Jump to content

Amnesty bill change by panel 'to benefit' Thaksin


webfact

Recommended Posts

POLITICS
Amnesty bill change by panel 'to benefit' Thaksin

Somroutai Sapsomboon,
Khanittha Thepphajorn
The Nation

30217480-01_big.JPG?1382139033393

House panel proposes everyone facing legal action after 2006 coup should be absolved

BANGKOK: -- THE GOVERNMENT is risking a new round of political conflict after the House panel vetting a government-proposed amnesty bill yesterday voted to rewrite a clause to include as beneficiaries people facing legal action in cases stemming from post-coup investigations.


According to critics and observers, this latest move is aimed at benefiting fugitive former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who was sentenced to two years in jail and saw billions of baht in assets seized.

The 35-member vetting panel, dominated by MPs from the ruling coalition, voted 18-8 to support a proposal by the panel's deputy chairman Prayuth Siripanich, who is an MP from the ruling Pheu Thai Party. He suggested that Article 3 of the bill should be rewritten so that the amnesty covers persons accused of wrongdoing by a group of people or an organisation set up after the coup of September 19, 2006.

Twenty-six panel members were present at yesterday's meeting. What the panel did has confirmed an earlier concern of many that the amnesty bill would be rewritten to help "whitewash" the ex-leader of his wrongdoings while in power.

This could be another magnet to bring opponents and detractors of the ruling politicians to the streets in great numbers, according to observers. The International Court of Justice has scheduled November 11 to rule on a case filed by Cambodia, seeking an interpretation of the court's 1962 verdict over a territorial dispute involving the Preah Vihear Temple. A ruling deemed unfavourable to Thailand could cause angry government critics to protest.

The panel yesterday completed vetting all six articles of the bill and would allow MPs requesting amendment to the original bill to speak before the panel on October 30 and 31, according to its chairman Samart Kaewmeechai, who is also a Pheu Thai MP.

He expected the amnesty bill to be forwarded to Parliament for the second and third readings early next month.

In response to concerns that this proposed law was intended to help politicians accused of corruption, including Thaksin, Samart said: "In my view the law is meant to ensure justice to all parties."

The 2006 coup-makers set up the Assets Examination Committee (AEC) to investigate corruption allegations against members of the Thaksin cabinet.

The AEC's investigations led to many cases against those politicians, including one that led to an imprisonment verdict against Thaksin. In October 2008, the Supreme Court sentenced the ex-prime minister to two years in jail for abuse of power in the Ratchadaphisek land scandal, after his then-wife bought a state-seized land plot at a price much lower than the market price. In February 2009, the court seized Bt46 billion of Thaksin's assets believed to have been earned from abuse of power. There are more cases against Thaksin that have been suspended while he is a fugitive abroad.

Pheu Thai MP Korkaew Pikulthong yesterday acknowledged that this latest development would lead to increased opposition against the government, but he did not think this would lead to its ousting.

"It is because all the parties involved will benefit, including the yellow shirts and the [opposition] Democrat Party," he said in an interview with The Nation.

Leaders of the yellow-shirt People's Alliance for Democracy and some leading Democrat figures are facing a number of cases stemming from the political conflict.

A Pheu Thai source yesterday said this latest move was part of a plan by the ruling party, which had the vetting panel make the controversial decision. If the opposition grows strong, the government may shelve the bill or tone down the change; otherwise the ruling party would go ahead "all the way" so that the law would cover Thaksin.

Anti-government activist Suriyasai Katasila, who is the Green Group coordinator, yesterday said he expected a mass rally soon. He said protesters could now come out and rally legitimately after the MPs pushed for an amended draft of the amnesty law.

"I don't know if the People's Alliance for Democracy will regroup, as the leaders have announced they are stepping down. It is up to all of the PAD leaders. But I think the supporters who used to fight together wouldn't accept it. There might be a mass rally as soon as it is clear that there will be amnesty for Thaksin Shinawatra," he said.

"When things turn out like this, there's no need for the protest to wait for the third reading as we can see the government's goal even in the second reading so far," he said.

Nitithorn Lamlua, a leader of the Students' and People's Network for Thailand Reform, said the group would not step up its rally but believed more people would join them at the Urupong intersection.

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-10-19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If this is the case of giving blanket amnesty to all wrong doers criminals and all effectively

from 2006, it will be only befitting to offer same to all other criminals in the penal

systems who committed crimes dating back to 2006, right? why only Thaksin and his ilk ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop slagging off the best thing to happen to Thailand and it's people!

