacked by a security guard for breaching a rule banning gas-filled balloons on the rail system. Full story: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crushdepth Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 It's not about Thai or Foreigner, It's about Rules is Rules. Rule #53257: Passengers with balloons shall be clubbed in the head? That guard should be sitting in a cell. Its pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurofiend Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 It's not about Thai or Foreigner, It's about Rules is Rules. Rule #53257: Passengers with balloons shall be clubbed in the head? That guard should be sitting in a cell. Its pathetic. Rules is Rules, Son... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indothai Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Just jumped into the topic, are any rules written in "proper" English at the entrances of BTS/MRT/BRT stations? Proper, not translated from Thai to English via Google! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keemapoot Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Channel 3 just had extensive coverage again this morning, including an interview with the Irish guy who is the subject of the controversy. He stated that he admits he should have acted differently, but that the actions of smacking him by the guard were not an appropriate response. He also said he was greatly dismayed by all the nonstop gossip about him on the online forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunron13 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 It's not about Thai or Foreigner, It's about Rules is Rules. No, this is Thailand; cash rules! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DP25 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 He also said he was greatly dismayed by all the nonstop gossip about him on the online forums. That's probably worse than the clubbing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chupup Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 If you look at the video, he was already bleeding while he was on the other side of the gates, where no security guard is present. On top of that, he does seem like an aggressive a-hole. Seeing how the guy seemed to want to punch the security guard, if I were the BTS guy, I would have clubbed him in the head as well. But, as always, the farang apologetist/"thais hate farangs" brigade will soon swarm this topic. What, just like you have ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunron13 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 For those who speak a foreign language but cannot read and understand pictures? But you know how some signs are so badly translated here that you might start to ignore the English translation. He might have thought it meant no skinny ties. +2 for originality. As for Nisa, judging by the level of your posting, I'd gladly send you ten balloons today for your graduation from Grade 1. I made a concerted effort to find this type of sign at Phrom Phong station this morning and it's not there. Oh, maybe it's posted INSIDE the turnstiles with the no food and no drink signs. Have to agree with you about Nisa; it's arguments border on being more childish than immature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoodMaiDai Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 (edited) I was about to say there needs to be a sign but someone just posted it. Well then. Edited March 23, 2012 by PoodMaiDai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurofiend Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 For those who speak a foreign language but cannot read and understand pictures? But you know how some signs are so badly translated here that you might start to ignore the English translation. He might have thought it meant no skinny ties. lol, i missed this gem of a post among this shitheap of a thread.. great observation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8OA8 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Typical, I have seen the same type of thugery from Transit inspectors in Australia. This type of violence should under no circumstances be condoned. The man is clearly non hostile and is trying to understand why he has become a victim of such unforgiviable agression. So much for a happy day out on the train with girl and kids. -sack them immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curt1591 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Typical, I have seen the same type of thugery from Transit inspectors in Australia. This type of violence should under no circumstances be condoned. The man is clearly non hostile and is trying to understand why he has become a victim of such unforgiviable agression. So much for a happy day out on the train with girl and kids. -sack them immediately. I guess they edited out the part where they beat him about the face! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sydneyjed Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Will the public get to see the CCTV film of the incident...persuming if it hasn't already mysteriously vanished?...Only then can an educated opinion be seen for what it is, instead of some of the constant kangaroo court mentallity drivel being shown on here for what it is over the last day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayjay3880 Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 What I see on the video is a man being stopped at one entrance before entering and then proceeding to another entrance only to try and force his way by the guards. Another case of a Farang thinking he is better than anyone else. You can also clearly see that this was a setup. At the end of the video, the second Farang looks at the camera and gives a thumbs up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dknslowly Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 I don´t really see why he shouldn´t be allowed to carry the balloons on the train, when it´s no crime to bring a dirty bicycle. Balloons aren't always harmless. Don't always assume they are filled with Helium. Hydrogen is much cheaper, gives more profit & let me tell you from experience it really goes "boom" if there's a spark. For pure safety reasons you don't let balloons on the train. Dirty bikes don't explode on impact. You don't want to be on the train when a, "Oh the humanity" situation arises. Sad case which has done nothing to bring either the "Farangs who hate Thais" and the "Thais who hate Farangs" closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steffi Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 The only reason balloons are banned is because they take up too much space on the train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses G. Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Sad case which has done nothing to bring either the "Farangs who hate Thais" and the "Thais who hate Farangs" closer. Don't forget the "Farangs who hate Farangs who hate Thais" camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurofiend Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Sad case which has done nothing to bring either the "Farangs who hate Thais" and the "Thais who hate Farangs" closer. Don't forget the "Farangs who hate Farangs who hate Thais" camp. or the farangs who hate thais who hate farangs who hate other farangs who like thais that hate farangs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts