"Let's cut all the bull..." is usually the prelude to abandoning evidence in favour of personal opinion. "A lot of Thai drivers are bad drivers. Full stop." isn't an argument; it's a sweeping assertion based entirely on anecdote. Seeing drivers go the wrong way, fail to indicate or ignore zebra crossings doesn't prove Thai drivers are inherently "bad" any more than watching dashcam videos from Russia proves all Russians are bad drivers. This is exactly why road safety is an evidence-based discipline. It relies on engineering, epidemiology, collision investigation and statistics—not "I've seen..." or "I've been driving here for 15 years...". You then reinforce your conclusion with another anecdote: "I've never caused an accident." Good for you—but that's evidence of one driver's experience, not evidence that your assessment of an entire nation's driving is correct. BTW “experience” for many drivers simply means the accumulation of bad habits. The irony is that you've listed behaviours that are symptoms of a transport system with poor road engineering, weak enforcement, inadequate licensing and ineffective road safety policy, then attributed them to some supposed national defect in Thai drivers. That's a classic example of confusing system failure with individual ability.
