Jump to content

Corruption: "Vote or tax" is nonsense


webfact

Recommended Posts

STOPPAGE TIME
Corruption: "Vote or tax" is nonsense

Tulsathit Taptim

Dear Thai people, I see that Democracy wrote you a letter last week, so I couldn't help myself. What nonsense he tried to put into your heads! It was self-romanticising and idealising at their best. I could just ask him to come back to the real world, but I guess it will be more fruitful talking to you guys.

Forget checks and balances, my friends. You people were on the right track. Democracy only works with me, Corruption, as the engine oil. Your country is suffering a huge political crisis not because of lack of checks and balances, but because I and he, Democracy, are reluctant about striking a deal.

Democracy, baby, you are all about people's power. If the majority says the world is flat, then so be it. If the majority says graft is acceptable as long as it benefits them, embrace that and move on. If Thais ask what's wrong with one side's corruption if the other side is also corrupted, listen up, kiddo.

As for you, Thai people, listen, too. I've been battling Democracy for God knows how long, but, weak and near-dead as he is, he wouldn't accept a pact. I want him to accept me as his inseparable buddy. I want it to be a universal, irrevocable, indisputable and non-protestable knowledge that Democracy and Corruption come as a package. You want the former, you'll definitely get the latter. It's supposed to be that way.

What do checks and balances do? They make life difficult - no, impossible - for you. Goodness is what the majority says it is, and that's it. "Listen to the minority" my ***. Please excuse my language. If you have to heed what the minority has to say every time you make a decision, you aren't going anywhere. Somehow, somewhere, some people will oppose an idea. That's why we needed Democracy to begin with.

Hitler wasn't me screwing Democracy's head. Hitler was an Exhibit A victim of imperfect Democracy. He was a prime example of what can happen when the world is half-hearted about Democracy and me. World War II erupted because a lot of people forgot that he had the right to do what he did, after he had been empowered by his people.

You may argue that the rest of the world did not agree with Hitler, and that was "Democracy" prevailing in the ultimate sense. Nice try, but didn't the rest of the world also disagree with the Iraq invasion? If I remember correctly, the United Nations was not that pleased with its Security Council. So, did Democracy defeat Hitler and Dictatorship defeat Saddam Hussein? I'm confused.

Well, let's forget what I just said about Iraq and Hitler. Let bygones be bygones, unless you want to wreck your brains trying to make sense of them. My point is, romanticism and idealisation are extremely harmful. They give you a dilemma, make you grow an impractical conscience and, finally, land a war on your doorsteps. To quote Al Pacino in "The Devil's Advocate", idealised Democracy will make you "jump from one foot to the next, and laugh his **** off" while you're doing that.

The world is grey, Thai people. Democracy and I are the perfect package. You wouldn't want me to keep on with Dictatorship, would you? If you wonder why I don't want to be with Dictatorship any longer, all I can say is that things have become a bit too easy. Dictatorship embraced me since the dawn of mankind. Let's just say Democracy is a much better challenge.

Even Democracy admitted in his letter that money is important. "What on Earth will you vote for if there's no money for winners of the vote to spend?" he said. He was referring to the importance of tax, but let me rephrase it just a bit to make it more realistic: What on Earth do potential vote winners want if not the money? Don't tell me they want to serve, protect and sacrifice.

Unlike Democracy, I'm not here to persuade you. You see, the messier and nastier things are, the more they play into my hands. I'm here to rebut that pitiful, self-aggrandising angel named Democracy. He asked you to embrace his true essence, to respect both vote and tax, or else. What baloney. Either vote or tax, it's romanticism all the same, and romanticism belongs to the art world only.

I'm a humanist, and the most practical one alive. I'm here to remind you that you don't have to "take it or leave it" as far as I'm concerned. I've always been here with you through thick and thin and no matter what. Like "that song" says, you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.

Irrevocably yours,
Corruption

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-01-29

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"...Hitler wasn't me screwing Democracy's head. Hitler was an Exhibit A victim of imperfect Democracy. He was a prime example of what can happen when the world is half-hearted about Democracy and me. World War II erupted because a lot of people forgot that he had the right to do what he did, after he had been empowered by his people... ... I'm confused... " Tulsathit Taptim

Oh my, Hitler had the right to do what he did because he was elected?

Which shows you the lengths people will go to to justify evil used in the name of the concept of Democracy.

Maybe he is being ironic? Thais are not noted for their prowess in irony in English.

Apparently as well, many on TVF not really grasping the nettle of irony when presented.

Imperfect Democracy indeed and in fact,

and because people abrogated the right of the people to STOP their elected officials

from over stepping the mark by huge measures.

If a democratic system no longer has ways of recalling an election or removing evil doers from offices,

how otherwise can they be stopped from doing their evil? It's not like Thailand is the only place

fighting an after the election battle with their officials who have got their mandate all wrong.

Or intended to get their mandate all wrong from the beginning.

Democracy and elections are a good thing, but when the system in place allows those concepts to be grossly abused,

something is going to give way, and in a big way eventually, but inexorably. We are seeing that now, sadly.

Edited by animatic
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find most of Tulsie's stuff pretty near incomprehensible anyway, so I haven't even tried to read this (and judging by the comments - I was right not to bother). I do, however, recommend this article in The Nation today which I don't think was posted on TV yet: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/One-media-image-undermines-the-protesters-case-30225465.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find most of Tulsie's stuff pretty near incomprehensible anyway, so I haven't even tried to read this (and judging by the comments - I was right not to bother). I do, however, recommend this article in The Nation today which I don't think was posted on TV yet: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/One-media-image-undermines-the-protesters-case-30225465.html

Yes, a pity this article did not make TV News, while the absolute nonsense in the OP got in evidence.

The article at your link is remarkable and makes some points that everyone should keep in mind very well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My eyes wide open hair standing up on my back, not touching my coffee, something is seriously wrong so I kept reading and reading and reading

hoping that at one point I would understand what he was saying.

It' wasn't until I started reading everyone's posts that helped me calm down after thinking I suffered a stroke last night in my

sleep that left in a vegetable state unable to make sense of normal rhetoric. Thank god for the comments I can now go back to drinking my coffee coffee1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...