Viva the rightful elected leaders return!

CCC

I totally agree 100%

Drop all charges and let him come back to Thailand.

Because there will be an absolute riot in the streets in BKK and probably all over the country, it will be the end of this government and he and his entire family will likely flee to distant lands.

Hurry up and bring him back..... sooner the better.

Police will stand by, also the red thugs and you'll have hundreds or thousand dead who will be labeled as terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long before the tanks start to roll?

If this bill gets passed, not too long.

Thailand, the hub of the foot shot.

At the moment the army doesn't show any sign that they want to help Thailand.

The situation hasn't reached the point of no return yet, but you can bet there are some fervent conversations going on behind closed doors right now to prevent that happening.

But if this one man party keeps pushing just for his benefit..... get the popcorn out.

We are living in interesting times.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would help if the article published all 6 parts of the proposed Bill, not just what it deems as the "controversial" part. For example I don't think the relatives of the dead (either army or civilian) will be too happy if those found responsible for those deaths were "pardoned"

Despite the prevailing mindset, it's not all about Thaksin, that's an Abhisit obsession.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He suggested that Article 3 of the bill should be rewritten so that the amnesty covers persons accused of wrongdoing by a group of people or an organisation set up after the coup of September 19, 2006.

Cant see how this benefit our man in Dubai, he is not accused of anything, he was accused, tried within the Thai legal process and found gulity and sentenced and then became a fugitive.

therefore this clause change shouldnt apply to the dear leader anyway

I believe the interpretation would be that the cases against Thaksin originated with the AEC, which was one of those post coup formed entities.

Therefore, in the view of PT, any case that originated with the AEC would be subject to the amnesty, regardless of its current state or status.

But the curious part is, the current case against Abhisit re the 2011 protester deaths was brought, if I recall correctly, by the DSI. Would that fall under the post 2006 notion in the proposed law?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the curious part is, the current case against Abhisit re the 2011 protester deaths was brought, if I recall correctly, by the DSI. Would that fall under the post 2006 notion in the proposed law?

of course it would, it would have to....as its pretty obvious these charges were laid by the DSI as a bargaining chip....ie let brother number 1 back in and we will drop the those charges, as a certain "gentleman" was howling that the charges against him were politically motivated, so are the charges against Abhibsit & Co...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He suggested that Article 3 of the bill should be rewritten so that the amnesty covers persons accused of wrongdoing by a group of people or an organisation set up after the coup of September 19, 2006.

Cant see how this benefit our man in Dubai, he is not accused of anything, he was accused, tried within the Thai legal process and found gulity and sentenced and then became a fugitive.

therefore this clause change shouldnt apply to the dear leader anyway

I believe the interpretation would be that the cases against Thaksin originated with the AEC, which was one of those post coup formed entities.

Therefore, in the view of PT, any case that originated with the AEC would be subject to the amnesty, regardless of its current state or status.

But the curious part is, the current case against Abhisit re the 2011 protester deaths was brought, if I recall correctly, by the DSI. Would that fall under the post 2006 notion in the proposed law?

Abhisit and Suthep have been accused and charged with murder, a normal criminal charge. Nothing coup related. However they may (probably will be) covered by the State of Emergency Act. It depends if it can be proved that the orders they gave (the use of live ammunition, creation of live fire zones etc) were proportionate to the threat or not.

If proved disproportionate they're in a deep world of trouble - or should be in an ideal world, but this is when we'll see where the "boy from Newcastle" roots really lie, 'scuse the pun.

Edited by fab4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thaksin is such a smart, intelligent man who see things clearly and would make a good leader. But since these talents are misused by him, at the end of the day he is just another crook who failed in this lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To forgive a wrong is comendable, but first there has to be an admission of wrong doing, a payment made for such wrong doing, and finally a pentence period by the wrong doer as well as a measureable payment to those wronged. That is the Thai way, this is Thailand, Taksin is Thai, so it should be presented to the people to decide, as the other avenue is not possible.

The vote of the people on this, was proposed and generally agreed upon at one stage, but the incompentance of the government, due to failure to produce what they promised, the damage their pograms have resulted in to the government and the national economy, etc would probably not receive a majority vote of the eligable voters.

Thus they are attempting to piggy back a personal 'come home free card' to do what they have denied from the start, Absolve Thaksin of any legal chages and bring him home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...