Scott Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 Kim Jong-Un made starving dogs eat naked uncle alive in cage Singapore: North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un's uncle was stripped naked and thrown into a cage to be executed by dogs. Unlike previous executions of political prisoners, which were carried out by firing squads with machine guns, Jang Song Thaek was thrown into a cage, along with his five closest aides. According to the Straits Times, Jang was starved for three days, and then dogs were allowed to prey on them until they were completely eaten up. This is called 'quan jue', or execution by dogs. http://zeenews.india.com/news/world/kim-jong-un-made-starving-dogs-eat-naked-uncle-alive-in-cage_901174.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted January 3, 2014 Author Share Posted January 3, 2014 Also being reported here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2533088/How-Kim-Jong-Un-killed-scum-uncle-Dictator-stripped-naked-thrown-cage-eaten-alive-pack-dogs.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Credo Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 God, what a horrible way to die. And then they probably ate the dogs. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post noikrit Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 What a charming family ..... 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MJP Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 This sicko has nuclear weapons. Anyone else bothered by this? 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Costas2008 Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 One day......that fat, ugly, bastard will get his reward. And I hope it's a horrible one. The sooner the better. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 One day......that fat, ugly, bastard will get his reward. And I hope it's a horrible one. The sooner the better. Yes, very much the sooner the better. It's clearly out of control. And he has nuclear weapons. Hopefully the Chinese will deal with it as soon as possible. Let's leave all this barbarism back in preceding centuries and move on. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ulysses G. Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 The point seems to be, don't mess with Kim Jong-Un. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Credo Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 Now it makes sense why Dennis Rodman's last visit was so short. Kim probably called him and said he'd like to have him for dinner. 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 I understand the NK press release mentioning Jang was "human scum, lower than a dog" now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costas2008 Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 MJP, on 03 Jan 2014 - 18:19, said: Costas2008, on 03 Jan 2014 - 18:16, said: One day......that fat, ugly, bastard will get his reward. And I hope it's a horrible one. The sooner the better. Yes, very much the sooner the better. It's clearly out of control. And he has nuclear weapons. Hopefully the Chinese will deal with it as soon as possible. Let's leave all this barbarism back in preceding centuries and move on. The problem is that China is the only country that supports him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uptheos Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 Well hasn't Fat Boy become a ray of sunshine! What's the next step, being eaten by him? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 MJP, on 03 Jan 2014 - 18:19, said: Costas2008, on 03 Jan 2014 - 18:16, said: One day......that fat, ugly, bastard will get his reward. And I hope it's a horrible one. The sooner the better. Yes, very much the sooner the better. It's clearly out of control. And he has nuclear weapons. Hopefully the Chinese will deal with it as soon as possible. Let's leave all this barbarism back in preceding centuries and move on. The problem is that China is the only country that supports him! Do they? Really? Or do they just about keep him contained? If they do support him, then that says it all about the Chinese Communist Party. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post midas Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 Now it makes sense why Dennis Rodman's last visit was so short. Kim probably called him and said he'd like to have him for dinner. with some fava beans and a nice chianti................. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardandtubs Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 (edited) I can't imagine any of the 300 officials who supposedly witnessed what happens when you get on the wrong side of baby Kim would have leaked the story, so how did the newspaper find out? Edited January 3, 2014 by edwardandtubs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post brewsterbudgen Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 I can't imagine any of the 300 officials who supposedly witnessed what happens when you get on the wrong side of baby Kim would have leaked the story, so how did the newspaper find out? Maybe it's not true. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Credo Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 They figured it out when the Humanitarian Assistance request had reduced the amount of dog food ordered. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Steely Dan Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 It's a dog eat dog world in North Korea. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim1980 Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 OMG how cruel can people possibly be? How many are out there like Un? People like that still exist huh? Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Thailand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsrebel Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 I can't imagine any of the 300 officials who supposedly witnessed what happens when you get on the wrong side of baby Kim would have leaked the story, so how did the newspaper find out? Maybe it's not true. Propaganda. Need a better source. Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keemapoot Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 The point seems to be, don't mess with Kim Jong-Un. Yup, the old "now they will fear you" trick: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F430murci Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 I can't imagine any of the 300 officials who supposedly witnessed what happens when you get on the wrong side of baby Kim would have leaked the story, so how did the newspaper find out? Maybe it's not true. Propaganda. Need a better source.Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app What does China stand to benefit? Unless fat boy with short arms and a bad hair comes forward and says this is how we did it . . . Then again no one would believe him either or he was perhaps in a drug and alcohol induced blackout when it happened. This speaks volumes as to both the culture and morals of NK for a human to be able to do this to a relative. ----- The official North Korean account on Dec. 12 did not specify how Jang was put to death. Hong Kong-based pro-Beijing newspaper Wen Wei Po reported that Jang and his five closest aides were set upon by 120 hunting hounds which had been starved for five days. http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/03/22156917-kim-jong-uns-executed-uncle-was-eaten-alive-by-120-hungry-dogs-report?lite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post zydeco Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 My guess is that the uncle wasn't such a nice guy either. Probably a lot of uncle's victims thinking he finally got what he deserved. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MJP Posted January 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 3, 2014 I can't imagine any of the 300 officials who supposedly witnessed what happens when you get on the wrong side of baby Kim would have leaked the story, so how did the newspaper find out? Maybe it's not true. Propaganda. Need a better source.Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app What does China stand to benefit? Unless fat boy with short arms and a bad hair comes forward and says this is how we did it . . . Then again no one would believe him either or he was perhaps in a drug and alcohol induced blackout when it happened. This speaks volumes as to both the culture and morals of NK for a human to be able to do this to a relative. ----- The official North Korean account on Dec. 12 did not specify how Jang was put to death. Hong Kong-based pro-Beijing newspaper Wen Wei Po reported that Jang and his five closest aides were set upon by 120 hunting hounds which had been starved for five days. http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/03/22156917-kim-jong-uns-executed-uncle-was-eaten-alive-by-120-hungry-dogs-report?lite It also speaks volumes about the psychiatric capacity of fat boy to cause mass death in South Korea by radiological or other means. This all looks terribly unstable. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
folium Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 I can't imagine any of the 300 officials who supposedly witnessed what happens when you get on the wrong side of baby Kim would have leaked the story, so how did the newspaper find out? Maybe it's not true. Since when has the Daily Mail run a story that is untrue.....heaven forbid. Perhaps the Esteemed Leader got a box set of the Sopranos for an early Christmas present, and substituted pigs for dogs. It is all things considered a very sustainable way of protein production. Feed your many enemies to dogs and then eat the result. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briggsy Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 What does a North Korean hunting hound look like? That is a genuine question. Similar to a beagle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F430murci Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 I can't imagine any of the 300 officials who supposedly witnessed what happens when you get on the wrong side of baby Kim would have leaked the story, so how did the newspaper find out? Maybe it's not true. Since when has the Daily Mail run a story that is untrue.....heaven forbid.Perhaps the Esteemed Leader got a box set of the Sopranos for an early Christmas present, and substituted pigs for dogs. It is all things considered a very sustainable way of protein production. Feed your many enemies to dogs and then eat the result. Not sure they have enough pigs in NK to do the job. Apparently, this form of dog execution is sufficiently poplar in NK to have a name, quan jue. I had to work in a case in mid 90s for Supreme Court where a little old lady was ripped apart by 2 pit bulls. I saw the ER photos and read depose of those trying to save this poor women along with witness accounts before cops arrived and shot the dogs. This would undoubtedly be about as bad of a way to go as imaginable. Slow, very painful and plugs of skin are little pulled exposed bone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Publicus Posted January 3, 2014 Share Posted January 3, 2014 Jang was family and also always was close to Beijing so this is a swift kick to Beijing's groin. It's already been published that CCP leader Xi Jinping considers Kim to be a kid, tempermental, unstable, unprepared. The HKG newspaper that published the dogs report, Wen Wei Po is considered in HKG (and elsewhere) to be a Beijing mouthpiece so it could seem Xi is distancing the CCP-PRC much further from Pyongyang than his predecessors who themselves were hopping mad at the Kim dynasty for adamantly refusing to adopt Deng Xiao Peng market style reforms. While I was living in the PRC recently every PRChinese who talked to me about North Korea spoke with strong disapproval of the state of affairs there. I think not many here would be surprised to see as I'm seeing during recent days the many PRChinese netizens at their permitted online discussion forums expressing the same sentiments as are being presented in this thread topic and in other related threads over time, but at this one in particular. Beijing can't pull the plug on the oil, food, hard USD cash and all the rest of the support it sends to Pyongyang for the obvious reason it can't cope with a collapse and due to the regional security implications of a collapse. Beijing however can't continue to look this helpless and tossed about by Pyongyang as it increasingly looks to the governments of the region or to its own PRChinese citizens. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeThePoster Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Jang was starved for three days Wouldn't starving the dogs for 3 days before introducing them to the victims make better television? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post folium Posted January 4, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 4, 2014 Perhaps no one let the dogs out and maybe the Sopranos link was too great even for NK. Have a read of this excellent view from the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/01/03/no-kim-jong-un-probably-didnt-feed-his-uncle-to-120-hungry-dogs/ 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now