Popular Post webfact Posted May 7, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 7, 2013 STOPPAGE TIMEA prostitute's take on cartoon uproarTulsathit TaptimDear all: I speak English no good so please not mind me say this in the language. I only want to tell everyone leave me alone. If this is insult anyone I sorry. I just want go back my old life, where everyone was hypocritical silent about prostitution, not hypocritical loud about it. At least there was some peace in the silence, or I believe.Chai Ratchawat, enough please. You said, "selling the country" is worse than being a whore. I feeling offended very much. What my profession got to do with putting the country on sale? I not quite know the meaning of selling the country but it sound not good.My problem with you is you implies I sell my body is bad, although it may not be same same bad as selling the country. I want to ask you what wrong with me? I hear that some people even sell their soul. I don't care they are bad or good. I just want to say everyone selling something all the time, right?You using a bad comparison, pal. Just because I doing something illegal not mean I don't do this country great service. We donate to temple construction. We buy motor-cy for our brothers. We send parents our money. We are reason why sex crimes not shoot through the chart. I can go on and on.Why you not said selling the country is worse than robbing gold shop or selling amphetamine? People always match being a "Kari" with bad politics. I never get it.Now, Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra. If you sue Chai Ratchawat you also implies I sell my body is bad. Your defenders say he not compare you to prostitute, but he offend you by saying you "lower" than one. My point that if being "lower" than me is insult to you, you also have low opinion about me.Do you got it, Madame Prime Minister? You sue me you risk being hypocrite. Same same for people around you. I guess you not sue me if Chai say selling the country is worse than being Mother Teresa, right? Also you not sue Chai if he say, "At least Patcharapa Chaichua" not sell the country. That my point.Don't fall into trap, Madame Prime Minister. Show me democratic country where people not say obscenity things about politicians. They did this tape of last prime minister Abhisit try to frame and kill protesters. I mean, come on. You guys should be consistent and condemn that too. It worse than insult in my book.Finally, rest of you. I'm poor and my English broken but I not stupid. Most of all, I not want people to use my name or name of my honest profession for political purpose. I know they does things like this in democracy. People spin and twist things so much and use everything that in front of them. They can come up with any truth-lie alchemy for all I care, but leave me out of it.There is I-told-you-so bunch who using the uproar to promote their ideology that everybody equal. They accusing supporters of Chai Ratchawat of hypocrisy because the supporters have "limited" perspective on freedom of expression. This is classic Thailand. Everyone can spin and every issue is worth spinning. I not like it when people have bad opinion about me and my friends, but I not like it more when people pretend to be nice to us to serve their nonsense agenda.And I not want this to start gender issue, either. A lot of man prostitutes wondering why the "Kari" comment by Chai seem to offend feminist activists in particularly. I not want female Kari to get any special treatment. And more so if special treatment is political motivated.If I hear word "Maternal gender" again, I will lead work stoppage protest that will send this country to financial bankrupt and sexual famine. First, you guys make it sound like "fathers" not important. Second, how the @#$percent such chauvinistic society care so much about opposite sex anyway?If you guys are for real, next time someone proposes who brave enough proposes bill that make my job legal, write good things about people like me to newspapers and on social media. If you guys speak in one voice at such time, I will be thank you to all of you. If you can't do that or won't do that, just shut the hell up.But you all must leave "Kari" out of you people's bad politics. I don't care who you are - our insulters, our praisers, our closet insulters. By leaving us alone you do us favour, but also do yourselves favour. When you treat elephant in your living room as not there, you have some peace of mind. Everyone needs it, right? -- The Nation 2013-05-08 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hookedondhamma Posted May 7, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 7, 2013 ... Is this a joke?? 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Songhua Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Anybody have a copy of The Nation? Is this an editorial, letter to the editor or an article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post maidu Posted May 7, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 7, 2013 The article is trying to jangle peoples' subjective bells. It sounds contrived to me. Prostitute can be a noun or a verb. As a verb, it means, 'to sell one's services in a demeaning or questionable manner.' Prostitution is like the inverse of religion: we pretend disdain for prostitution, but we privately lust after it. On the other hand, we pretend we like going to church or temple, but we would rather slip in to the broom closet with some delectable sex object. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post maidu Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 (edited) Show me a politician who doesn't prostitute his/her position, and I'll show you a municipal bridge made of cotton candy. BTW, the so-called letter from a prostitute (above) was written by an English speaker. Just one of many proofs: In the last sentence, it mentiones; 'closet insulters.' No Thai, whether an English teacher or whatever, ever uses the word 'closet' as an adjective. They simply don't know that nuance of the Eng.language. Same with the phrase 'gender issue' used earlier in the fake letter. Ok, I googled the name 'Tulsathit Taptim' and see he's a writer for the Nation. When the writer said he/she was a prostitute, I believed him. Just goes to show, you can't believe what Nation writers write. Also: though he tries to write in a such a cutsie crude style, he fails. Satire works when it resembles the object or person it's mocking. His fake letter is so contrived and off-base, that it's neither witty nor effective in trying to convey his message. Sorry Tulsathit. Try again, but don't try so hard to be cute. Edited May 8, 2013 by maidu 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BookMan Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 Reads like some of the troll postings we get here on ThaiVisa. 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thai at Heart Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 A not very witty attempt at discussing censorship. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post seasia Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 Terrible fake and pointless. 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg71 Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 (edited) This wasnt written by some ho,maybe the minister should ban the nation as once again it has fallen into the depths of the toilet.this offends me and should be part of notthenation not a national newspaper Edited May 8, 2013 by greg71 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bkkgriz Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 Please find me a prostitute in Thailand that understands and knows how to use hypocritical and I will believe this was actually written by a pro. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post fakename Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 Wasn't the idea for everyone to know it was fake, or am I the only one that can understand these post? Come on people, use your imagination a bit, I think it was a good article. If you took this as someone "trolling", then you have been too long at TV. 