Theyreallrubbish Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 http://www.cambridge...er-02072012.htm A woman beat a man to death with a claw hammer in Haverhill after he changed his will in her favour, a court has heard. Paul Norfolk, 77, was found dead at his home in Castle Lane on December 30 when police entered the house after being contacted by his brother, prosecutor Andrew Jackson told Ipswich Crown Court. Bunthawee Rimmer, 49, who denies murder, is alleged to have beaten him to death as he slept and was found injured alongside him. Less than three months earlier, Mr Norfolk had changed his will to leave his house and most of his money to Rimmer instead of his wife, who was in a care home. Mr Jackson said Mr Norfolk had lain injured but alive for some 15 hours following the attack. Rimmer did nothing to seek help, he added. More at the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wana Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 If hope she gets the maximum sentence they can give for such a cold blooded b1tch 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucidLucifer Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) We all know the lengths some Thai women will go to to lay their hands on money, but this one has to be right up there in terms of despicable acts. Part of me actually wishes it is proven that she was genuinely mentally ill, and it all wasn't just for the cash. RIP Mr Norfolk. Edited July 2, 2012 by LucidLucifer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brit1984 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 I feel so sorry for his wife... Sent from iPhone; please forgive any typos or violations of forum rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post DP25 Posted July 2, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted July 2, 2012 Rimmer, originally from Thailand and also known as Pacer, had moved into Mr Norfolk’s home in late 2010 to help care for his wife, Esme, shortly after the death of her husband, Geoffrey Rimmer, from natural causes. They might want to look in to that natural causes death of her husband 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJIC Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Whatever Nationality,she will learn that life is not so cheap in the UK courts,if you are caught,and found guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boater Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 What an evil women ... And as the other poster mentioned , look into the other deat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boater Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 It's hit the dailymail - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2167831/Married-pensioner-77-beaten-death-younger-Thai-lover-changed-leave-340-000.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barefoot1988 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 i get really hot blooded after reading these kind of news. god . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meatboy Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 trouble is life in a uk prison will be like a 5*hotel to her if found guilty,where's the rope. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze01 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 trouble is life in a uk prison will be like a 5*hotel to her if found guilty,where's the rope. The only real justice will be that she will have to eat farang food for the rest of her life. A fate worse than death for most thai women I know. RIP to the old duffer. Shame he picked a bad one as she did him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GuestHouse Posted July 2, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted July 2, 2012 OK this relates to both Thailand and the UK. Can we have a bit less Thailand in the way we approach the story and a bit more UK. Let the woman be tried in a court of law before we pronounce her guilt or launch into the usual abuse. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meatboy Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 OK this relates to both Thailand and the UK. Can we have a bit less Thailand in the way we approach the story and a bit more UK. Let the woman be tried in a court of law before we pronounce her guilt or launch into the usual abuse. who said she's guilty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnniey Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 I hope they mention the name of the 'love' love website he found her on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSnapper Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 OK this relates to both Thailand and the UK. Can we have a bit less Thailand in the way we approach the story and a bit more UK. Let the woman be tried in a court of law before we pronounce her guilt or launch into the usual abuse. Sure! She was most certainly a very poor victim of male abuse and trafficking. She needs our sympathy! Women are always victims, and therefore she should get some treatment, not jail! The house she got is a just compensation for what she had to suffer! As a famous feminist once commented when a woman killed her husband: "One woman did it, now every woman can do it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudolus Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 So, according to the Mail, these two old boys went to Pattaya on a sex tour. One of them brought her back as a souvenir, married her and then popped his clogs through old age leaving her nothing in his will more or less and is then kicked out of her house most likely penniless by the old boys family who knows she is a hooker and detest her for their perception of her even if she was the best wife a man could have. His mate sees a chance to relive his tour with his pal so moves her in. She thinks "one of these old bastards is going to give me my pay day" and twists him round to get the will changed, bides her time, and bosh. Mean while, poor old Mrs Norfolk is all alone now in her moments of lucidity knowing hubby cheated and then got killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuestHouse Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 There you go again, the TV jury have deliberated and found her guilty. While totally missing the sub-text of the gutter press playing on the Thai Bride theme. This is precisely the kind of attitudes that create problems for the many thousands of normal Thai/British couples in the UK. But no let's join the party and enjoy the fun. We don't need courts of law we have public opinion driven by the gutter press. She's Thai, she's a gold digger, she's murdered her husband for money. This is how we should view all Thai wives in the UK. Courts .... Who needs them?! