Jump to content

Australia Recognized Third Gender


webfact

Recommended Posts

Australia recognized third gender

NEW SOUTH WALES: -- The Court of Appeal in New South Wales admitted existence of the third sex that is neither male nor female. Thus Australia became the first country in the world to recognize 'non-specified' gender.


The decision will affect people who have undergone gender reassignment surgery, as well as anyone who identifies as intersex or gender neutral.

It overturned a ruling that everyone must be registered as a man or a woman with the registry of births, deaths and marriages. It declared for the first time that word sex do not bear a binary meaning of "male" or "female".

The decision was a victory for 52-year-old activist Norrie May-Welby who is now referred to by the gender-neutral pronouns "zie" (instead of he/she) or "hir" (instead of him/her).

Norrie was born as a male, went through male-to-female reassignment surgery but later found that being a woman was not what zie felt like either. Zie sought to have his neuter sex reflected in New South Wales Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages and in 2010 became the first Australian to be given the designation "sex not specified". The certificate had been cancelled in four months and Norrie lodged an appeal.

Source: http://english.ruvr.ru/news/2013_06_03/Australia-recognized-third-gender-9233/

-- THE VOICE OF RUSSIA 2013-2013-06-03

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there you are. For me that is quite simple. If you have male sex organs you are a man, and if female sex organs you are a female. Unless they have some deformities but I assume this is not the case here. What about passports? Will they get N for neutral? Or what is the name of the third sex. Do they have a name for it yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even those humans born with both male and female genitalia will be either female or male.

Doubtful.

See here: http://www.isna.org/faq/conditions

First, women wanted to be treated like a man in women's lib movement.

Then, women wanted to be a man.

Now, they want to be a man, but recognized as something previously unclassified.

What's next?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's next?

Not much!

That's the point. This means NOTHING except to a tiny minority. How about live and let live?

Nothing at all. Totally cool with live and let live. Something will be next though. Always is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what the chromosome makeup on people like this generally is. Do they have an extra chromosome--at least those that are biologically suffering from mixed sex syndrome?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why this would bother anyone.

It's something a tiny minority might find useful in their lives and something that won't make a bit of difference to everyone else.

Like legalized gay marriage, but a much TINIER minority.

You don't NEED to understand it.

It doesn't change your life ONE BIT either way, so why not!?!

Personally I don't have strong feelings about the need for this in Australia or anywhere but it is such a trifle, I just don't get the objections.

People just like to criticize really stupid things, and that's what this story is all about.

btw - sign up for a new gmail account and it asks for your gender; Male, Female, Other. :-)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A correction to the headline and subsequent erroneous statements that this is Australia. It is Sydney New South Wales, not Australia. The state courts of NSW do not make commonwealth law for the rest of the country or impact the laws of the other states and territories.

Cheers

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A correction to the headline and subsequent erroneous statements that this is Australia. It is Sydney New South Wales, not Australia. The state courts of NSW do not make commonwealth law for the rest of the country or impact the laws of the other states and territories.

Cheers

Why let the truth spoil a good story though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what the chromosome makeup on people like this generally is. Do they have an extra chromosome--at least those that are biologically suffering from mixed sex syndrome?

Complex story. There are only the XY and XX variants, but hormons or lack of them screws it all up sometimes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_insensitivity_syndrome

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ridiculous.

Yeah, the only ridiculous thing about it is that it took them so long.

Those 'third gender' people exist, it's a fact of Nature. Whether they like it or not is their business.

Legal recognition of the fact so late is a reflection on the Australia and its Legal System.

First or last - they are slow thinkers. laugh.png

Ancient Greeks were smarter smile.png

Edited by ABCer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's next?

Not much!

That's the point. This means NOTHING except to a tiny minority. How about live and let live?

Fine, then can we please stop remaking things over to satisfy a very small group. If someone wants to identify as asexual, good for it. There is always a dominating aspect in an intersex person. If it is a masculine predisposition, then the intersex is male etc. This doesn't mean there is discrimination or any denial of human rights. That person can identify with whatever group he wants, but a behavioural desire doesn't change the physical reality.

You speak Spanish don't you? In Spanish, all nouns are either masculine or feminine. el jardin - garden - masculine, la Universidad - university, feminine.The same for the French language. Le cheval is masculine for the horse. Ma jambe - My leg, and even though I am a guy, my leg is feminine. No one bothers the French or the Spanish speakers to remove gender from their language. It only seems to occur with English.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even those humans born with both male and female genitalia will be either female or male.

Doubtful.

See here: http://www.isna.org/faq/conditions

Perhaps you should read the actual health literature. A manifestation of a sexual identity, i.e. a behaviour, does not change the physical state.

That's the literature I was actually referring to. Yes, I agree manifestation of a sexual identity does not necessarily relate to a physical or physiological state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...