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post soi41 Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 I think we just found Yinglucks speechwriter!! 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Payboy Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 Speaks volumes about the Nation. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thait Spot Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 Make of it what you may, there are some very nice points made. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candypants Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 Wasn't the idea for everyone to know it was fake, or am I the only one that can understand these post? Come on people, use your imagination a bit, I think it was a good article. If you took this as someone "trolling", then you have been too long at TV. people here are generally quite thick and cannot recognize a simple literary contrivance no matter how ham-handed the attempt. the prostitute personna would have come off much better had the attempts at poor grammar been abandoned or at least not mixed in with colloquial english like "off the chart", or terms like uproar and ideology. That said the point is somewhat valid and it is a fair pokee at the hypocrisy and cynicism which governs thailand. It was a worthy comment lost by the authour's fear of taking ownership of his argument. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candypants Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 (edited) Make of it what you may, there are some very nice points made.agree wholeheartedly. there are those here who cannot see the forest for the trees however. Edited May 8, 2013 by candypants 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geriatrickid Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Make of it what you may, there are some very nice points made. At the cost of denigrating the people of Thailand? If the Nation wishes to criticize the PM outright, I support its right to do so. However, I draw the line at the use of hurtful racist articles that the editors know will be misunderstood or misinterpreted. It's not journalism. A responsible journalist can make his/her point without resorting to guttersnipe behaviour. I'm sure the folks at the Nation stood about giggling and patting each other on the back on just how smart they think they are. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candypants Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 (edited) Make of it what you may, there are some very nice points made. At the cost of denigrating the people of Thailand? If the Nation wishes to criticize the PM outright, I support its right to do so. However, I draw the line at the use of hurtful racist articles that the editors know will be misunderstood or misinterpreted. It's not journalism. A responsible journalist can make his/her point without resorting to guttersnipe behaviour. I'm sure the folks at the Nation stood about giggling and patting each other on the back on just how smart they think they are. denigrating the people of Thailand? hurtful, racist articles? not sure what you read, but i see nothing racist or hurtful. Please do show me what exactly you are referring to. As for the the folks at the nation stood about giggling, they should be ashamed that they had a valid point to make but diluted it with nonsensical rhetoric. Edited May 8, 2013 by candypants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Credo Posted May 8, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 8, 2013 The underlying premise is wrong. The PM has not sold the country. Not one inch of Thailand has been sold. Heck, they are having trouble just selling rice. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maidu Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Wasn't the idea for everyone to know it was fake, or am I the only one that can understand these post? Come on people, use your imagination a bit, I think it was a good article. If you took this as someone "trolling", then you have been too long at TV. If I was editor at the Nation, I'd give the writer a 2 month sabbatical without pay. ....or maybe it was the editor that wrote that tripe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mampara Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Some ferang trying to put "dwang into the fan" but try and read between the lines, some of it makes sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eezergood Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Almost had me....until the second sentence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacovl46 Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 SEXUAL FAMINE!!! That's the definite highlight of this post in my book!!! ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonarax Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Let see, journalist goes an speaks to some prostitutes and has a conversation in English for what reasons? The cartoonist makes plenty of sense for a person with common sense.. If you think your being made of fun now, wait till all the other media outlets catch up.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapfries Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Definitely written by a native English speaker, attempting to 'hide' that fact. That kills it for me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSkip Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Show me a politician who doesn't prostitute his/her position, and I'll show you a municipal bridge made of cotton candy. BTW, the so-called letter from a prostitute (above) was written by an English speaker. Just one of many proofs: In the last sentence, it mentiones; 'closet insulters.' No Thai, whether an English teacher or whatever, ever uses the word 'closet' as an adjective. They simply don't know that nuance of the Eng.language. Same with the phrase 'gender issue' used earlier in the fake letter. Ok, I googled the name 'Tulsathit Taptim' and see he's a writer for the Nation. When the writer said he/she was a prostitute, I believed him. Just goes to show, you can't believe what Nation writers write. Also: though he tries to write in a such a cutsie crude style, he fails. Satire works when it resembles the object or person it's mocking. His fake letter is so contrived and off-base, that it's neither witty nor effective in trying to convey his message. Sorry Tulsathit. Try again, but don't try so hard to be cute. I can only concur................Thank You Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evolare Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Even yingluck wouldn't have been able to write that. Her english is terrible. Not sure what that makes her but stupid, or as her brother would say "I am not care". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morakot Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 (edited) Anybody have a copy of The Nation? Is this an editorial, letter to the editor or an article? It's in the Opinion section. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/A-prostitutes-take-on-cartoon-uproar-30205584.html Taptim2013.pdf Edited May 8, 2013 by Morakot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cats4ever Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 The article is trying to jangle peoples' subjective bells. It sounds contrived to me. Prostitute can be a noun or a verb. As a verb, it means, 'to sell one's services in a demeaning or questionable manner.' Prostitution is like the inverse of religion: we pretend disdain for prostitution, but we privately lust after it. On the other hand, we pretend we like going to church or temple, but we would rather slip in to the broom closet with some delectable sex object. Go easy on the "WE" champ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cats4ever Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Even yingluck wouldn't have been able to write that. Her english is terrible. Not sure what that makes her but stupid, or as her brother would say "I am not care". How many foreign PMs or Presidents speak good Thai? They may be stupid or they may not be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now