Jump to content

Court Sentences 9 Men Behind Supoth Robbery


webfact

Recommended Posts

Court sentences 9 men behind Supoth robbery
ANUPHAN CHANTANA
THE NATION

BANGKOK: -- The mastermind and seven accomplices involved in robbing "corruption money" from the former permanent secretary for Transport Suphoth Sublom were convicted and sentenced by the Criminal Court Friday.

Singthong Jaichomchuen was convicted for masterminding the robbery of Bt18.12 million in cash from Supoth's home on February 12, 2011. He was initially given 18 years in jail, but his sentence was commuted to 12, as his testimony was useful to the trial.

Singthong and eight other suspects were first arraigned in court on February 9, 2012. The other suspects are Saokaew Namwong, Somboon Riyathe, Boonsueb Jomkun, Wutthichai Phanthawaree, Wanankrit Butkunha, Praphan Riangkrua, Chayathat Jannachai and Wassana Saphersup.

The court ruled that a witness' account showed that the nine suspects were hiding the stolen cash from February 12 to November 23, 2011 before they were arrested.

Saokaew and Somboon were convicted for planning the robbery with Singthong. They were initially given a 12-year term, but it was commuted to nine after they confessed.

Boonsueb, Wutthichai, Wanankrit and Wassana were convicted of accepting the stolen cash and were sentenced to five years in jail. However, Boonsueb and Wanankrit's term was halved due to confession, while Wutthichai and Wassana's term was commuted to three years and four months.

Chayathat was convicted for supporting the robbery and initially sentenced to 12 years in jail, which was commuted to eight years on grounds that he provided useful testimony.

The court acquitted Praphan on benefit of doubt, but he is being detained pending an appeal.

The robbery has also prompted the National Anti-Corruption Commission to launch a graft probe against Supoth.

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-03-29

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

It appears that this was a case of people relieving a thief of the money he got through thievery. So agree no theft.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

It appears that this was a case of people relieving a thief of the money he got through thievery. So agree no theft.

Of course it's theft. It's not their money either. So what right do they have to keep it?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

It appears that this was a case of people relieving a thief of the money he got through thievery. So agree no theft.
Of course it's theft. It's not their money either. So what right do they have to keep it?
while i agree with you, i find it hard to feel any sympathy for the corrupt little scumbag who was robbed There are no good guys in this story, just a lot of greedy f.....s Edited by Bluespunk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

It appears that this was a case of people relieving a thief of the money he got through thievery. So agree no theft.
Of course it's theft. It's not their money either. So what right do they have to keep it?

It was satire DJ. Everyone knows it was theft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UPDATE
Court sentences 9 men behind Supoth robbery

Anuphan Chantana
The Nation

30203024-01_big.jpg
Singthong Jaichomchuen was convicted yesterday for masterminding the robbery of Bt18.12 million from the home of former permanent secretary for Transport Suphoth Sublom on February 12, 2011.

BANGKOK: -- The mastermind and seven accomplices involved in robbing alleged "corruption money" from former permanent secretary for Transport Suphoth Sublom were convicted and sentenced by the Criminal Court yesterday.

Singthong Jaichomchuen was convicted for masterminding the robbery of Bt18.12 million in cash from Supoth's home on February 12, 2011. He was initially given 18 years in jail, but his sentence was commuted to 12 years, as his testimony was useful to the trial.

Singthong and eight other suspects were first arraigned in court on February 9, 2012. The other suspects are Saokaew Namwong, Somboon Riyathe, Boonsueb Jomkun, Wutthichai Phanthawaree, Wanankrit Butkunha, Praphan Riangkrua, Chayathat Jannachai and Wassana Saphersup.

The court ruled that a witness' account showed the nine suspects had hidden the stolen cash from February 12 to November 23, 2011 before they were arrested. Saokaew and Somboon were convicted for planning the robbery with Singthong. They were initially given a 12-year term, but it was commuted to nine after they confessed.

Boonsueb, Wutthichai, Wanankrit and Wassana were convicted of accepting the stolen cash and were sentenced to five years in jail. However, Boonsueb and Wanankrit's term was halved after their confession, while Wutthichai and Wassana's term was commuted to three years and four months.

Chayathat was convicted for supporting the robbery and initially sentenced to 12 years in jail, which was commuted to eight years on grounds that he provided useful testimony.

The court acquitted Praphan giving him the benefit of doubt, but he is being detained pending an appeal.

The robbery has also prompted the National Anti-Corruption Commis-sion to launch a graft probe against Supoth.

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-03-30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

It appears that this was a case of people relieving a thief of the money he got through thievery. So agree no theft.
Of course it's theft. It's not their money either. So what right do they have to keep it?
while i agree with you, i find it hard to feel any sympathy for the corrupt little scumbag who was robbed There are no good guys in this story, just a lot of greedy f.....s

I don't know the legal definition of theft in Thailand but using the more usual meaning it's theft because 'They took something with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it.'

The theft was actually not from Supoth but from whoever he stole it from but they may well have thought that he owned it. That's assuming he's found guilty of the corruption of course. I'm not sure if that could be used in his defence as his intent was to deprive even though he was stopped by the money being taken.

If we're lucky someone with more knowledge of the law will come along.

Edited by kimamey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

It appears that this was a case of people relieving a thief of the money he got through thievery. So agree no theft.
Of course it's theft. It's not their money either. So what right do they have to keep it?I don't know the legal definition of theft in Thailand but using the more usual meaning it's theft because 'They took something with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it.'

The theft was actually not from Supoth but from whoever he stole it from but they may well have thought that he owned it. That's assuming he's found guilty of the corruption of course. I'm not sure if that could be used in his defence as his intent was to deprive even though he was stopped by the money being taken.

If we're lucky someone with more knowledge of the law will come along.

We certainly will be.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it normal that a person has to much cash in his house ?

supposedly over a billion baht ?

no investigation about unusual wealth ?

assest before office, assest after office ... all the bribe money in between

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it normal that a person has to much cash in his house ?

supposedly over a billion baht ?

no investigation about unusual wealth ?

assest before office, assest after office ... all the bribe money in between

Don't panic I'm sure the DSI will be along soon to show why it's actually the democrats fault. All will be sorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

KBAA, on 29 Mar 2013 - 18:00, said:

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

It appears that this was a case of people relieving a thief of the money he got through thievery. So agree no theft.

.

No theft??

Edited by watcharacters
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not 12 Mill. they got, but more then 50 Mill.

Sp something is waiting them when they come out !

They just took something that actually not belonged to the person who kept it in his house, so real theft ??? NO !

18.12 million Baht, not 12 million, according to the OP.

And supoth gets?

Investigated by the NACC, again according to the OP ?

Weren't some of his/family assets also seized some time back ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...