-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
Latest posts...
-
2
Afghanistan’s New Taliban Laws: A Veil of Silence and Invisibility for Women
The Taliban don't care what the UN thinks or does. Not for the first time, IMO the UN is a waste of money, as all it does is whine about the terrible things that go on in the real world, and does nothing to stop any of it. -
2
Afghanistan’s New Taliban Laws: A Veil of Silence and Invisibility for Women
Anyone that thought women's "rights" would survive the departure of the allied forces in Afghanistan is living in Lala Land IMO. Some of us thought the US should have left after defeating the Taliban, as it would not have given false hope to the women of that blighted country. In the event, all it did was waste many billions in treasure and kill a load of people for no good reason, IMO. -
9
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Monday 26 August 2024
Koh Samui eyes approval of 12.1 billion baht cruise terminal by Ryan Turner Image: Supapong Chaolan/Bangkok Post A new cruise terminal in Koh Samui, set to open in 2032, aims to significantly boost tourism in Surat Thani, Thailand, according to Deputy Caretaker Minister Manaporn Charoensri. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1336455-koh-samui-eyes-approval-of-121-billion-baht-cruise-terminal/ -
0
Koh Samui eyes approval of 12.1 billion baht cruise terminal
A new cruise terminal in Koh Samui, set to open in 2032, aims to significantly boost tourism in Surat Thani, Thailand, according to Deputy Caretaker Minister Manaporn Charoensri. Manaporn, along with Caretaker Transport Minister Suriya Jungrungreangkit, visited Koh Samui to review the progress of major transport infrastructure projects. Suriya revealed that the ministry has several new initiatives underway to enhance the tourism sector. Manaporn announced yesterday, August, 24, that the Marine Department has completed a comprehensive study on the 12.1 billion baht cruise terminal project, which will cover 47 rai of land at Laem Hin Khom. The chosen location is ideal due to its deep-sea environment, which naturally breaks wind and provides ample space for the port. The study also addresses emergency response measures and insights into the potential for full-scale commercial development, including readiness for public utilities. It explores Public-Private Partnership (PPP) net cost investment as the most suitable financing option. The PPP net cost investment is projected to generate at least 46 billion baht in economic benefits over 37 years, with an expected economic internal rate of return (EIRR) of over 15%, said Manaporn. “The Marine Department has submitted the study to the ministry, which will forward it to the Cabinet for consideration.” She added that the project is expected to receive approval by next month, after which the bidding process will begin. Construction is slated to start in 2029 and will take at least three years to complete. The terminal is anticipated to be fully operational by 2032. Manaporn noted that the terminal is expected to handle 120 cruise landings annually and attract at least 180,000 cruise visitors to the island each year. Manaporn added that the new terminal is poised to stimulate tourism in the southern province. “The project has received positive feedback from private investors, as it is expected to stimulate the province’s tourism.” This initiative is part of a broader effort by the ministry to strengthen Surat Thani‘s tourism infrastructure, ensuring long-term economic benefits and enhanced visitor experiences in the region, reported Bangkok Post. by Ryan Turner Image: Supapong Chaolan/Bangkok Post Source: The Thaiger 2024-08-26 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
1
Kennedy Family Condemns RFK Jr.'s Trump Endorsement as a Betrayal of Core Values
The party of JFK vanished long ago, and bears no resemblance to it now, IMO. Kennedy was an inspirational leader that had a vision of a better future for Americans and the world, but all today's Dem leaders have is hate Trump, IMO. IMO if JFK were alive now he'd leave the Dems and become an independent. -
9
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Monday 26 August 2024
