Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry to hear about your lifelong problems.

Regretfully the DM cannot be regarded as a source of reliable medical knowledge/information..

Find some scientific, peer reviewed studies , published in a respected scientific journal and there may be some justifiable interest .

Tabloid story's unfortunately are just entertainment for the masses.

Posted

Sorry to hear about your lifelong problems.

Regretfully the DM cannot be regarded as a source of reliable medical knowledge/information..

Find some scientific, peer reviewed studies , published in a respected scientific journal and there may be some justifiable interest .

Tabloid story's unfortunately are just entertainment for the masses.

Generally I would agree with you but its not all astrology. in this case a consultant urological surgeon is speaking about developments in his own field of expertise.

Posted

Probably the treatment is not in Thailand yet but you might take a look at this article also.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/09/10/160741926/doctors-take-aim-at-epidemic-kidney-stones-with-lasers

An interesting article which confirms the recent wisdom that higher dietry calcium actually protects against the formation of calcium oxalate stones by binding oxalates . For years I was advised to eat a low calcium diet and to avoid foods high in oxalates. Now we are told to eat a high calcium diet and that dietry oxalate intake has no correlation with the oxalate levels in urine. Is it any wonder that so many patients developed further stones !

Posted

Thread closed in keeping with the following Health Forum specific rules:

4. Posting/pinning of news articles: The forum is for members to seek advice on health/beauty related matters. it is not the place for general dissemination of news, research findings etc....

and

2. Quackery and Misinformation:".....Posters should be aware that factual misstatements abound on the internet and, to a lesser extent, in printed media. In particular, broad claims to the effect that "X number of (doctors/scientists)" agree to something or that something has been "proven in X number of studies" without specific citations are often fictitious. If a poster chooses to repeat such information as fact, the burden of ensuring these citations are reliable rest with the poster, who should take the time to verify this.

The last would mean taking the time to obtain and review the actual scientific study, not repeating other sources claims of what these study(s) shows. In my experience the majority of the time there are significant inaccuracies in mass media reports of the result of scientific research.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...