Jump to content

US campaigns to enlist Australia and other allies to attack Islamic State in Syria


Recommended Posts

Posted

US campaigns to enlist Australia and other allies to attack Islamic State in Syria

WASHINGTON: -- The United States has begun to mobilise a broad coalition of allies, including Australia, behind potential US military action in Syria and is moving towards expanded air strikes in northern Iraq, administration officials said on Tuesday.


President Barack Obama was broadening his campaign against the Sunni militants of the Islamic State and nearing a decision to authorise air strikes and air drops of food and water around the northern Iraqi town of Amerli, home to members of Iraq's Turkmen minority, the officials said.

The town of 12,000 has been under siege by the militants for more than two months.

"Rooting out a cancer like ISIL won't be easy, and it won't be quick," Mr Obama said in a speech on Tuesday to the American Legion in Charlotte, New Carolina, using an alternative name for the Islamic State.

He said that the United States was building a coalition to "take the fight to these barbaric terrorists", and that the militants would be "no match" for a united international community.

Administration officials characterised the dangers facing the Turkmen, who are Shiite Muslims considered infidels by the Islamic State, as similar to the threat faced by thousands of Yazidis, who were driven to Mount Sinjar in Iraq after attacks by the militants.

Full story: http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-campaigns-to-enlist-australia-and-other-allies-to-attack-islamic-state-in-syria-20140827-1091d0.html

theage.jpg
-- The Age 2014-08-27

  • Like 1
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

$2B? WOW thats a lot of gummy bears!

JT with funding to that level, it smacks of state sponsorship dont you think? Or at least a nod.

Its hard to move that much money around with no tractability.

perhaps funding provided to destabilize the oil markets to drive up prices?

Who would benefit?

$2B? that smells bigtime!

Sorry, Just thinking out loud.

i've been busy with work

Haven t noticed the news in a while

  • Like 2
Posted

America does not need to ask the Australian Government, As Mr Abbott has no spine and would send Australians to Hell if it would please Obama, This Iraq mission has become a total failure,

A few weeks back Abbott proactively stated he would consider contributing military (RAAF) assistance. So far, at least in the public domain, Oz has only dropped some humanitarian supplies.

The outgoing head of ASIO has stated during "Meet the Press" program he believes up to 150 Australians are either on the ground or trying to support IS within Oz with matters such as recruitment efforts. When asked why supporters in Oz have not been arrested he said it's 'intelligence' & not sufficient evidence for criminal prosecution. Contrary to experts on TV he went on to say only a very small minority of Australian Muslims are sympathetic to radical Islam & Islamic community leaders are helping law enforcement & ASIO. Also said ASIO are actively seeking & recruiting Australian Muslims

Posted

This action is needed. The USA shouldn't be expected to do all this important fighting against genocidal radical Islamic terrorists alone. Obama is a leader who clearly is not a war monger. But push has come to shove with the emergence of ISIS. They are a MASSIVELY bigger threat to the west than Al Queda ever was. They are reportedly funded at 2 billion dollars. It is more or less predictable as they have many western operatives that they will be able to strike WITHIN western countries. This isn't a quickie thing either .. more like for the foreseeable future and then some.

Indeed not a quickie; A retired Australian army commander warned that Australia would likely be at war with this ideology for the rest of the century. Naturally the PC apologists went mad at this.

Actually he was specifically referring to radical Islamists that was not denied by PC brigade. Some reports had mis-quoted him as referring to Islam; this is what the 'PC apologists' rejected to which, in writing, he agreed. Original report at:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/defence/well-fight-radical-islam-for-100-years-says-exarmy-head-peter-leahy/story-e6frg8yo-1227018630297

  • Like 1
Posted

This action is needed. The USA shouldn't be expected to do all this important fighting against genocidal radical Islamic terrorists alone. Obama is a leader who clearly is not a war monger. But push has come to shove with the emergence of ISIS. They are a MASSIVELY bigger threat to the west than Al Queda ever was. They are reportedly funded at 2 billion dollars. It is more or less predictable as they have many western operatives that they will be able to strike WITHIN western countries. This isn't a quickie thing either .. more like for the foreseeable future and then some.

Indeed not a quickie; A retired Australian army commander warned that Australia would likely be at war with this ideology for the rest of the century. Naturally the PC apologists went mad at this.

Actually he was specifically referring to radical Islamists that was not denied by PC brigade. Some reports had mis-quoted him as referring to Islam; this is what the 'PC apologists' rejected to which, in writing, he agreed. Original report at:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/defence/well-fight-radical-islam-for-100-years-says-exarmy-head-peter-leahy/story-e6frg8yo-1227018630297

Islam is a broad (ahem) Mosque, or so I've heard; of course it's the political supremacist ideology to which he is referring, not automatically anybody who just happens to be born Muslim. Any discussion as to the degree of overlap might take us off topic.