Pattaya Officials Continue Crackdown on Vagrants to Protect City Image By Aim Tanakorn Pattaya City officials have continued their efforts to apprehend vagrants who negatively impact the city’s image as a tourist destination, following the directives of Pattaya City Mayor, Mr. Poramase Ngampichet. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1336454-pattaya-officials-continue-crackdown-on-vagrants-to-protect-city-image/ -
0
Pattaya Officials Continue Crackdown on Vagrants to Protect City Image
Pattaya City officials have continued their efforts to apprehend vagrants who negatively impact the city’s image as a tourist destination, following the directives of Pattaya City Mayor, Mr. Poramase Ngampichet. In the morning on August 24th, 2024, officials from the city’s Special Affairs Department received a report from concerned citizens about two vagrants soliciting money from passersby in front of a convenience store on Third Road in North Pattaya. The officials immediately went to the scene to meet the two. Upon arrival, officials found an unidentified homeless woman, approximately 40-50 years old, along with her 8-year-old son. The woman claimed that she had previously been married to a Scottish man who sent her monthly financial support. However, after losing her ATM card, she no longer had access to the funds to support herself and her son. The authorities arranged for her and her son to be processed with the local homeless center according to the regulations. By Aim Tanakorn Full story: THE PATTAYA NEWS 2024-08-26 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
1
Starmer: Conditions in Britain will Deteriorate Before They Improve
Perhaps if the UK didn't give loadsacash to Ukraine, they might not have to increase taxes. -
9
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Monday 26 August 2024
Police arrest contract killer after 33 year manhunt in Lopburi by Ryan Turner Image courtesy of KhaoSod Police in Lopburi province yesterday apprehended a contract killer who escaped a 33 year prison sentence after a failed assassination attempt at a hotel. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1336453-police-arrest-contract-killer-after-33-year-manhunt-in-lopburi/ -
0
Police arrest contract killer after 33 year manhunt in Lopburi
Police in Lopburi province yesterday apprehended a contract killer who escaped a 33 year prison sentence after a failed assassination attempt at a hotel. Chief of Police Supakorn Chantabut, along with Deputy Chief Siwawong Damrongsatchasi, alongside other officers successfully arrested the 56 year old contract killer, Paisan, yesterday, August 24. The arrest took place in Chaibadan district, Lopburi province. The case traces back to November 20, 1989, when an assailant used a firearm to shoot Somjai, a hotel manager, and her brother-in-law Sawiang at a hotel in Trat province. Both victims sustained injuries but the perpetrator managed to escape. Initially, it was suspected that the attack stemmed from a land sale dispute, leading to the hiring of a hitman to kill Somjai. However, the assassination attempt was unsuccessful, leading to his conviction. Paisan consistently denied the charges in all three levels of court: the trial court, the appellate court, and the Supreme Court. Despite his denials, he was convicted and sentenced to 33 years in prison. Paisan fled before he could be imprisoned, leading to a prolonged manhunt that culminated in his capture yesterday, reported KhaoSod. The police team meticulously tracked Paisan’s movements, leading them to the remote hill where he was hiding. The arrest marks a significant accomplishment for the local police, who dedicated considerable resources and effort to resolve this decades-old case. In other news, a 16 year old boy was shot and killed by a 14 year old in Lopburi after the younger boy became jealous over romantic attention towards his girlfriend. The incident occurred yesterday. Police received a report at 7.05pm about a shooting at a three-way junction in Ban Nong Krathum, Maha Phot subdistrict, Sa Bot district, Lopburi province. Upon arrival, authorities discovered the body of a 16 year old boy lying on the roadside with a gunshot wound that had passed through his chest. by Ryan Turner Image courtesy of KhaoSod Source: The Thaiger 2024-08-26 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
3
Did Ann Coulter Really Do That?!?
