Jump to content

What's The Hurry? Reconciliation Can't Be A Rush Job: Thai Talk


Recommended Posts

Posted

THAI TALK

What's the hurry? Reconciliation can't be a rush job

Suthichai Yoon

The Nation

30179843-01_big.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The government and ruling Pheu Thai Party have been warned: National reconciliation can't be rushed. Neither can it be force-fed. Or else the country could choke on an overdose of one-sided "justice for the victors". Disaster could strike if things are wrapped up in a hurry by a majority vote in Parliament.

The warnings have come from such institutions as the King Prajadhipok's Institute (KPI) and the Truth Commission for National Reconciliation. But judging from official comments from the power-that-be, the advice is not being heeded. Further political tension is lurking around the corner - yet again.

Deputy Premier and Interior Minister Yongyuth Wichaidit has shot down a proposal to hold a series of public hearings on how best to achieve national reconciliation. He insists that organising a nationwide debate on the issue would merely "waste time" and delay the implementation of unity efforts.

His argument, a favourite stand of any party with a majority in the House, is that Parliament is already a "key mechanism" through which the public voice can be measured. In his own words: "It is impossible for all 60 million Thai people to have their own say on the proposals. In any case, their representatives are already in Parliament."

That means he has tossed aside concerns from certain quarters that any move that smacks of the "tyranny of the majority" in Parliament could ruin respect for the minority.

Besides, with most Thais getting increasingly sceptical about whether their MPs really represent their own real thinking, any attempt to force the issue to a conclusion within a short period of time could spark another national catastrophe.

Pheu Thai was initially trying to ram through the KPI's recommendations with a majority vote, prompting the KPI research team to issue a series of statements warning that politicians must not exploit only particular parts of the paper to suit their own political agenda.

And that thinly-veiled purpose was obviously to use the segment in the KPI report suggesting that the work of the committee set up after the 2006 coup - which probed and confiscated some of former premier Thaksin Shinawatra's assets - be declared null and void.

In fact, the KPI academics became so alarmed that their work was being used to promote the ruling party's cause that they threatened to "withdraw" the report if the House was to vote on it immediately.

The KPI wanted the House committee to delay any voting on the issue until after the general public had been given a chance to debate its pros and cons.

It was at this juncture that the Truth Commission, headed by Dr Kanit na Nakhon, released its third report to Premier Yingluck Shinawatra with another stern exhortation: Don't rush the reconciliation process with a majority vote or else the country could be plunged into a new round of conflicts that could threaten the whole effort to achieve unity.

But Deputy Premier Yongyuth, who chairs a government panel charged with monitoring the Kanit Commission, insisted that the majority in Parliament will determine what to do with the reconciliation proposals based on the KPI report.

The whole exercise is obviously getting messier every day. The ruling party, it seems, is bent on using the KPI report to push through its own version of national reconciliation, despite the fact that the academics who had carried out the research themselves are saying that Pheu Thai should not proceed without referring to a broader base of public opinion.

The KPI researchers made it clear that they would withdraw the study if the House forwarded its proposals for Cabinet consideration, since such a move could spark a "war of reconciliation" and that it would end up being a case of "justice for the victors".

To add insult to injury, the government is also set to rush the constitutional amendment motion into the House while the controversy over the "reconciliation war" is still looming large. Critics see the two moves as a two-pronged political assault on the part of the ruling party to help former premier Thaksin to return to Thailand as a man free of any criminal charges.

The speed with which these parallel moves are being forced through the legislative body has triggered a sudden rise in the local political temperature.

Unless the Pheu Thai Party steps on the brakes to slow things down to show its respect for opposing views over these highly inflammable issues, the next crisis is just around the corner.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-04-12

Posted

Yingluck and Abhisit should hold a televised debate on reconciliation, what it actually means and what are the best steps to achieve it, so everyone can become informed on the matter.

Not going to happen of course, the figurehead PM doesn't do debates.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

"That means he has tossed aside concerns from certain quarters that any move that smacks of the "tyranny of the majority" in Parliament could ruin respect for the minority"

This whole dust-up by the Opposition suggesting there is a 'rush to judgment' is very understandable from their perspective. Going backward would be their preference, considering the felonious culpabilities of their leadership, who should be recusing themselves in any event. Contrarily, advancing and making progress is self-servingly being spun as 'hurried and hasty"................. An interesting use of the political maxim "Tyranny of the majority". They never referenced "tyranny of the minority' during their coup induced administration that was challenged at R'song, and thoroughly discarded by last years voters.

Edited by CalgaryII
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Yingluck and Abhisit should hold a televised debate on reconciliation, what it actually means and what are the best steps to achieve it, so everyone can become informed on the matter.

Not going to happen of course, the figurehead PM doesn't do debates.

Better, Yingluck and Abhisit could fall in love and marry. Typical Thai soap. 60 million will glue in front of their tele in tears of joy.

Edited by sparebox2
Posted

Is the KPI report actually complete and avaliable to download? The fact that Pheu Thai want to ram through some cherry-picked proposals even before the report has been completed and released does indicate that they are in quite a hurry, and not merely "advancing and making progress".

Posted

Blanket amnesty is the only way to achieve true reconciliation. Extremists on both sides call for revenge, which they call 'justice.' In such cases of politicial unrest, there is no such thing as justice. The only way to move forward is to accept that both sides engaged in a struggle and the outcome is what it is. It is time to accept things as they are and begin to move the country forward.

Posted

Yingluck and Abhisit should hold a televised debate on reconciliation, what it actually means and what are the best steps to achieve it, so everyone can become informed on the matter.

Not going to happen of course, the figurehead PM doesn't do debates.

Thaksin in Abhisit....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...