Edit: Though I do have issues with the word radical, what about literal, orthodox or puritanical? Radical infers extreme or fringe, which their behavior might be viewed through our eyes, but in essence the radicals may claim not to deviate one iota from the original scripture in their behavior. My observation deals with ideas not necessarily numbers by the way.

Posted

But I thought when they got Bin Laden everything was going to be OK?

Not at all. Bin Dead was a mastermind behind 9/ll and the US believed it had to hunt him down and kill him no matter what or how long it took. In the eyes of Americans who are admittedly a different culture, "no one" waltzes into the US even by proxy and kills 3,000 people, takes down important buildings, hijacks and crashes airliners and creates general mayhem without paying the ultimate penalty.

He was as good as dead the moment those guys of his hijacked the airplanes.

  • Like 2
Posted

America does not need to ask the Australian Government, As Mr Abbott has no spine and would send Australians to Hell if it would please Obama, This Iraq mission has become a total failure,

And if we don't support our ALLIES who do we turn to if WE are attacked?

  • Like 2
Posted

They should just bomb the UK; thats where most of the isis fighters seem to be coming from

Looks like the americans will be fighting on both sides....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28945626#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

It's stupid invasions based on lies and mistaken support to 'rebels' in Syria that has created this mess. The attacks on the ISIS fighters already means that the US is on both sides in Syria anyway.

It's about time that the US put aside it's cold war resurrection with Russia and anti-Iran stance (and f.. the AIPAC) and get a UN SC resolution to rid both Syria and Iraq of these well-funded fanatics.

It was done to get rid of Iraq from Kuwait in a legitimate way. Coalitions with sycophants like Australia tried the illegitimate way which brings us back to where we are now.

  • Like 1
Posted

America does not need to ask the Australian Government, As Mr Abbott has no spine and would send Australians to Hell if it would please Obama, This Iraq mission has become a total failure,

Australia isn't client state or colony of America. While I don't care for Abbott, there is nothing Australia will get out of this from America.

  • Like 1
Posted

$2B? WOW thats a lot of gummy bears!

JT with funding to that level, it smacks of state sponsorship dont you think? Or at least a nod.

Its hard to move that much money around with no tractability.

perhaps funding provided to destabilize the oil markets to drive up prices?

Who would benefit?

$2B? that smells bigtime!

Sorry, Just thinking out loud.

i've been busy with work

Haven t noticed the news in a while

$2B smells bigtime? against a country whose military budget in 2005 was $1.5 billion per day? While Senator Dirksen may or may not have actually said "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money" that is certainly the way US budgets seem to regard the number ... chump change.

Posted

Gotta get that central bank operating over there; only a few countries left to go- Muslims don't accept interest as acceptable terms of banking. Explains the purpose, intent, and reasons for a lot of problems.

  • Like 1
Posted

With my cocky crystal ball, I will tell you where all of this will lead. I will take one likely path of actions and consequences and state it:

First, use recent history as a guide for the apparent lack of a US policy and you will note that the lack of a policy actually masks a very deliberate policy. It cannot be otherwise. The US will seek to unseat Syria and assuming Russia is somehow compensated for its port or made irrelevant to the issue, Syria will be unseated. Assad will be finished. A "moderate" free syrian army will begin to fill the vacuum from leadership currently living in the West and funded by the west. Simultaneous to the direct or indirect actions that unseat Assad IS will be variously bombed, appear to be running etc. It will not be.

In the immediate aftermath jockeying will be done politically in Syria to make it appear that deliberative government is trying to be formed. It will not be and they will be unable to even maintain this pretense for a short time. The Alawites will be hunted down and killed wherever they are found. IS will be stronger than ever and while some internal battles may take place between various al nursa, et al, factions, Syria will totally fall to Islamists within 12 months of completion of US and coalition bombing.

The contiguous land of the Iranian hegemon will be broken and in its place will be a sunni islamist army that will not turn first on Israel. If IS does not simultaneous (concurrent with US bombing in Syria) attack into Iraq again it will do so now and consolidate from the Sea to the Persian gulf. They will stop just short of Karbala Basra area. The lines now fractured as the US and allies in the region wanted it wanted it.

This is one of only a few roads that will be paved soon.

The nice thing about this prediction is I think it will come to pass in enough time that you guys can tell me what a dumbass I was.

Posted

They should just bomb the UK; thats where most of the isis fighters seem to be coming from

Looks like the americans will be fighting on both sides....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28945626#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

It's stupid invasions based on lies and mistaken support to 'rebels' in Syria that has created this mess. The attacks on the ISIS fighters already means that the US is on both sides in Syria anyway.

It's about time that the US put aside it's cold war resurrection with Russia and anti-Iran stance (and f.. the AIPAC) and get a UN SC resolution to rid both Syria and Iraq of these well-funded fanatics.

It was done to get rid of Iraq from Kuwait in a legitimate way. Coalitions with sycophants like Australia tried the illegitimate way which brings us back to where we are now.

UN....!!!!!! Worthless as Tits on a Boar Hog

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...