All it says on the linked article is that she said "“Talk about weird …” Without more that is meaningless. I seem to remember a certain demographic attacked Trump's young son. Apparently it depends on one's politics as to what is acceptable. In any event, killing unborn children is a pretty awful thing to do and the Dems seem to want that for every female in the US. Methinks this is just another political left faux labelling of an opponent -
2
Afghanistan’s New Taliban Laws: A Veil of Silence and Invisibility for Women
The Taliban's repressive regime in Afghanistan has taken yet another draconian step toward erasing the presence and identity of women in public life. In a newly issued set of laws, spanning 114 pages and 35 articles, the militant group has imposed severe restrictions on women’s freedoms, including a ban on their voices and bare faces in public. This document, seen by The Associated Press, reflects the Taliban's unyielding commitment to a version of Islamic law that strips away the basic rights and dignities of women. These laws were officially enacted on Wednesday, with the approval of the Taliban's supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada. The Taliban, which regained control of Afghanistan following the U.S. withdrawal in 2021, has systematically dismantled the rights of women and girls that had been arduously gained over the past two decades. The new regulations mark a significant escalation in this process, pushing Afghan women further into the shadows of society. "Inshallah, we assure you that this Islamic law will be of great help in the promotion of virtue and the elimination of vice," stated ministry spokesperson Maulvi Abdul Ghafar Farooq on Thursday, according to the AP. This statement encapsulates the Taliban's justification for their oppressive measures, cloaking their actions in the rhetoric of religious piety. The laws cover a broad spectrum of public and private life, with specific instructions on everything from celebrations and music to transportation and personal grooming. One of the most disturbing aspects of these regulations is detailed in Article 13, which mandates that women must cover their faces in public and refrain from wearing short or tight clothing. This article extends the Taliban’s already harsh dress codes, further restricting women’s autonomy over their own bodies. Article 13 also goes further by banning women from looking at men to whom they are not related by marriage or blood. This prohibition is a stark indicator of the Taliban's desire to control not just women's appearance, but their very interactions with the world around them. Moreover, women are now forbidden from singing or reading aloud, effectively silencing their voices in both literal and metaphorical terms. The imposition of these laws comes on the heels of a United Nations report in July, which accused the Taliban's Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice of widespread intimidation and human rights violations. The report highlighted the ministry’s role in enforcing gender apartheid and other forms of oppression. However, the ministry has rejected these claims, continuing to assert that their actions are in line with Islamic principles. The Taliban's latest legal directives represent not just a violation of women’s rights, but a profound erosion of the social fabric of Afghanistan. Women, who once had the opportunity to participate in education, work, and public life, are now being systematically erased from public visibility. These laws not only isolate women physically by confining them to their homes and cloaking them in public but also silence their voices, cutting them off from the broader discourse of society. The international community has expressed concern over the Taliban's treatment of women, but these latest developments underscore the regime's disregard for global criticism. The Taliban's actions appear to be driven by an ideological commitment to a rigid interpretation of Islamic law, which they claim is necessary for the promotion of virtue and the elimination of vice. Yet, in practice, these laws serve to entrench the Taliban's power by enforcing strict gender segregation and limiting the role of women to one of subservience and invisibility. The situation in Afghanistan remains dire, particularly for women and girls who are facing an increasingly oppressive environment. The Taliban's laws are a stark reminder of the challenges that lie ahead for those advocating for human rights and gender equality in the country. As these new regulations take effect, the voices and faces of Afghan women are being forced into silence and obscurity, marking a tragic step backward for a nation that had once shown signs of progress. Credit: Hill 2024-08-26 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
1
Kennedy Family Condemns RFK Jr.'s Trump Endorsement as a Betrayal of Core Values
The Kennedy family, long-standing pillars of the Democratic Party, faced a profound rupture on Friday as Robert F. Kennedy Jr., once a prominent independent presidential candidate, publicly endorsed former President Donald Trump. This decision, which Kennedy announced while suspending his campaign, was met with sharp criticism from his siblings, who called it a "betrayal of the values that our father and our family hold most dear." Kerry Kennedy, one of RFK Jr.'s siblings and the president of the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights organization, issued a strong rebuke alongside four of her siblings—Courtney Kennedy, Chris Kennedy, Rory Kennedy, and former Maryland Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend. In their joint statement, they expressed deep dismay at their brother's decision to align himself with Trump. "We want an America filled with hope and bound together by a shared vision