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dingdang Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 "fatal fall at home"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSnapper Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Courts .... Who needs them?! White Knights and Political Correctness - who needs them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuestHouse Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Ah "Political Correctness" .... You can't handle the argument so you drag up Politcal Correctness - Well it's all in your own mind. There is nothing Politically Correct in suggesting courts should decide guilt. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evadgib Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 trouble is life in a uk prison will be like a 5*hotel to her if found guilty,where's the rope. The only real justice will be that she will have to eat farang food for the rest of her life. A fate worse than death for most thai women I know. RIP to the old duffer. Shame he picked a bad one as she did him in. HMP are well versed in foreign menus these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenervoussurgeon Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 While not trying to defend this woman ,if you read the story ,she hit him over the head with a hammer and then lay on the bed next to him for 15 hours , drank toilet cleaner ,cut and mutilated herself and took tablets ,to be honest she sounds crazy , so lets not jump to quickly to the "Thai woman kills old guy for his money" theory again i do not defend what she did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSnapper Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Ah "Political Correctness" .... You can't handle the argument so you drag up Politcal Correctness - Well it's all in your own mind. There is nothing Politically Correct in suggesting courts should decide guilt. It's very politically correct to demand that people should not discuss matters before a court has decided. It's also very politically correct to jump in to defend the murderer and show no empathy with the victim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrel Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 British justice will ensure that, if proven guilty, she will spend just a couple of years in quite nice prison accommodation at the taxpayer's expense and will then be free to leave with her ill-gotten gains. She'll probably even have her flight back to Thailand paid for her. And they wonder why the UK is going to the dogs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuestHouse Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 It's very politically correct to demand that people should not discuss matters before a court has decided. It's also very politically correct to jump in to defend the murderer and show no empathy with the victim. You clearly have no idea what Political Correctness is, much less any idea if the principles of legal process. That asside, can you please point out where I have defended the accused? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuestHouse Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 British justice will ensure that, if proven guilty, she will spend just a couple of years in quite nice prison accommodation at the taxpayer's expense and will then be free to leave with her ill-gotten gains. She'll probably even have her flight back to Thailand paid for her. And they wonder why the UK is going to the dogs. I might normally say 'One could not make this crap up' - but you just did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainman34014 Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Now; if only she had drunk a bit more of that drain cleaner it would have saved the British taxpayer a lot of dosh ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WebBangkok Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 If found guilty, and person doing this is not right in the head. Doesnt have to be Thai/UK etc. The person is sick in the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSnapper Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 British justice will ensure that, if proven guilty, she will spend just a couple of years in quite nice prison accommodation at the taxpayer's expense and will then be free to leave with her ill-gotten gains. She'll probably even have her flight back to Thailand paid for her. And they wonder why the UK is going to the dogs. She will certainly try to play the victim card. "Abused immigrant" "forced to date old men", "killing was last resort in a hopeless situation" etc. Women's groups, immigrant's groups will stand on her side and the court will take all this crap into account. We have seen it so many times. In the end, she gets a short sentence and a psycho therapy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucidLucifer Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 (edited) trouble is life in a uk prison will be like a 5*hotel to her if found guilty,where's the rope. The only real justice will be that she will have to eat farang food for the rest of her life. A fate worse than death for most thai women I know. RIP to the old duffer. Shame he picked a bad one as she did him in. HMP are well versed in foreign menus these days. Deprived of Thai food, she could probably take her case to the European Court of Human Rights. The annoying parts are, it would be at the taxpayers expense, and she'd almost certainly win. Did somebody mention political correctness? Edited July 3, 2012 by LucidLucifer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now