webfact Posted July 23, 2014 Share Posted July 23, 2014 2006 US Murder suspect arrested by Pattaya Tourist PolicePATTAYA: -- There is some confusion relating to the arrest of a 42 year old Thai Woman on Wednesday by Pattaya’s Tourist Police, relating to the alleged murder of a US Tourist on Pattaya Beach Road which took place on 11th February 2006. Reports by local media outlets in 2006 suggested the suspect, Khun Krittsana, was arrested 3 days after the alleged knife attack on Mr. Tony Lindsey from Hawaii, on Pattaya Beach Road in front of Soi 7. It is thought, at the time, she was working as a prostitute and entered into an argument with Mr. Lindsey over payment for sexual services. The argument escalated when her Husband, Khun Supot aged 35, was called and began to fight the Tourist. Khun Krittsana is alleged to have stabbed Mr. Lindsey and he later succumbed to his injuries in Hospital. Reports at the time suggest she was arrested by Police Captain Sompob from Pattaya Police, but on 17th February 2006 arrest warrant number 168/2549 was issued for her.Full story: http://www.pattayaone.net/pattaya-news/136130/2006-us-murder-suspect-arrested-by-pattaya-tourist-police/ -- Pattaya One 2014-07-24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dave2 Posted July 24, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted July 24, 2014 re It is thought, at the time, she was working as a prostitute and entered into an argument with Mr. Lindsey over payment for sexual services. The argument escalated when her Husband, Khun Supot aged 35, was called and began to fight the Tourist her husband ! .... the pair of them.. pure class dave2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacko45k Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 Her pimp was busy I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post jaapfries Posted July 24, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted July 24, 2014 BRILLIANT REPORTING . . . . . . . "Reports at the time suggest she was arrested by Police Captain Sompob from Pattaya Police, but on 17th February 2006 arrest warrant number 168/2549 was issued for her." 1. Incident occurred on 11th 2. Arrested (3 days later) hence: 14th 3. Arrest-Warrant issued on 17th THEN; she was arrested yesterday: 7 year later ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sorry; but I am very confused here . . . . . . . . . . 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cracker1 Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 It appears she had an arrest warrant for murder was issued for her and she continued to work in Pattaya as a prostitute and the Pattaya Police could not find her. Why could she not be found in this period ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petercool Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 It appears she had an arrest warrant for murder was issued for her and she continued to work in Pattaya as a prostitute and the Pattaya Police could not find her. Why could she not be found in this period ? Thai ID cards show only one's original issue town's address and not any current address. That could explain things but national data base would show her ID picture but only recently taken mug shots (if there are any) would help if she radically changed her appearance. But we may never know just how she kept under the radar. Not all employers keep staff records that might have listed her ID. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petercool Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 A totally speculative post was removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smedly Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 BRILLIANT REPORTING . . . . . . . "Reports at the time suggest she was arrested by Police Captain Sompob from Pattaya Police, but on 17th February 2006 arrest warrant number 168/2549 was issued for her." 1. Incident occurred on 11th 2. Arrested (3 days later) hence: 14th 3. Arrest-Warrant issued on 17th THEN; she was arrested yesterday: 7 year later ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sorry; but I am very confused here . . . . . . . . . . 1. committed murder on the 11th 2. Arrested on the 14th and released shortly after - no warrant 3. Arrest warrant issued 17th 4. Have warrant but she did a runner for a few days ........... ........... ........... 5. Arrest warrant found behind cabinet in office 6. Caught not wearing helmet July 2014 cha ching 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kieran2698 Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 Maybe she bought her release but they didn't destroy the evidence from the case properly for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezzra Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 I hope that this is going to go the way of " ends well all well " and she will get what she deserves albeit the delays if she have found to be the culprit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razer Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 So .... What has the US Embassy been doing about the case all this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolut Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 (edited) BRILLIANT REPORTING . . . . . . . "Reports at the time suggest she was arrested by Police Captain Sompob from Pattaya Police, but on 17th February 2006 arrest warrant number 168/2549 was issued for her." 1. Incident occurred on 11th 2. Arrested (3 days later) hence: 14th 3. Arrest-Warrant issued on 17th THEN; she was arrested yesterday: 7 year later ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sorry; but I am very confused here . . . . . . . . . . Add in "local media reports ......" which would probably include a report by the current media agency being quoted, and the confusion deepens Edited July 24, 2014 by Absolut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emster23 Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 (edited) They need to work on how headline is phrased. I thought they had arrested an American for murder. Edited July 24, 2014 by Rimmer off topic speculation removed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimmer Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 Please contact the original source to discuss news content or headline wording thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asiantravel Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 I hope the evidence has been kept in good order over seven years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidmann Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 thats long time ,he did not pay for short time ,mad place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ohio Posted July 24, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted July 24, 2014 Hhhhmmmmmmmm ???? Ignoring the headline miswording. A Prostitute is arrested over a Murder. She hides for 7 years by working as a prostitutein the same are. Got It. I've worked some Cold Cases But this takes the cake. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sepi69 Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 BRILLIANT REPORTING . . . . . . . "Reports at the time suggest she was arrested by Police Captain Sompob from Pattaya Police, but on 17th February 2006 arrest warrant number 168/2549 was issued for her." 1. Incident occurred on 11th 2. Arrested (3 days later) hence: 14th 3. Arrest-Warrant issued on 17th THEN; she was arrested yesterday: 7 year later ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sorry; but I am very confused here . . . . . . . . . . If I still can do the math, it has been 8 years and 5 months from the day when they issued arrest-warrant... Not 7 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NativeSon360 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 So .... What has the US Embassy been doing about the case all this time? A ha,ha,ha,ha,ha......Huh? Duh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanangpete Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 BRILLIANT REPORTING . . . . . . . "Reports at the time suggest she was arrested by Police Captain Sompob from Pattaya Police, but on 17th February 2006 arrest warrant number 168/2549 was issued for her." 1. Incident occurred on 11th 2. Arrested (3 days later) hence: 14th 3. Arrest-Warrant issued on 17th THEN; she was arrested yesterday: 7 year later ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sorry; but I am very confused here . . . . . . . . . . Me too, but he was a farang ,so they have no real conviction to make an arrest of a Thai! Why was she let off the first time ? What if anything have the US Embassy being doing about it, its a disgrace, this was a cold blooded murder, no doubt in front ot witnesses. What about the POL Capt, does he not even get hauled in? Its totally beyond the thinking of a logical mind. Ill watch this one with interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phanangpete Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Im afraid to say it , but the stats are there to prove it , a lot of these thai women are downright EVIL ! No im not anti thai or women, ive been with one for , hard time, 8 yrs now . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kieran2698 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Im afraid to say it , but the stats are there to prove it , a lot of these thai women are downright EVIL ! No im not anti thai or women, ive been with one for , hard time, 8 yrs now . What stats are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now