of a brighter future," Kerry Kennedy wrote. "We believe in Harris and Walz. Our brother Bobby’s decision to endorse Trump today is a betrayal of the values that our father and our family hold most dear." The statement concluded with a somber reflection on the situation: "It is a sad ending to a sad story." The timing of RFK Jr.'s announcement was not unexpected. For much of the week, speculation had been mounting that he would endorse Trump. On Wednesday, Kennedy had signaled that he would be making a significant announcement about the future of his candidacy. True to his word, he used Friday's address to make his endorsement official while also declaring the suspension of his independent campaign. Kennedy revealed that he would be removing his name from the ballot in key swing states such as Pennsylvania and Arizona, though it would remain on the ballot in states firmly aligned with either the Democratic or Republican parties. During his address, Kennedy spent much of his time criticizing the Democratic Party and the media, accusing them of denying him a fair chance in the presidential race. "In my heart, I no longer believe that I have a realistic path to electoral victory in the face of this relentless, systematic censorship and media control," he stated at the press conference. "So I cannot in good conscience ask my staff and volunteers to keep working their long hours, or ask my donor to keep giving when I cannot honestly tell them that I have a real path to the White House." Kennedy's decision to withdraw from swing states like Arizona and Pennsylvania came swiftly after his Wednesday announcement. Sources close to Kennedy have indicated that he is in negotiations with the Trump campaign for a potential role in a second Trump administration. This move further fueled the ire of his siblings, who have been critical of RFK Jr.'s political ambitions from the outset. The Kennedy family has been synonymous with the Democratic Party since John F. Kennedy's presidency, and RFK Jr.'s independent bid was a departure from this legacy. The family had previously dismissed his candidacy, expressing concern over his divergence from their shared values. Last year, when RFK Jr. launched his presidential campaign, several family members publicly denounced his candidacy, particularly in light of his controversial anti-vaccination stance during the COVID-19 pandemic. "Bobby might share the same name as our father, but he does not share the same values, vision, or judgment. Today’s announcement is deeply saddening for us. We denounce his candidacy and believe it to be perilous for our country," some of Kennedy’s siblings wrote at the time. The fallout from RFK Jr.'s latest decision was swift, with other members of the Kennedy family also expressing their disappointment. Jack Schlossberg, the grandson of former President John F. Kennedy, took to social media to voice his dismay. "Never been less surprised in my life. Been saying it for over a year — RFK Jr. is for sale, works for Trump. Bedfellows and loving it," Schlossberg wrote on the platform X, formerly known as Twitter. He went on to praise Vice President Kamala Harris, stating, "Kamala Harris is for the people — the easiest decision of all time just got easier." The Kennedy family's reaction to RFK Jr.'s endorsement of Trump underscores the deep divisions that have emerged within the family as a result of his political choices. For a family that has long championed progressive values and Democratic ideals, RFK Jr.'s decision to side with Trump represents a stark and painful divergence from the path laid out by their forebears. As the Kennedy siblings lamented in their statement, it is indeed a sad ending to what has become a deeply troubled chapter in the family's storied history. Credit: Hill 2024-08-26 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
1
Starmer: Conditions in Britain will Deteriorate Before They Improve
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will deliver a stark warning this week, asserting that conditions in Britain will deteriorate before they improve. In his address, Starmer will claim that there is "rot deep in the heart" of the nation, a situation that demands significant and potentially painful reforms. This message will be interpreted by many as a precursor to imminent tax increases and spending cuts, with Starmer positioning himself as the leader who inherited not only an "economic black hole" but also a "societal black hole." Speaking from Germany, where he will meet with Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Starmer will address the working people of Britain with a candid message: he must make "unpopular decisions" to steer the country towards recovery. "I will be honest about the choices we face and how tough this will be," he will state. "Frankly – things will get worse before they get better." Starmer's rhetoric underscores the gravity of the situation. "When there is rot deep in the heart of a structure, you can’t just cover it up. You can’t tinker with it or rely on quick fixes. You have to overhaul the entire thing. Tackle it at the root. Even if it’s harder work and takes more time," he will explain. The Prime Minister's remarks reflect his belief that without addressing these fundamental issues, the nation risks seeing the same problems reemerge, potentially in a more severe form. "The rot returns. In all the same places. And it spreads. Worse than before. You know that – and I know that. That’s why this project has always been about fixing the foundations of this country." Throughout his campaign, Starmer has repeatedly promised not to increase taxes on "working people," assuring voters that a Labour government would not raise VAT, income tax, or National Insurance. However, his reluctance to rule out other tax hikes has led to speculation that increases in capital gains tax, inheritance tax, and business taxes may be on the horizon. Last month, Chancellor Rachel Reeves conceded that tax hikes would be necessary in the upcoming Budget on October 30, a point that Starmer will emphasize in his speech. In his first comments on the financial situation since Reeves claimed that the Conservatives had left a £22 billion gap in public finances, Starmer will go further, warning that the crisis is not just economic but also societal. "If we don’t take tough action across the board, we won’t be able to fix the foundations of the country like we need," he will argue. The Prime Minister is prepared to make difficult decisions, even if they prove unpopular. "I won’t shy away from making unpopular decisions now if it’s the right thing for the country in the long term. That’s what a Government of service means," he will declare. The Prime Minister's speech follows a statement by Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, suggesting that an increase in employers' National Insurance contributions might be on the table. Jones recently softened the Chancellor's earlier commitment to not increase National Insurance, indicating that the promise to freeze "employee National Insurance" would still be honored. In his upcoming remarks, Starmer is expected to defend his government's decision to grant inflation-busting pay raises to public sector workers, a move that has drawn criticism from some quarters. Earlier this month, Reeves announced a 5.5 percent pay increase for millions of workers, including teachers and nurses, with prison service workers and senior NHS managers receiving a 5 percent boost. Despite this, the government has faced backlash, especially after some train drivers, who were offered a 14 percent pay rise over three years, announced a new strike over a separate dispute shortly after. Starmer will argue that these pay rises are necessary to maintain the functioning of essential services. "I defy anyone to tell me that you can grow an economy when people can’t get to work – because the transport system is broken. Or can’t return to work – because they’re stuck on an NHS waiting list," he will say. He will highlight his government's achievements, claiming, "We’ve done more in seven weeks than the last government did in seven years. And these are just the first steps towards the change people voted for. The change I’m determined to deliver." However, Starmer's government has also faced criticism for its decision to cut the universal winter fuel allowance, a move that has particularly angered pensioners. The Prime Minister's stance on this issue has been challenged by Richard Fuller, the Tory Party chairman, who accused Starmer of prioritizing union interests over vulnerable pensioners. "Just two months in and Keir Starmer has taken winter fuel payments off 10 million pensioners and showered billions of taxpayers’ money on his union paymasters," Fuller said. He further criticized the Labour government for "squandering money" and fabricating a financial crisis to justify tax increases, leaving pensioners "literally in the cold." Starmer's speech will also address the summer riots that swept across the country, forcing him to cancel his holiday. He will argue that the violence was fueled by "populism" and the exploitation of "cracks in our society." Drawing a parallel with the 2011 London riots, during which he served as Director of Public Prosecutions, Starmer will contend that the nation is now in a worse state than it was back then. He will express regret over the decision to release prisoners early, a move announced last month, but will argue that it was necessary to free up prison space to manage the riots effectively. Reflecting on the situation, Starmer will lament, "When I think back to that time, I see just how far we’ve fallen. Because responding to those riots was hard, but dealing with the riots this summer was much harder." He will describe the lack of sufficient prison space as "about as fundamental a failure as you can get." The Prime Minister will accuse the rioters of exploiting a broken system, saying, "Those people throwing rocks, torching cars, making threats – they didn’t just know the system was broken. They were betting on it. They were gaming it. They saw the cracks in our society after 14 years of populism and failure – and they exploited them. That’s what we have inherited." As Starmer prepares to deliver this sobering address, the challenges facing his government are becoming increasingly clear. With tough decisions on the horizon, the Prime Minister is set to argue that only by addressing the deep-rooted issues at the heart of Britain can the country begin to rebuild and move forward. His message to the nation will be one of honesty and resolve: the road ahead will be difficult, but it is the only path to lasting recovery. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-26 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe -
0
Netanyahu’s Resurgence: How Israel's Leader Turned the Tide Amid Crisis and Controversy
Against all odds, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has managed to stage a political comeback that few would have predicted in the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas attack, the deadliest tragedy in Israel's history. Despite the initial backlash against his handling of the crisis, Netanyahu is now leading in the polls as Israel’s preferred leader, an extraordinary shift that has baffled both critics and analysts alike. Known as a master of political survival, Netanyahu has repeatedly defied predictions of his political demise, winning elections five times even when it seemed his career was on the brink. Analysts initially speculated that the October 7 massacre, which claimed the lives of 1,200 Israelis, might finally mark the end of his reign. Yet, Netanyahu’s strategy of waiting out the storm appears to be paying off, with polls showing a significant resurgence in his and his party’s popularity. In August, a Maariv poll indicated that Netanyahu’s Likud party had regained its position as the largest party in the Knesset, securing 22 seats, while the National Unity party, led by his main rival Benny Gantz, dropped to 20 seats. More strikingly, 48 percent of voters expressed a preference for Netanyahu as prime minister, compared to 42 percent for Gantz. This shift in public opinion is remarkable, considering the months of protests, international criticism, and even dissent from within Israel’s own military and political elite that have marred Netanyahu’s tenure since the October attack. For many Israelis, Netanyahu’s resilience in the face of intense pressure—both from within the country and from key allies like the United States—has reinforced his image as a leader who can stand firm during crises. Pinhas Amar, a 67-year-old from Hadera, voiced his support for Netanyahu, citing his “resistance to pressure” and the way he handled the hostage situation, despite accusations that Netanyahu had not done enough to secure their release. Amar sees Netanyahu as “running a marathon,” a leader who is in it for the long haul. Shulamit Perez, from Or Akiva, echoes this sentiment, describing Netanyahu as the “smartest” and most “responsible” politician in Israel. Like many of Netanyahu’s supporters, she believes that the left-wing opposition has been unfairly targeting him for years, using October 7 as their latest pretext. Perez does not believe Netanyahu was adequately warned by Israel’s security agencies about the Hamas threat, further exonerating him in her eyes. Aviv Bushinsky, a former adviser and chief of staff to Netanyahu, attributes the prime minister’s renewed popularity to his unwavering message on the necessity of completely eliminating Hamas. According to Bushinsky, Netanyahu’s focus on national security and his resistance to international pressure, including from the US, resonates deeply with the Israeli public. “Israelis want to see leadership and strength. And Netanyahu has shown both,” Bushinsky explains. This strategy of positioning himself as a defender of Israel against both external and internal adversaries is a familiar one for Netanyahu. Throughout his career, he has often portrayed himself as the only leader capable of standing up to Israel’s enemies, even at the risk of straining relationships with allies. While his critics argue that this approach jeopardizes Israel’s long-term security, particularly its relationship with the US, Netanyahu’s core supporters continue to reward him for it at the polls. Benny Gantz’s failure to provide a clear and compelling alternative has also played into Netanyahu’s hands. According to Bushinsky, Gantz’s decision to leave the government without offering a “precise and clear” reason was a pivotal moment that led to his decline in public support. Meanwhile, Miki Zohar, Israel’s culture minister and one of Netanyahu’s closest confidants, believes that many Israelis are beginning to appreciate the prime minister’s long-term strategy concerning threats like Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas. Zohar argues that Netanyahu’s patience and consistency in his messaging have been key to his political survival. Political strategist Nadav Shtrauchler, who has worked closely with Netanyahu, describes the prime minister’s current position as the “second chapter” of his post-October 7 survival strategy. Shtrauchler predicts that Netanyahu will use the upcoming months, particularly the period leading up to the US election and the return of the Knesset from recess, to solidify his position. This could involve making a significant military move on Israel’s northern border or securing a ceasefire with Hamas, actions that could further bolster his standing among voters. However, despite his recent gains, Shtrauchler cautions that Netanyahu is unlikely to regain the level of support he once enjoyed, noting that the prime minister’s party will “never go back” to holding 32 seats in the Knesset. The current coalition faces numerous challenges, including the contentious issue of drafting ultra-Orthodox youth into the army, a topic that has previously toppled Netanyahu’s governments. Shtrauchler anticipates that Israelis should prepare for elections in 2025, as the coalition’s stability remains precarious. Yet, even as Netanyahu appears to be regaining his footing, his leadership continues to provoke fierce opposition, particularly from the families of hostages still held by Hamas. Sharone Lifschitz, whose 83-year-old father, Oded Lifschitz, remains captive in Gaza, has been vocal in her criticism of Netanyahu, accusing him of delaying a ceasefire deal that could have secured the hostages’ release. Lifschitz blames Netanyahu for using the hostages as “human shields” to further his political agenda, a sentiment that reflects the deep divisions within Israeli society over his leadership. Ultimately, Netanyahu’s ability to navigate the aftermath of the October 7 attack and maintain his grip on power underscores his enduring political acumen. He has managed to survive the most significant crisis in Israel’s history by doing what he does best: stalling for time, playing the political game to his advantage, and maintaining a consistent message on security. However, his continued success will depend on whether he can address the hostages' issue and other critical challenges facing his government. Failure to do so could prove unforgivable to many voters, potentially undoing the gains he has so carefully rebuilt. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-26 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now